以希望感為核心之高中氣候變遷課程評量研究

An Evaluation Research on Hope-Oriented Climate Change Curriculum at Senior-High School

10.6173/CJSE.202003_28(1).0004

梁格寧(Ko-Ning Liang)；曾鈺琪(Yu-Chi Tseng)

二因子混合設計變異數分析 ； 希望感 ； 氣候變遷 ； Two-Way Mixed ANOVA ； Hope ； Climate Change

科學教育學刊

28卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

75 - 97

繁體中文

隨著氣候變遷成為全球環境挑戰，氣候行動不但成為聯合國教科文組織在2017年提出的全球17項永續發展目標的重要學習內容之一，亦為目前臺灣環境教育議題中的重要學習主題。但氣候變遷是個以全球為尺度、跨領域、充滿複雜性和不確定性的環境議題，容易讓青少年在學習時感到絕望而不利採取氣候行動。因此如何設計1套能有效提升希望感、又能促進氣候素養和環境行為的課程，是本研究的主要目標。本文運用Snyder的希望感理論設計1套以氣候行動為主題的高中多元選修課程，採用Li與Monroe的氣候變遷希望感量表評量課程成效，以便利抽樣邀請臺北市一所公立高中合作教學，並以不等控制組之準實驗設計進行資料收集，共有實驗組40名及控制組61名學生參與研究，最後以二因子變異數分析課程效果。研究結果發現一學期共3個模組的課程能顯著提升實驗組學生的氣候變遷希望感、技能與行為。本研究雖未能增加氣候變遷知識，但課程介入能減緩實驗組學生的知識退步程度。此外，本研究也發現初次用於臺灣女性高中生群體的氣候變遷希望感量表具有良好的信效度。依據前述結果，本研究亦提出未來的研究和教學建議。

As climate change has become a serious environmental challenge for global sustainable development. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) proposed climate action as one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2017. Climate change was also designated as an important learning topic by Taiwanese government. However, climate change is a global-scale, cross-disciplinary, complex, and uncertain environmental issue. Therefore, adolescent learners easily feel too hopeless to take action to address issues associated with climate change. The purpose of this research is to design and evaluate a curriculum that aims to promote adolescent's sense of hope, knowledge, skills, and behavior regarding climate change. We transformed Snyder's hope theory into an instructional strategy and designed a semester-long course for senior-high-school students. Through convenience sampling, we invited four teachers and 161 students at one public senior high school to join this research. We adopted Li and Monroe's Climate Change Hope Scale (CCHS) to evaluate learning outcomes through the quasi-experimental design. Result from a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis showed that after learning three modules, students' sense of hope, environmental skills, and behavior significantly increased at the end of semester. Results also showed a decline of students' knowledge loss in treatment group. In addition, we found that CCHS had good reliability and validity in Taiwanese adolescent population. According to the findings of this study, we propose continued research and the development of educational strategies which promote student engagement in learning climate change.

