促進知識整合的網路學習環境量表發展

Developing a Web Based Learning Environment Instrument to Promote Knowledge Integration

10.6173/CJSE.2008.1606.03

林建良(Chien-Liang Lin)；黃台珠(Tai-Chu Huang)；吳裕益(Yuh-Yih Wu)

知識整合 ； 問卷發展 ； 網路學習 ； 學習環境量表 ； Knowledge Integration ； Leaning Environment Instrument ； Scale Development ； Webbased Learning

科學教育學刊

16卷6期（2008 / 12 / 01）

605 - 626

繁體中文

本研究為促進專題學習中的知識整合編製一個網路學習環境量表，量表的構念分成易取、互動、反應、結構及整合五個分量表，用以評鑑網路學習環境的設計。研究者請兩位數位學習及一位課程教學專長的大學教授進行該量表初稿的審議，以增加量表的專家效度。由於當前大專進行網路學習的學生樣本不易取得，本研究立意選取研究者運用專題學習策略教授的大專生進行施測。預試施測的回收有效樣本為187份，經項目分析保留網路學習環境量表共39題。正式施測的回收有效樣本為176份，運用結構方程模式以題目分群方式進行驗證性因素分析檢驗該量表的構念效度。結果發現測量模式與觀察資料適配度大致良好。該量表整體信度為.962，各分量表的信度（Cronbach's alpha 值）介於.769至.901 之間。另外，網路學習環境量表設計有開放式問題，藉以蒐集學習者對網路學習環境的感知。經文本分析結果發現，學習者對網路學習環境使用原因及優缺點的感知，會考量易取、互動及整合的特性。本研究發展的網路學習環境量表具有良好的信效度，配合開放式問題文本分析結果的檢驗，確實可作為評鑑網路學習環境的工具。

The purpose of this study was to develop a web based learning environment instrument using insights gained from project based learning and knowledge integration. The instrument contained five subscales: access, interaction, response, structure and integration and was used to evaluate the design of the web based learning environment to promote the knowledge integration of project based learning. In order to enhance the validity of this instrument, two e-learning experts and one course instruction expert were invited to review the instrument. Due to the limitations of web based courses at the college level, data were gathered from college students in a project based course taught by one of the authors with project based learning. The initial number of subjects for the pre-test was 187, and the final version of the instrument contained 39 items. The number of subjects in the post test was 176; using the confirmatory factor analysis to establish construct validity of the instrument with the structured equation model using the item parcels method. By utilizing confirmatory factor analysis to examine the measurement model, goodness of fit was confirmed to be reliable. The Cronbach's alpha reliability for the entire instrument was .962 and the Cronbach's alpha reliability for each of the 5 subscales ranged from .769 to .901. We also designed five open-ended questions for the instrument to collect the subjects' awareness and preferences of the web based project learning environment. The results of content analysis found that; the accessibility, interaction and integration characteristics were the main concerns of the learners in using a web course. Findings of this study confirmed the validity and reliability of the web based learning environment instrument. Thus, showing that it is a useful instrument to evaluate web based learning environments.

