题名

性別化的青少年友誼網絡與性別角色態度：單一性別與混合性別的班級脈絡

并列篇名

Gendered Adolescent Friendship Networks and Gender Role Attitudes: Social Contexts of Single-Gender and Mixed-Gender Classes

DOI

10.7014/SRMA.2018090001

作者

楊天盾(Tien-Tun Yang)；熊瑞梅(Ray-May Hsung)

关键词

性別化的友誼網絡 ； 班級脈絡 ； 性別角色態度 ； 指數隨機圖模型 ； gendered friendship networks ； social contexts of classes ； gender role attitudes ； Exponential Random Graph Model

期刊名称

調查研究-方法與應用

卷期/出版年月

40期（2018 / 09 / 01）

页次

7 - 61

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

青少年友誼發展的過程，性別一直扮演重要的角色。傳統社會對男女應表現出的行為與態度之不同期待，可能使得男女在個人社會網絡的組成、密度與規模因此產生差異。女生傾向產生非階層性與關係性相互依賴的友誼結構，男生則傾向集體性相互依賴、集體中心性與階層性的友誼結構。本研究從班級脈絡的角度，探討男女所產生性別化的網絡結構，如何在不同性別組成的班級中透過彼此的互動過程展現出來。本研究使用中央研究院「台灣青少年成長歷程研究」的調查資料做為研究對象。結果發現，單一性別的班級脈絡，男生班的網絡結構呈現集體中心性與階層性的特質，女生班則沒有。而混合性別的班級脈絡，由於班級性別隔離的現象明顯，因此，雖在指數隨機圖模型模型（ERGM）中沒有集體中心性與階層性的特質，但男生仍有較明顯的集中性趨勢。最後，結構對性別角色態度的影響，在單一性別的班級脈絡中，越位於集體中心性核心結構位置的個體有較傳統的性別角色態度。
英文摘要

