题名

以因素混合分析評估青少年偏差行為的異質性:自我控制理論的詮釋

并列篇名

Introducing Factor Mixture Analysis to Evaluate Heterogeneity of Adolescents' Deviance: Interpretation from Self-Control Theory

DOI

10.7014/SRMA.2017040004

作者

吳中勤(Chung Chin Wu)

关键词

因素混合分析 ; 偏差行為 ; 異質性 ; 潛在類別分析 ; delinquency ; factor mixture analysis ; heterogeneity ; latent class analysis

期刊名称

調查研究-方法與應用

卷期/出版年月

37期(2017 / 04 / 01)

页次

155 - 194

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

多數偏差行為研究著重於偏差行為嚴重程度的探究,可能忽略青少年群體異質性,而少數研究雖注意到偏差行為的群體異質性,但卻忽略群體內青少年在偏差行為嚴重程度上的變異性。因素混合分析(Factor Mixture Analysis, FMA)可在相同測量模式中,以潛在類別分析(Laten Class Analysis, LCA)捕捉偏差行為的群體異質性,並以因素分析(Factor Analysis, FA)來描述次群體內青少年在偏差行為嚴重程度上的差異,但仍較少受到研究者的重視。有鑑於此,本研究主要目的在於,評估LCA、FA 與FMA 應用於國中青少年偏差行為研究的實益。研究結果發現:⑴ 2 類別1 因素FMA 模式,較適合描述國中青少年偏差行為的群間與群內異質性。⑵在同時考量偏差行為的類型與程度後,FMA 出現與LCA 不同的分類結果。最後於文末根據研究結果,提出相應之建議。

