探索醫學系學生居家線上考試之e化監考觀點與學習醫學焦慮度：性別所扮演之角色

Exploring Perspectives of e-Proctored Exam and Learning Anxiety Among Medical Student in COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Gender

10.6173/CJSE.202309_31(3).0003

楊曉芳(Sheau-Fang Yang)；黃志富(Jee-Fu Huang)；黃孟娟(Meng-Chuan Huang)；徐仲豪(Jong-Hau Hsu)；梁至中(Jyh-Chong Liang)

e化監考 ； 性別 ； 線上考試 ； 學習成效 ； 學習焦慮度 ； e-Proctored Exam ； Gender ； Online Exam ； Learning Achievement ； Learning Anxiety

科學教育學刊

31卷3期（2023 / 09 / 01）

267 - 289

繁體中文;英文

新冠肺炎疫情持續延燒期間，各級學校停課居家線上學習至學期末結束，原有的學期考試則需以線上考試的方式進行。為維護線上考試的公平性，各校發展出不同的e化監考機制。本研究旨在探究醫學系學生實施e化監考線上考試時之觀點，及其學習醫學焦慮程度是否可以預測學生之學習成效。研究對象為醫學系三年級114位學生，於基礎臨床整合課程中的兩模組進行e化監考環境居家線上考試，考試之後分別進行e化監考線上考試觀點及學習醫學焦慮度問卷，而後以學生考試成績為學習成效變項，以階層迴歸分析法來分析不同層次的問卷變項與學習成就變項的關聯性。研究結果發現，兩個問卷工具可以有效預測學生的學習成效。在疫情的情況下，醫學生大致認同e化監考線上考試可以維護評量的公平性。而在e化監考環境中，性別會與學習醫學焦慮度問卷之害怕與壓力變項以及學科焦慮變項產生交互作用。與女學生的學習表現不同，男學生對於考試越感到害怕以及壓力，則有更低的成績；而男學生對於學科越感到焦慮，則會有更高的成績。因此，本研究建議在e化監考環境中，應特別注意因考試形式害怕有壓力，以及對於學科焦慮而影響到男女學生最後有不同的學習表現。

During the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, schools at all levels suspended online learning until the end of the semester, while the original semester exams had to be administered online. In order to maintain the fairness of online examinations, schools developed different online proctoring mechanisms. The purpose of this study is to investigate medical students' perceptions when implementing e-proctored online examinations and whether their anxiety level in studying medicine could predict students' learning achievement. The target population was 114 students in the third year of the Department of Medicine, and the e-proctored online examinations were conducted in 2 blocks of the basic clinical integration course. After the exams, they completed questionnaires on e-proctoring perspectives and levels of medical anxiety. The students' exam results were used as the dependent variable of academic performance, and hierarchical regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between different levels of questionnaire variables and academic achievement variables. The results of the study revealed that the two questionnaire instruments were effective in predicting students' learning outcomes. In the case of pandemic, medical students generally agreed that e-proctored online examinations could maintain the fairness of the assessment. In the e-proctored setting, gender interacted with the fear and stress variables of the Learning Medicine Anxiety Questionnaire and the subject anxiety variable. Unlike female students, male students who feel more afraid and stressed during exams tend to have lower scores. However, male students who feel more anxious about the subject tend to have higher scores. Therefore, this study suggests that special attention should be paid to the effects of test anxiety and subject-specific anxiety on male and female students' learning performance in e-proctoring environments.

1. 洪寶蓮, B.-L.,陳緋娜, F.-N.(2004)。醫學系學生人格特質與學習狀況之調查研究：以中國醫藥大學為例。通識教育年刊，6，121-140。
   連結：
2. 郭國禎, G.-J.,駱芳美, F.-M.(2011)。統計焦慮量表信度與效度考驗。輔導與諮商學報，33(1)，23-35。
   連結：
3. Adanır, G. A.,Ismailova, R.,Omuraliev, A.,Muhametjanova, G.(2020).Learners’ perceptions of online exams: A comparative study in Turkey and Kyrgyzstan.International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,21(3),1-17.
4. Ahmad, N.,Hussain, S.,Khan, F. N.(2018).Test anxiety: Gender and academic achievements of university students.Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute,32(3),295-300.
5. Aldheleai, Y. M.,Al-Sharafi, M. A.,Al-Kumaim, N. H.,Al-Rahmi, W. M.(2021).Investigating the impact of the sense of privacy on the correlation between online learning interaction and students’ academic performance.Recent advances in technology acceptance models and theories
6. Amrhein, V.,Korner-Nievergelt, F.,Roth, T.(2017).The earth is flat (p > 0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research.PeerJ,5,e3544.
7. Andreou, V.,Peters, S.,Eggermont, J.,Wens, J.,Schoenmakers, B.(2021).Remote versus onsite proctored exam: Comparing student results in a cross-sectional study.BMC Medical Education,21,624.
8. Balash, D. G.,Kim, D.,Shaibekova, D.,Fainchtein, R. A.,Sherr, M.,Aviv, A. J.(2021).Examining the examiners: Students’ privacy and security perceptions of online proctoring services.Proceedings of the Seventeenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
9. Bedford, W.,Gregg, J.,Clinton, S.(2009).Implementing technology to prevent online cheating: A case study at a small southern regional university (SSRU).Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,5(2),230-238.
10. Butler-Henderson, K.,Crawford, J.(2020).A systematic review of online examinations: A pedagogical innovation for scalable authentication and integrity.Computers & Education,159,104024.
11. Carstairs, J.,Myors, B.(2009).Internet testing: A natural experiment reveals test score inflation on a high-stakes, unproctored cognitive test.Computers in Human Behavior,25(3),738-742.
12. Coghlan, S.,Miller, T.,Paterson, J.(2021).Good proctor or “Big Brother”? Ethics of online exam supervision technologies.Philosophy & Technology,34(4),1581-1606.
13. Conijn, R.,Kleingeld, A.,Matzat, U.,Snijders, C.(2022).The fear of big brother: The potential negative side-effects of proctored exams.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,38(6),1521-1534.
14. Cruise, R. J.,Cash, R. W.,Bolton, D. L.(1985).Development and validation of an instrument to measure statistical anxiety.American statistical association 1985 proceedings of the section on statistical education
15. Dikmen, M.(2022).Test anxiety in online exams: Scale development and validity.Current Psychology
16. Duncan, A.,Joyner, D.(2022).On the necessity (or lack thereof) of digital proctoring: Drawbacks, perceptions, and alternatives.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,38(5),1482-1496.
17. Faucher, D.,Caves, S.(2009).Academic dishonesty: Innovative cheating techniques and the detection and prevention of them.Teaching and Learning in Nursing,4(2),37-41.
18. Fennema, E.,Sherman, J. A.(1976).Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,7(5),324-326.
19. Gall, J.(2006).Orienting tasks and their impact on learning and attitudes in the use of hypertext.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,15(1),5-29.
20. Gao, W.,Ping, S.,Liu, X.(2020).Gender differences in depression, anxiety, and stress among college students: A longitudinal study from China.Journal of Affective Disorders,263,292-300.
21. Gaudart, J.,Huiart, L.,Milligan, P. J.,Thiebaut, R.,Giorgi, R.(2014).Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,111(19),E1934.
22. Gogus, A.,Saygın, Y.(2019).Privacy perception and information technology utilization of high school students.Heliyon,5(5),e01614.
23. Grover, P. L.,Smith, D. U.(1981).Academic anxiety, locus of control, and achievement in medical school.Journal of Medical Education,56(9),727-736.
24. Heckel, C.,Messerschmidt-Grandi, C.,Ringeisen, T.(2021).Learners’ characteristics, test anxiety, learning efforts, and performance: Validating their structural relationships.Educational Psychology,41(9),1117-1138.
25. Hembree, R.(1988).Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety.Review of Educational Research,58(1),47-77.
26. Hopko, D. R.,Mahadevan, R.,Bare, R. L.,Hunt, M. K.(2003).The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability.Assessment,10(2),178-182.
27. Hylton, K.,Levy, Y.,Dringus, L. P.(2016).Utilizing webcam-based proctoring to deter misconduct in online exams.Computers & Education,92-93,53-63.
28. Ilgaz, H.,Adanır, G. A.(2020).Providing online exams for online learners: Does it really matter for them?.Education and Information Technologies,25(2),1255-1269.
29. Jaap, A.,Dewar, A.,Duncan, C.,Fairhurst, K.,Hope, D.,Kluth, D.(2021).Effect of remote online exam delivery on student experience and performance in applied knowledge tests.BMC Medical Education,21,86.
30. Khalaf, K.,El-Kishawi, M.,Moufti, M. A.,Al Kawas, S.(2020).Introducing a comprehensive high-stake online exam to final-year dental students during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluation of its effectiveness.Medical Education Online,25(1),1826861.
