社會性科學議題建模課程對師資生公路選線決策的影響

The Impacts of Socioscientific Issue Modeling Curriculum for Preservice Teachers' Decision Making on Highway Route Selection

10.6173/CJSE.202109_29(3).0002

鄭子善(Tzu-Shan Cheng)；林靜雯(Jing-Wen Lin)；李宜諺(Yi-Yen Lee)；林錦鴻(Chin-Hung Lin)

SageModeler ； 公路選線 ； 決策 ； 社會性科學議題 ； 社會性科學議題建模課程 ； SageModeler ； Highway Route Selection ； Decision Making ； Socioscientific Issue ； Socioscientific Issue Modeling Curriculum

科學教育學刊

29卷3期（2021 / 09 / 01）

219 - 243

繁體中文

東豐公路的興建需求源於921地震震斷了東勢到豐原唯一的聯絡道路，影響居民就醫與物資運送。本研究採個案研究法，以東豐公路選線這個真實的社會性科學議題（Socio-scientific Issue, SSI），探討SSI建模課程對師資生公路選線決策面向與品質的影響，以及決策方案和決策面向與品質之間的關聯性。本研究的研究對象為六組，共23位某國立大學參與「科學統整課程設計」課程的師資生。研究者設計決策因素表格與SageModeler電腦建模兩種不同建模表徵工具，進行兩輪建立—評鑑—修正建模循環歷程（Generation-Evaluation-Modification）的SSI建模課程。研究結果顯示師資生對此議題的決策面向主要著重於安全與經濟，並由一開始關注地震影響交通「安全」及居民「社會」正義的面向，逐漸關注到此條道路在爭議中卻已投入成本興建一半的「經濟」面向。而在決策品質部分，隨著SSI建模課程介入，師資生的決策品質逐步上升，逐漸能掌握單一因素中「可比較與量測」的特質，並提供更為「充足的證據或理由」支持決策，但對於因素間關係仍停留於同因素面向的縱向連結，須藉助SageModeler電腦建模工具才出現少量跨面向考量的橫向連結。多數組別的決策方案前後一致，但都提出更多科學性證據或決策因素而增強了決策品質。

The demand for the construction of the Dongfeng Highway originated after the 921 earthquake that disrupted the only connecting road from Dongshi to Fengyuan, affecting residents' medical treatment and material transportation. Utilizing the authentic Socioscientific Issue (SSI) of Dongfeng Highway route selection, this study explored the impact of this SSI modeling curriculum on the decision-making aspects and quality of highway route selection, the decision-making plan, and the relationship between decision-making aspects and quality. This study involved six groups of 23 preservice teachers from a national university who participated in a Science Integrated Curriculum Design course. This study used a decision factors table and SageModeler, two representational modeling tools, to conduct two SSI modeling cycles of Generation-Evaluation-Modification. Results showed that the decision-making aspects of preservice teachers on this issue mainly focus on safety and the economy. Their attention went to the earthquake's impact on traffic ＂safety＂ and the ＂social＂ justice issues faced by residents, and then slowly shifted to the road involved in the dispute-the ＂economic＂ aspect of construction at half the cost. With the intervention of SSI modeling courses regarding decision-making quality, the preservice teachers' decision-making quality gradually increased. They grasped ＂comparable and measurable＂ characteristics in a single factor and provided more ＂sufficient evidence or reasons＂ to support their decision-making. Despite this, they provided the vertical connection of the same factor aspect. Only with the assistance of SageModeler could they use a small amount of cross-aspects consideration of the horizontal connection. The majority of the participants presented consistent decision-making plans, but they all incorporated more scientific evidence or decision-making factors to enhance decision-making quality.

