Women's (No) Naming Right under the Shadow of Patronymy: Changes in the Public Attitudes in Taiwan between 2002 and 2012

父權陰影下的子女姓氏決定：比較台灣民眾在2002到2012年間的態度轉變

10.7014/SRMA.2017100002

陳昭如(Chao-ju Chen)；彭渰雯(Yen-wen Peng)；張晉芬(Chin-fen Chang)

patronymy ； matronymic naming ； gender and family ； legal reform ； Taiwan Social Change Survey ； 父權 ； 從母姓 ； 性別與家庭 ； 法律改革 ； 台灣社會變遷基本調查

調查研究-方法與應用

38期（2017 / 10 / 01）

57 - 97

英文

Patronymy is the norm by which children's surnames are based on their fathers' surnames; and/or wives' surnames are to follow their husbands'. Taiwan is one of the countries where the practice of patronymy prevails. Before 2007, it was legally required that children assume the father's surname, albeit with some exceptions. In 2007, the legislature passed a milestone amendment of family law that permits parents to decide the surname of the child through mutual agreement, but governmental statistics show that on average only 1.7% of all newborns in the past 9 years took their mother's surname. Whether people in Taiwan are indeed overwhelmingly dominated by patronymic thinking despite the legal amendment, or there is a disjuncture between people's attitudes and behavior on nontraditional surnaming as revealed by existing literature, is the main question that we want to probe. Drawing on data from the 2002 and 2012 Taiwan Social Change Survey, we analyze people's attitudes a decade apart, and the factors that influenced and differentiated people's attitudes. Based on binomial logistic analysis of the two surveys, we find significant impacts of demographic and socio-economic status on the naming practices in the family. While in general Taiwanese endorsement of patronymy declined after the law passed, men are significantly more likely to support patronymic naming than are women. Respondents with higher education and upper non-manual workers seem to be more flexible in bestowing children's last names. We also confirm that when people support gender equality and when women are better educated, families are more likely to accept the taking of mothers' surnames. To change the practice of patronymic surnaming, therefore, we suggest a more radical legal reform approach accompanying continuous feminist activism to empower women and change men's gender ideology, and to encourage the decision to give children the mother's surname.

父╱夫姓常規是指子女應從父姓、妻子應改為夫姓或冠夫姓。在台灣，除了少數法定例外，子女依法須從父姓。歷經多年婦女運動的努力，〈民法〉2007年廢除子女應從父姓的規定，改由父母自行約定。官方數據顯示，新法實施九年以來，所有新生兒中只有1.7%從母姓。台灣人民的態度真與新法大相逕庭、如此支持父姓常規嗎？本文分析2002和2012年「台灣社會變遷基本調查」資料，以瞭解台灣人對於從父姓或母姓的態度變化及影響態度的因素。二元邏輯迴歸分析結果顯示，父權意識形態與社經地位對於子女從姓態度有顯著影響。儘管民眾對父姓常規的支持度明顯下降，男性仍較支持子女從父姓；教育程度較高者、白領階級、較具性別平權意識者、母親社經地位較高者對從母姓較為認同或開放。但男性社經地位並無影響。因此若要改變父姓常規並縮減態度與實踐上的落差，似乎需採行更基進的法律來回應夫妻協商立足點的不平等，並持續推動女性主義運動以培力女性地位，並提高男性對性別平等的支持。