31. Kharbat, F. F.,Abu Daabes, A. S.(2021).E-proctored exams during the COVID-19 pandemic: A close understanding.Education and Information Technologies,26(6),6589-6605.
32. Kusurkar, R.,Croiset, G.,ten Cate, O.(2013).Implications of gender differences in motivation among medical students.Medical Teacher,35(2),173-174.
33. Lee, J. W.(2020).Impact of proctoring environments on student performance: Online vs offline proctored exams.The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business,7(8),653-660.
34. Levy, Y.,Ramim, M. M.(2009).Initial development of a learners’ ratified acceptance of multibiometrics intentions model (RAMIM).Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning,5,379-397.
35. Linden, K.,Gonzalez, P.(2021).Zoom invigilated exams: A protocol for rapid adoption to remote examinations.British Journal of Educational Technology,52(4),1323-1337.
36. Madhyastha, S.,Latha, K. S.,Kamath, A.(2014).Stress, coping and gender differences in third year medical students.Journal of Health Management,16(2),315-326.
37. Milone, A. S.,Cortese, A. M.,Balestrieri, R. L.,Pittenger, A. L.(2017).The impact of proctored online exams on the educational experience.Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning,9(1),108-114.
38. Pekrun, R.(2006).The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice.Educational Psychology Review,18(4),315-341.
39. Pekrun, R.(Ed.),Linnenbrink-Garcia, L.(Ed.)(2014).International handbook of emotions in education.Routledge.
40. Pelch, M.(2018).Gendered differences in academic emotions and their implications for student success in STEM.International Journal of STEM Education,5,33.
41. Penteado, B. E.,Marana, A. N.(2009).A video-based biometric authentication for e-learning web applications.Enterprise Information Systems—11th International Conference
42. Perkins, A. M.,Corr, P. J.(2005).Can worriers be winners? The association between worry ing and job performance.Personality and Individual Differences,38(1),25-31.
43. Plake, B. S.,Parker, C. S.(1982).The development and validation of a revised version of the mathematics anxiety rating scale.Educational and Psychological Measurement,42(2),551-557.
44. Prince, D. J.,Fulton, R. A.,Garsombke, T. W.(2009).Comparisons of proctored versus non-proctored testing strategies in graduate distance education curriculum.Journal of College Teaching & Learning,6(7),51-62.
45. Rezazadeh, M.,Tavakoli, M.(2009).Investigating the relationship among test anxiety, gender, academic achievement and years of study: A case of iranian EFL university students.English Language Teaching,2(4),68-74.
46. Richardson, F. C.,Suinn, R. M.(1972).The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data.Journal of counseling Psychology,19(6),551-554.
47. Schnell, K.,Ringeisen, T.,Raufelder, D.,Rohrmann, S.(2015).The impact of adolescents’ self-efficacy and self-regulated goal attainment processes on school performance—Do gender and test anxiety matter?.Learning and Individual Differences,38,90-98.
48. Sideeg, A.(2015).Test anxiety, self-esteem, gender difference, and academic achievement: The case of the students of medical sciences at Sudanese universities: (A mixed methods approach).British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences,19(2),39-59.
49. Singh, I.,Jha, A.(2013).Anxiety, optimism and academic achievement among students of private medical and engineering colleges: A comparative study.Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology,3(1),222-233.
50. Sohail, N.(2013).Stress and academic performance among medical students.Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan,23(1),67-71.
51. Stowell, J. R.,Bennett, D.(2010).Effects of online testing on student exam performance and test anxiety.Journal of Educational Computing Research,42(2),161-171.
52. ul Haq, A.,Jamal, A.,Butt, U.,Majeed, A.,Ozkaya, A.(2015).Understanding privacy concerns in online courses: A case study of proctortrack.Global Security, Safety and Sustainability: Tomorrow’s Challenges of Cyber Security—10th International Conference
53. van Halem, N.,van Klaveren, C.,Cornelisz, I.(2021).The effects of implementation barriers in virtually proctored examination: A randomised field experiment in Dutch higher education.Higher Education Quarterly,75(2),333-347.
54. Wuthisatian, R.(2020).Student exam performance in different proctored environments: Evidence from an online economics course.International Review of Economics Education,35,100196.
55. Zeidner, M.(1991).Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students: Some interesting parallels.British Journal of Educational Psychology,61(3),319-328.
56. Ziehfreund, S.,Reifenrath, J.,Wijnen-Meijer, M.,Welzel, J.,Sauter, F.,Wecker, H.,Biedermann, T.,Zink, A.(2022).Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for eexam during COVID-19: A promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams.Medical Education Online,27(1),2114131.
57. 王瑞杰, R.-J.(2009)。山西醫科大學=Shanxi Medical University。
58. 王漱陽, S.-Y.,劉秀萍, X.-P.,張志剛, Z.-G.,曾勇, Y.(2021)。疫情期間本科生病理解剖學課程在線考試的探討與實踐。復旦學報（醫學版），48(1)，71-75。
59. 葉珊, S.(2019)。醫學生焦慮狀態與生活滿意度相關性研究。衛生職業教育，9，121-122。