While adolescents are growing up, school is the place where they have the most contact with other students, and peer relationships between classmates at school are very important for adolescents. Gender always plays an important role for development of friendship among adolescents. Different behaviors and attitudes exhibited by males and females due to different traditional social expectations can result in different composition of individual social networks. Girls tend to build relationally interdependent friendship structures, and boys tend to build collectively interdependent, in-star and hierarchical friendship structures. This study explores gendered friendship networks to show the process of peer interaction in social contexts of single-gender and mixed-gender classes. At the same time, the network structure how to affect adolescent gender role attitudes. This study uses the data from the Taiwan Youth Project (TYP) of Academia Sinica. The result shows that in single-gender classes, the male network structure exhibits collectively central and hierarchical characteristics, but the female and mixed-gender network structures do not. In mixed-gender classes, the phenomenon of gender segregation is obvious, and males and females still tend to interact with same-gender members. Finally, in single-gender classes, individuals in core structure positions have more traditional gender role attitudes.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Baerveldt, Chris,Van Duijn, M. A. J.,Vermeij, L.,van Hemert, D. A.(2004).Ethnic Boundaries and Personal Choice. Assessing the Influence of Individual Inclinations to Choose Intra-ethnic Relationships on Pupils' Networks.Social Networks,26(1),55-74.
  2. Barsky, N. P.(1999).A Core/Periphery Structure in a Corporate Budgeting Process.Connections,22(2),22-29.
  3. Baumgarte, R.,Nelson, D. W.(2009).Preference for Same- versus Cross-Sex Friendships.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,39(4),901-917.
  4. Bearman, Peter(1997).Generalized Exchange.American Journal of Sociology,102(5),1383-1415.
  5. Beck, R. J.,Fitzgerald, W. J.,Pauksztat, B.(2003).Individual Behaviors and Social Structure in the Development of Communication Networks of Self-Organizing Online Discussion Groups.Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments,Netherlands:
  6. Borgatti, S. P.,Everett, M. G.(1999).Models of Core/Periphery Structures.Social Networks,21(4),375-395.
  7. Branje, S. J. T.,Frijns, T.,Finkenauer, C.,Engels, R.,Meeus, W.(2007).You Are My Best Friend: Commitment and Stability in Adolescents' Same-Sex Friendships.Personal Relationships,14(4),587-603.
  8. Broverman, I. K.,Vogel, S. R.,Broverman, D. M.,Clarkson, F. E.,Rosenkrantz, P. S.(1972).Sex-Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal.Journal of Social Issues,28(2),59-78.
  9. Casper, M. Deborah,Card, N. A.(2010)."We were Best Friends, But . . .": Antipathetic Relationships Emerging from Broken Friendships.Journal of Adolescent Research,25(4),499-526.
  10. Chodorow, N.(1978).The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  11. Clark, M. L.,Ayers, M.(1992).Friendship Similarity during Early Adolescence: Gender And Racial Patterns.Journal of Psychology,126(4),393-405.
  12. Coleman, J. S.(1988).Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.The American Journal of Sociology,94(Supplement),S95-S120.
  13. Collins, W. A.(ed.)(1994).Development During Middle Childhood: The Years from Six to Twelve.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  14. Cook, T. D.,Deng, Y.,Morgano, E.(2007).Friendship Influences during Early Adolescence: The Special Role of Friends' Grade Point Average.Journal of Research on Adolescence,17(2),325-356.
  15. Cummings, J. N.,Cross, R.(2003).Structural Properties of Work Groups and Their Consequences for Performance.Social Networks,25(3),197-210.
  16. Currarini, Sergio,Jackson, M. O.,Pin, P.(2010).Identifying the Roles of Race-based Choice and Chance in High School Friendship Network Formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,107(11),4857-4861.
  17. De Nooy, Wouter,Mrvar, A.,Batagelj, V.(2005).Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  18. Dunphy, Dexter C.(1963).The Social Structure of Urban Adolescent Peer Groups.Sociometry,26(2),230-246.
  19. Eckes(ed.),Trautner, H. M.(ed.)(2000).The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
  20. Eder, D.,Hallinan M. T.(1978).Sex Differences in Children's Friendships.American Sociological Review,43(2),237-250.
  21. Erikson, E.(1968).Identity: Youth and Crisis.New York:Norton.
  22. Fox, M.,Gibbs, M.,Auerbach, D.(1985).Age and Gender Dimensions of Friendship.Psychology of Women Quarterly,9(4),489-502.
