题名

運用知識翻新活動提升學生在能源教育之認知與情意學習

并列篇名

Using Knowledge Building Activities to Enhance Students' Cognitive and Affective Learning in Energy Education

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.202209_30(3).0003

作者

曾莉婷(Li-Ting Tseng)；陳美如(Mei-Ju Chen)

关键词

知識翻新 ； 能源教育 ； 情意目標 ； 認知目標 ； Knowledge Building ； Energy Education ； Affective Goals ； Cognitive Goals

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

30卷3期（2022 / 09 / 01）

页次

241 - 265

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

面對世界的變革，一個人是否具有學習力並能跨域學習，從而創造新的知識，以解決當今所面臨的問題將成為關鍵。如今認知技能（認知）相關研究已累積豐富之研究結果，然而，情意面向卻長期受到忽略。本研究採個案研究，以13位小學中高年級的學生為研究對象，運用知識翻新理論與知識論壇的輔助，探討知識翻新活動對於學生在能源教育議題中之認知與情意學習的發展與關係，期望學生能對於能源議題提出真實的問題、理解並回應他人想法以形成觀點；能蒐集與分析資料、擬定研究計畫、創作能源屋。研究方法採質量混合，針對認知目標層次與情意目標層次進行分析與歸納，呈現認知與情意學習的歷程。研究結果發現，透過知識翻新之教學策略皆有助於提升認知及情意目標層次，且兩者具正相關，亦即學生不僅能運用所學解決遇到的真實問題，也培養樂在學習的積極態度。
英文摘要

