合作問題解決自我效能量表發展與科學學習成就關係之探討

Development of the Collaborative Problem Solving Self-Efficacy Scale With the Relationship on Science Learning Achievement

10.6173/CJSE.202012_28(4).0003

王淑卿(Shu-Ching Wang)；葉宗一(Tsung-I Yeh)；王國華(Kuo-Hua Wang)

自我效能 ； 合作問題解決評量 ； 科學學習成就 ； 量表編製 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； Self-Efficacy ； Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) Assessment ； Science Learning Achievement ； Scale Construction ； Confirmatory Factor Analysis

科學教育學刊

28卷4期（2020 / 12 / 01）

353 - 377

繁體中文

本研究旨在發展國中生合作問題解決自我效能（Collaborative Problem Solving Self-Efficacy, CPS-SE）量表作為合作問題解決（Collaborative Problem Solving, CPS）課堂評量工具，並應用以檢驗量表與學生科學學習成就的關係。研究對象是方便取樣自臺灣五個縣市的男女合班國中生，共1,045人。基於學生能力國際評量計畫（Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA）2015 CPS評量架構而建構量表的構面及題項。量表分析過程包括五個階段：一、項目分析；二、探索性因素分析；三、信度分析；四、驗證性因素分析；和五、複核效度分析。研究發現三個值得注意的結果：首先，建構效度的過程中，萃取三個因素，包括共享理解、行動解決和團隊組織。其次，每個分量表的Cronbach's α係數皆超過.95，透過結構方程模式（Structural Equation Modeling, SEM）分析競爭模型，選擇適配度最佳且最簡約的模型，顯示模型和資料的適配度良好，表示CPS-SE量表具備良好的信度和效度。第三，自然科學學習成就表現的高成就生與中成就生在共享理解、行動解決和團隊組織等三個分量表，皆顯著優於低成就生，高成就生與中成就生則無顯著差異。

The purpose of this study was to develop the Collaborative Problem Solving Self-Efficacy (CPS-SE) scale as a Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) classroom assessment tool and to use it to examine the relationship between students' CPS-SE and their science learning achievement. Convenience sampling was used to select 1,045 students from coeducational secondary schools in five Taiwan counties. The dimensions and items of the scale were constructed based on the 2015 CPS assessment framework of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). The scale analysis process comprised of five stages: (1) item analysis, (2) exploratory factor analysis, (3) reliability analysis, (4) confirmatory factor analysis, and (5) cross-validation. Three noteworthy results were found. First, there were three factors extracted through factor analysis during the establishment of construct validity: sharing understanding, taking action on problems, and team organization. Second, the Cronbach's α for each subscale exceeded .95. Applied Structural Equation Model (SEM) the best fit and most parsimonious model was chosen based on model comparisons. Statistical analysis of the model showed goodness-of-fit to the data, which indicated that CPS-SE scale had high consistency and reliability. Third, students who were high and medium academic achievers on science learning scored significantly higher than those who were low academic achievers on three subscales: sharing understanding, taking action on problems, and team organization. There was no significant difference between high-achieving and medium-achieving students on the three subscales.

