評分規準對科學筆記寫作及科學閱讀理解能力的影響

The Impact of Rubrics on Scientific Note-Taking and Science Reading Comprehension

10.6173/CJSE.202009_28(3).0003

蔡惠如(Hui-Ju Tsai)；鄭夢慈(Meng-Tzu Cheng)

科學筆記寫作 ； 科學閱讀理解 ； 評分規準 ； Scientific Note-Taking ； Science Reading Comprehension ； Rubrics

科學教育學刊

28卷3期（2020 / 09 / 01）

255 - 280

繁體中文

雖然評分規準在國內推行已久，與評分規準相關的實徵研究多局限於評分規準的設計，甚少有研究探討評分規準對學生實質能力的影響。其次，科學領域的寫作與閱讀能力近幾年來逐漸被重視，故本研究目的主要探討評分規準是否能提升學生的科學筆記寫作表現及科學閱讀理解能力。本研究採準實驗研究法，研究對象為桃園某國中七年級學生，其中兩個班共73人為實驗組，一個班共36人為對照組。兩組實施相同的教學方式，配合教學進度實施三階段的科學筆記寫作共17次，惟實驗組在使用評分規準評量後，會將評分規準發放給學生作為學習鷹架。本研究主要採重複量測共變數分析及共變數分析，以先前學習成就（段考成績）作為共變數進行統計控制，研究結果發現，有評分規準回饋的組別在科學筆記寫作成果與科學閱讀理解上都顯著地有更好的表現。

In Taiwan, while rubrics have long been applied in grading, empirical studies mostly focused on the design of rubrics rather than the effects on students' achievements. Given that the ability to write and read in the scientific field is important, this study aims to investigate whether the use of rubrics improves students' performances on scientific note-taking and science reading comprehension. A quasi-experimental design was applied on 109 7th graders, with 73 in the treatment group and 36 in the control group. There are three phases of experiments, in which a total of 17 scientific note-taking activities were graded with the rubrics, and the treatment and control groups differ in whether the rubrics showing the details about their note-taking performance were returned to the students as feedbacks. Data were analyzed by using repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and ANCOVA, controlling for the effect of prior knowledge (midterm exam grades). The results indicated that the use of rubrics significantly improved students' performances on scientific note-taking and science reading comprehension.

