透過知識創新教學理念與學習平臺以培養國小學生自然課合作學習與翻新想法的習慣

Elementary Students Engaging in Collaborative Idea Generation and Improvement in a Science Class through Knowledge Building and Knowledge Forum

10.6173/CJSE.2014.2204.04

洪煌堯(Huang-Yao Hong)；蔡佩真(Pei-Chen Tsai)；林倍伊(Pei-Yi Lin)

合作學習 ； 知識創新 ； 知識論壇平臺 ； 節能減碳 ； 電腦支援協作學習 ； Collaborative Learning ； Knowledge Building ； Knowledge Forum ； Energy Saving ； Computer Collaborative Learning

科學教育學刊

22卷4期（2014 / 12 / 01）

413 - 439

繁體中文

本研究以知識創新的教學理念為基礎，設計國小自然課程中有關「節能減碳」知識的學習活動，並經由知識論壇平臺的輔助以促進學生以翻新想法為核心的合作學習。本研究採個案研究，以臺灣國小五年級學生為研究對象。以知識創新的教學理念進行一學年有關節能減碳教育的教學，學生利用知識論壇平臺進行互動、合作與討論。結果發現，知識創新教學有助於促進學生間以「想法」為單位的合作學習，例如學生在知識論壇上的「修改他人想法的貼文」在學習第一至三階段中不斷成長，「共有作者貼文」的比例在學習階段一至四中不斷成長。透過知識論壇的合作互動，學生能夠產生許多關於節能減碳的個人想法，同時分享並不斷改進想法，使想法更具完整性與解釋力。另外，與國中教材的重要概念相比，結果亦顯示在知識創新的教學下學生能提出更豐富、多元的節能減碳的想法。證實知識創新環境中的學習有助於培養學生集體知識共構的習慣，以及豐富學生的合作學習經驗。本研究建議：鼓勵以想法為中心的合作學習與互動，以幫助學生發展知識創新的關鍵能力。

This study aimed to help students collectively construct knowledge regarding energy saving, using an innovative pedagogical approach called knowledge building. Participants in this case study were 5th-grade students in Taiwan. They worked in Knowledge Forum-a knowledge building environment-for a complete school year. The analysis indicated that knowledge building did make students become more collaborative; as a result, they were able to engage deeply in the process of ideas generation, idea interaction, and idea improvement, rather than to engage in superficial social talk. In addition, it was found that students were able to discuss and form rich concepts of energy saving; they were not only able to share ideas, but to deepen their ideas relevant to energy-saving; it was found that there were significantly more concepts co-constructed in class than concepts covered in some official curriculum materials. In sum, knowledge building seemed to be useful for students to create collaborative knowledge in science learning. Some implications regarding teaching and collaborative learning were discussed.