As the world is continuously changing, it is crucial that whether a person is able to use interdisciplinary learning to create new knowledge in order to solve problems we are facing today. A great deal of previous research has focused on the cognitive skills (cognition) required for problem solving. However, there have been few research studies of the affective learning. This research conducted a case study method, taking 13 third to sixth grade students in the elementary school as the participants. The theory of knowledge building and the assistance of knowledge forum were used to explore the development and relationship of knowledge building activities on students' cognition and affective learning in energy education issues. The students are expected to ask real questions about energy issues, suspecting others' ideas and forming arguments. In addition, they also are asked to collect and analyze data, formulate research projects, and create energy houses. This research conducted a mixed-method that is to analyze and summarize the cognitive goals as well as the affective goals to present the process of cognitive and affective learning. The results of the study found that the teaching strategies of knowledge building could improve cognitive and affective learning goals. Both learning goals were positively correlated. That is to say, students not only can apply what they have learned to solve real-world problems, but also have a positive attitude to learn.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 林倍伊, P.-Y.,林顯達, H.-T.,李佩蓉, P.-J.,詹雯靜, W.-C.,洪國財, G.-T.,洪煌堯, H.-Y.(2016)。在不同模式的電腦支援協作學習環境下，師培生理解教學理論層次之差異—以Blackboard和Knowledge Forum為例。資訊社會研究，31，71-108。
    連結：
  2. 洪煌堯, H.-Y.,蔡佩真, P.-C.,林倍伊, P.-Y.(2014)。透過知識創新教學理念與學習平臺以培養國小學生自然課合作學習與翻新想法的習慣。科學教育學刊，22(4)，413-439。
    連結：
  3. 曾正宜, J.-Y.(2015)。學習科學之核心議題與研究趨勢。教育研究集刊，61(3)，105-121。
    連結：
  4. Anderson, L. W.,Krathwohl, D. R.,Airasin, P. W.,Cruikshank, K. A.,Mayer, R. E.,Pintrich, P. R.,Raths, J.,Wittrock, M.(2001).A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.Addison Wesley Longman.
  5. Bloom, B. S.(Ed.)(1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (Handbook I: Cognitive domain).Longman.
  6. Cheng, R.,Zachry, M.(2020).Building community knowledge in online competitions: Moti-vation, practices and challenges.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction,4(CSCW2),1-22.
  7. Cristofaro, M.(2020).“I feel and think, therefore I am”: An affect-cognitive theory of manage-ment decisions.European Management Journal,38(2),344-355.
  8. Cuban, L.(2001).Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom.Harvard University Press.
  9. Dekker, T. J.(2020).Teaching critical thinking through engagement with multiplicity.Thinking Skills and Creativity,37,Article 100701.
  10. Dias, R. A.,de Paula, M. R.,Rizol, P. M. S. R.,Matelli, J. A.,de Mattos, C. R.,Balestier, J. A. P.(2021).Energy education: Reflections over the last fifteen years.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,141,110845.
  11. Dias, R. A.,Mattosb, C. R.,Balestieria, J. A. P.(2004).Energy education: Breaking up the ra-tional energy use barriers.Energy Policy,32(11),1339-1347.
  12. Ecalle, J.,Bouchafa, H.,Potocki, A.,Magnan, A.(2013).Comprehension of written sentences as a core component of children’s reading comprehension.Journal of Research in Reading,36(2),117-131.
  13. Finn, J. D.,Zimmer, K. S.(2012).Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter?.Handbook of research on student engagement
  14. Gan, Y. C.,Hong, H.-Y.,Chen, B.,Scardamalia, M.(2021).Knowledge building: Idea-centered drawing and writing to advance community knowledge.Educational Technology Research and Development,69(5),2423-2449.
  15. Ghlamallah, H.(2022).Krathwohl’s taxonomy of the affective domain transposed.Journal of Faslo El-Khitab,11,555-566.
  16. Hong, H.-Y.,Chang, Y.-H.,Chai, C. S.(2014).Fostering a collaborative and creative climate in a college class through idea-centered knowledge-building.Instructional Science,42(3),389-407.
  17. Hong, H.-Y.,Chen, F.-C.,Chai, C. S.,Chan, W.-C.(2011).Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice.Instructional Science,39(4),467-482.
  18. Hong, H.-Y.,Lin, S.-P.(2010).Teacher-education students’ epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building.The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,19(1),99-110.
  19. Hou, H.-T.(2011).A case study of online instructional collaborative discussion activities for prob-lem-solving using situated scenarios: An examination of content and behavior cluster analysis.Computers & Education,56(3),712-719.
  20. International Energy Agency. (2022). Global energy review 2021. https://bit.ly/3R7sk20.
  21. International Energy Agency. (2021). Key world energy statistics 2021. https://bit.ly/3e6eoqh.