1. 吳裕聖, Y.-S.,曾玉村, Y.(2003)。概念構圖教學策略對小五學生科學文章理解及概念構圖能力之影響。教育研究集刊，49(1)，135-169。
   連結：
2. 洪月女, Y.-N.,靳知勤, C.-C.(2008)。科學寫作理論與教學之探討。課程與教學，11(2)，173-191。
   連結：
3. 胡瑞萍, R.-P.,林陳涌, C.-Y.(2002)。寫作與科學學習。科學教育月刊，253，2-18。
   連結：
4. 孫劍秋, C.-C.,林孟君, M.-C.(2013)。從臺灣中學生PISA閱讀素養的表現談精進學生閱讀素養的教學策略。中等教育，64(3)，35-51。
   連結：
5. 張貴琳, K.-L.,黃秀霜, H.-S.,鄒慧英, H.-I.(2010)。從國際比較觀點探討臺灣學生PISA 2006閱讀素養表現特徵。課程與教學，13(1)，21-46。
   連結：
6. 陳品華, P.-H.(2013)。大學生課堂筆記策略教學方案之成效。教育研究集刊，59(1)，73-112。
   連結：
7. 鄭可萱, K.-H.,李松濤, S.-T.(2018)。當科學素養與閱讀素養相遇：高中學生科學新聞閱讀策略之實驗研究。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，157-192。
   連結：
8. Andrade, H.(1997).Understanding rubrics.Educational Leadership,54(4),14-17.
9. Andrade, H.(2000).Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning.Educational Leadership,57(5),13-18.
10. Andrade, H.,Du, Y.,Wang, X.(2008).Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,27(2),3-13.
11. Bui, D. C.,Myerson, J.(2014).The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking.Learning and Individual Differences,33,12-22.
12. Chang, W.-C.,Ku, Y.-M.(2015).The effects of note-taking skills instruction on elementary students’ reading.The Journal of Educational Research,108(4),278-291.
13. Chen, P.-H.,Teo, T.,Zhou, M.(2017).Effects of guided notes on enhancing college students’ lecture note-taking quality and learning performance.Current Psychology,36(4),719-732.
14. Faber, J. E.,Morris, J. D.,Lieberman, M. G.(2000).The effect of note taking on ninth grade students’ comprehension.Reading Psychology,21(3),257-270.
15. Fellows, N. J.(1994).A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(9),985-1001.
16. Glynn, S. M.,Muth, K. D.(1994).Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(9),1057-1073.
17. Greenberg, K. P.(2015).Rubric use in formative assessment: A detailed behavioral rubric helps students improve their scientific writing skills.Teaching of Psychology,42(3),211-217.
18. Gulzar, M. A.,Buriro, G. A.,Charan, A. A.(2017).Investigating the effects of rubrics on assessment of writing tasks.International Research Journal of Arts & Humanities (IRJAH),45(45),191-206.
19. Hagen, Å. M.,Braasch, J. L. G.,Bråten, I.(2014).Relationships between spontaneous notetaking, self-reported strategies and comprehension when reading multiple texts in different task conditions.Journal of Research in Reading,37(Suppl. 1),141-157.
20. Hand, B.,Hohenshell, L.,Prain, V.(2004).Exploring students’ responses to conceptual questions when engaged with planned writing experiences: A study with year 10 science students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(2),186-210.
21. Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Retrieved August 26, 2020, from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/piaget.html
22. Just, M. A.,Carpenter, P. A.(1980).A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review,87(4),329-354.
23. Kellogg, R. T.,Raulerson, B. A.(2007).Improving the writing skills of college students.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,14(2),237-242.
24. Kiewra, K. A.(1988).Cognitive aspects of autonomous note taking: Control processes, learning strategies, and prior knowledge.Educational Psychologist,23(1),39-56.
25. Kiewra, K. A.(1989).A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond.Educational Psychology Review,1(2),147-172.
26. Kiewra, K. A.,Dubois, N. F.,Christian, D.,McShane, A.,Meyerhoffer, M.,Roskelley, D.(1991).Note-taking functions and techniques.Journal of Educational Psychology,83(2),240-245.
27. Mertler, C. A.(2000).Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom.Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation,7
28. Montgomery, K.(2000).Classroom rubrics: Systematizing what teachers do naturally.The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas,73(6),324-328.
29. Moskal, B. M.(2000).Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?.Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation,7
30. Nielsen, K.(2014).Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: A conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies.Journal of Research in Reading,37(1),1-16.
31. Ozuru, Y.,Dempsey, K.,McNamara, D. S.(2009).Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts.Learning and Instruction,19(3),228-242.
32. Panadero, E.,Jonsson, A.(2013).The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review.Educational Research Review,9,129-144.
33. Panadero, E.,Tapia, J. A.,Huertas, J. A.(2012).Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education.Learning and Individual Differences,22(6),806-813.
34. Peper, R. J.,Mayer, R. E.(1986).Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures.Journal of Educational Psychology,78(1),34-38.
35. Perfetti, C. A.(1999).Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader.The neurocognition of language,Oxford, UK:
36. Perfetti, C. A.,Stafura, J.(2014).Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension.Scientific Studies of Reading,18(1),22-37.
37. Peverly, S. T.,Wolf, A. D.(2019).Note-taking.The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education,Cambridge, UK:
38. Piolat, A.,Olive, T.,Kellogg, R. T.(2005).Cognitive effort during note taking.Applied Cognitive Psychology,19(3),291-312.
39. Popham, W. J.(1997).What’s wrong—and what’s right—with rubrics.Educational Leadership,55(2),72-75.
40. Poulin, C. M.(2013).Kent, OH,Kent State University.
41. Rahmani, M.,Sadeghi, K.(2011).Effects of note-taking training on reading comprehension and recall.The Reading Matrix,11(2),116-128.
42. Reddy, Y. M.,Andrade, H.(2010).A review of rubric use in higher education.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,35(4),435-448.
43. Reutzel, D. R.,Smith, J. A.,Fawson, P. C.(2005).An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,20(3),276-305.
44. Ritchhart, R.,Church, M.,Morrison, K.(2011).Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners.San Francisco, CA:JosseyBass.
45. Shanahan, T.,Shanahan, C.(2008).Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy.Harvard Educational Review,78(1),40-59.
46. Simon, M.,Forgette-Giroux, R.(2000).A rubric for scoring postsecondary academic skills.Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation,7
47. Slotte, V.,Lonka, K.(1999).Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehension.Contemporary Educational Psychology,24(1),1-20.
48. Souvignier, E.,Mokhlesgerami, J.(2006).Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension.Learning and Instruction,16(1),57-71.
49. Sundeen, T. H.(2014).Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality.Assessing Writing,21,74-88.
50. Timmerman, B. E. C.,Strickland, D. C.,Johnson, R. L.,Payne, J. R.(2011).Development of a ‘universal’ rubric for assessing undergraduates’ scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,36(5),509-547.
51. Trevors, G.,Duffy, M.,Azevedo, R.(2014).Note-taking within MetaTutor: Interactions between an intelligent tutoring system and prior knowledge on note-taking and learning.Educational Technology Research and Development,62(5),507-528.
52. Van Meter, P.,Yokoi, L.,Pressley, M.(1994).College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking.Journal of Educational Psychology,86(3),323-338.
53. Verhoeven, L.,Perfetti, C. A.(2008).Advances in text comprehension: Model, process and development.Applied Cognitive Psychology,22(3),293-301.
54. Wetzels, S. A. J.,Kester, L.,van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,Broers, N. J.(2011).The influence of prior knowledge on the retrieval-directed function of note taking in prior knowledge activation.British Journal of Educational Psychology,81(2),274-291.
55. Wiggins、 G.,McTighe, J.,賴麗珍（譯）, L.-C.(Trans.)(2008).重理解的課程設計.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological.
56. 林清山, C.-S.,程炳林, B.-L.(1996)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報，28，15-57。
57. 黃俊儒, C.-J.(2010)。促進以閱讀理解為基礎的科學教學—美國密西根大學的參訪紀實與省思。科學教育月刊，330，2-10。
58. 蔡正濱, C.-P.(2005)。屏東縣=Pingtung County, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系=National Pingtung University。
59. 鄧名翔, M.-H.(2016)。新竹市=Hsinchu City, Taiwan，國立交通大學教育研究所=National Chiao Tung University。
60. 鍾仲萱, C.-H.(2016)。新竹市=Hsinchu City, Taiwan，國立交通大學工業工程與管理系所=National Chiao Tung University。

1. (2022)。中小學國際交流活動課程化之行動研究。教育研究月刊，338，67-82。