  23. Frank, O.,Strauss, D.(1986).Markov Graphs.Journal of the American Statistical Association,81(395),832-842.
  24. Freeman, L. C.(1978).Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification.Social Networks,1(3),215-239.
  25. Freeman, Linton C.(2004).The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science.Vancouver, BC:Empirical Press.
  26. Furman, W.(ed.),Brown, B.B.(ed.),Feiring, C.(ed.)(1999).The Development of Romantic Relationships in Adolescence.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  27. Gilligan, C.(1982).In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  28. Gondal, Neha,McLean, Paul D.(2013).What Makes a Network Go Round? Exploring the Structure of a Strong Component with Exponential Random Graph Models.Social Networks,35(4),499-513.
  29. Goodreau, S. M.,Kitts, J. A.,Morri, M.(2009).Birds of a Feather, or Friend of a Friend? Using Exponential Random Graph Models to Investigate Adolescent Social Networks.Demography,46(1),103-125.
  30. Goodreau, Steven(2007).Advances in Exponential Random Graph (P*) Models Applied to a Large Social Network.Social Networks,29(2),231-248.
  31. Gould, Roger V.(2002).The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test.American Journal of Sociology,107(5),1143-1178.
  32. Grannis, R.(2009).Paths and Semipaths: Reconceptualizing Structural Cohesion in Terms of Directed Relations.Sociological Methodology,39(1),117-150.
  33. Hall, J. A.(2011).Sex Differences in Friendship Expectations: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,28(6),723-747.
  34. Hallinan, Maureen T.,Teixeira, R. A.(1987).Students' Interracial Friendships: Individual Characteristics, Structural Effects and Racial Differences.American Journal of Education,95(4),1563-1583.
  35. Halpern, Diane,Eliot, F. L.,Bigler, R. S.,Fabes, R. A.,Hanish, L. D.,Hyde, J.,Liben, L. S.,Martin, C. L.(2011).The Pseudoscience of Single-Sex Schooling.Science,333(6050),1706-1707.
  36. Hand, Laura Shaffer,Furman, W.(2009).Rewards and Costs in Adolescent Other-sex Friendships: Comparisons to Same-sex Friendships and Romantic Relationships.Social Development,18(2),270-287.
  37. Hendrick, C.(ed.),Hendrick, S.S.(ed.)(2000).Close Relationships: A Sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  38. Holland, Paul W.,Leinhardt, Samuel(1970).A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometric Data.American Journal of Sociology,76(3),492-513.
  39. Hunter, David,Goodreau, R. S.,Handcock, M.(2008).Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models.Journal of the American Statistical Association,103(481),248-258.
  40. Hussong, A. M.(2000).Distinguishing Mean and Structural Sex Differences in Adolescent Friendship Quality.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,17(2),223-243.
  41. Ibarra, Herminia(1992).Homophily and Differential Returns: Sex Differences in Network Structure and Access in an Advertising Firm.Administrative Science Quarterly,37(3),422-447.
  42. Johnson, H. D.(2004).Gender, Grade and Relationship Differences in Emotional Closeness within Adolescent Friendships.Adolescence,39(154),243-255.
  43. Knecht, A.(2008).Netherlands,Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology(ICS), Utrecht University.
  44. Kohlberg, Lawrence,Gilligan, C.(1971).The Adolescent as Philosopher: The Discovery of Self in a Postconventional World.Daedalus,100(4),1051-1086.
  45. Kreager, Derek A.,Molloy, L. E.,Moody, J.,Feinberg, M. E.(2016).Friends First? The Peer Network Origins of Adolescent Dating.Journal of Research on Adolescence,26(2),257-269.
  46. Lazega, Emmanuel,Pattison, P. E.(1999).Multiplexity, Generalized Exchange and Cooperation in Organizations: A Case Study.Social Networks,21(1),67-90.
  47. Leaper, C.(ed.)(1994).Childhood Gender Segregation: Causes and Consequences.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  48. Lomi, Alessandro,Lusher, Dean,Pattison, Philippa E.,Robins, Garry(2014).The Focused Organization of Advice Relations: A Study in Boundary Crossing.Organization Science,25(2),438-457.
  49. Lubbers, Miranda J.(2003).Group Composition and Network Structure in School Classes: A Multilevel Application of the P* Model.Social Networks,25(4),309-332.
  50. Maddux, W. W.,Brewer, M. B.(2005).Gender Differences in the Relational and Collective Bases for Trust.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations,8(2),159-171.
  51. McPherson, Miller,Smith-Lovin, L.,Cook, J. M.(2001).Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.Annual Review of Sociology,27,415-444.
