利用凱利方格晤談法探討教師對科學本質的觀點－個案研究

A Case Study of Teacher's Views of Science

10.6173/CJSE.198806_6(2).0001

林陳涌(Chen-Yung Lin)；楊榮祥(Jong-Hsiang Yang)

科學本質 ； 科學信念 ； 凱利方格技術 ； Nature of Science ； Belief of Science ； Kelly's Repertory Grid Technique

科學教育學刊

6卷2期（1988 / 06 / 01）

113 - 128

繁體中文;英文

本研究目的主要在修訂及應用凱利方格技術晤談法，探討一位個案國中生物教師的科學本質觀點。凱利方格技術晤談法為一半結構晤談法，共進行依著一定的步驟，但給予被晤談者相當彈性的範圍。因此一方面研究者能有效的掌控晤談結果的效度，一方面能依被晤談者的理念架構深入探討其對科學的觀點。修訂後凱利方格技術晤談法的進行步驟如下，首先，準備晤談資料元素供進行晤談使用，然後在晤談過程中儘量引出被晤談者的構念，再由被晤談者將其構念分組及排列成構念圖，每個構念圖代表被晤談者對科學本質的觀念架構。本文發表一位個案教師（張老師）對科學本質的構念及構念圖，並討論其觀點。張老師從「科學的功能」、「科學永遠是對的嗎？」、「科學是可以學的」、「科學是科學的」、與「如何才能科學化」五個向度來看科學。整體來看，張老師強調證據對科學理論的決定性、否認社會心理因素在科學發展造成的影響。另外，本文提出使用凱利方格技術晤談法的建議。

This research was conducted to modify and employ Kelly's repertory grid technique, investigate the views of science of a biology teacher. Kelly's repertory grid technique is a kind of semi-structured interview which proceeds with a fixed series of steps, but allows some flexibility for interviewee. The interview runs as follows. Interviewers begin with elements as the subject for interview, elicit as many constructs as possible during the course of interview, and ask interviewees to group and map their constructs. Each construct map indicates a structure of views on the nature of science. This article reported a biology teacher's constructs and construct map. She presented her views of science in terms of five maps, namely, The function of science, Is science forever right, Science is reachable, Science is scientific, and How can be scientific. She emphasized the critical power of empirical evidence over science theories and denied the socio-psychological effect on the development of science. This article concluded with suggestion on the use of Kelly's repertory grid technique.

1. Aikenhead, G. S.(1988).An Analysis of Four Ways of Assessing Students beliefs About STS Topics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,25(8),607-627.
2. Aikenhead, G. S.,Ryan, A. G.(1992).The Development of a New Instrument: "Views on Science - Tech nology - Society" (VOSTS).Science Education,76(5),477-491.
3. American Association for the Advance of Science=AAAS(1993).Bench marks for Science Literacy.New York:Oxford University Press.
4. Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office(1989).Science in the National Curriculum.United Kingdom for Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
5. Duffy, G.(1977).A Study of Teacher Conceptions of Reading.National Reading Conference,New Orleans:
6. Feyerabend, P.(1988).Against Method Revised Edition.New York:VERSO.
7. Hanson, N. R.(1958).Patterns of Discovery.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
8. Kelly, G. A.(1955).The Psychology of Personal Constructs.New York:Norton.
9. Klopfer, L. E.,Cooley, W. W.(1963).Test on Understanding Science, Form W.Pricenton:Educational Test ing Service.
10. Lakin, S.,Wellington, F.(1994).Who will teach the 'nature of science' ?: teachers' views of science and their implications for science education.International Journal of Science Education,16(2),175-190.
11. Lin, C. Y.(1994).the University of Iowa.
12. Lucas, A. M.(1975).Hidden Assump tions in Measures of "Knowledge about Science and Scientists".Science Education,59(4),481-485.
13. Mayer, R. H.,Goldsberry, L.(1987).,未出版
14. Munby, H.(1983).Thirty studies involving the "Scientific Attitude Inventory": what confidence can we have in this instrument.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,20(2),141-162.
15. Munby, H.(1982).The place of teachers' beliefs in research on teacher thinking and decision making, and an alternative methodology.Instructional Science,11,201-225.
16. National Research Council(1996).National Science Education Standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
17. Olson, J.(1982).Constructivism and education: a productive alliance.Interchange,13(4),70-75.
18. Pope, M.,Gilbert, J.(1983).Personal experience and the construc tion of knowledge in science.Science Education,67(2),193-203.
19. Pope, M.,Keen(1981).Personal Construct Psychology and Education.London:Academic Press.
20. Popper, K. P.(1968).The Logic of Scientific Discovery.New York:Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc..
21. Rubba, P. A.,Andersen, H.(1978).Development of an Instrument to Assess Secondary School Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scien tific Knowledge.Science Education,62(4),449-458.
22. Schibeci, R. A.(1981).Science teach ers and science - related attitudes.Euro pean Journal of Science Education,3(4),451-459.
23. Science Curriculum Framework and Criteria Committee(1990).Science Framework for California Public Schools Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve.California Department of Education.
24. She, H. C.(1995).Elementary and Middle School Students' Perception of Science, Scientists, and Their Work.Proceedings of National Science Council, Part D,5(1),19-28.
25. Welch, W.,Wayne, W.,Pella, M. O.(1968).The development of an instrument for inventorying knowledge of the processes of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,5,64-68.
26. 王心詠,黃台珠(1997)。教師信念與實驗室教學實務對學習環境的影響: 一位國中生物教師的個案研究。中華民國第十三屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編，台北市:
27. 吳明清(1991).教育研究: 基本觀念與方法分析.台北:五南出版社.
28. 林陳涌(1996)。「了解科學本質量表」之發展與效化。科學教育學刊，4(1)，31-58。
29. 許玫理(1992)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
30. 郭重吉,蔣佳玲(1995)。評析學生對科學家的形象之相關研究。科學教育月刊，179，2-14。
31. 舒煒光,邱仁宗(1990).當代西方科學哲學述評.台北:水牛出版社.
32. 蔣佳玲,郭重吉(1994)。「我心目中的科學家」─國小學童所持有的科學家的形象。中華民國第十屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編，台北市:
33. 鄭湧涇(1989)。職前與在職生物教師對科學的本質的了解。中華民國第四屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編