题名

國小生在探究式學習中自我效能感、表情符與科學概念理解之初探

并列篇名

A Preliminary Exploration of Perceived Self-Efficacy, Smileyometer, and Scientific Conceptual Understanding in Pupils' Inquiry Learning

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.202203_30(1).0002

作者

林美君(Mei-Chun Lin);陳欣珏(Hsin-Chueh Chen);張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang)

关键词

Go-Lab ; 自我效能感 ; 表情符 ; 結構化探究式學習 ; Go-Lab ; Perceived Self-Efficacy ; Smileyometer ; Structured Inquiry-Based Learning

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

30卷1期(2022 / 03 / 01)

页次

27 - 48

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在使用Go-Lab線上探究式教材模組,探討國小學童自我效能感、表情符與科學概念理解的關聯性,並瞭解正負向心情的相關因子。研究對象為新北市一所國民小學的五年級學生,共計73位。本研究採用前實驗研究的單組前後測設計法,並同時運用質性與量化的研究方法進行探討。研究者依學生在「自我效能感量表」與「表情符」的分數,將學生分成高、低兩個組別。結果顯示,結構化探究式學習有助於學生對水溶液酸鹼度科學概念的理解。另外,探究活動後,學生在自我效能感之「我鼓勵自己完成自然課的作業」項目有顯著提升。高自我效能感的學生不僅進步幅度較大,心情也較佳。同樣地,心情較佳的學生也會有較大的進步幅度。學生正向心情的相關因子為「學業成就感」,尤其是「學業成就感」中的「難易度」與「任務達成」兩個項目。然而,負向心情的學生,往往難以表達自己負向感受的具體理由。最後,研究者依據研究結果,提出未來在提升學生心情與自我效能感之教學實踐與研究上的若干建議。