  52. Mercken, Liesbeth,Snijders, T. A. B.,Steglich, C.,de Vries, H.(2009).Dynamics of Adolescent Friendship Networks and Smoking Behavior: Social Network Analyses in Six European Countries.Social Science and Medicine,69(10),1506-1514.
  53. Miller, J. B.(1976).Toward a New Psychology of Women.Boston:Beacon Press.
  54. Mouw, Ted,Entwisle, B.(2006).Residential Segregation and Interracial Friendship in Schools.American Journal of Sociology,112(2),394-441.
  55. Muuss, Rolf Eduard Helmut(ed.),Velder, Eli(ed.),Porton, Harriet(ed.)(1995).Theories of Adolescence.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  56. Putnam, R. D.(1993).The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life.The American Prospect,13,35-42.
  57. Putnam, R. D.(2000).Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York:Simon and Schuster.
  58. Rank, C.,Rank, O.,Wald, A.(2006).Integrated versus Core-Periphery Structures in Regional Biotechnology Networks.European Management Journal,24(1),73-85.
  59. Robins, G.,Elliott, P.,Pattison, P.(2001).Network Models for Social Selection Processes.Social Networks,23(1),1-30.
  60. Robins, G.,Pattison, P.,Kalish, Y.,Lusher, D.(2007).An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph (P*) Models for Social Networks.Social Networks,29(2),173-191.
  61. Robins, G.,Pattison, P.,Wang, Peng(2009).Closure, Connectivity and Degree Distributions: Exponential Random Graph (P*) Models for Directed Social Networks.Social Networks,31(2),105-117.
  62. Robins, G.,Snijders, T.,Wang, Peng,Handcock, M.,Pattison, P.(2007).Recent Developments in Exponential Random Graph (P*) Models for Social Networks.Social Networks,29(2),192-215.
  63. Robnett, Rachael,Leaper, C.(2013).Friendship Groups, Personal Motivation, and Gender in Relation to High School Students' STEM Career Interest.Journal of Research on Adolescence,23(4),652-664.
  64. Rubin, K. H.(ed.),Bukowski, W. M.(ed.),Laursen, B.(ed.)(2009).Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships and Groups.New York:Guilford Press.
  65. Rubin, L. B.(1985).Just Friends: The Role of Friendship in Our Lives.New York:Harper and Row.
  66. Sanne, Smith,Maas, Ineke,van Tubergen, Frank(2014).Ethnic Ingroup Friendships in Schools: Testing the By-Product Hypothesis in England, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden.Social Networks,39(1),33-45.
  67. Snijders, T. A. B.(2002).Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of Exponential Random Graph Models.Journal of Social Structure,3(2),1-40.
  68. Snijders, T. A. B.,Pattison, P.,Robins, G. L.,Handcock, M.(2006).New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models.Sociological Methodology,36(1),99-153.
  69. Steglich, Christian,Snijders, T. A. B.,Pearson, M.(2010).Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence.Sociological Methodology,40(1),329-393.
  70. Vaquera, Elizabeth,Kao, Grace(2008).Do You Like Me as Much as I Like You? Friendship Reciprocity and Its Effects on School Outcomes among Adolescents.Social Science Research,37(1),55-72.
  71. Vermeij, Lotte,Van Duijn, M. A. J.,Baerveldt, C.(2009).Ethnic Segregation in Context: Social Discrimination among Native Dutch Pupils and Their Ethnic Minority Classmates.Social Networks,31(4),230-239.
  72. Wallerstein, I.(1974).The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century.New York:Academic Press.
  73. Wang, Peng,Robins, Garry,Pattison, Philippa(2009).PNet: A Program for the Simulation and Estimation of Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models USER MANUAL.Melbourne:University of Melbourne Press.
  74. Wasserman, S.,Pattison, P.(1996).Logit Models and Logistic Regressions for Social Networks: I. An Introduction to Markov Graphs and p*.Psychometrika,61(3),401-425.
  75. White, H. C.,Boorman, S. A.,Breiger, R. L.(1976).Social Structure from Multiple Networks: I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions.American Journal of Sociology,81(4),730-780.
  76. Worell, J.(ed.)(2001).Encyclopedia of Women and Gender.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
  77. Yohanan, Eshel,Kurman, J.(1990).Ethnic Equity and Asymmetry in Peer Acceptance.Journal of Social Psychology,130(6),713-723.
  78. Zeng, Zhen,Xie, Y.(2008).A Preference-Opportunity-Choice Framework with Applications to Intergroup Friendship.American Journal of Sociology,114(3),615-648.
  79. 呂玉瑕(2011)。臺灣民眾性別角色態度的變遷：1991-2001。臺灣社會學刊，48，51-94。
  80. 呂玉瑕、周玉慧(2015)。二十一世紀臺灣青少年性別角色態度之形成與變遷。臺灣社會學刊，58，95-155。
  81. 救國團編(1998)。Y 世代與Z世代：青少年文化與秩序之探討。台北:救國團社會研究院。
  82. 黃文三(2006)。性別角色與教育。台北:群英。
  83. 熊瑞梅(2001)。都市事件行動體系的分析—以臺中市為例。國立台灣大學社會學刊，29，59-110。
被引用次数
  1. 蔣世寶(2023)。大專班級組織成員對於課程活動之參與態度研究－以視覺傳達設計專業為例。教育研究與實踐學刊，70(1)，49-76。
  2. 葉高華,吳秋園(2021)。高中班級内友誼網絡與課業諮詢網絡的生成。調查研究-方法與應用，46，161-191。
print cancel