题名

高中資訊科技教科書資訊科學史內容分析

并列篇名

Content Analysis of the History of Computer Science in Senior High School Information Technology Textbooks

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.202106_29(2).0004

作者

陳秋燕(Chiu-Yen Chen);邱瓊芳(Chiung-Fang Chiu);吳正己(Cheng-Chih Wu)

关键词

資訊科技教科書 ; 資訊科學 ; 資訊科學史 ; Information Technology Textbook ; Computer Science ; History of Computer Science

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

29卷2期(2021 / 06 / 01)

页次

167 - 189

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在分析高中資訊科技教科書中資訊科學史的呈現情形。研究首先建立「資訊科學史篇幅分析表」及「資訊科學史內容分析表」,分別針對資訊科學史所占篇幅及內容進行分析,內容分析類目包括:圖片內容、主題領域、年代、事件貢獻者及因果脈絡敘述等五項。接著針對13套通過教育部審定之高中資訊科技教科書進行分析。研究結果顯示,資訊科技教科書中之資訊科學史:(1)篇幅介於0.20%~5.40%,平均每套占2.20%;(2)呈現形式以文字為主;(3)圖片內容以設備為主;(4)軟體領域出現最多;(5)年代大多是在1946年Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer(ENIAC)發明後;(6)貢獻者以組織機構為多;(7)以簡單事實無因果脈絡的敘述為主。研究亦發現課程綱要及教科書作者是影響教科書資訊科學史呈現的重要因素。本研究建議未來課程綱要應將資訊科學史納入學習內容,並增進教師及教科書作者的資訊科學史素養。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to analyze how the History of Computer Science (HoCS) is presented in senior high school information technology textbooks. The review checklists for analyzing the contents of HoCS in the textbooks were developed and contained the following topics: space allocated, type of pictures, field, era, contributor, and context about the evolution of computer science theories or techniques. A total of 13 senior high school information technology textbooks endorsed by the Taiwan Ministry of Education were analyzed. The findings of this study were as follows: (1) the space allocated to HoCS ranged from 0.20% to 5.40% (an average of 2.20%); (2) the main format of history presentation used in HoCS was text; (3) the pictures used in HoCS mainly featured equipment; (4) the most discussed field in HoCS was software; (5) the era of history incidents presented in HoCS occurred mainly in the years after the invention of the Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer (ENIAC) in 1946; (6) the names of contributors mentioned in HoCS were mostly organizations; (7) the narrative of HoCS is mainly simple and without much further explanation about the evolution of computer science theories or techniques. In addition, this study found that the computer science curriculum guidelines and textbook authors were important factors affecting how HoCS was presented in these textbooks. Based on these findings, the researchers of this study posit that HoCS should be included in the learning content of future computer science curriculum guidelines. Furthermore, teachers' and textbook authors' literacy of HoCS should also be enhanced.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 呂紹海, S.-H.,巫俊明, C.-M.(2008)。國小「自然與生活科技」教科書中科學史內容之分析。新竹教育大學教育學報,25(2),1-31。
    連結:
  2. 林育慈, Y.-T.,吳正己, C.-C.(2016)。運算思維與中小學資訊科技課程。教育脈動電子期刊,6,38-53。
    連結:
  3. 林陳涌, C.-Y.,鄭榮輝, Y.-T.,張永達, J.-H.(2009)。融入科學史教學對高中學生的科學本質觀、對科學的態度以及學習成就的影響。科學教育學刊,17(2),93-109。
    連結:
  4. 邱奕華, Y.-H.,劉湘瑤, S.-Y.(2014)。科學史教學對學生科學認識觀與概念學習的影響—不同教學順序的比較。科學教育學刊,22(3),307-330。
    連結:
  5. 許良榮, L.-R.,蕭培玉, P.-Y.(2007)。中小學之科學本質與科學史的教學需求之研究 history of science” in elementary and secondary schools。科學教育學刊,15(1),1-23。
    連結:
  6. 傅麗玉, L.-Y.(2001)。兒童科技史:臺灣兒童讀物中科技史材料之研究。科學教育學刊,9(4),417-434。
    連結:
  7. 熊同鑫, T.-H.(2013)。自然與生活科技領域教科書中的多元文化圖像。教科書研究,6(3),35-57。
    連結:
  8. Ainsworth, S.(1999).The functions of multiple representations.Computers & Education,33(2-3),131-152.
  9. Aycock, J.(2015).Applied computer history: Experience teaching systems topics through retro games.the Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference 2015,New York, NY:
  10. Cass, S.(2020).Careers: The top programming languages: Our latest rankings put Python on top—again.IEEE Spectrum,57(8),22-22.
  11. Ceruzzi, P. E.(2003).A history of modern computing.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  12. Chen, Y. F.,Wu, C.-C.(2013).Bring history of computing into high school CS curriculum: Teachers’ perspectives.2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering,Macau, China:
  13. Chiu, C.-F.(2015).Programming examples analysis of commercial vocational high school textbooks in Taiwan.2015 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering,Taipei, Taiwan:
  14. Clary, R. M.,Wandersee, J. H.(2015).The history of science in the science classroom: The past is the key to the future in science education.Earth Sciences History,34(2),310-332.
  15. Clough, M. P.(2017).History and nature of science in science education.Science education,Rotterdam, The Netherland:
  16. Drakopoulou, M.,Skordoulis, C.,Halkia, K.(2005).History of science in 20th century Greek science textbooks of primary education.International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference,Leeds, UK:
  17. Draper, G. M.,Kessler, R. R.,Riesenfeld, R. F.(2009).A history of computing course with a technical focus.ACM SIGCSE Bulletin,41(1),458-462.
  18. Garrison, D. R.(2011).E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice.New York, NY:Routledge.
  19. Gauld, C.(1992).Wilberforce, Huxley & the use of history in teaching about evolution.The American Biology Teacher,54(7),406-410.
  20. Ge, Y.-P.,Unsworth, L.,Wang, K.-H.,Chang, H.-P.(2018).What images reveal: A comparative study of science images between Australian and Taiwanese junior high school textbooks.Research in Science Education,48,1409-1431.
  21. Hazzan, O.,Lapidot, T.,Ragonis, N.(2015).Guide to teaching computer science: An activity-based approach.London, UK:Springer.
  22. Höttecke, D.,Silva, C. C.(2011).Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: An analysis of obstacles.Science & Education,20,293-316.
  23. Impagliazzo, J.,Lee, J. A.(2004).Using computing history to enhance teaching.IFIP International Conference on the History of Computing,Toulouse, France:
  24. Jiao, Q.,Lv, H.(2009).Cultural function and spiritual value of computer science history and computer science education.2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science,Wuhan, China:
  25. Kozma, R.(2003).The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding.Learning and Instruction,13,205-226.
  26. Leiner, B. M.,Cerf, V. G.,Clark, D. D.,Kahn, R. E.,Kleinrock, L.,Lynch, D. C.(1997).The past and future history of the Internet.Communications of the ACM,40(2),102-108.
  27. Leite, L.(2002).History of science in science education: Development and validation of achecklist for analysing the historical content of science textbooks.Science & Education,11,333-359.
  28. Lin, J. M.-C.,Lin, K.-Y.,Wu, C.-C.(1999).A content analysis of programming examples in high school computer textbooks in Taiwan.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,18(3),225-244.
  29. Liu, Y.,Treagust, D. F.(2013).Content analysis of diagrams in secondary school science textbooks.Critical analysis of science textbooks,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
  30. Ma, Y.,Wan, Y.(2017).History of science content analysis of Chinese science textbooks from the perspective of acculturation.Science & Education,26(6),669-690.
  31. Matthews, M. R.(2014).Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science, 20th anniversary revised and expanded edition.New York, NY:Routledge.
  32. Matthews, M. R.(2015).History of science in the curriculum.Encyclopedia of science education,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
  33. McDonald, C. V.(2016).Evaluating junior secondary science textbook usage in Australian schools.Research in Science Education,46,481-509.
  34. Myers, B. A.(1998).A brief history of human-computer interaction technology.Interactions,5(2),44-54.
  35. Niaz, M.(2000).A rational reconstruction of the kinetic molecular theory of gases based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for chemistry textbooks.Instructional Science,28,23-50.
  36. O’Regan, G.(2018).EDVAC and ENIAC computers.The innovation in computing companion,Cham, Switzerland:
  37. Oldroyd, D. R.(1977).Teaching the history of chemistry in New South Wales secondary schools.Australian Science Teachers Journal,23(2),9-22.
  38. Orpwood, G. W. F.,Souque, J.-P.(1984).Science education in Canadian schools. Volume I. Introduction and curriculum analyses.Ottawa, Canada:Science Council of Canada.
  39. Panetta, K. (2017, October 3). Gartner top 10 strategic technology trends for 2018. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2018