英文摘要

Most research on deviance has emphasized investigating the severity of deviance. This may result in ignoring the heterogeneity in the population. Although, a few studies have addressed this heterogeneity, the variation in the severity of deviance within a class was still overlooked. Factor mixture analysis (FMA) incorporates latent class analysis (LCA) with factor analysis (FA) to capture the heterogeneity in a population and to depict the severity of deviance within a class, respectively, within a single model. However, it has received insufficient attention to date. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of applying LCA, FA, and FMA to investigate adolescents' deviance in junior high school. The results showed: (1) A two-class, one-factor F MA model was suitable for depicting heterogeneities between and within classes for junior high school adolescents. (2) After taking type and degree of deviance into account, FMA had results differing from that of LCA. Corresponding suggestions were proposed based on the present results at the end of this article.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 李文傑(2012)。偏差友伴與偏差行為:友伴的影響效果確實存在嗎?。調查研究—方法與應用,28,119-160。
    連結:
  2. 周愫嫻(2004)。社會階級與少年偏差行為關係。犯罪學期刊,7(1),31-48。
    連結:
  3. 張楓明(2006)。社會控制理論之「參與因素」對青少年偏差行為抑制性之實證研究。犯罪學期刊,9(2),73-100。
    連結:
  4. 廖鳳池、許雅惠、翁令珍(2003)。高雄地區青少年逃家經驗之調查研究。諮商輔導學報,9,47-79。
    連結:
  5. 潭子文、張楓明(2013)。依附關係、低自我控制與青少年偏差行為關聯性之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,36,67-90。
    連結:
  6. 伊慶春,2008, 台灣青少年成長歷程研究: 國一樣本(J1) 第一波, 青少年問卷 (C00176_4)〔原始數據〕。中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心 學術調查研究資料庫:https://srda.sinica.edu.tw,取用日期:2015 年12 月20 日。 doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00176_4–1
  7. Agnew, R.(1991).A Longitudinal Test of Social Control Theory and Delinquency.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,28,126-156.
  8. Agnew, R.(1989).A Longitudinal Test of the Revised Strain Theory.Journal of Quantitative Criminology,5,373-387.
  9. Brauer, J. R.(2009).Testing Social Learning Theory Using Reinforcement's Residue: A Multilevel Analysis of Self-Reported Theft and Marijuana Use in the National Youth Survey.Criminology,47(3),929-970.
  10. Burnett, S.,Bault, N.,Coricelli, G.,Blakemore, S. J.(2010).Adolescents' Heightened Risk-Seeking in a Probabilistic Gambling Task.Cognitive Development,25(2),183-196.
  11. Burt, C. H.,Simons, R. L.,Simons, L. G.(2006).A Longitudinal Test of the Effects of Parenting and the Stability of Self-Control: Negative Evidence for the General Theory of Crime.Criminology,44(2),353-396.
  12. Burton, V. S.,Cullen, F. T.,Evans, T. D.,Alarid, L. F.,Dunaway, R. G.(1998).Gender, Self- Control, and Crime.Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency,35(2),123-147.
  13. Cauffman, E.,Shulman, E. P.,Steinberg, L.,Claus, E.,Banich, M. T.,Graham, S.,Woolard, J.(2010).Age Differences in Affective Decision Making as Indexed by Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.Developmental Psychology,46(1),193-207.
  14. Clark, S. L.(2010).Los Angeles, CA,University of California.
  15. Clark, S. L.,Muthén, B.,Kaprio, J.,D'Onofrio, B. M.,Viken, R.,Rose, R. J.(2013).Models and Strategies for Factor Mixture Analysis: An Example Concerning the Structure Underlying Psychological Disorders.Structural Equation Modeling,20(4),681-703.
  16. Damon, William(edited),Lerner, Richard M.(edited),Eliot-Pearson(edited)(2006).Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  17. Eisenberg, N.,Fabes, R. A.,Guthrie, I. K.,Reiser, M.(2000).Dispositional Emotionality and Regulation: Their Role in Predicting Quality of Social Functioning.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,78(1),136-157.
  18. Gottfredson, M. R.,Hirschi, T.(1990).A General Theory of Crime.Standford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  19. Grasmick, H. G.,Tittle, C. R.,Bursik, R. J.,Arneklev, B. J.(1993).Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,30(5),5-29.
  20. Hancock, G. R.(edited),Samuuelson, K. M.(edited)(2008).Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models.Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing.
  21. Hay, C.(2001).Parenting, Self-Control, and Delinquency: A Test of Self-Control Theory.Criminology,39(3),707-736.
  22. Hirschi, T.(2002).Causes of Delinquency.New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Publishers.
  23. Juffer, F.,Stams, G. J. J. M.,van Jzendoorn, M. H.(2004).Adopted Children's Problem Behavior is Significantly Related to Their Ego Resiliency, Ego Control, and Sociometric Status.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45(4),697-706.
