以結構方程模式探討影響高中學生團隊參加創意競賽表現之因素

Study on the Factors Affecting the Team Performance of Senior High School Students in the Creative Contest by Using Structure Equation Modeling

10.6173/CJSE.201906_27(2).0001

王裕宏(Yu-Hung Wang)；劉佳儒(Jia-Ru Liou)；張美珍(Mei-Chen Chang)

科學博物館 ； 能源科技 ； 創意競賽 ； Science Museum ； Energy Technology ； Creative Contests

科學教育學刊

27卷2期（2019 / 06 / 01）

73 - 95

繁體中文

為推動能源科技教育，教育部指導由博物館統籌規劃辦理「全國能源科技創意實作競賽」，提供一競賽平臺，讓學生以能源為主題進行創意實作，從中決選出具創意且具體實踐的作品。為探析影響高中學生團隊參加競賽表現的因素，本研究透過文獻分析發展影響創意競賽表現模式，以2014～2017年參加全國能源科技創意實作競賽的387名高中學生為調查對象，進行驗證性因素分析，建構高中學生團隊競賽表現模式，探討在表現模式中各影響因素間的關係。研究結果發現，研究模式適配度理想，適用高中學生團隊競賽表現模式；團隊組成對於競賽表現具有直接顯著的影響，是影響最大的構面因素；知識運用構面對於競賽表現沒有直接影響，參賽動機因素對於知識運用構面有直接影響效果，雖未能直接影響競賽表現，但透過團隊組成對競賽表現具有間接影響效果。本模式分析高中學生參加團隊競賽表現的影響因素，研究結果有助於學校在組織團隊參加比賽時考量學生參賽動機、團隊組成及知識運用對競賽表現的影響。研究另提出具體建議，供學校參加類似競賽活動時參考，如學生團隊的組成方式、學校提供知識運用面的支援等。

To promote energy technology education, the ＂National Energy Technology Creative Contest＂ was co-sponsored by the Ministry of Education and the Science Museums, with the aim to provide a competitive platform that could allow students to implement creative projects based on the theme of energy. This study explored the influencing factors that affect the performance of senior high students participating in the contest. Based on literature review, this study developed a contest performance model, and treated the senior high school students (N = 387) participating in the National Energy Technology Creative Contest from 2014 to 2017 as subjects. The confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the contest performance model and explore the influencing factors in the model. Results of this study revealed: 1. the research model had good model fit to the data collected from the student participants; 2. the team composition dimension had a direct and significant influence on the contest performance and was the most influential of the assessed dimensions; 3. the knowledge application dimension had no direct influence on team performance; 4. motivation factors had direct influence on the knowledge application dimension. Although students' motivation did not directly affect team performance, it had a mediating effect on team performance through team composition. The proposed model analyzed the influencing factors that affected the team performance of senior high students participating in the contest. The results of this study may be of interest to high schools in evaluating the influence of motivation, team composition, and knowledge application on team performance when organizing teams. Several suggestions are put forward for reference to schools on team contest, including team composition and support from school on knowledge application from schools.