1. 吳貞儀, J.-Y,許瑛玿, Y.-S,張文馨, W.-X,方素琦, S.-C.(2017)。社會性科學議題線上教學模組對高中生多元面向決策的影響。數位學習科技期刊，9(3)，69-94。
   連結：
2. 林昇邦, S.-P.,許瑛玿, Y.-S.(2017)。高中學生決策能力與氣候變遷調適素養改變之教學研究。科學教育學刊，25(S)，413-437。
   連結：
3. Alred, A. R.,Dauer, J. M.(2020).Understanding factors related to undergraduate student decision-making about a complex socio-scientific issue: Mountain lion management.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,16(2)
4. Bielik, T.,Opitz, S. T.,Novak, A. M.(2018).Supporting students in building and using models: Development on the quality and complexity dimensions.Education Sciences,8(3)
5. Borgerding, L. A.,Dagistan, M.(2018).Preservice science teachers’ concerns and approaches for teaching socioscientific and controversial issues.Journal of Science Teacher Education,29(4),283-306.
6. Dauer, J. M.,Lute, M.,Straka, O.(2017).Indicators of informal and formal decision-making about a socioscientific issue.International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology,5(2),124-138.
7. Demir, E.(2016).Characteristics of 15-year-old students predicting scientific literacy skills in Turkey.International Education Studies,9(4),99-107.
8. Derman, A.,Kayacan, K.(2017).Investigating of the relationship between the views of the prospective science teachers on the nature of scientific models and their achievement on the topic of atom.European Journal of Education Studies,3(6),541-559.
9. Ebenezer, J. V.,Connor, S.(1998).Learning to teach science: A model for the 21st century.London, UK:Prentice-Hall.
10. Eilks, I.,Rauch, F.,Ralle, B.,Hofstein, A.(2013).How to allocate the chemistry curriculum between science and society.Teaching chemistry—A study book: A practical guide and textbook for student teachers, teacher trainees and teachers,Rotterdam, The Netherlands:
11. Fang, S.-C.,Hsu, Y.-S.,Lin, S.-S.(2019).Conceptualizing socioscientific decision making from a review of research in science education.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,17(3),427-448.
12. Frangopol, D. M.,Liu, M.(2007).Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost.Structure & Infrastructure Engineering,3(1),29-41.
13. Grace, M.(2009).Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting.International Journal of Science Education,31(4),551-570.
14. Khan, S.(2007).Model-based inquiries in chemistry.Science Education,91(6),877-905.
15. Khan, S.(2011).New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations.Journal of Science Education and Technology,20(3),215-232.
16. Kiker, G. A.,Bridges, T. S.,Varghese, A.,Seager, T. P.,Linkov, I.(2005).Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making.Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management,1(2),95-108.
17. Krell, M.,Upmeier zu Belzen, A.,Krüger, D.(2014).Students’ levels of understanding models and modelling in biology: Global or aspect-dependent?.Research in Science Education,44(1),109-132.
18. National Research Council(2013).Next generation science standards: For states, by states.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
19. Nida, S.,Mustikasari, V. R.,Eilks, I.(2021).Indonesian pre-service science teachers’ views on socio-scientific issues-based science learning.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,17(1)
20. Novak, J. D.,Gowin, D. B.(1984).Learning how to learn.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
21. Nurtamara, L.,Sajidan, Suranto,Prasetyanti, N. M.(2020).The effect of biotechology module with problem based learning in the socioscientific context to enhance students’ socioscientific decision making skills.International Education Studies,13(1),11-20.
22. Patronis, T.,Potari, D.,Spiliotopoulou, V.(1999).Students’ argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching.International Journal of Science Education,21(7),745-754.
23. Pedretti, E.,Nazir, J.(2011).Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on.Science Education,95(4),601-626.
24. Peel, A.,Zangori, L.,Friedrichsen, P.,Hayes, E.,Sadler, T.(2019).Students’ model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resistance through socio-scientific issues-based learning.International Journal of Science Education,41(4),510-532.