1. 彭淑玲, S.-L.(2019)。知覺教師回饋，個人成就目標，學業自我效能與無聊之關係：中介效果與條件間接化效果分析。教育心理學報，51(1)，83-108。
   連結：
2. 趙珮晴, P.-C.,余民寧, M.-N.(2012)。自律學習策略與自我效能、學習興趣、學業成就的相關研究。教育研究集刊，58(3)，1-32。
   連結：
3. Aguado, D.,Rico, R.,Sánchez-Manzanares, M.,Salas, E.(2014).Teamwork Competency Test (TWCT): A step forward on measuring teamwork competencies.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,18(2),101-121.
4. Arieli-Attali, M.(2019).Book review: Innovative assessment of collaboration (Methodology of educational measurement and assessment) by von Davier, A. A., Zhu, M., & Kyllonen, P. C. (Eds.).Applied Psychological Measurement,43(1),89-91.
5. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
6. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
7. Bandura, A.(2006).Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents,Greenwich, CT:
8. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York, NY:W. H. Freeman.
9. Bandura, A.(2001).Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective.Annual Review of Psychology,52,1-26.
10. Bandura, A.,Caprara, G. V.,Barbaranelli, C.,Gerbino, M.,Pastorelli, C.(2003).Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning.Child Development,74(3),769-782.
11. Bentler, P. M.,Yuan, K.-H.(1999).Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics.Multivariate Behavioral Research,34(2),181-197.
12. Byrne, B. M.(2010).Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.New York, NY:Routledge.
13. Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,Tannenbaum, S. I.,Salas, E.,Volpe, C. E.(1995).Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements.Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations,San Francisco, CA:
14. Care, E.(Ed.),Griffin, P.(Ed.),Wilson, M.(Ed.)(2018).Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Research and applications.Cham, Switzerland:Springer.
15. Chiu, M. M.(2000).Group problem-solving processes: Social interactions and individual actions.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,30(1),26-49.
16. Cooke, N. J.,Salas, E.,Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,Stout, R. J.(2000).Measuring team knowledge.Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,42(1),151-173.
17. De Boeck, P.,Scalise, K.(2019).Collaborative problem solving: Processing actions, time, and performance.Frontiers in Psychology,10
18. Fiore, S. M.,Graesser, A.,Greiff, S.,Griffin, P.,Gong, B.,Kyllonen, P.(2017).Collaborative problem solving: Considerations for the National Assessment of Educational Progress.Alexandria, VA:National Center for Education Statistics.
19. Griffin, P.,Care, E.(2015).ATC21S method.Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
20. Griffin, P.,Care, E.,McGaw, B.(2012).The changing role of education and schools.Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
21. Hair, J.,Black, W.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
22. Hammack, R.,Ivey, T.(2017).Examining elementary teachers’ engineering self-efficacy and engineering teacher efficacy.School Science and Mathematics,117(1-2),52-62.
23. Harding, S.-M. E.,Griffin, P. E.,Awwal, N.,Alom, B. M. M.,Scoular, C.(2017).Measuring collaborative problem solving using mathematics-based tasks.AERA Open,3(3),1-19.
24. Hesse, F.,Care, E.,Buder, J.,Sassenberg, K.,Griffin, P.(2015).A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills.Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
25. Judge, T. A.,Erez, A.,Bono, J. E.,Thoresen, C. J.(2002).Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(3),693-710.
26. Kyllonen, P. C.(2012).Measurement of 21st century skills within the common core state standards.Invitational Research Symposium on Technology Enhanced Assessments,Washington, DC:
27. Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth(2006).Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning.Winnipeg, Canada:Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth.
28. Miwa, M.(2005).Bandura’s social cognition.Theories of information behavior,Medford, NJ:
29. Oliveri, M. E.,Lawless, R.,Molloy, H.(2017).A literature review on collaborative problem solving for college and workforce readiness.ETS Research Report Series,2017(1),1-27.
30. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2015 draft collaborative problem solving framework. Retrieved May 20, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/callsfortenders/Annex%20ID_PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf
31. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017a). PISA 2015 collaborative problem solving framework. Retrieved May 20, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf
32. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2017).PISA 2015 results: Collaborative problem solving.Paris, France:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
33. Ramdass, D.,Zimmerman, B. J.(2011).Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework.Journal of Advanced Academics,22(2),194-218.
34. Robertson Evia, J.,Peterman, K.,Cloyd, E.,Besley, J.(2018).Validating a scale that measures scientists’ self-efficacy for public engagement with science.International Journal of Science Education, Part B,8(1),40-52.
35. Schunk, D. H.(1995).Self-efficacy and education and instruction.Selfefficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application,New York, NY:
36. Schunk, D. H.,Zimmerman, B. J.(2007).Influencing children’s self-efficacy and selfregulation of reading and writing through modeling.Reading & Writing Quarterly,23(1),7-25.
37. Sorić, I.,Palekčić, M.(2009).The role of students’ interests in self-regulated learning: The relationship between students’ interests, learning strategies and causal attributions.European Journal of Psychology of Education,24(4),545-565.
38. Stevens, M. J.,Campion, M. A.(1994).The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management.Journal of Management,20(2),503-530.
39. Ullman, J. B.(2001).Structural equation modeling.Using multivariate statistics,Needham Heights, MA:
40. von Davier, A. A.(Ed.),Zhu, M.(Ed.),Kyllonen, P. C.(Ed.)(2017).Innovative assessment of collaboration.Cham, Switzerland:Springer.
41. Wang, L., & Pollastri, A. R. (2019). User’s guide to the collaborative problem solving adherence & impact measures (CPS-AIMs). Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://thinkkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Users-Guide-to-Collaborative-Problem-Solving-Aims-ImpactMeasures-CPS-AIMs.pdf
42. Zimmerman, B. J.(2000).Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),82-91.
43. 吳毓瑩, Y.-Y.(1996)。量表奇偶點數的效度議題。調查研究，2，5-34。
44. 李茂能, M.-N.(2019).結構方程模式理論與實務：圖解AMOS取向.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
45. 林碧芳, P.-F,邱皓政, H.-J.(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(1)，141-169。
46. 邱皓政, H.-J.(2019).量化研究與統計分析：SPSS與R資料分析範例解析.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
47. 國立編譯館=National Institute for Compilation and Translation(2000).教育大辭書.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:文景=Win Join.
48. 國家教育研究院(2018年11月2日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：自然科學領域。查詢日期：2020年5月20日，檢自https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/class_schema/%E8%AA%B2%E7%B6%B1/17-%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8/17-1/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%AD%E5%B0%8F%E5%AD%B8%E6%9A%A8%E6%99%AE%E9%80%9A%E5%9E%8B%E9%AB%98%E7%B4%9A%E4%B8%AD%E7%AD%89%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E2%94%80%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8%E9%A0%98%E5%9F%9F.pdf。 [National Academy for Educational Research. (2018, November 2). Shiernian guomin jibenjiaoyu kecheng gangyao—Guomin zhongxiaoxue ji putongxing gaoji zhongdeng xuexiao: Ziran kexue lingyu. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/class_schema/%E8%AA%B2%E7%B6%B1/17-%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8/17-1/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%AD%E5%B0%8F%E5%AD%B8%E6%9A%A8%E6%99%AE%E9%80%9A%E5%9E%8B%E9%AB%98%E7%B4%9A%E4%B8%AD%E7%AD%89%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E2%94%80%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8%E9%A0%98%E5%9F%9F.pdf]