國小資深與資淺教師教學覺察力表現比較之個案研究

Comparing Experienced and Novice Teachers' Performance in Three Phases of the Noticing Measurement: A Case Study

10.6173/CJSE.202012_28(4).0004

林勇吉(Yung-Chi Lin)；陳姿蒨(Tzu-Chian Chen)

國小數學教師 ； 教師覺察力 ； 評量 ； Elementary School Mathematics Teachers ； Teacher Noticing ； Assessment

科學教育學刊

28卷4期（2020 / 12 / 01）

379 - 402

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討資深與資淺國小教師，在不同評量「提問」階段（開放問題、具體問題、自由回看）的數學覺察力表現有何差異。本研究採用個案研究法，以五位資深國小教師（年資超過八年）、五位資淺國小教師（年資低於三年）為研究對象。研究程序為兩組教師分別接受一對一訪談，在觀看教學影片後，接受連續三個不同設計（開放問題、具體問題、自由回看）的覺察力評量施測。研究結果指出：一、資深教師在「開放問題」的表現優於資淺教師，能夠指出較多的關鍵事件（n＝19 vs. 4）。二、資深與資淺教師在「具體問題」與「自由回看」的整體差異不大。在具體問題中（總平均：資深vs.資淺＝0.55 vs.0.54），資淺教師在注意向度的表現略佳（0.71 ＞ 0.66）、資深教師在回應的向度表現略佳（0.45 ＞ 0.35）；在自由回看中，兩組教師均致力於擴展在第一階段已提過的評論（資深＝資淺＝38％），以及再次回答原本答錯的具體問題（資深＝35％；資淺＝34％）。三、本研究從影片中定義11個關鍵事件，平均而言資深教師能指出較多的關鍵事件（M＝6.6），並且將近半數在第一階段開放問題就能指出（49％）；相對的資淺教師平均能指出的關鍵事件略少（M＝5.6），超過半數都需要具體問題的指引才能指出（61％）。四、影片長度的差異（1～5分鐘）似乎不影響兩組教師的表現。

The purpose of this study was to compare the teaching observation abilities of five experienced mathematics teachers with the teaching abilities of five novice mathematics teachers. A case study method was adopted for this study, and data were collected from teachers using open-ended questions, structured questions and second time viewing the videos. Researchers conducted one-on-one interviews with all the participants. During these interviews, participants were asked to watch four short (1-5-minute) classroom teaching videos. After watching each video three times, the participants were asked to answer open-ended questions and structured questions, and to write down comments in response to the instruction presented in the video based on their knowledge of teaching. Results indicated that the experienced teachers were able to point out more critical events in the open-ended question phase; however, there was a slight difference between experienced and novice teachers regarding their answers to the structured questions after viewing the videos a second time. Novice teachers appeared to perform slightly better in the attending-to category (0.71 ＞ 0.66), while the experienced teachers performed better in the responding category (0.45 ＞ 0.35). A third finding showed that experienced teachers were slightly better in identifying critical events (M = 6.6) than the novice teachers (M = 5.6). Finally, the length of the videos did not seem to influence the performance of either group in answering the structured questions.

