科學新聞觀點對不同年齡階段女性健康決策之影響－以荷爾蒙療法為例

The Impact of Science News Positions on Different Age Levels Women's Health Decision-An Example of Hormone-Replacement Therapy

10.6173/CJSE.2014.2203.03

林靜雯(Jing-Wen Lin)；林錦鴻(Chin-Hung Lin)；陳美蓉(Mei-Rong Chen)

科學新聞 ； 健康決策 ； 健康相關之社會性科學議題 ； 荷爾蒙療法 ； 新聞觀點 ； Science News ； Health Decision-Making ； Health-Related Socio-Science Issues (H-SSI) ； Hormonal-Replacement Therapy (HRT) ； News Position

科學教育學刊

22卷3期（2014 / 09 / 01）

281 - 306

繁體中文

本研究以更年期不適是否採用荷爾蒙療法（Hormone Replace Therapy, HRT）為例，探討科學新聞之正、負觀點對不同年齡層女性健康決策之影響。研究者先分別將78名女大學生及79名更年期婦女，隨機分配至「正面新聞」或「負面新聞」兩組，接著調查其閱讀新聞前、後採用HRT之決策程度、理由的改變情形及新聞面向的覺察情形。研究發現新聞之正、負觀點會影響女大學生採用HRT之決策改變程度，但並不影響更年期婦女。而以「健康信念模式」分析受試者的決策理由則顯示不同觀點之健康新聞會影響女大學生對「自覺行動利益」與「自覺行動障礙」的覺知，但對於更年期婦女則沒有顯著影響。而以「文化鑽石」之架構分析受試者閱讀新聞的解讀面向則顯示無論哪種年齡階段皆注意新聞「文本」，而較不能體察其他面向。若女大學生與更年期婦女相較，前者對新聞「生產者」的面向較為關注，而後者則較有先入為主的看法而不需要進一步的資訊補充。文末，研究者根據研究結果對科學教學及科學新聞寫作提出建議。

This study takes menopause hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) as an example to explore the impact of a positive or negative view of the science news on different age level women's health decisions. Seventy-eight female college students and 79 post-menopause women were randomly assigned to two groups of ＂positive news＂ or ＂negative news＂ respectively. Then, their decision degree, changes, reasons and awareness about news perspectives of reading hospital circulars and news were investigated. The research results show that the news of the positive or negative view influence female college students' decisions about the degree of adopting HRT, but do not affect post-menopause women. Using ＂Health belief model＂ to analyze the reasons for the participants' decision-making, this study found different positions of news would influence female college students' awareness of ＂perceived benefits of actions＂ and ＂perceived barriers of action＂. Furthermore, using the framework of the ＂cultural diamond＂ to analyze the participants' interpretation perspectives of news, this study found either age levels pay their attention to the news ＂text＂, and are less able to aware of the other perspectives. Comparisons between female students and post-menopause women show the former is more concerned about the ＂producers＂ perspective, while the latter is prejudiced by their original impressions without the need for further supplementary information. According to the findings, this study provides recommendation to teaching health-related social science issues in science education and writing science news in the end.