  24. Kim, Y. K.,Muthén, B. O.(2009).Two-Part Factor Mixture Modeling: Application to an Aggressive Behavior Measurement Instrument.Structural Equation Modeling,16(4),602-624.
  25. Kochanska, G.,Knaack, A.(2004).Effortful Control as a Personality Characteristic of Young Children: Antecedents, Correlates, Andconsequences.Journal of Personality,71(6),1087-1112.
  26. Krohn, M. D.(edited),Lizotte, A. J.(edited),Hall, G. P.(edited)(2009).Handbook on Crime and Deviance.New York:Springer-Verlag.
  27. LaGrange, Teresa C.,Silverman, R. A.(1999).Low Self-Control and Opportunity: Testing the General Theory of Crime as an Explanation for Gender Differences in Delinquency.Criminology,41,41-72.
  28. Lemery, K. S.,Essex, M. J.,Smider, N. A.(2002).Revealing the Relation between Temperament and Behavior Problem Symptoms by Eliminating Measurement Confounding: Expert Ratings and Factor Analyses.Child Development,73(3),867-882.
  29. Lengua, L. J.,West, S. G.,Sandler, I. N.(1998).Temperament as Apredictor of Symptomatology in Children: Addressing Contamination Ofmeasures.Child Development,69(1),164-181.
  30. Lilly, J. R.,Cullen, F. T.,Ball, R. A. C.(2007).Criminology Theory: Context and Consequence.Thousands Oaks, CA:Sage.
  31. Lubke, G. H.,Muthén, B.(2005).Investigating Population Heterogeneity with Factor Mixture Models.Psychological Methods,10(1),21-39.
  32. Meredith, W.(1993).Measurement Invariance, Factor-Analysis and Factorial Invariance.Psychometrika,58(4),525-543.
  33. Moon, B.,Hwang, H.-W.,McCluskey, J. D.(2011).Causes of School Bullying: Empirical Test of A General Theory of Crime, Differential Association Theory, and General Strain Theory.Crime and Delinquency,57(6),849-877.
  34. Muthén, B.,Asparouhov, T.(2006).Item Response Mixture Modeling: Application to Tobacco Dependence Criteria.Addictive Behaviors,31,1050-1066.
  35. Muthén, B.,Muthén, L. K.(2000).Integrating Person-centered and Variable-centered Analyses: Growth Mixture Modeling with Latent Trajectory Classes.Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research,24(6),882-891.
  36. Muthén, L. K.,Muthén, B. O.(1998).Mplus User's Guide.Los Angeles, CA:Muthen & Muthen.
  37. Nagin, D. S.(2005).Group-based Modeling of Development.London:Harvard University Press.
  38. Nylund, K. L.,Asparoutiov, T.,Muthén, B. O.(2007).Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.Structural Equation Modeling,14(4),535-569.
  39. Olson, S. L.,Sameroff, A. J.,Kerr, D. C. R.,Lopez, N. L.,Wellman, H. M.(2005).Developmental Foundations of Externalizing Problems in Young Children: The Role of Effortful Control.Development and Psychopathology,17(1),25-45.
  40. Ratchford, M.,Beaver, K. M.(2009).Neuropsychological Deficits, Low Self-Control, and Delinquent Involvement toward a Biosocial Explanation of Delinquency.Criminal Justice and Behavior,36(2),147-162.
  41. Reisig, M. D.,Pratt, T. C.(2011).Low Self-Control and Imprudent Behavior Revisited.Deviant Behavior,32(7),589-625.
  42. Shedler, J.,Block, J.(1990).Adolscent Drug Use and Psychological Health.American Psychologist,45(5),612-630.
  43. Stefurak, T.,Calhoun, G. B.(2007).Subtypes of Female Juvenile Offenders: A Cluster Analysis of the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry,30(2),95-111.
  44. Stefurak, T.,Calhoun, G. B.,Glaser, B. A.(2004).Personality Typologies of Male Juvenile Offenders Using a Cluster Analysis of the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory Introduction.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,48(1),96-110.
  45. Taylor, J.,Kemper, T. S.,Loney, B. R.,Kistner, J. A.(2009).Recidivism in Subgroups of Severe Male Juvenile Offenders.Psychology Crime and Law,15(5),395-408.
  46. Turner, M. G.,Piquero, A. R.(2002).The Stability of Self-Control.Journal of Criminal Justice,30(6),457-471.
  47. Turner, M. G.,Piquero, A.,Pratt, C.(2005).The School Context as a Source of Self-Control.Journal of Criminal Justice,33,327-339.
  48. Wang, J.,Wang, X.(2012).Structural Equation Modeling: Application Using Mplus.West Sussex, England:John Wiley & Sons.
  49. Wolfson, J.,Fields, J. H.,Rose, S. A.(1987).Symptoms, Temperament, Resiliency, and Control in Anxiety-Disordered Preschool Children.The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,26(1),16-22.
  50. 林秀勤、張憲庭、游錦雲(2009)。霸凌現象與學生偏差行為對友善校園影響之研究。初等教育學刊,32,75-103。
  51. 張楓明、潭子文(2011)。個人信念、負向生活事件、偏差同儕與青少年初次偏差行為關聯性之實證研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,3(1),133-160。
  52. 黃俊傑、王淑女(2001)。家庭、自我概念與青少年偏差行為。應用心理學研究,11,45-68。
  53. 潭子文(2011)。台灣地區高中生依附關係、自我概念與偏差行為關聯性之研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,3(1),41-80。