1. 陳怡君(2010)。第二「姓」！新生兒姓氏協商的性別權力關係。婦研縱橫，92，48-59。
   連結：
2. 陳昭如(2014)。父姓的常規，母性的權利：子女姓氏修法改革的法社會學考察。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，43(2)，271-380。
   連結：
3. 彭渰雯、洪綾君(2011)。為何從母姓？夫妻約定子女姓氏的影響因素調查。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，28，1-54。
   連結：
4. Ministry of the Interior, 2016b, 2015 Yearly Bulletin of Interior Statistics, http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/ list.htm (Date visited: February 23, 2017). 　　內政部，2016b，104 年內政統計年報（http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm， 取用日期：2017 年2 月23 日）。
5. DGBAS (Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics), 2016, “National Statistics of Republic of China (Taiwan).” https://eng.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15761& ctNode=1609&mp=5 (Date visited: November 29, 2016).
6. Almack, Kathryn(2005).What's in a Name? The Significance of the Choice of Surnames Given to Children Born within Lesbian-parent Families.Sexualities,8(2),239-254.
7. Augustine-Adams, Kif(1997).The Beginning of Wisdom Is to Call Things by Their Right Names.Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies,7(1),1-35.
8. Brightman, Joan(1994).Why Hillary chooses Rodham Clinton.American Demographics,16(3),9-11.
9. Eshleman, Amy,Halley, Jean(2016).Self-Identified Feminist Mothers' Naming Practices for Their Children: Accepting Being 'as Feminist as Everyone' Else.Women's Studies,45(3),215-29.
10. Freeman, Michael D. A.(edited),Smith, Fiona(edited)(2013).Law and Language.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
11. Goldin, Claudia,Shim, Maria(2004).Making a Name: Women's Names at Marriage and Beyond.Journal of Economic Perspectives,18,143-160.
12. Gooding, Gretchen E.,Kreider, Rose M.(2009).Women's Marital Naming Choices in a Nationally Representative Sample.Journal of Family Issues,31(5),681-701.
13. Hoffnung, Michele(2006).What's In a Name? Marital Name Choice Revisited.Sex Roles,55(11-12),817-825.
14. Intons-Peterson, Margaret Jean,Crawford, Jill(1985).The Meanings of Marital Surnames.Sex Roles,12(11-12),1163-1171.
15. Johnson, David R.,Scheuble, Laurie K.(1995).Women's Marital Naming in Two Generations: A National Study.Journal of Marriage and the Family,57(3),724-732.
16. Johnson, David R.,Scheuble, Laurie K.(2002).What Should We Call Our Kids? Choosing Children's Surnames When Parents' Last Names Differ.The Social Science Journal,39(3),419-429.
17. Kline, Susan L.,Stafford, Laura,Miklosovic, Jill C.(1996).Women's Surnames: Decisions, Interpretations and Associations with Relational Qualities.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,13(4),593-617.
18. Kohn, Melvin L.(1977).Class and Conformity; A Study in Values.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
19. Lebell, Sharon M. G.(1988).Naming Ourselves, Naming Our Children: Resolving the Last Name Dilemma.Freedom, CA:Crossing Press.
20. Liss, Miriam,Erchull, Mindy J.(2012).Differences in Beliefs and Behaviors between Feminist Actual and Anticipated Mothers.Psychology of Women Quarterly,37(3),381-391.
21. Lockwood, Penelope,Burton, Caitlin,Boersma, Katelyn(2011).Tampering with Tradition: Rationales Concerning Women's Married Names and Children's Surnames.Sex Roles,65(11-12),827-839.
22. MacDougall, Priscilla Ruth(1985).The Right of Women to Name Their Children.Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice,3(1),91-160.
23. McCann, Michael(1994).Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
24. Noack, Turid,Wiik, Kenneth Aarskaug(2008).Women's Choice of Surname upon Marriage in Norway.Journal of Marriage and Family,70(2),507-518.
25. Nugent, Colleen(2010).Children's Surnames, Moral Dilemmas: Accounting for the Predominance of Fathers' Surnames for Children.Gender and Society,24(4),499-525.
26. Qi, Xiaoying(2017).Neo-traditional Child Surnaming in Contemporary China: Women's Rights as Veiled Patriarchy.Sociology
27. Rebick, Marcus(edited),Takenaka, Ayumi(edited)(2006).The Changing Japanese Family.London:Routledge.
28. Rosenberg, Gerald N.(2008).The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?.Chicago:University of Chicago.
29. Scheuble, Laurie K.,Johnson, David R.(2007).Social and Cognitive Factors in Women's Marital Name Choice.The American Name Society,55(3),229-251.
30. Scheuble, Laurie K.,Johnson, David R.,Johnson, Katherine M.(2012).Marital Name Changing Attitudes and Plans of College Students: Comparing Change Over Time and Across Regions.Sex Roles,66(3-4),282-292.
31. Suter, Elizabeth A.(2004).Tradition Never Goes Out of Style: The Role of Tradition in Women's Naming Practices.The Communication Review,7(1),57-87.
32. Tam, Siumi Maria(edited),Wong, Wai Ching Angelo(edited),Wang, Danning(edited)(2014).Gender and Family in East Asia.New York:Routledge.
33. Tanaka, Kimiko(2012).Surnames and Gender in Japan: Women's Challenges in Seeking Own Identity.Journal of Family History,37(2),232-240.
34. Twenge, Jean M.(1997).'Mrs. His Name': Women's Preferences for Married Names.Psychology of Women Quarterly,21(3),417-429.
35. Yang, Hyunah(edited)(2013).Law and Society in Korea.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
36. 內政部(2016)。全國姓名統計分析。台北=Taipei:內政部=Ministry of the Interior。
37. 章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2003)。,未出版
38. 章英華、傅仰止(2003)。,未出版
39. 彭渰雯、陳宜倩(2011)。單親家庭「姓」解放：民法親屬編子女姓氏條文之「不利影響」研究。台北=Taipei:財團法人婦女新知基金會=Awakening Foundation。

1. 陳昭如(2022)。母姓難從，漢姓難移：原住民身分的性別與族群交織難題。婦研縱橫，116，50-63。