1. 徐美苓(2005)。新聞乎？廣告乎？醫療風險資訊的媒體再現與反思。新聞學研究，83，83-125。
   連結：
2. 張玨(2003)。更年期婦女健康是公共衛生政策的議題。臺灣衛誌，22(4)，245-250。
   連結：
3. 黃俊儒(2008)。構思科技社會中的即時學習：以學生及專家對於科學新聞文本之理解差異為例。科學教育學刊，16(1)，105-124。
   連結：
4. 黃俊儒、簡妙如(2008)。「科學家發明了什麼？！」─解析學生對於科學新聞中的科技產物意象。科學教育學刊，16(4)，415-438。
   連結：
5. 黃俊儒、簡妙如(2010)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究：從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究，105，127-166。
   連結：
6. 靳知勤、楊惟程、段曉林(2010)。引導式Toulmin論證模式對國小學童在科學讀寫表現上的影響。科學教育學刊，18(5)，443-467。
   連結：
7. 翁凌志(n.d.)。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系─中文文章適讀性線上分析系統。查詢日期：2009年10月31日，檢自http://140.127.45.25/Readability/Analyze/Help.aspx
8. 林天送(2002年12月31日)。2002年醫學五大紀事。中國時報，34版。
9. Ahluwalia, R.,Burnkrant, R. E.,Unnava, H. R.(2000).Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment.Journal of Marketing Research,37(2),203-214.
10. Appling, S. E.,Allen, J. K.,Van Zandt, S.,Olsen, S.,Brager, R.,Hallerdin, J.(2000).Knowledge of menopause and hormone replacement therapy use in low-income urban women.Journal of Women's Health Gender Based Medicine,9(1),57-64.
11. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
12. Carpenter, J. S.,Byrne, M. M.,Studts, J. L.(2011).Factors related to menopausal symptom management decisions.Maturitas,70(1),10-15.
13. Chew, F.,Palmer, S.,Kim, S.(1998).Testing the influence of the health belief model and a television program on nutrition behavior.Health Communication,10(3),227-245.
14. Corbett, J. B.,Durfee, J. L.(2004).Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming.Science Communication,26(2),129-151.
15. Dietel, M.(2010).Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT), breast cancer and tumor pathology.Maturitas,65(3),183-189.
16. Dishman, R. K.(1986).Exercise compliance: A new view for public health.The Physician and Sports Medicine,14(5),127-142.
17. Fineberg, H. V.,Rowe, S.(1998).Improving public understanding: Guidelines for communicating emerging science on nutrition, food safety, and health.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,90(3),194-199.
18. Griswold, W.(1994).Cultures and societies in a changing world.London:Sage.
19. Herr, P. M.,Kardes, F. R.,Kim, J.(1991).Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective.Journal of Consumer Research,17(4),454-462.
20. Hickey, M.,Elliott, J.,Davison, S. L.(2012).Hormone replacement therapy.British Medical Journal,344,e763.
21. Hulley, S. B.,Grady, D.(2004).The WHI estrogen-alone trial-Do things look any better?.The Journal of the American Medical Association,291(14),1769-1771.
22. Kennedy, D.(Ed.),Overholser, G.(Ed.)(2010).Science and the media.Cambridge, MA:American Academy of Arts & Sciences.
23. Kuhl, J.(Ed.),Beckmann, J.(Ed.)(1985).Action-control: From cognition to behavior.Heidelberg, Germany:Springer-Verlag.
24. Lin, C. H.,Lin, J. W.,Lin, H. F.(2010).Is a hospital circular effective? How would the hormone-replacement therapy related knowledge affect non-science majored undergraduates'attitude?.21st International Conference on Chemical Education,Taipei, Taiwan:
25. Marks, D.,Murray, M.,Evans, B.,Willig, C.(2000).Health psychology: Theory, research and practice.London:Sage.
26. Prochaska, J. O.,DiClemente, C. C.(1983).Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,51(3),390-395.
27. Reyna, V. F.(2008).Theories of medical decision making and health: An evidence-based approach.Medical Decision Making,28(6),829-833.
28. Rosenstock, I. M.,Strecher, V. J.,Becker, M. H.(1988).Social learning theory and the health belief model.Health Education & Behavior,15(2),175-183.
29. Sadler, T. D.,Zeidler, D. L.(2009).Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(8),909-921.
30. Sarafino, E. P.,Smith, T. W.(2012).Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions.Indianapolis, IN:John Wiley & Sons.
31. Stefanick, M. L.,Anderson, G. L.,Margolis, K. L.,Hendrix, S.,Rodabough, R. J.,Paskett, E. D.(2006).Effects of conjugated equine estrogens on breast cancer and mammography screening in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy.The Journal of the American Medical Association,295(14),1647-1657.
32. Steptoe, A.(Ed.),Matthews, A.(Ed.)(1984).Health care and human behavior.London:Academic Press.
33. Tashakkori, A.,Teddlie, C.(1998).Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches.London:Sage.
34. Thunell, L.,Stadberg, E.,Misom, I.,Mattsson, L.(2005).Changes in attitudes, knowledge and hormone replacement therapy use: A comparative study in two random samples with 6-year interval.Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica,84(4),395-401.
35. Vosniadou, S.(Ed.)(2008).International handbook of research on conceptual change.New York:Routledge.
36. Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators(2002).Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the women's health initiative randomized controlled trial.The Journal of the American Medical Association,288(3),321-333.
37. Yang, F. Y.(2005).Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socioscientific issue and personal epistemology.Educational Studies,31(1),65-84.
38. Zarcadoolas, C.,Pleasant, A.,Greer, D. S.(2005).Understanding health literacy: An expanded model.Health Promotion International,20(2),195-203.
39. 全嘉莉(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班。
40. 吳嘉麗(2003)。更年期荷爾蒙療法的爭議。科學發展，364，74-77。
41. 李守義、周碧瑟、晏涵文(1989)。健康信念模式的回顧與前瞻。中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌，9(3)，123-137。
42. 林芳玫(1996)。女性與媒體再現─女性主義與社會建構論的觀點。臺北市:巨流。
43. 林樹聲(2004)。重視自然與生活科技學習領域中科技爭議議題的融入與探討。國民中小學九年一貫課程理論基礎，臺北市:
44. 林靜雯、林錦鴻(2011)。探討大學生閱讀更年期衛教單張知識對其接受荷爾蒙補充療法決策的影響。科學教育研究與發展季刊，63，37-68。
45. 孫曼蘋(2003)。全球化SARS風暴下，國際媒體風險呈現之初探。全球化時代與新聞報導研討會論文集，臺北市:
46. 徐美苓、黃淑貞(1998)。愛滋病新聞報導內容之分析。新聞學研究，56，237-268。
47. 張美娟(2009)。健康素養與健康照護。志為護理，8(3)，65-69。
48. 許寶珊、林靜雯、林錦鴻、廖美惠(2010)。科學新聞對非科學主修大學生之決策影響─以更年期婦女使用荷爾蒙補充療法為例。中華民國第二十六屆科學教育學術研討會，花蓮市:
49. 黃俊儒(2004)。通識課程中社會／科學議題之選擇與提問。通識教育，11(3/4)，19-38。
50. 談靜慧、金繼春(2004)。自主之概念分析。護理雜誌，51(3)，65-70。
51. 盧孳豔、林雪貴(2001)。更年期的論述分析。護理雜誌，48(1)，77-82。
52. 羅文輝(1995)。新聞記者選擇消息來源的偏向。新聞學研究，50，1-13。

1. 林秀玉、辛旻靜(2017)。大學生對人工生殖科技的接受度與觀點。科學教育學刊，25(S)，463-484。
2. 潘怡如、陳雅君、林煥祥(2018)。以科學新聞融入教學提升中學生自我效能及論證能力之探討。科學教育學刊，26(1)，71-96。
3. 張耀仁(2020)。臺灣「科學傳播」研究析論：理論詮釋與反思（1970-2019）。傳播研究與實踐，10(2)，1-32。