1. 王裕宏,張美珍,朱耀明(2012)。大學生參與博物館科技競賽的參賽動機之研究。科技博物，16(2)，25-44。
   連結：
2. 王裕宏,張美珍,劉佳儒(2014)。大學生團隊創意競賽表現模式之驗證性分析。科技博物，18(4)，21-54。
   連結：
3. 呂建億,林坤誼(2014)。績優高中生活科技教師實作教學表徵之研究。中等教育，65(4)，14-31。
   連結：
4. 柳金佑,朱益賢(2010)。國中生與高中生在班級科技競賽中之參賽表現與問題解決能力差異之研究。臺東大學教育學報，21(1)，31-55。
   連結：
5. 胡宜中,邱永亮,蔣鵬(2017)。結合決策實驗室法與網路程序分析法評估烘焙師傅於國際競賽獲獎之關鍵因素。觀光休閒學報，23(1)，101-127。
   連結：
6. 張芳瑜(2016)。於高中實施工程設計專題製作活動課程設計之探討。科技與人力教育季刊，3(1)，5-11。
   連結：
7. 張珮珊,賴吉永,溫媺純(2017)。科學探究與實作課程的發展、實施與評量：以實驗室中的科學論證為核心之研究。科學教育學刊，25(4)，355-389。
   連結：
8. 陳劍涵(2015)。翻轉教育2.0導讀。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊，1，190-195。
   連結：
9. 葉家良,張美珍,朱耀明,黃俊夫(2007)。高中學生參與科技競賽的動機及其與競賽成績之相關性研究。科技博物，11(1-2)，5-29。
   連結：
10. Amabile, T. M.(1983).The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,45(2),357-376.
11. Arbuckle, J. L.(2013).Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos (Version 22.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: IBM SPSS..
12. Black, G.(2012).Transforming museums in the twenty-first century.London:Routledge.
13. Bollen, K. A.,Stine, R. A.(1992).Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models.Sociological Methods & Research,21(2),205-229.
14. Brophy, D. R.(2006).A comparison of individual and group efforts to creatively solve contrasting types of problems.Creativity Research Journal,18(3),293-315.
15. Burguillo, J. C.(2010).Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance.Computers & Education,55(2),566-575.
16. Capron, L.(1999).The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions.Strategic Management Journal,20(11),987-1018.
17. Cheng, H. N. H.,Wu, W. M. C.,Liao, C. C. Y.,Chan, T.-W.(2009).Equal opportunity tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms.Computers & Education,53(3),866-876.
18. Chiang, Y.-H.,Hsu, C.-C.,Shih, H.-A.(2017).Extroversion personality, domain knowledge, and the creativity of new product development engineers.Creativity Research Journal,29(4),387-396.
19. Christiaans, H. H. C. M.(2002).Creativity as a design criterion.Creativity Research Journal,14(1),41-54.
20. Christiaans, H. H. C. M.,Venselaar, K.(2005).Creativity in design engineering and the role of knowledge: Modelling the expert.International Journal of Technology and Design Education,15(3),217-236.
21. Curseu, P. L.,Pluut, H.(2013).Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups’ cognitive complexity.Studies in Higher Education,38(1),87-103.
22. Desai, A.,Tippins, M.,Arbaugh, J. B.(2014).Learning through collaboration and competition: Incorporating problem-based learning and competition-based learning in a capstone course.Organization Management Journal,11(4),258-271.
23. Erbil, L.,Dogan, D. F.(2012).Collaboration within student design teams participating in architectural design competitions.Design and Technology Education,17(3),70-77.
24. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.Journal of Marketing Research,18(3),382-388.
25. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2009).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
26. Hong, E.,O’Neil, H. F., Jr.,Peng, Y.(2016).Effects of explicit instructions, metacognition, and motivation on creative performance.Creativity Research Journal,28(1),33-45.
27. Huang, N.-T. N.,Chiu, L.-J.,Hong, J.-C.(2016).Relationship among students’ problemsolving attitude, perceived value, behavioral attitude, and intention to participate in a science and technology contest.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,14(8),1419-1435.
28. IBM Corp(2013).IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0) [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: Author..
29. Kerr, B.(Ed.)(2009).Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
30. Kim, M.-S.(2018).A web-based system to build teams for project-based learning courses: An industrial engineering case.Global Journal of Engineering Education,20(2),91-99.
31. Kreitler, S.,Casakin, H.(2009).Motivation for creativity in design students.Creativity Research Journal,21(2-3),282-293.
32. Kurtzberg, T. R.,Amabile, T. M.(2001).From guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity.Creativity Research Journal,13(3-4),285-294.
33. Lee, I. R.,Kemple, K.(2014).Preservice teachers’ personality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children's creativity.Creativity Research Journal,26(1),82-94.
34. Liang, H.,Wang, M.-M.,Wang, J.-J.,Xue, Y.(2018).How intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives affect task effort in crowdsourcing contests: A mediated moderation model.Computers in Human Behavior,81,168-176.
35. Lovelace, J. B.,Hunter, S. T.(2013).Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders’ influence on subordinate creative performance across the creative process.Creativity Research Journal,25(1),59-74.