1. Beilstein, S. O.,Perry, M.,Bates, M. S.(2017).Prompting meaningful analysis from pre-service teachers using elementary mathematics video vignettes.Teaching and Teacher Education,63,285-295.
2. Berliner, D. C.(2004).,未出版
3. Berliner, D. C.,Stein, P.,Sabers, D.,Clarridge, P. B.,Cushing, K.,Pinnegar, S.(1988).Implications of research on pedagogical expertise and experience for mathematics teaching.Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching,Reston, VA:
4. Carter, K.,Cushing, K.,Sabers, D.,Stein, P.,Berliner, D. C.(1988).Expert-novice differences in perceiving and processing visual classroom information.Journal of Teacher Education,39(3),25-31.
5. Choy, B. H.(2014).Noticing critical incidents in a mathematics classroom.37th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA),Sydney, Australia:
6. de Araujo, Z.,Amador, J.,Estapa, A.,Weston, T.,Aming-Attai, R.,Kosko, K. W.(2015).Animating preservice teachers’ noticing.Mathematics Teacher Education and Development,17(2),25-44.
7. Estapa, A. T.,Amador, J.,Kosko, K. W.,Weston, T.,de Araujo, Z.,Aming-Attai, R.(2018).Preservice teachers’ articulated noticing through pedagogies of practice.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,21(4),387-415.
8. Goodell, J. E.(2006).Using critical incident reflections: A self-study as a mathematics teacher educator.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,9(3),221-248.
9. Goodwin, C.(1994).Professional vision.American Anthropologist,96(3),606-633.
10. Huang, R.,Li, Y.(2012).What matters most: A comparison of expert and novice teachers’ noticing of mathematics classroom events.School Science and Mathematics,112(7),420-432.
11. Hughes, J. E.,Packard, B. W.-L.,Pearson, P. D.(2000).The role of hypermedia cases on preservice teachers’ views of reading instruction.Action in Teacher Education,22(Suppl. 2),24-38.
12. Jacobs, V. R.,Lamb, L. L. C.,Philipp, R. A.(2010).Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,41(2),169-202.
13. Kagan, D. M.(1992).Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers.Review of Educational Research,62(2),129-169.
14. Kaiser, G.,Busse, A.,Hoth, J.,König, J.,Blömeke, S.(2015).About the complexities of video-based assessments: Theoretical and methodological approaches to overcoming shortcomings of research on teachers’ competence.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,13(2),369-387.
15. Kersting, N.(2008).Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics.Educational and Psychological Measurement,68(5),845-861.
16. Kilic, H.(2018).Pre-service mathematics teachers’ noticing skills and scaffolding practices.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,16(2),377-400.
17. Kleinknecht, M.,Gröschner, A.(2016).Fostering preservice teachers’ noticing with structured video feedback: Results of an online- and video-based intervention study.Teaching and Teacher Education,59,45-56.
18. Leinhardt, G.,Putnam, R. T.,Stein, M. K.,Baxter, J.(1991).Where subject knowledge matters.Advances in research on teaching,Greenwich, CT:
19. Leslie, D.,Lorraine, M. M.,Julie, M. A.,Darrell, E.(2018).Curricular noticing: A framework to describe teachers’ interactions with curriculum materials.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,49(5),521-532.
20. Mason, J.(2002).Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing.London, UK:Routledge Falmer.
21. Meschede, N.,Fiebranz, A.,Möller, K.,Steffensky, M.(2017).Teachers’ professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs: On its relation and differences between preservice and in-service teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,66,158-170.
22. Mitchell, R. N.,Marin, K. A.(2015).Examining the use of a structured analysis framework to support prospective teacher noticing.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,18(6),551-575.
23. Pouta, M.,Lehtinen, E.,Palonen, T.(2020).Student teachers’ and experienced teachers’ professional vision of students’ understanding of the rational number concept.Educational Psychology Review
24. Rosaen, C. L.,Lundeberg, M.,Cooper, M.,Fritzen, A.,Terpstra, M.(2008).Noticing noticing how does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences?.Journal of Teacher Education,59(4),347-360.
25. Sabers, D. S.,Cushing, K. S.,Berliner, D. C.(1991).Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensional and immediacy.American Educational Research Journal,28(1),63-88.
26. Schoenfeld, A. H.(1998).Toward a theory of teaching-in-context.Issues in Education,4(1),1-94.
27. Schön, D. A.(1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.New York, NY:Basic Books.
28. Seidel, T.,Stürmer, K.,Blomberg, G.,Kobarg, M.,Schwindt, K.(2011).Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others?.Teaching and Teacher Education,27(2),259-267.
29. Sherin, M. G.(Ed.),Jacobs, V. R.(Ed.),Philipp, R. A.(Ed.)(2011).Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes.London, UK:Routledge.
30. Sherin, M. G.,van Es, E. A.(2005).Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interations.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,13(3),475-491.
31. Simpson, A.,Vondrová, N.,Žalská, J.(2018).Sources of shifts in pre-service teachers’ patterns of attention: The roles of teaching experience and of observational experience.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,21(6),607-630.
32. Stahnke, R.,Schueler, S.,Roesken-Winter, B.(2016).Teachers’ perception, interpretationand decision-making: A systematic review of empirical mathematics education research.ZDM Mathematics Education,48(1),1-27.
33. Star, J. R.,Lynch, K.,Perova, N.(2011).Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ abilities to attend to classroom features: A replication study.Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes,New York, NY:
34. Star, J. R.,Strickland, S. K.(2008).Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,11(2),107-125.
35. van Es, E. A.,Sherin, M. G.(2002).Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,10(4),571-596.
36. van Es, E. A.,Sherin, M. G.(2008).Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club.Teaching and Teacher Education,24(2),244-276.
37. van Es, E. A.,Sherin, M. G.(2006).How different video club designs support teachers in “learning to notice.”.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education,22(4),125-135.
38. Vondrová, N.(2018).The effect of a video-based intervention on the knowledge-based reasoning of future mathematics teachers.Invited lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education,Cham, Switzerland:
39. Yin, R. K.(2017).Case study research and applications: Design and methods.London, UK:Sage.
40. 林勇吉, Y.-C.(2017)。真的只有教師知識和信念嗎？數學教師覺察力：從另一個觀點來看待教師的專業能力。科學教育月刊，402，2-15。
41. 陳姿蒨, T.-C.(2018)。新竹市=Hsinchu, Taiwan，國立清華大學數理教育研究所=National Tsing Hua University。
42. 傅昶詳, C.-H.,林勇吉, Y.-C.(2017)。調查國小教師數學教學覺察力之個案研究。2017第九屆科技與數學教育國際學術研討會暨數學教學工作坊，臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan: