學生對教師之學科教學知覺問卷之發展

Development of Students Perceptions of Teacher's Pedagogical Content Knowledge Questionnaire

10.6173/CJSE.198806_6(2).0002

段曉林(Hsiao-lin Tuan)；王國華(Kuo-Hua Wang)；張惠博(Hui-Po Chang)

學科教學知識 ； 問卷發展 ； 科學教學 ； 學生的知覺 ； Pedagogical content knowledge ； questionnaire development ； science teaching ； students's perceptions

科學教育學刊

6卷2期（1988 / 06 / 01）

129 - 147

繁體中文;英文

自Shulman（1986,1987）倡導學科教學知識的概念後，學者們紛紛將此概念運用在師資培育的研究中。Shulman認為學科教學知識的重點之一，在於教師所傳達的學科知識必須是學生所能理解的，然而過去的研究卻鮮少從學生對課室教學之知覺來探討教師學科教學的表現。有鑑於此，本研究的目的有三：利用質與量的研究方法，發展出一份適合國中生所使用的「學生對教師之學科教學知覺問卷」；藉由問卷編製與效化過程探究學科教學知識內涵；提供科學教師利用此份問卷做為自我反省與改進科學教學的方向。本份問卷發展的方式為，收集學科教學知識相關研究以建立本份問卷的構念類別與題目；再經由專家、有經驗的老師、與學生分別做專家與表面效度的檢核；選擇中部縣市7所國中15個班級共634名學生為對象進行前測；前測資料經分析與修改後，再以中部縣市10所國中24個班級共935名學生進行正式施測；問卷回收後分別進行信效度檢驗。資料分析結果顯示整份問卷的α值為0.95，各分量表α值分佈於0.70至0.90之間，各班級在各類分量表的得分達顯著差異，因素分析結果能確認原先所歸納之問卷構念。如何利用本份問卷進行教學改進亦將於文中提及。

Ever since Shulman introduced the concept of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), in 1986, many scholars have been interested in studying the effects and implications of a teacher's PCK on student learning. But few research have investigated the appropriateness of PCK from students' perspective. The purpose of this study was to develop a students' perceptions of teacher's pedagogical content knowledge (SPOTPCK) questionnaire to investigate the nature of PCK. Theoretical claims and empirical research in PCK were used to design questions and sub-scales for the SPOTPCK. Expert science teachers and students and face validity of the instrument were established. An initial version of the instrument was administered to 634 students and five subscales were derived based on factor analysis of the data. The final version of SPOTPCK was administered to 935 students in 10 schools in central Taiwan. Analysis of these data showed students were able to identify aspects of teachers' PCK. The total Cronbach of the SPOTPCK was 0.95, α arranged from 0.30 to 0.90 among the five subscales. Implications and applications of the SPOTPCK are discussed.

1. 邱美虹,江玉婷(1997)。初任與資深國中地球科學教師學科教學知識之比較。科學教育學刊，5(4)，419-460。
   連結：
2. Borg, W. R.,Gall, M. D.(1989).Educational research.New York:Longman.
3. Carter, K.(1990).Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach.Handbook of research on teacher education,New York:
4. Clermont, C. P.,Borko, H.,Krajcik, J. S.(1994).Comparative study of the pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrators.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(4),419-441.
5. Coble, C. R.,Koballa, T. R.(1996).Science education.Handbook of research on teacher education,New York:
6. Cochran, K. F.,DeRuiter, J. A.,King, A.(1993).Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation.Journal of Teacher Education,44(4),263-272.
7. Eash, M. J.,Waxman, H. C.(1982).Eash, M. J. & Waxman, H. C.(1982). Evaluating teacher behavior with student perceptions: A manual for the our class and its work questionnaire. Unpublished document, University of Illinois at Chicago..
8. Fraser, B. J.(1994).A quarter of century of research on classroom environment.Symposium International on Research of Science Instruction,Taipei:
9. Fraser, B. J.(1994).Research classroom and school climate.Handbook of research on science teaching and learning,New York:
10. Fraser, B. J.(1990).Fraser, B. J.(1990). Individualized classroom environment questionnaire (ICEQ). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research..
11. Fraser, B. J.(Ed.),Walberg, H. J.(Ed.)(1991).Educational Environments.New York:Pergamon Press.
12. Fraser, B. J.,Rennie, L. J.,Tobin, K.(1990).The learning environment as a focus in a study of higher-level cognitive learning.International Journal of Science Education,12,531-548.
13. Fry, G.,Chantavanich, S.,Chantavanich, A.(1981).Merging qualitative vanich, and qualitative research techniques: Toward a new research paradigm.Anthropology and Education Quarterly,52(2),145-158.
14. Geddis, A. N.(1993).Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching.International Journal of Science Education,15(6),673-683.
15. Geddis, A. N.,Onslow, B.,Beynon, C.,Oesch, J.(1993).Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes.Science Education,77(6),575-591.
16. Gee, C. J.,Gabel, D. L.(1996).The first year of teaching: Science in the elementary school.Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,St Louis, MO:
17. Grossman, P. L.(1988).Stanford,Stanford University.
18. LaBonty, J.,Danielson, K. E.(1988).Effective teaching: What do kids say ?.The Clearing House,61,394-398.
19. Lloyd, B. A.,Lloyd, R. C.(1986).Teaching / learning: The student view point.Reading Horizon,26(4),266-269.
20. Loughran, J.,Derry, N.(1995).Researching teaching for understanding: the students' perspective.annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisco, Ca:
21. Magnusson, S.,Borko, H.,Krajcik, J. S.(1992).The relationship between teacher content and pedagogical content knowledge and student content knowl edge of heat energy and temperature.Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,Boston, Massachusetts:
22. Marks, R.(1990).Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception.Journal of Teacher Education,41(3),3-11.
23. Maroufic, C.(1989).A study of student attitudes toward traditional and generative models of instruction.Adolescence,24(3),65-72.
24. McDiarmid, G. W.,Ball, D. L.,Anderson, C. W.(1989).Why staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: Subject-specific pedagogy.Knowledge base for the beginning teacher,Oxford:
25. Munby, H.(1986).A qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and principles.annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Montreal, Canada:
26. Murray, F. B.(Ed.)(1996).The teacher educator's handbook.San Franciso:Jossey-Bass.
27. National Research Council(1996).National Science Education Standards.Washington, D. C.:National Academy Press.
28. Olson, L.,Moore, M.(1984).A Report of the Students for Quality Teaching Project, Citizens Policy centerA Report of the Students for Quality Teaching Project, Citizens Policy center,Oakland, CA:.
29. Rentoul, A. J.,Fraser, B. J.(1979).Conceptualization of inquiry-based on open classroom learning environments.Journal of Curriculum Studies,11,233-245.
30. Reynolds, A.(1992).What is compe tent beginning teaching ? A review of the literature.Review of Educational Research,62(1),1-35.
31. Shulman, L. S.(1986).Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher,15(1),4-14.
32. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
33. Shulman, L. S.,Skyes, G.(1986).A national board for teaching ? In search of a bold standard.Task Force on Teaching as a Profession, Carnegie Forum on Education and Economy,Stanford, CA:
34. Steele, D. F.(1994).Helping preser vice teachers confront their conceptions about mathematics and mathematics teaching and learning.the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New Orleans, LA:
35. Tamir, P.(1988).Subject matter and related pedagogical pedagogical knowledge in teacher education.Teaching and Teacher Education,4,99-110.
36. Tobin, J.(Ed.),Kahle, J. B.(Ed.),Fraser, B. J.(Ed.)(1990).Windows into science classes: Problems associated with higher-level cognitive learning.London:Falmer.
37. Tobin, K.(1993).Applications of qual itative and quantitative data in interpre tive research.1993 International Conference on Interpretative Research in Science Education,Taipei, Taiwan:
38. Tobin, K.,Fraser, B. J.(1989).Barriers to higher-level cognitive learn ing in high school science.Science Education,73,659-682.
39. Tobin, K.,Tippins, D. J.,Gallard, A. J.(1994).Research on instructional strategies for teaching science.Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning,New York:
40. Tuan, H. L.(1996).Investigating the nature and development of pre-service chemistry teachers' content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and pedagogi cal content knowledge.Proceedings of the National Science Council Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education,6(2),101-112.
41. Tuan, H. L.,Kaou, R. C.(1997).A study of a beginning Taiwanese eighth grader physical science teacher's peda gogical content knowledge development.Proceedings of the National Science Council Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education,7(3),135-154.
42. Turley, S.(1994).The way teachers is, like, totally whacked: The student voice on classroom practice.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New Orleans, LA:
43. 周文欽,歐滄和,許擇基,盧欽銘,金樹人,范德鑫(1995).心理與教育測驗.台北:心理出版社.
44. 林曉雯(1996)。國中生物教師教學內容知識的詮釋性研究。屏東師院學報，9，263-290。
45. 邱美虹(1997)。國科會專題研究成果報告國科會專題研究成果報告,台北:國立台灣師範大學。
46. 段曉林(1996)。學科教學知識對未來科教師資培育上的啟示。第一屆數理教學及師資培育學術研討會論文彙編
47. 段曉林,張惠博,王國華(1996)。學生對教師學科教學知覺問卷之發展。中華民國第十二屆科學教育學術研討會，台中，台灣:
48. 張惠博(1996)。職前科學教師學科教學知識發展之研究。科學教育學刊，4(1)，59-92。
49. 黃永和(1996)。國小實習教師數學學科教學知識之個案研究。中華民國第十二屆科學教育學術研討會，台中，台灣:
50. 楊國樞,文崇一,吳聰賢,李亦園(1989).社會及爲科學研究法.台北:東華書局.
51. 鄭湧涇,楊坤原(1995)。對生物學的態度量表之發展與效化。科學教育學刊，3(2)，189-211。
52. 賴慶三(1997)。國小實習教師數學學科教學知識之個案研究。台北師院學報，10，455-500。
53. 簡紅珠(1993)。師範生學科與學科教學的知識基礎。師範教育多元化與師資素質學術研討會彙編