题名

高中探究本位課程之設計與實施的個案研究－以新興科技議題為例

并列篇名

The Design and Enactment of an Emerging Technology Inquiry-Based Curriculum in Senior High School: A Case Study

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2011.1901.01

作者

洪振方(Jeng-Fung Huang)；陳毓凱(Yu-Kai Chen)

关键词

中等教育 ； 探究本位課程 ； 新興科技 ； Secondary Education ； Inquiry-Based Curriculum ； Emerging Technology

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

19卷1期（2011 / 02 / 01）

页次

1 - 23

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究主要目的在於提供一個高中其設計與實施新興科技探究本位課程(Emerging Technology Inquiry-based Curriculum, ETIC)之成功範例。資料來源包括課室觀察記錄；教材、會議記錄等文本資料；教師與學生的半結構式晤談；以及學生的問卷資料。本研究採個案研究法，參與者為六位高中科學教師以及一個學生小組。研究主要發現如下：(1)ETIC之教學目標在培養學生對環境議題的關懷、發展替代能源的知識以及運用探究來進行學習；(2)ETIC之課程設計由教學目標轉化而成，主要包含「專家講座」、「補充教學」、「校外經驗」以及「科學探究」等成分；(3)ETIC在實施上採取「刺激誘發」、「教學介入」與「引導探究」等機制；(4)ETIC課程提供學生經驗科學探究的歷程，培養學生高層次思考的能力。
英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to provide a successful case for designing and implementing an Emerging Technology Inquiry-based Curriculum (ETIC) in a senior high school. The data sources included fieldnotes, a collection of artefacts (such as teaching materials, meeting records), interviews (both for instructors and students), and open-ended questionnaires from all students. The interview participants for this case study included six secondary science teachers and a purposively selected student group, with four students. The results revealed that (1) the objectives of ETIC included a concern for environmental issues, developing knowledge of renewable energy, and involvement in scientific inquiry; (2) the foundation for ETIC curriculum design was built around the objectives above, with the approach including ”professional lectures,” ”supplementary instruction,” ”out-of-school experience,” and ”scientific inquiry;” (3) the ETIC implementing mechanisms included ”exciting stimulation,” ”teaching intervention,” and ”guided inquiry;” and (4) the students’ experiences closely reflected the objectives of ETIC. Furthermore, the students recognized important features of scientific research.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 楊秀停、王國華(2007)。實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊，15(4)，430-459。
    連結：
  2. 蔡執仲、段曉林(2005)。探究式實驗教學對國二學生理化學習動機之影響。科學教育學刊，13(3)，289-315。
    連結：
  3. National Science Teachers Association. (2004) Scientific inquiry & education – NSTA position statements: Scientific inquiry Retrieved August 24, 2009, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/inquiry.aspx
  4. Abd-El-Khalick, F.,BouJaoude, S.,Duschl, R.,Lederman, N. G.,Mamlok-Naaman, R.,Hofstein, A.(2004).Inquiry in science education: International perspectives.Science Education,88(3),397-419.
  5. Abell, S. K.(ed.),Lederman, N. G.(ed.)(2007).Handbook of research on science education.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Ainley, M.,Hidi, S.,Berndorff, D.(2002).Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship.Journal of Educational Psychology,94(3),545-561.
  7. Baumgartner, E.,Zabin, C.(2008).A case study of project-based instruction in the ninth grade: A semester-long study of intertidal biodiversity.Environmental Education Research,14(2),97-114.
  8. Chinn, C. A.,Hmelo-Silver, C. E.(2002).Authentic inquiry: Introduction to the special section.Science Education,86(2),171-174.
  9. Chinn, C. A.,Malhotra, B. A.(2002).Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks.Science Education,86(2),175-218.
  10. Creswell, J. W.(1998).Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  11. Cuevas, P.,Lee, O.,Hart, J.,Deaktor, R.(2005).Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(3),337-357.
  12. Drayton, B.,Falk, J.(2006).Dimensions that shape teacher-scientist collaborations for teacher enhancement.Science Education,90(4),734-761.
  13. Edelson, D. C.,Gordin, D. N.,Pea, R. D.(1999).Addressing the challenges of inquiry- based learning through technology and curriculum design.Journal of the Learning Sciences,8(3-4),391-450.
  14. Etheredge, S.,Rudnitsky, A.(2003).Introducing students to scientific inquiry: How do we know what we know?.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
  15. Furtak, E. M.(2006).The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching.Science Education,90(3),453-467.
  16. Gibson, H. L.,Chase, C.(2002).Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science.Science Education,86(5),693-705.
  17. Guba, E. G.(1981).Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries.Educational Communication and Technology Journal,29(2),75-91.
  18. Hidi, S.(1990).Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning.Review of Educational Research,60(4),549-571.
  19. Hidi, S.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2000).Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century.Review of Educational Research,70(2),151-179.
  20. Hinrichsen, J.,Jarrett, D.(1999).Science inquiry for the classroom: A literaturereview.Portland, OR:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
  21. Hofstein, A.,Lunetta, V. N.(2004).The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century.Science Education,88(1),28-54.
