臺灣菸農對菸權的願受價格之研究

Empirical Analysis of Farmers' Willingness to Accept Voluntary Tobacco Conversion Programs in Taiwan

10.7014/SRMA.2014100005

張景行(Ching-Hsing Chang)；李佳珍(Jia-Jan Lee)；盧永祥(Yung-Hsiang Lu)

菸農 ； 菸草種植權 ； 願受價格 ； tobacco farming ； willingness-to-accept ； two-stage model ； tobacco conversion program

調查研究-方法與應用

32期特刊（2014 / 10 / 01）

129 - 158

繁體中文

國內外針對菸農的相關經濟分析付之闕如；因此，本研究在全臺各菸草種植區域，針對606個菸農進行訪談，並利用兩階段模型來分析菸農願受價格之影響因素。在第一階段Probit模型的實證發現，對於菸草產業的前景愈樂觀的菸農，愈不願意接受種植權的買賣，願意接受出價的傾向會隨著種植權的增加而降低；第二階段的2SLS實證發現，實際有種植行為的菸農會要求較高的售價，而且菸農私下進行種植權租賃的成交價格對願受價格有正面的影響，而對菸草產業抱持樂觀態度的菸農也會要求較高的願受價格。

Empirical studies on tobacco farming in Taiwan are almost nonexistent. To fill the gap, we apply a two-stage model to explore the factors that determine tobacco farmers' willingness-to-accept (WTA) value to forfeit their contracts on growing tobacco. The results from a first-step Probit model suggest that farmers who are optimistic toward the future of the tobacco industry are less likely to sell their contracts, and large farmers, in terms of scale of cultivation, are less willing to give up their farming contracts. The second stage of our analysis relies on a two-stage least squares model. We find that WTA value is positively associated with actual farming practices, and higher previous contract trading prices lead to a higher WTA value. Consistent with the rationale in the first stage, we also find that optimism regarding the future of the tobacco industry leads to a higher WTA price.

1. 臺灣菸酒股份有限公司2010–2011 《臺灣地區菸酒事業統計年報》。臺北：臺灣省菸酒公賣局。
2. 行政院農業委員會1981–2011 《中華民國70~100 年的農業統計年報》。臺北：行政院農業委員會。
3. Croson, R., J. J. Rachlinski, and J. Johnston 2005 “Culpability as an Explanation of the WTA-WTP Discrepancy in Contingent Valuation,” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.
4. 臺灣省政府農林廳1996 《 臺灣省現耕釀酒葡萄農戶申請廢園輔導轉作要點》。南投：臺灣省政府農林廳。
5. Bateman, Ian J.(ed.),Willis, Kenneth G.(ed.)(1999).Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
6. Beach, R. H.,Pattanayak, S. K.,Yang, J. C.,Murray, B. C.,Abt, R. C.(2005).Econometric Studies of Non-Industrial Private Forest Management: A Review And Synthesis.Forest Policy and Economics,7(3),261-281.
7. Bergstrom, A. R.(1990).Continuous Time Econometric Modelling.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Dupraz, P.,Vermersch, D.,De Frahan, H.,Delvaux, L.(2003).The Environmental Supply of Farm Households: A Flexible Willingness to Accept Model.Environmental and Resource Economics,25(2),171-189.
9. Gregory, S. A.,Conway, M. C.,Sullivan, J.(2003).Econometric Analyses of Nonindustrial Forest Landowners: Is There Anything Left to Study?.Journal of Forest Economics,9(2),137-164.
10. Haab, T.,McConnell, K. E.(1997).Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,32(2),251-270.
11. Hanemann, M.(1991).Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?.American Economic Review,81(3),635-647.
12. Horowitz, J. K.,McConnell, K. E.(2002).A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,44(3),426-447.
13. Jefferson, T.,Taplin, R.(2011).An Investigation of the Endowment Effect Using a Factorial Design.Journal of Economic Psychology,32(6),899-907.
14. Jones-Lee, M. W.,Hammerton, M.,Philips, P.(1985).The Value of Safety: Results of a National Sample Survey.The Economic Journal,95(377),49-72.
15. Lindhjem, H.,Mitani, Y.(2012).Forest Owners'Willingness to Accept Compensation for Voluntary Conservation: A Contingent Valuation Approach.Journal of Forest Economics,18(4),290-302.
16. Mitchell, R. C.,Carson, R. T.(1989).Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method.Washington, DC:Resources for the Future.
17. Randall, A.,Stoll, J.(1980).Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space.American Economic Review,70(3),449-455.
18. Shogren, J. F.,Shin, S. Y.,Hayes, D. J.,Kliebenstein, J. B.(1994).Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept.American Economic Review,84(1),255-270.
19. Willig, R.(1976).Consumer's Surplus without Apology.American Economic Review,66(4),589-597.
20. Wooldridge, J. M.(2010).Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
21. 洪馨蘭(2010)。屏北平原「臺灣菸草王國」之形成—以《台菸通訊》（1963-1990）為討論。師大臺灣史學報，3，45-92。
22. 陳明健(1994)。自然資源與環境經濟學。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
23. 陳淑君(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系。
24. 陸雲(1990)。環境資源估價之研究：非市場估價方法。經濟論文，18(1)，93-135。
25. 黃宗煌(1990)。臺灣地區國家公園之保育效益評估。台灣土地金融季刊，43(3)，305-325。
26. 臺灣省政府農林廳(1998)。臺灣省政府農林廳志。臺北:豐年社。

1. 陳珮青、張麗娟、李玉春(2017)。不吸菸者對於二手菸接受意願與願受價格之初探。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，36(1)，44-53。