1. 林昇邦, S.-P.,許瑛玿, Y.-S.(2017)。高中學生決策能力與氣候變遷調適素養改變之教學研究。科學教育學刊，25(Suppl.)，413-437。
   連結：
2. 許世璋, S.-J.,高思明, S.-M.(2009)。整合議題分析、生命故事、與自然體驗之大學環境課程介入研究—著重於情意目標的成效分析。科學教育學刊，17(2)，135-156。
   連結：
3. 黃靖惠, J.-H.,洪志誠, C.-C.,許瑛玿, Y.-S.(2012)。九年一貫教科書「全球暖化概念」內容分析。教科書研究，5(3)，27-57。
   連結：
4. 潘淑蘭, S.-L.,周儒, J.,吳景達, C.-T.(2017)。探究環境素養與影響環境行動之因子：以臺灣大學生為例。環境教育研究，13(1)，35-65。
   連結：
5. Azevedo, J.,Marques, M.(2017).Climate literacy: A systematic review and model integration.International Journal of Global Warming,12(3/4),414-430.
6. Bofferding, L.,Kloser, M.(2015).Middle and high school students’ conceptions of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.Environmental Education Research,21(2),275-294.
7. Hungerford, H. R.,Volk, T. L.,Ramsey, J. M.,Litherland, R. A.,Peyton, R. B.(2003).Investigating and evaluating environmental issues and actions: Skill development program.Champaign, IL:Stipes.
8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(2013).Climate change 2013: The physical science basis.
9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(2007).AR4 Climate change 2007: Synthesis report.
10. Kerret, D.,Orkibi, H.,Ronen, T.(2016).Testing a model linking environmental hope and self-control with students’ positive emotions and environmental behavior.The Journal of Environmental Education,47(4),307-317.
11. Li, C.,Monroe, M. C.(2018).Development and validation of the climate change hope scale for high school students.Environment and Behavior,50(4),454-479.
12. Monroe, M. C.,Plate, R. R.,Oxarart, A.,Bowers, A.,Chaves, W. A.(2017).Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research.Environmental Education Research,25(6),791-812.
13. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2009, March). The essential principles of climate literacy. Retrieved October 20, 2019, from https://downloads.globalchange.gov/Literacy/climate_literacy_highres_english.pdf
14. Ojala, M.(2015).Hope in the face of climate change: Associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation.The Journal of Environmental Education,46(3),133-148.
15. Ojala, M.(2012).Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people.Environmental Education Research,18(5),625-642.
16. Pruneau, D.,Liboiron, L.,Vrain, E.,Gravel, H.,Bourque, W.,Langis, J.(2001).People’s ideas about climate change: A source of inspiration for the creation of educational programs.Canadian Journal of Environmental Education,6,121-138.
17. Snyder, C. R.(2002).Target article: Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind.Psychological Inquiry,13(4),249-275.
18. Snyder, C. R.,Cheavens, J.,Michael, S. T.(1999).Hoping.Coping: The psychology of what works,New York, NY:
19. Snyder, C. R.,Harris, C.,Anderson, J. R.,Holleran, S. A.,Irving, L. M.,Sigmon, S. T.(1991).The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60(4),570-585.
20. Snyder, C. R.,Rand, K. L.,Sigmon, D. R.(2002).Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family.Handbook of positive psychology,New York, NY:
21. Stevenson, K.,Peterson, N.(2016).Motivating action through fostering climate change hope and concern and avoiding despair among adolescents.Sustainability,8(1)
22. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
23. United States’ Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Next generation science standards for states, by states. Retrieved October 30, 2019, from https://www.nextgenscience.org
24. 尤淑盈, S.-Y.,林啟超, C.-C.(2016)。希望理論融入國小數學學習領域對學童之希望感、內隱智力信念和學業成就之影響。東海教育評論，11，83-112。
25. 王文科, W.-K.,王智弘, C.-H.(2019).教育研究法.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu Nan.
26. 行政院國家發展委員會, Executive Yuan(2012)。行政院國家發展委員會(2012年6月25日)。國家氣候變遷調適政策綱領。查詢日期：2019年11月4日，檢自https://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=5E865E40CA33E974&upn=5A6FC15150F6BF01
27. 吳有為, Y.-W.(2009)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北教育大學=National Taipei University of Education。
28. 林立潔, L.-J.(2014)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所=National Taiwan Normal University。
29. 林維捷, W.-C.(2009)。國民中學教科書之氣候變遷課程內容概念分析。環境教育實務交流暨學術研討會，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
30. 邱皓政, H.-J.(2018).量化研究法(三)：測驗原理與量表發展技術.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh.
31. 唐淑華, S.-H.(2010).從希望感模式論學業挫折之調適與因應：正向心理學提供的「第三種選擇」.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological.
32. 教育部(2011)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題(環境教育)。查詢日期：2019年9月27日，檢自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/908/67361.pdf。[Ministry of Education. (2011). Guomin zhongxiaoxue jiu nian yiguan kecheng gangyao zhongda yiti (huanjing jiaoyu). Retrieved September 27, 2019, from https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/908/67361.pdf]
33. 教育部(2013)。氣候變遷調適素養問卷。查詢日期：2016年9月10日，檢自http://disaster.moe.edu.tw/Safecampus/Main/Knowledge_Climate_Scale.aspx。[Ministry of Education. (2013). Qihou bianqian tiaoshi suyang wenjuan. Retrieved September 10, 2016, from http://disaster.moe.edu.tw/Safecampus/Main/Knowledge_Climate_Scale.aspx]
34. 梁世武, S.-W.,劉湘瑤, S.-Y.,蔡慧敏, H.-M.,方偉達, W.-T.(2012)。,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:行政院環境保護署=Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan。
35. 許世璋, S.-J.(2004)。,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council, Executive Yuan。
36. 許晃雄, H.-H.,吳宜昭, Y.-C.,周佳, C.,陳正達, C.-T.,陳永明, Y.-M.,盧孟明, M.-M.(2011).臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2011.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council, Executive Yuan.
37. 顏志龍, C.-L.,鄭中平, C.-P.(2017).給論文寫作者的統計指南：傻瓜也會跑統計.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu Nan.

1. 林孟煒(2022)。高中與社區合作多元選修課程實施探究：以「地方創客」為例。教育理論與實踐學刊，46，53-84。