英文摘要

This study aimed to explore the relationships among primary students' perceived self-efficacy, smileyometer, and understanding of scientific concepts, and to know the factors related to students' positive and negative moods via Go-Lab online teaching modules. The participants of this study were 73 fifth-graders at a primary school in New Taipei City. This study adopted a set of one-group pretest-posttest designs and used both qualitative and quantitative methods for data collection and analysis. The participants were assigned to either the high or the low group based on their scores on the perceived self-efficacy scale and the smileyometer. The results show that structured inquiry-based learning is beneficial for students to understand the scientific concept of acidity and alkalinity. In addition, after the inquiry activities, the participants significantly improved their scores on the perceived self-efficacy item "I motivate myself to complete science work and homework." Furthermore, the participants with higher perceived self-efficacy not only made greater academic progress but also were in a better mood. Similarly, the participants in a better mood also made greater academic progress. The main factor leading to a positive mood for the participants is their academic achievement, particularly the two sub-items "degree of difficulty" and "task accomplishment." However, the participants with negative moods could hardly express clear reasons for their negative feelings. Based on the results, the researcher provides suggestions for future instructional practices and studies to improve students' moods and perceived self-efficacy.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 陳欣珏, H.-C.,張俊彥, C.-Y.(2019)。網路探究活動對國中高、低批判思考能力學生之探究能力及演化概念知識的影響。科學教育學刊,27(4),229-250。
    連結:
  2. Alfieri, L.,Brooks, P. J.,Aldrich, N. J.,Tenenbaum, H. R.(2011).Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?.Journal of Educational Psychology,103(1),1-18.
  3. Azuma, J.,Ebner, M.(2008).A stylistic analysis of graphic emoticons: Can they be candidates for a universal visual language of the future?.Proceedings of EdMedia: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications
  4. Baadte, C.,Schnotz, W.(2014).Feedback effects on performance, motivation and mood: Are they moderated by the learner's self-concept?.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,58(5),570-591.
  5. Bakic, J.,Jepma, M.,De Raedt, R.,Pourtois, G.(2014).Effects of positive mood on probabilistic learning: Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.Biological Psychology,103,223-232.
  6. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.W. H. Freeman.
  7. Bell, R. L.,Smetana, L.,Binns, I.(2005).Simplifying inquiry instruction.The Science Teacher,72(7),30-33.
  8. Bradbury, N. A.(2016).Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more?.Advances in Physiology Education,40(4)
  9. Britner, S. L.,Pajares, F.(2006).Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,43(5),485-499.
  10. Bryan, T.,Bryan, J.(1991).Positive mood and math performance.Journal of Learning Disabilities,24(8),490-494.
  11. Bryan, T.,Mathur, S.,Sullivan, K.(1996).The impact of positive mood on learning.Learning Disability Quarterly,19(3),153-162.
  12. Corbalan, G.,Kester, L.,van Merriënboer, J. J. G.(2009).Dynamic task selection: Effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation.Learning and Instruction,19(6),455-465.
  13. de Jong, T.,Gillet, D.,Sotiriou, S.,Agogi, E.,Zacharia, Z.(2015).Designing inquiry learning spaces for online labs in the Go-Lab platform.16th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction
  14. de Jong, T.,Sotiriou, S.,Gillet, D.(2014).Innovations in STEM education: The Go-Lab federation of online labs.Smart Learning Environments,1(3)
  15. de Jong, T.,van Joolingen, W. R.(1998).Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains.Review of Educational Research,68(2),179-201.
  16. Dikke, D.,Faltin, N.(2015).Go-Lab MOOC—An online course for teacher professional development in the field of Inquiry-Based Science Education.7th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies
  17. Edelson, D. C.,Gordin, D. N.,Pea, R. D.(1999).Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design.Journal of the Learning Sciences,8(3-4),391-450.
  18. Epstein, M. L.,Epstein, B. B.,Brosvic, G. M.(2001).Immediate feedback during academic testing.Psychological Reports,88(3),889-894.
  19. Epstein, M. L.,Lazarus, A. D.,Calvano, T. B.,Matthews, K. A.,Hendel, R. A.,Epstein, B. B.,Brosvic, G. M.(2002).Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses.The Psychological Record,52(2),187-201.
  20. Eysink, T. H. S.,Gersen, L.,Gijlers, H.(2015).Inquiry learning for gifted children.High ability studies,26(1),63-74.
  21. Febrilia, I.,Warokka, A.(2011).The effects of positive and negative mood on university students’ learning and academic performance: Evidence from Indonesia.3rd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences
  22. Fernandez, F. B.(2017).Action research in the physics classroom: The impact of authentic, inquiry based learning or instruction on the learning of thermal physics.Asia-Pacific Science Education,3(3)
  23. Gillet, D.,de Jong, T.,Sotirou, S.,Salzmann, C.(2013).Personalised learning spaces and federated online labs for STEM education at school.2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)
  24. Herring, S.,Dainas, A.(2017).Nice picture comment! Graphicons in Facebook comment threads.50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  25. Heuven, E.,Bakker, A. B.,Schaufeli, W. B.,Huisman, N.(2006).The role of self-efficacy in performing emotion work.Journal of Vocational Behavior,69(2),222-235.
  26. Jackson, J. W.(2002).Enhancing self-efficacy and learning performance.The Journal of Experimental Education,70(3),243-254.
  27. Keselman, A.(2003).Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40(9),898-921.
  28. Ketelhut, D. J.(2007).The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment.Journal of Science Education and Technology,16(1),99-111.
  29. Krause, U.-M.,Stark, R.,Mandl, H.(2009).The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics.Learning and Instruction,19(2),158-170.
  30. Lee, Y.-J.(2008).A study of the influence of instructional innovation on learning satisfaction and study achievement.The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning,4(2),43-54.
  31. Liew, T. W.,Tan, S.-M.(2016).The effects of positive and negative mood on cognition and motivation in multimedia learning environment.Educational Technology & Society,19(2),104-115.
  32. Long, H. B.(1985).Contradictory expectations? Achievement and satisfaction in adult learning.Journal of Continuing Higher Education,33(3),10-12.
  33. Magen-Nagar, N.,Cohen, L.(2017).Learning strategies as a mediator for motivation and a sense of achievement among students who study in MOOCs.Education and Information Technologies,22(3),1271-1290.
  34. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.),Alexander, P. A.(Ed.)(2010).Handbook of research on learning and instruction.Handbook of research on learning.
  35. Mills, N.,Pajares, F.,Herron, C.(2007).Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation.Language Learning,57(3),417-442.
  36. Moreno, R.(2004).Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia.Instructional Science,32(1-2),99-113.
  37. Murphy, J. (2017, November 6). Make online messaging personal by embracing the nonverbal. http://bit.ly/3wfmIJv
  38. Narciss, S.,Huth, K.(2006).Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction.Learning and Instruction,16(4),310-322.
  39. Pedaste, M.,Mäeots, M.,Siiman, L. A.,de Jong, T.,van Riesen, S. A. N.,Kamp, E. T.,Manoli, C. C.,Zacharia, Z. C.,Tsourlidaki, E.(2015).Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle.Educational Research Review,14,47-61.
  40. Ramachaudran, V. S.(Ed.)(1994).Encyclopedia of human behavior.Academic Press.
  41. Read, J. C.(2008).Validating the Fun Toolkit: An instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology.Cognition, Technology & Work,10(2),119-128.
  42. Ruiz-Primo, M. A.,Shavelson, R. J.,Hamilton, L.,Klein, S.(2002).On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(5),369-393.
  43. Scrimin, S.,Mason, L.,Moscardino, U.(2014).School-related stress and cognitive performance: A mood-induction study.Contemporary Educational Psychology,39(4),359-368.
  44. Şen, C.Sezen Vekli, G.(2016).The impact of inquiry based instruction on science process skills and self-efficacy perceptions of pre-service science teachers at a university level biology laboratory.Universal Journal of Educational Research,4(3),603-612.
  45. Sulistiyo, M. A. S.,Wijaya, A.(2020).The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning on computational thinking skills and self-efficacy of high school students.Journal of Physics: Conference Series,1581
  46. Trautmann, N.,MaKinster, J.,Avery, L.(2004).What makes inquiry so hard? (and why is it worth it?).National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting
  47. Usher, E. L.,Pajares, F.(2008).Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: A validation study.Educational and Psychological Measurement,68(3),443-463.
  48. van der Sluis, F.,van Dijk, B.,Perloy, B.(2012).Measuring fun and enjoyment of children in a museum: Evaluating the Smileyometer.Proceedings of measuring behavior 2012
  49. Wood, R.,Bandura, A.(1989).Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,56(3),407-415.
  50. Yantraprakorn, P.,Darasawang, P.,Wiriyakarun, P.(2013).Enhancing self-efficacy through scaffolding.3rd International Conference on Foreign Language Learning and Teaching
  51. Zimmerman, B. J.(2000).Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),82-91.
  52. Zulkosky, K.(2009).Self-efficacy: A concept analysis.Nursing Forum,44(2),93-102.
  53. 教育部(2018年11月2日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校:自然科學領域。http://bit.ly/3vUz7DI [Ministry of Education (2018, November 2). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary, junior high schools and general senior high schools—Natural sciences. http://bit.ly/3vUz7DI]
  54. 教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱。https://reurl.cc/vdGND1 [Ministry of Education. (2008). General guidelines of grades 1-9 curriculum for elementary and junior high school education. https://reurl.cc/vdGND1]