题名

翻轉教學式合作學習對生活科技實作課程學習成效影響之研究

并列篇名

Cooperative Flipped Teaching Supported Living Technology Hands-On Curriculum

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2016.2401.03

作者

戴文雄(David W. S. Tai);王裕德(Yu-Te Wang);王瑞(Ray Wang);陳嘉苓(Jia-Ling Chen)

关键词

生活科技實作課程 ; 合作學習態度 ; 科技態度 ; 線上學習自我效能 ; 翻轉教學 ; Living Technology Hands-on Curriculum ; Cooperative Learning Attitude ; Technology Attitude ; Web-based Learning Self-efficacy ; Flipped Teaching

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

24卷1期(2016 / 03 / 01)

页次

57 - 88

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討翻轉教學式合作學習對高中學生在生活科技實作課程學習成就、科技態度、合作學習態度及課程滿意度之影響,本研究主要採準實驗研究法,研究對象為中部一所國立高級中學103學年度第二學期修習「生活科技」課程之高二3個班級共120位學生,隨機抽取兩班為實驗組(N = 72),另一班為控制組(N = 48),實驗組學生採用翻轉教學式合作學習,控制組學生採用傳統講述式合作學習,實驗組及控制組皆採取認知型態異質性分組,兩人一組,並進行為期11週(22節課)的教學實驗,本研究於教學實驗前後施測以蒐集研究所需之相關數據,研究中透過開放性問卷蒐集質性資料。研究結果顯示:一、「翻轉教學式合作學習」確實能提升學生在科技實作課程的學習成就、課程滿意度、科技態度及合作學習態度。二、「翻轉教學式合作學習」中學習參與確實會影響學生在科技實作課程的學習成就及課程滿意度,但對科技態度及合作學習態度則無顯著影響。三、「翻轉教學式合作學習」中線上學習自我效能確實會影響學生在科技實作課程的學習成就及課程滿意度,但對科技態度及合作學習態度則無顯著影響。