  22. Jeanpierre, B.,Oberhauser, K.,Freeman, C.(2005).Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(6),668-690.
  23. Khan, S.(2007).Model-based inquiries in chemistry.Science Education,91(6),877-905.
  24. Krajcik, J.,Blumenfeld, P. C.,Marx, R. W.,Bass, K. M.,Fredricks, J.,Soloway, E.(1998).Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students.Journal of the Learning Science,7(3-4),313-350.
  25. Lawson, A. E.(1995).Science teaching and the development of thinking.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
  26. Marx, J. G.,Honeycutt, K. A.,Clayton, S. R.,Moreno, N. P.(2006).The Elizabeth Towns incident: An inquiry-based approach to learning anatomy developed through high school-university collaboration.American Biology Teacher,68(3),140-147.
  27. Mintzes, J. J.(ed.),Wandersee, J. H.(ed.),Novak, J. D.(ed.)(2000).Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view.San Diego, CA:Academic.
  28. National Research Council(1996).National Science Education Standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  29. National Research Council(2009).Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  30. National Research Council(2000).How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  31. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  32. Olson, S.(ed.),Loucks-Horsley, S.(ed.)(2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  33. Palmer, D. H.(2009).Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(2),147-165.
  34. Palmer, D. H.(2005).A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching.International Journal of Science Education,27(15),1853-1881.
  35. Park Rogers, M. A.,Abell, S. K.(2008).The design, enactment, and experience of inquiry-based instruction in undergraduate science education: A case study.Science Education,92(4),591-607.
  36. Park, J.,Jang, K.-A.,Kim, I.(2009).An analysis of the actual processes of physicists' research and the implications for teaching scientific inquiry in school.Research in Science Education,39(1),111-129.
  37. Pataray-Ching, J.,Roberson, M.(2002).Misconceptions about a curriculum-asinquiry framework.Language Arts,79(6),498-505.
  38. Patton, M. Q.(2002).Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  39. Roberts, L. F.,Wassersug, R. J.(2009).Does doing scientific research in high school correlate with students staying in science? A half-century retrospective study.Research in Science Education,39(2),251-256.
  40. Roehrig, G. H.,Luft, J.(2004).Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons.International Journal of Science Education,26(1),3-24.
  41. Shiland, T. W.(2002).Reply to Pushkin.Science Education,86(2),167-170.
  42. Singer, J.,Marx, R. W.,Krajcik, J.,Chambers, J. C.(2000).Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform.Educational Psychologist,35(3),165-178.
  43. Thompson, S. L.,Collins, A.,Metzgar, V.,Joeston, M. D.,Shepherd, V.(2002).Exploring graduate-level scientists' participation in a sustained K-12 teaching collaboration.School Science and Mathematics,102(6),254-265.
  44. Tsai, C.-C.(2001).Probing students' cognitive structures in science: The use of a flow map method coupled with a meta-listening technique.Studies in Educational Evaluation,27(3),257-268.
  45. Tsai, C.-C.(2003).Taiwanese science students' and teachers' perceptions of the laboratory learning environments: Exploring epistemological gaps.International Journal of Science Education,25(7),847-860.
  46. Uitto, A.,Juuti, K.,Lavonen, J.,Meisalo, V.(2006).Students' interest in biology and their out-of-school experiences.Journal of Biological Education,40(3),124-129.
  47. van der Valk, T.,de Jong, O.(2009).Scaffolding science teachers in openinquiry teaching.International Journal of Science Education,31(6),829-850.
  48. Zachos, P.,Hick, T. L.,Doane, W. E. J.,Sargent, C.(2000).Setting theoretical and empirical foundations for assessing scientific inquiry and discovery in educational programs.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(9),938-962.
  49. Zimmerman, C.(2000).The development of scientific reasoning skills.Developmental Review,20(1),99-149.
  50. Zion, M.,Cohen, S.,Amir, R.(2007).The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices.Research in Science Education,37(4),423-447.
  51. Zion, M.,Shapira, D.,Slezak, M.,Link, E.,Bashan, N.,Brumer, M.(2004).Biomind-A new biology curriculum that enables authentic inquiry learning.Journal of Biological Education,38(2),59-67.
  52. 凌美璦(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
  53. 陳麗華、彭增龍(2007)。全球觀課程設計的新視野：公民行動取向。教育研究與發展期刊，3(2)，1-18。
  54. 謝莉文(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學地球科學研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 蘇冠綸,蘇金豆(2021)。以教育性AI科技發展探究學生自然科學導論學習成效。教育傳播與科技研究，125，55-70。
  2. 楊桂瓊、陳雅君、洪瑞兒、林煥祥(2015)。新興科技融入探究式教學的成效探討。科學教育學刊，23(2)，111-127。
  3. 張懷綾,金凱儀(2020)。行動式擴增實境學習系統對情境興趣與學習成效之影響性：以戶外古蹟導覽教育課程為例。數位學習科技期刊，12(3)，89-115。
  4. 鍾昌宏、王國華(2014)。國民中學學生接受不同電腦模擬融入論證式探究的教學模式之學習成效探討─以遺傳單元為例。數位學習科技期刊，6(3)，19-40。
print cancel