1. 李建億(2006)。網際網路專題學習互動歷程之研究。科學教育學刊，14(1)，101-120。
   連結：
2. 岳修平、鐘婉莉(2005)。專題式學習小組網路溝通互動之研究。教育學刊，25，1-23。
   連結：
3. 徐敏珠、楊建民(2006)。我國高等教育之數位學習發展策略分析。教育學刊，26，191-214。
   連結：
4. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
5. Bandalos, D. L.(2002).The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling.Structural Equation Modeling,9(1),78-102.
6. Bandalos, D. L.,Finney, S. J.,G. A. Marcoulides(Ed.)(2001).New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
8. Chang, V.,Fisher, D. L.,M. Kulski and A. Herrmann (Eds.)(2001).New horizons in university teaching and learning.Perth, Western Australia:Curtin University of Technology.
9. Clark, D.,Linn, M. C.,Davis, E. A., Bell P.(Eds.)(2004).Internet environments for science education.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Davis, E. A.,Linn, M. C.(2000).Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE.International Journal of Science Education,22(8),819-837.
11. Grant, M. M.,Branch, R. M.(2005).Project based learning in a middle school: Tracing abilities through the artifacts of learning.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,38(1),65-98.
12. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.UK:Prentice Hall International.
13. Hatcher, L.(1994).A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling.Cary, NC:SAS Institute.
14. Henson, R. K.(2001).Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,34,177-189.
15. Huang, J. C.,Newell, S.(2003).Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects.International Journal of Project Management,21,167-176.
16. Jegede, O.,Fraser, B.,Fisher, D.(1998).Development, validation and use of a learning environment instrument for university distance education settings.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
17. Jöreskog, K. C.,Sörbom, D.(1984).LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods.Mooresville IN:Scientific Software.
18. Jung, I.(2001).Building a theoretical framework of web-based instruction in the context of distance education.British Journal of Educational Technology,32(5),525-534.
19. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39,31-36.
20. Krajcik, J. S.,Czerniak, C. M.,Berger, C. F.(2003).Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach.New York:McGraw-Hill.
21. Lave, J.,Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participatio.England:Cambridge University Press.
22. Lin, C. L.,Huang, T. C.,Wu, Y. Y.(2007).The development and validation of web project based learning environment instrument (WPBLEI).Poster session presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST).
23. Linn, M. C.,B.J. Fraser,K. G. Tobin(Eds.)(1998).International handbook of science education.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer.
24. Linn, M. C.,Davis, E. A.,Bell, P.(2004).Internet environments for science education.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Linn, M. C.,Hsi, S.(2000).Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Maor, D.,Fraser, B. J.(1996).Use of classroom environment perceptions in evaluating inquiry-based computer assisted learning.International Journal of Science Education,18,401-421.
27. Marx, R. W.,Blumenfeld, P. C.,Krajcik, J. S.,Soloway, E.(1997).Enacting project-based science.The Elementary School Journal,97(4),341-358.
28. Owston, R. D.(2000).Evaluating web-based learning environments: Strategies and Insights.Cyberpsychology & Behavior,3,79-87.
29. Ozcelik, E.,Yildirim, S.(2005).Factors influencing the use of cognitive tools in web-based learning environements: A case study.The Quarterly Review of Distance Education,6(4),295-308.
30. Pearson, J.,Trinidad, S.(2005).OLES: An instrument for refining the design of e-learning environments.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,21,396-404.
31. Sigel, P.(1978).Constructivism and teacher education.The Elementary School Journal,78,333-338.
32. Tal, T.,Krajcik, J. S.,Blumenfeld, P. C.(2006).Urban schools' teachers enacting project-based science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,43(7),722-745.
33. Talsma, V.(2004).Unpublished dissertation.Ann Arbor:University of Michigan.
34. Tanaka, J. S.(1987)."How big is big enough?": Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables.Child Development,58,134-146.
35. Teh, G. P. L.,Fraser, B. J.(1994).An evaluation of computer assisted learning in geography in Singapore.Australian Journal of Educational Technology,10(1),55-68.
36. Tobin, K.(1998).Qualitative perceptions of learning environments on the World Wide Web.Learning Environments Research,1(1),139-162.
37. van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,Kirschner, P. A.,Kester, L.(2003).Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning.Educational Psychologist,38(1),5-13.
38. Whipp, J. L.,Chiarelli, S.(2004).Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study.Education Technology Research and Development,52(4),5-22.
39. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
40. 吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南。
41. 吳為聖、張惠博、陳錦章(2004)。網路學習環境對科學教學與學習之影響：高中師生的觀點。中華民國第十九屆科學教育學術研討會，台北市:
42. 李建億、黃瑋苹(2004)。網路專題學習活動中多元智慧對學習成果影響之研究。師大學報：科學教育類，49(1)，65-80。
43. 邱晧政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南。
44. 徐新逸(2001)。如何利用網路幫助孩子成為研究高手？網路專題式學習與教學創新。台灣教育，607，25-34。
45. 徐新逸(2003)。數位學習課程發展模式初探。教育研究月刊，116，15-30。
46. 陳英豪、吳裕益(1998)。測驗與評量。高雄市:復文。
47. 黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
48. 葉玉珠(2005)。影響國小學童科技創意發展的因素之量表發展。師大學報：科學教育類，50(2)，29-54。

1. 陳彥廷(2014)。「國小教師數學教學知識（MPCK）知覺量表」發展之探究。測驗學刊，61(1)，51-78。
2. 林建良(2013)。網路專題課程中大專生知識整合程序之個案研究。教育傳播與科技研究，105，41-58。
3. 劉嘉茹、侯依伶、邱美虹(2009)。探討九年一貫課程實施前後國三學生科學態度變化研究。科學教育學刊，17(5)，409-432。
4. 趙梅如、王世億(2013)。大學生同性友誼品質之內涵驗證及性別差異分析。教育心理學報，44(4)，829-852。
5. 鄒小蘭、張靖卿、張芝萱、吳道愉、吳武典(2016)。國中學生生涯發展組型之探討。教育心理學報，47(3)，417-448。