  40. Pekdağ, B.,Azizoğlu, N.(2020).History-based instruction enriched with various sources of situational interest on the topic of the atom: The effect on students’ achievement and interest.Research in Science Education,50,1187-1215.
  41. Rupf, J. A.(2004).Teaching the history of computing (painlessly).Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges,20(2),212-218.
  42. Scherer, R.,Siddiq, F.,Sánchez Viveros, B.(2019).The cognitive benefits of learning computer programming: A meta-analysis of transfer effects.Journal of Educational Psychology,111(5),764-792.
  43. Solbes, J.,Traver, M.(2003).Against a negative image of science: History of science and the teaching of physics and chemistry.Science & Education,12,703-717.
  44. Tatnall, A.(2012).Reflections on the history of computing: Preserving memories and sharing stories.New York, NY:Springer.
  45. Walrand, J.,Varaiya, P. P.(2000).High-performance communication networks.San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann.
  46. Whitman, D.(2004).The mad, mad world of textbook adoption.Washington DC:Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
  47. Winegrad, D.(1996).Celebrating the birth of modern computing: The fiftieth anniversary of a discovery at the Moore School of Engineering of the University of Pennsylvania.IEEE Annals of the History of Computing,18(1),5-9.
  48. Wolfer, J.(2017).Embedding a sense of history in the computing curriculum: Historic influences on a custom CPU instruction set.2017 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference,Santos, Brazil:
  49. Wu, C.-C.,Lee, G. C.,Lai, H.-K.(2004).Using concept maps to aid analysis of concept presentation in high school computer textbooks.Education and Information Technologies,9(2),185-197.
  50. Yacoubian, H. A.,Al-Khatib, L.,Mardirossian, T.(2017).Analysis of the image of scientists portrayed in the Lebanese national science textbooks.Science & Education,26,513-528.
  51. Zendler, A.,Reile, S.(2018).The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning outcome in computer science education.Studies in Educational Evaluation,58,132-144.
  52. 吳正己, C.-C.(2020)。資訊科技課程發展沿革。中學資訊科技教材教法,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
  53. 國家教育研究院(2018b年9月20日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中學暨普通型高級中等學校:科技領域。查詢日期:2020年10月29日,檢自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=6852。[National Academy for Educational Research. (2018b, September 20). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for junior high schools and general senior high schools: Technology. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=6852]
  54. 國家教育研究院(2018a年11月2日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校:自然科學領域。查詢日期:2020年10月29日,檢自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=6572。[National Academy for Educational Research. (2018a, November 2). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary, junior high schools and general senior high schools: Natural sciences. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=6572]
  55. 教育部=Ministry of Education(1983).高級中學課程標準.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:正中=Cheng Chung.
  56. 教育部=Ministry of Education(1996).高級中學課程標準.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Author.
  57. 教育部(2018年5月23日)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要自然與生活科技學習領域。查詢日期:2020年10月29日,檢自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/722/67284.pdf。[Ministry of Education. (2008, May 23). Guidelines of grade 1–9 curriculum for elementary and junior high school education: Science and technology learning area. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/722/67284.pdf]
  58. 許良榮, L.-R.,邱玉如, Y.-J.(2003)。國內大專用書「自然科學概論」內容之潛在問題分析。科學教育月刊,262,2-12。
  59. 陳勇志, Y.-J.,洪木利, M.-L.,林財庫, T.-K.(1998)。現行國中理化教科書的科學史內容之分析。科學與教育學報,2,181-204。
  60. 普通高級中學課程發展委員會、普通高級中學課程總綱修訂小組、普通高級中學各科課程綱要專案小組編(2009)。普通高級中學課程綱要。臺北市:教育部。[Putong Gaoji Zhongxue Kecheng Fazhan Weiyuanhui, Putong Gaoji Zhongxue Kecheng Zonggang Xiuding Xiaozu, & Putong Gaoji Zhongxue Geke Kecheng Gangyao Zhuanan Xiaozu. (Eds.). (2009). Curriculum guidelines of senior high school education: General guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.]
  61. 楊國樞, G.-S.,文崇一, C.-Y.,吳聰賢,李亦園, Y.-Y.(2001).社會及行為科學研究法.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:東華=Tunghua.