屬性化概念圖的模糊評量

Fuzzy Assessment of Attributed Concept Maps

10.6173/CJSE.199803_6(1).0004

張國恩(Kuo-En Chang)；林水成(Shui-Cheng Lin)；潘宏明(Hung-Ming Pan)；陳世旺(Sei-Wang Chen)

概念圖 ； 屬性化概念圖 ； 模糊評量 ； concept map ； attributed concept map ； fuzzy assessment

科學教育學刊

6卷1期（1998 / 03 / 01）

81 - 94

繁體中文;英文

一張概念圖是由許多命題（propositions）所組成，而每個命題包括兩個概念（concepts）及他們之間的聯結語，因此一張概念圖描述著某一知識內容中概念間的相互連結關係。然而不同的概念與聯結語在一知識主題（knowledge domain）中扮演著不同的角色，其重要性當然會有所不同。因此本文提出一種屬性化概念圖（attributed concept map）的觀念，也就是對概念圖中每一概念及聯結語給予一權値代表其重要性。假設專家或老師已經建構好一張屬性化概念圖，我們稱它為專家概念圖。我們提出一種以模糊集合理論為基礎的評量方式（或稱模糊評量），將學生建構的概念圖與專家概念圖比對，來評估學生對某一知識主題的了解程度。實驗顯示以屬性化概念圖為主的模糊評量在合理性、穩定性上均有顯著的改進，結果也顯示此方法是可行的。

A concept map consists of a collection of notions interconnected to each other that collectively delineate a significant branch of knowledge. The notions and relationships constituting a map play distinct roles during restating the subject portrayed by the map. The notions and relationships are assigned associated weights by experts to indicate their relative degree of importance in the conceptual context. The resulting map is called the expert concept map. During the evaluation of the prototype maps, students were asked to build a map. The maps were compared with the expert concept map using a technique conceptualized in terms of a fuzzy discipline. The maps and techniques were developed and tested against data. The results revealed that approach was feasible.

1. Aitkenhead, A. M.(Ed.),Slack, J. M.(Ed.)(1985).Issues in cognitive modeling.
2. Anderson, J. R.(1983).The architecture of cognition.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
3. Ausubel, D. P.,Novak, J. D,Hanesian, H.(1978).Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4. Beyerhach, B. A.,Smith, J. M.(1990).Using computerized concept mapping program to assess teacher's thinking about effective teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(10),961-971.
5. Ebel, R. L.(1979).Essentials of Educational Measurement.Englewood Tice-Hall, Inc..
6. Fisher, K. M.(1990).Semantic Networking: The New-Kid on the Block.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27,1001-1018.
7. Fisher, K. M.,Faletti, J.,Patterson, H.,Thornton, R.,Lipson, J.,Spring, C.(1990).Computerbased concept mapping.Journal of College Science Teaching,19,347-352.
8. Friendly, M. L.(1977).In search of the M-Gram: The structure of organization in free recall.Cognitive Psychology,9,188-249.
9. Goldsmith, T. E.,Johnson, P. J.,Acton, W. H.(1991).Assessing structural knowledge.Journal of Educational Psychology,83(1),88-96.
10. Herl, H.,Baker, E.,Niemi, D.(1996).Construct validation of an approach to modeling cognitive structure of U.S. history knowledge.Journal of Education Research,89,213-230.
11. Johnson, P. J.,Goldsmith, T. E.,Teague, K. W.(1994).Locus of the predictive advantage in pathfinder based representation of classroom knowledge.Journal of Educational Psychology,86(11),617-626.
12. Klir, G. J,Yuan, B.(1995).Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and Appli cations.Prentice-Hall Inc.
13. Kruskal, J. B.(1964).Multidimen sional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonnumeric hypothesis.Psychometric,29,115-129.
14. Lowe, D. C.(1985).Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition.Hingham, Massachusetts:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Markham, K. P.,Mintzes, J. J.,Jones, M. G.(1994).The concepts as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31,91-104.
16. Noavk, J. D.(1990).Concept Maps and Vee Diagrams: Two metacogni tive tools to facilitate meaningful learning.Instructional Science,19,29-52.
17. Noavk, J. D.(1991).Clarify with concept maps.Science Teacher,45-49.
18. Novak, J. D.,Gowin, D. B.(1984).Learning How to Learn.Cambridge London:Cambridge University Press.
19. Paivio, A.(1986).Mental Representations: A dual coding approach.New York:Oxford University Press.
20. Rumelhart, D. E.,McClell, J. L.(1985).Distributed memory representation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, General,25,1-75.
21. Shavelson, R. J.(1974).Methods for examining representations of subject matter structure in a student's memory.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,11,231-249.
22. Shavelson, R. J.,Stanton, G. C.(1975).Concept validation: Methodology and application to the three measures of cognitive structure.Journal of Education Measurement,12,67-85.
23. Zimmermann, H. J.(1991).Fuzzy set theory and Its Applications.Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. 邱上真(1989)。知識結構的評量：概念構圖技巧的發展與試用。國立台灣師範大學教育學院特殊教育學係暨研究所特殊教育學報，4，215-244。

1. 陳美紀、梁秀萍(2005)。商職學生長期債券投資成本迷思概念診斷工具發展之研究。教育科學期刊，5(1)，15-39。
2. 許天維、胡豐榮、卓樹樣(2005)。LFT-extended分析法。測驗統計年刊，13(上)，25-74。
3. 劉威德、梁姿茵(2008)。以模糊理論和管制圖建構多元評量成績管控系統—以繪畫科目爲例。測驗學刊，55(1)，151-184。
4. (2002)。模糊語意變數的多準則評量之研究。臺中師院學報，16，451-470。