36. Ma, J.,Tucker, C. S.,Okudan Kremer, G. E.,Jackson, K. L.(2017).Exposure to digital and hands-on delivery modes in engineering design education and their impact on task completion efficiency.Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science,21(2),61-78.
37. Marks, M. A.,Zaccaro, S. J.,Mathieu, J. E.(2000).Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments.Journal of Applied Psychology,85(6),971-986.
38. McCade, J.(1990).Problem solving: Much more than just design.Journal of Technology Education,2(1),1-13.
39. McMahon, K.,Ruggeri, A.,Kämmer, J. E.,Katsikopoulos, K. V.(2016).Beyond idea generation: The power of groups in developing ideas.Creativity Research Journal,28(3),247-257.
40. Mumford, M. D.,Feldman, J. M.,Hein, M. B.,Nagao, D. J.(2001).Tradeoffs between ideas and structure: Individual versus group performance in creative problem solving.The Journal of Creative Behavior,35(1),1-23.
41. Nunnally, J. C., Jr.,Bernstein, I. H.(1994).Psychometric theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
42. Pack, D. J.,Avanzato, R.,Ahlgren, D. J.,Verner, I. M.(2004).Fire-fighting mobile robotics and interdisciplinary design-comparative perspectives.IEEE Transactions on Education,47(3),369-376.
43. Pociask, S.,Gross, D.,Shih, M.-Y.(2017).Does team formation impact student performance, effort and attitudes in a college course employing collaborative learning?.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,17(3),19-33.
44. Riley, T. L.(2011).Competitions for showcasing innovative and creative talents.Gifted and Talented International,26(1),63-70.
45. Romanello, T.(2005).Collaborative competition? A great way to teach and motivate.The Physics Teacher,43(2),76-78.
46. Rubenstein, L. D.,McCoach, D. B.,Siegle, D.(2013).Teaching for creativity scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity.Creativity Research Journal,25(3),324-334.
47. Ryan, A. M.,Patrick, H.(2001).The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school.American Educational Research Journal,38(2),437-460.
48. Sternberg, R. J.(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of creativity.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
49. Tian, J.,Wang, L.(2016).Impact of design elements on performance in online innovation contests: Contest sequence as a moderator.International Journal of Services Technology and Management,22(6),315-330.
50. Tripathi, K. N.(1992).Competition and intrinsic motivation.The Journal of Social Psychology,132(6),709-715.
51. Trischler, J.,Kristensson, P.,Scott, D.(2018).Team diversity and its management in a codesign team.Journal of Service Management,29(1),120-145.
52. Van Eck, R.,Dempsey, J.(2002).The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills in a computer-based instructional simulation game.Educational Technology Research and Development,50(3),23-41.
53. Vandercruysse, S.,Vandewaetere, M.,Cornillie, F.,Clarebout, G.(2013).Competition and students’ perceptions in a game-based language learning environment.Educational Technology Research and Development,61(6),927-950.
54. Yu, F.-Y.,Liu, Y.-H.(2009).Creating a psychologically safe online space for a studentgenerated questions learning activity via different identity revelation modes.British Journal of Educational Technology,40(6),1109-1123.
55. Yue, H.,Cai, K.,Yu, Y.,He, Y.,Jin, Y.(2017).Investigation and analysis of college students’ cognition in science and technology competitions.International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning,12(7),146-157.
56. Zhu, Y.-Q.,Chen, H.-G.(2016).Empowering leadership in R&D teams: A closer look at its components, process, and outcomes.R&D Management,46(4),726-735.
57. 王裕宏,張美珍,劉佳儒(2016)。大學生團隊參與創意實作競賽之參賽動機及競賽成效評估分析。工業科技教育學刊，8，1-11。
58. 吳明隆,涂金堂(2005).SPSS與統計應用分析.臺北市:五南.
59. 李隆盛,吳正己,游光昭,周麗端,葉家棟,盧秋珍(2013)。,臺北市:國家教育研究院。
60. 林偉文(2011)。創意教學與創造力的培育─以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與研究，100，53-74。
61. 洪榮昭,康鳳梅,林展立(2003)。傑出科技創作學童創造特質分析─以機器人競賽為例。師大學報：科學教育類，48(2)，239-254。
62. 涂君暐(2005)。桃園縣，國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
63. 國家教育研究院(2019年1月)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要─國民中學暨普通型高級中等學校─科技領域課程手冊。查詢日期：2019年4月25日，檢自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/224701854.pdf。
64. 國家教育研究院(2018年9月20日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中學暨普通型高級中等學校─科技領域。查詢日期：2019年4月25日，檢自http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/52/pta_18529_8438379_60115.pdf。
65. 張志銘(1997)。中學階段學生參與田徑運動競賽動機之研究─以中華民國臺灣省彰化縣為例。體育學報，22，375-386。
66. 張美珍,王裕宏,沈益丞(2018)。科學博物館能源教育活動對於國小學童能源知識與態度影響。高雄師大學報，44，19-41。
67. 張偉豪(2011).SEM論文寫作不求人.高雄市:三星統計.
68. 陳玫伶(2007)。臺北市，國立臺北科技大學創新設計研究所。
69. 程安邦,周立強(2014)。參與實作競賽的教育價值。生物機電工程學報，4(1)，1-12。
70. 葉蓉樺(2007)。高中生動手作研習架構發展與初探：以國立自然科學博物館「高中生史特林引擎模型組裝研習」為例。科學教育月刊，303，2-16。

1. 劉佳儒,張美珍,王裕宏(2020)。輔導偏鄉國中學生學習飛行科學知識之成效分析：以培訓參與競賽活動為策略。科學教育學刊，28(4)，327-351。