25. Pitiporntapin, S.,Yutakom, N.,Sadler, T. D.(2016).Thai pre-service science teachers’ struggles in using socio-scientific issues (SSIs) during practicum.Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,17(2)
26. Roberts, D. A.(2007).Scientific literacy/science literacy.Handbook of research on science education,Mahwah, NJ:
27. Sabel, J. L.,Vo, T.,Alred, A.,Dauer, J. M.,Forbes, C. T.(2017).Undergraduate students’ scientifically informed decision making about socio-hydrological issues.Journal of College Science Teaching,46(6),71-79.
28. Sadler, T. D.(2009).Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice.Studies in Science Education,45(1),1-42.
29. Sadler, T. D.(2004).Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(5),513-536.
30. Sadler, T. D.,Barab, S. A.,Scott, B.(2007).What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?.Research in Science Education,37(4),371-391.
31. Sadler, T. D.,Zeidler, D. L.(2005).Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(1),112-138.
32. Sormunen, K.,Hartikainen-Ahia, A.,Jäppinen, I.(2017).Quality of SSI scenarios designed by science teachers.Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research: Selected papers from the ESERA 2015 conference,Cham, Switzerland:
33. Ural, E.,Ercan, O.(2020).Exploring pre-service primary school teachers’ informal reasoning and argumentation levels on a socio-scientific issue: The issue of transgenic plants in the agriculture.International Journal of Research in Teacher Education,11(3),48-66.
34. Verhoeff, R. P.(2017).The use of drama in socio-scientific inquiry-based learning.Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research: Selected papers from the ESERA 2015 conference,Cham, Switzerland:
35. Zangori, L.,Foulk, J.,Sadler, T. D.,Peel, A.(2018).Exploring elementary teachers’ percep-tions and characterizations of model-oriented issue-based teaching.Journal of Science Teacher Education,29(7),555-577.
36. Zangori, L.,Peel, A.,Kinslow, A.,Friedrichsen, P.,Sadler, T. D.(2017).Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,54(10),1249-1273.
37. Zavadskas, E. K.,Liias, R.,Turskis, Z.(2008).Multi-attribute decision-making methods for assessment of quality in bridges and road construction: State-of-the-art surveys.The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering,3(3),152-160.
38. Zeidler, D. L.,Sadler, T. D.,Simmons, M. L.,Howes, E. V.(2005).Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education.Science Education,89(3),357-377.
39. 張菁雅（2016）。臺中東豐快河堤替代方案與自行車道共構。查詢日期：2020年12月11日，檢自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1805334。[Chang, Y.-C. (2016). Taichung Dongfengkuai heti tidai fangan yu zixingchedao gonggou. Re-trieved December 11, 2020, from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1805334]
40. 教育部（2018a）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：自然科學領域。臺北市：作者。[Ministry of Education. (2018a). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary school, junior high and general senior high schools―The domain of natural sciences. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]
41. 教育部（2018b）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：社會領域。臺北市：作者。[Ministry of Education. (2018b). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary school, junior high and general senior high schools―The domain of social studies. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]
42. 郭志榮、張光宗（2019）。東豐快有爭議，道路強碰斷層與農地，環境疑慮待解。查詢日期：2021年5月20日，檢自https://e-info.org.tw/node/229472。[Kuo, C.-J., & Chang, K.-T. (2019). Dongfengkuai you zhengyi, daolu qiangpeng duanceng yu nongdi, huanjing yilü daijie. Retrieved May 20, 2021, from https://e-info.org.tw/node/229472]
43. 臺中市政府建設局（2017）。東豐快速道路重新規劃內容專案報告。查詢日期：2020年12月12日，檢自https://www.rdec.taichung.gov.tw/media/209499/76271630571.pdf。[Construction Bureau of Taichung City Government. (2017). Dongfeng kuaisu daolu chongxin guihua neirong zhuanan baogao. Retrieved December 12, 2020, from https://www.rdec.taichung.gov.tw/media/209499/76271630571.pdf]
44. 歐素美（2020）。東豐快速道路公聽會，東勢分局出動大批警力維安。查詢日期：2021年1月12日，檢自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3273507。[Ou, S.-M (2020). Dongfeng kuaisu daolu gongtinghui, Dongshi fenju chudong dapi jingli weian. Retrieved January 12, 2021, from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3273507]