英文摘要

The study aimed to explore the influence of flipped teaching on students' learning achievement in living technology hands-on curriculum, their technology attitude, their cooperative learning attitude and their course satisfaction. The study used a quasi-experimental design, involving 120 17-year-old students from 3 11th-grade classes for 11 weeks (22 hours in total). A pre-test and a post-test, as well as some open-ended questionnaires, were used. During the study, students were randomly assigned to 2 experimental groups (N = 72) and a control group (N = 48). Teacher adopted flipped teaching in the experimental group, while in the control group, the teacher used traditional lecture teaching. In addition, students in both the experimental groups and the control group were paired up according to their cognitive styles. The results of this study are as follows. First, significant differences were found between the experimental groups and the control group in terms of students' learning achievement in living technology hands-on curriculum, technology attitude, cooperative learning attitude and course satisfaction. Second, in the experimental groups, student's participation had a positive effect on students' learning achievement in living technology hands-on curriculum and their course satisfaction. However, there was no significant effect on students' technology attitude or their cooperative learning attitude. Third, in the experimental groups, students' web-based learning self-efficacy had a positive effect on students' learning achievement in living technology hands-on curriculum and their course satisfaction. However, there was no significant effect on students' technology attitude or their cooperative learning attitude.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 李堅萍(2006)。工藝技能學習成效與自我效能之相關性研究。藝術教育研究,12,39-64。
    連結:
  2. 張基成、周保男(2006)。能力本位網路學習系統之發展、實施與成效評估。科學教育學刊,14(2),209-235。
    連結:
  3. 游光昭、林坤誼、洪國峰(2010)。從反思與實踐看國中生在科技實作活動中的學習歷程表現。課程與教學,13(3),219-250。
    連結:
  4. 游光昭、韓豐年、徐毅穎、林坤誼(2005)。國中學生科技態度量表之發展。高雄師大學報,19,69-83。
    連結:
  5. 楊雅筑、段曉林(2015)。故事探究教材融入自然與生活科技課對學生參與表現與成就之影響。科學教育學刊,23(2),129-153。
    連結:
  6. 簡頌沛、吳心楷(2008)。高中實習教師的實務參與及身分轉變:情境認知觀點的探討。科學教育學刊,16(2),215-237。
    連結:
  7. 顏百鴻、歐陽誾(2012)。不同激勵機制對國小六年級學童網路學習活動影響之研究。教育學誌,27,221-262。
    連結:
  8. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012, June 12). Why flipped classrooms are here to stay. Retrieved July 20, 2015, from http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2012/06/12/fp_bergmann_sams.html?tkn=WPCC1Rxu4%2FbCFsj3iEU3%2Bqk97aMS3xc0jkgq&cmp=clp-sb-edtech
  9. Alenezi, A. R.,Abdul Karim, A. M.,Veloo, A.(2010).An empirical investigation into the role of enjoyment, computer anxiety, computer self-efficacy and internet experience in influencing the students' intention to use e-learning: A case study from Saudi Arabian governmental universities.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET,9(4),22-34.
  10. Ardies, J.,De Maeyer, S.,Gijbels, D.(2013).Reconstructing the pupils attitude towards technology-survey.Design and Technology Education,18(1),8-19.
  11. Baker, J. W.(2000).The "classroom flip": Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side.Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning,Jacksonville, FL:
  12. Bandura, A.(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human ageny.American Psychologist,37,122-147.
  13. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:W. H. Freeman.
  14. Bishop, J. L.,Verleger, M. A.(2013).The flipped classroom: A survey of the research.120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Atlanta, GA.:
  15. Bleicher, R. E.,Lindgren, J.(2005).Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy.Journal of Science Teacher Education,16(3),205-225.
  16. Bong, M.(2001).Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals.Journal of Educational Psychology,93(1),23-34.
  17. Chao, C.-Y.,Chen, Y.-T.,Chuang, K.-Y.(2015).Exploring students' learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: A study in high school engineering education.Computer Applications in Engineering Education,23(4),514-526.
  18. Cheng, K.-H.,Tsai, C.-C.(2011).An investigation of Taiwan University students' perceptions of online academic help seeking, and their web-based learning self-efficacy.The Internet and Higher Education,14,150-157.
  19. Chu, H.-C.,Hwang, G.-J.,Tsai, C.-C.,Tseng, J. C. R.(2010).A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses.Computers & Education,55(4),1618-1627.
  20. Chu, R. J.-C.(2010).How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of elearning among higher aged adults: Analyses of gender and age differences.Computers & Education,55(1),255-264.
  21. Davies, R. S.,Dean, D. L.,Ball, N.(2013).Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course.Educational Technology Research and Development,61(4),563-580.