  22. Kannan, N.,Vakeesan, D.(2016).Solar energy for future world: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,62,1092-1105.
  23. Krathwohl, D. R.,Bloom, B. S.,Masia, B. B.(1964).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (Hand book II: Affective domain).Longmans.
  24. Kuhl, J.(2000).A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems and interactions.Handbook of self-regulation
  25. Mangaroska, K.,Sharma1, K.,Gaševic, D.,Giannakos, M.(2021).Exploring students’ cogni-tive and affective states during problem solving through multimodal data: Lessons learned from a programming activity.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,38(1),40-59.
  26. Martínez-Bravo, M. C.,Sádaba Chalezquer, C.,Serrano-Puche, J.(2022).Dimensions of digi-tal literacy in the 21st century competency frameworks.Sustainability,14(3),Article 1867.
  27. Obergriesser, S.,Stoeger, H.(2020).Students’ emotions of enjoyment and boredom and their use of cognitive learning strategies—How do they affect one another?.Learning and Instruction,66,Article 101285.
  28. Ouyang, F.,Chen, S.,Yang, Y.-Q.,Chen, Y.-Q.(2022).Examining the effects of three group-level metacognitive scaffoldings on in-service teachers’ knowledge building.Journal of Educational Computing Research,60(2),352-379.
  29. Pekrun, R.(2011).Emotions as drivers of learning and cognitive development.New perspectives on affect and learning technologies
  30. Polo, C., & Lund, K. (2022). Affective dialoguing together: Considering the socio-cognitivo-emotional nature of collaborative learning in the analysis of educational interactions. https://reurl.cc/aa0G49.
  31. Sachdeva, S.,Eggen, P.-O.(2021).Learners’ critical thinking about learning mathematics.International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education,16(3),Article em0644.
  32. Scardamalia, M.(2002).Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge.Liberal education in a knowledge society
  33. Scardamalia, M.(2004).CSILE/Knowledge Forum.Education and technology: An encyclopedia
  34. Scardamalia, M.(2003).Knowledge forum (advances beyond CSILE).Journal of Distance Education,17(3),23-28.
  35. Scardamalia, M.,Bereiter, C.(2021).Knowledge building: Advancing the state of commu-nity knowledge.International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,19,261-279.
  36. Scardamalia, M.,Bereiter, C.(1983).The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and reme-dial capabilities in children’s composing.The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives
  37. Scardamalia, M.,Bereiter, C.(2003).Knowledge building.Encyclopedia of education
  38. Scardamalia, M.,Bereiter, C.(2006).Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology.Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences
  39. Sinatra, G. M.,Mason, L.(2013).Beyond knowledge: Learner characteristics influencing con-ceptual change.International handbook of research on conceptual change
  40. Snow, R. E.,Corno, L.,Jackson, D., III(1996).Individual differences in affective and conative functions.Handbook of educational psychology
  41. Soliman, D.,Costa, S.,Scardamalia, M.(2021).Knowledge Building in online mode: Insights and reflections.Education Sciences,11(8)
  42. Yeh, M.-L.(2002).Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the California critical thinking disposition inventory.International Journal of Nursing Studies,39(2),123-132.
  43. Zhang, J.,Hong, H.-Y.,Scardamalia, M.,Teo, C. L.,Morley, E. A.(2011).Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school.Journal of the Learning Sciences,20(2),262-307.
  44. Zhu, G.-X.,Chai, S.-M.,Ding, M.-R.(2022).Exploring pre-service teachers’ democratizing knowledge in a knowledge building community: Indicators and results.The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
  45. 王尊玄, T.-H.,王仁俊, J.-C.(2020)。以POEC模式發展STEM課程應用於國中能源教育之行動研究—以風力發電為例。工業科技教育學刊，13，89-104。
  46. 王靜華, C.-H.,林顯達, H.-T.,楊怡婷, I.-T.,洪煌堯, H.-Y.(2016)。知識翻新教學融入中文課程對國小四年級想法的影響。第二十屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會，香港=Hong Kong:
  47. 林雅婷, Y.-T.(2015)。國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。
  48. 張義兵, Y.-B.(2018).知識建構—新教育公平視野下教與學的變革.南京師範大學出版社=Nanjing Normal University Press.
  49. 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：總綱。https://reurl.cc/nOdWal[Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: General guidelines. https://reurl.cc/nOdWal]
  50. 郭靜姿, C.-C.(2003)。從資優生特質研究談情意輔導需求。情意思考教學研討會，臺北市，臺灣=Taipei, Taiwan:
  51. 陳美如, M.-J.(2017)。朝向學生學習的學校教育與課程教學變革探究。課程改革2016回顧與展望
  52. 陳美卿, M.-C.(2020)。國立臺北教育大學=National Taipei University of Education。
  53. 黃曉韻, H.-Y.(2022)。臺北市立大學=University of Tai-pei。
  54. 葉玉珠, Y.-C.(2002)。高層次思考教學設計的要素分析。國立中山大學通識教育學報，1，75-101。
  55. 蔡欣倫, H.-L.(2020)。運用CiteSpace繪製與探索台灣期刊資料庫之能源教育與素養知識圖譜。科學與人文研究，7(2)，268-281。
  56. 韓明媚, M.-M.(2010).學習力：沒有學習力,就沒有競爭力.就是文化=Jiu Shi Wen Hua.
print cancel