1. 羅希哲、蔡慧音、曾國鴻(2011)。高中女生STEM網路專題式合作學習之研究。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，30，41-61。
   連結：
2. Boyes, E.,Stanisstreet, M.(1993).The greenhouse effect-children's perceptions of causes, consequences and cures.International Journal of Science Education,15,531-552.
3. Chan, C. K.,Lam, I. C.,Leung, R. W.(2012).Can collaborative knowledge building promote both scientific processes and science achievement?.International Journal of Educational Psychology (IJEP),1(3),199-227.
4. Chang, C. H.,Hong, H. Y.(2012).Teacher-education students' beliefs in science teaching in a knowledge building environment.The future of learning-ICLS 2012,Sydney, Australia:
5. Chiu, C. H.,Hong, H. Y.(2012).Enhancing students' understanding of what ideas are for knowledge building.The future of learning-ICLS 2012,Sydney, Australia:
6. Dias, R. A.,Mattos, C. R.,Balestieri, J. A.(2004).Energy education: Breaking up the rational energy use barriers.Energy Policy,32(11),1339-1347.
7. Greiff, S.(2012).From interactive to collaborative problem solving: Current issues in the Programme for International Student Assessment.Review of Psychology,19(2),111-121.
8. Guthrie, J. W.(Ed.)(2003).Encyclopedia of education.New York:Macmillan Reference.
9. Hansen, J. K. P.(2010).Knowledge about the greenhouse effect and the effects of the ozone layer among Norwegian pupils finishing compulsory education in 1989, 1993, and 2005-what now?.International Journal of Science Education,32(3),397-419.
10. Hong, H. Y.,Chang, Y. H.,Chai, C. S.(2014).Fostering a collaborative and creative climate in a college class through idea-centered knowledge-building.Instructional Science,42(3),389-407.
11. Hong, H. Y.,Chen, F. C.,Chai, C. S.,Chan, W. C.(2011).Teacher-education students'views about knowledge building theory and practice.Instructional Science,39(4),467-482.
12. Hong, H. Y.,Lin, S. P.(2010).Teacher-education students' epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building.The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,19(1),99-110.
13. Hong, H. Y.,Scardamalia, M.,Messina, R.,Teo, C.(2008).Principle-based design to foster adaptive use of technology for building community knowledge.International. Perspectives in the learning sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the eighth international conference for the learning sciences-ICLS 2008,Utrecht, The Netherlands:
14. Hong, H. Y.,Sullivan, F. R.(2009).Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation.Educational Technology Research & Development,57(5),613-627.
15. Hong, H.-Y.(2011).Beyond group collaboration: Facilitating an idea-centered view of collaboration through knowledge building in a science class of fifth-graders.Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,20(2),246-260.
16. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1993).Cooperative learning.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley-Blackwell.
17. Kovalchick, A.(Ed.),Dawson, K.(Ed.)(2004).Education and technology: An encyclopedia.Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO.
18. Lee, Y. T.(Ed.),Lim, C. P.(Ed.)(2013).Creating holistic technologyenhanced learning experiences.Rotterdam, The Netherlands:Sense.
19. Popper, K. R.(1972).Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach.Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press.
20. Rena., M. P.,Keith, P.(2001).Lessons from cyberspace classroom.the meeting of the 17th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning,Madison, WI.:
21. Sawyer, K.(Ed.)(2006).Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences.New York:Cambridge University Press.
22. Sawyer, R. K.(Ed.)(2006).Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
23. Scardamalia, M.(2003).Knowledge forum (advances beyond CSILE).Journal of Distance Education,17(3),23-28.
24. Slavin, R. E.(1995).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
25. Smith, B.(Ed.)(2002).Liberal education in a knowledge society.Chicago, IL:Open Court.
26. Solbes, J.,Guisasola, J.,Tarin, F.(2009).Teaching energy conservation as a unifying principle in physics.Journal of Science Education and Technology,18(3),265-274.
27. Stahl, G.(2007).Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups.International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,Brunswick, NJ.:
28. Strauss, A. L.,Corbin, J.(1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
29. Tan, S. C.(Ed.),So, H. J.(Ed.),Yeo, J.(Ed.)(2014).Knowledge creation in education.Singapore:Springer Science, Business Media Singapore.
30. Whitehead, A. N.(1959).The aims of education.Daedalus,88(1),192-205.
31. Zhang, J.,Hong, H.-Y.,Scardamalia, M.,Teo, C.,Morley, E.(2011).Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school.Journal of the Learning Sciences,20(2),262-307.
32. Zografakis, N.,Menegaki, N. A.,Tsagarakis, P. K.(2008).Effective education for energy efficiency.Energy Policy,36(8),3226-3232.
33. 李麗香(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系。
34. 林姵君(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系。
35. 唐國華(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系。
36. 黃政傑、吳俊憲(2006)。合作學習：發展與實踐。臺北市:五南。
37. 黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。臺北市:五南。
38. 黃筑暉(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新北市，淡江大學水資源及環境工程學系碩士班。
39. 楊森吉(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班。
40. 鍾秀媛(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學自然科學系碩士班。

1. 曾莉婷,陳美如(2022)。運用知識翻新活動提升學生在能源教育之認知與情意學習。科學教育學刊，30(3)，241-265。
2. 洪國財(2018)。知識共構式教學對科技大學生多元的文化認知影響。通識學刊:理念與實務，6(2)，39-71+73-74。
3. 劉光夏、周宛瑜(2016)。翻轉教學融入國小高年級自然與生活科技領域課程學習成效之探討。教育傳播與科技研究，113，39-62。
4. 宋世祥,王佳琪(2019)。設計思考融入職前師資培育課程之實施與成效：以適性教學為例。教育科學研究期刊，64(4)，145-173。
5. 王明旭(2023)。協作學習理論發展團隊協作四部曲之跨域教學成效評估：以設計思考課程為例。教育實踐與研究，36(1)，73-120。
6. 張芷瑄,洪煌堯,洪國財(2022)。電腦輔助知識翻新教學對師資培育生科學教學信念之影響。科學教育學刊，30(4)，287-307。
7. (2021)。透過社群協作之知識翻新活動以促進在職教師碩士論文研究。教育研究月刊，324，57-78。