  22. Day, J. A.,Foley, J. D.(2006).Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human-computer interaction course.Ieee Transactions on Education,49(4),420-431.
  23. Flumerfelt, S.,Green, G.(2013).Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students.Educational Technology and Society,16(1),356-366.
  24. Frey, A.,Faul, A.,Yankelov, P.(2003).Student perceptions of web-assisted teaching strategies.Journal of Social Work Education,39(3),443-457.
  25. Fulton, K. P.(2012).10 reasons to flip.Phi Delta Kappan,94(2),20-24.
  26. Hutchins, H. M.(2004).TX.,University of North Texas.
  27. Jensen, J. L.,Kummer, T. A.,Godoy, P. D. d. M.(2015).Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning.CBE - Life Sciences Education,14(1),1-12.
  28. Kay, R. H.(2006).Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board effectiveness.British Journal of Educational Technology,37(5),761-783.
  29. Kay, R.,Kletskin, I.(2012).Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education.Computers & Education,59(2),619-627.
  30. Kong, S. C.(2014).Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy.Computers & Education,78,160-173.
  31. Lage, M. J.,Platt, G. J.,Treglia, M.(2000).Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment.Journal of Economic Education,31(1),30-43.
  32. Liang, J.-C.,Wu, S.-H.(2010).Nurses' motivations for Web-based learning and the role of Internet self-efficacy.Innovations in Education & Teaching International,47(1),25-37.
  33. Missildine, K.,Fountain, R.,Summers, L.,Gosselin, K.(2013).Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction.Journal of Nursing Education,52(10),597-599.
  34. Moraros, J.,Islam, A.,Yu, S.,Banow, R.,Schindelka, B.(2015).Flipping for success: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting.BMC Medical Education,15(1),27-27.
  35. Nam, C. W.,Zellner, R. D.(2011).The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning.Computers & Education,56,680-688.
  36. Prensky, M. R.(2010).Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
  37. Prinsen, F. R.,Volman, M. L. L.,Terwel, J.,van den Eeden, P.(2009).Effects on participation of an experimental CSCL-programme to support elaboration: Do all students benefit?.Computers & Education,52(1),113-125.
  38. Ruddick, K. W.(2013).TN,The University of Memphis.
  39. Shea, P.,Bidjerano, T.(2010).Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, selfregulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments.Computers & Education,55(4),1721-1731.
  40. Strayer, J. F.(2012).How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation.Learning Environments Research,15(2),171-193.
  41. Tsai, C.-C.,Ho, H. N. J.,Liang, J.-C.,Lin, H.-M.(2011).Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students.Learning and Instruction,21(6),757-769.
  42. Tsai, M.-J.,Tsai, C.-C.(2003).Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy.Innovations in Education & Teaching International,40(1),43-50.
  43. Wang, C. H.,Shannon, D. M.,Ross, M. E.(2013).Students' characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning.Distance Education,34(3),302-323.
  44. Wenger, E.(1998).Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  45. Wigfield, A.(Ed.),Eccle, J. S.(Ed.)(2002).Development of achievement motivation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
  46. Wong, T. H.,Ip, E. J.,Lopes, I.,Rajagopalan, V.(2014).Pharmacy students' performance and perceptions in a flipped teaching pilot on cardiac arrhythmias.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,78(10)
  47. Woolfolk, A. E.,Hoy, W. K.(1990).Prospective teachers' sense of efficacy and beliefs about control.Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),81-91.
  48. Yukselturk, E.,Bulut, S.(2007).Predictors for student success in an online course.Journal of Educational Technology & Society,10(2),71-83.
  49. Zakaria, E.,Chin, L. C.,Daud, M. Y.(2010).The effects of cooperative learning experience on eighth grade students' achievement and attitude toward science.Journal of Social Sciences,6(2),272-275.
  50. 朱益賢(2006)。從科技素養到科技創造力。生活科技教育,39(8),1-2。
  51. 何榮桂(2013)。從CAI到MOOC—臺灣數位學習的回顧與前瞻。T&D飛訊,180
  52. 吳靜吉(1974)。藏圖測驗。臺北市:遠流。
  53. 張玉山、游光昭、蕭佩如(2010)。科技教學評量策略之規劃研究—以水陸兩用車活動為例。工業科技教育學刊,3,53-60。
  54. 張清濱(2009)。教學原理與實務。臺北市:五南。
  55. 張喬閔(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南市,國立臺南大學教育學系科技發展與傳播碩士班。
  56. 教育部(2010)。普通高級中學課程綱要。臺北市:作者。
  57. 許金山(2006)。混合式數位學習歷程及成效之分析。生活科技教育,39(1),66-84。
  58. 許暉東(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南市,國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班。
  59. 郭靜姿、何榮桂(2014)。翻轉吧教學!。臺灣教育,686,9-15。
  60. 鄭曜忠(2008)。博士論文(博士論文)。彰化市,國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系。
被引用次数
  1. 黃寶園(Bao-Yuan Huang);常雅珍(Ya-Jane Chaung)(2022)。實施翻轉教室對學習者學習成效影響之統合分析:臺灣與中國大陸樣本的分析與比較。教育研究與發展期刊。18(2)。1-50。