题名

臺灣社區照顧關懷據點與需求人口之資源供需差異分析：應用地理可近性方法評估社區照顧資源配置妥適性

并列篇名

Disparity in Resource Allocation between Community Care Centers and the Demand Population in Taiwan: An Evaluation Conducted by Geographic Accessibility

DOI

10.7014/SRMA.2020040002

作者

曾明性(Ming-Hseng Tseng)；吳慧卿(Hui-Ching Wu)

关键词

社區照顧關懷據點 ； 社區照顧 ； 地理可近性 ； 資源配置 ； 空間不平等 ； community care center ； community-based care ； geographic accessibility ； resources allocation ； spatial inequality

期刊名称

調查研究-方法與應用

卷期/出版年月

44期（2020 / 04 / 01）

页次

41 - 95

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

提高社區照顧關懷據點可近性，有助落實活躍老化政策。本文以2017年衛生福利部公開資料為資源提供點，65歲以上人口為需求人口，運用皮爾森相關係數、地理可近性、吉尼係數等方法，以縣市區域平均法、分區（同縣市使用）最近距離法及全島（跨縣市共享）最近距離法，進行資源供需差距分析。研究發現，需求人口區位與據點位置與數量，存在資源供需差距。首先，從線性相關分析發現，皮爾森相關係數相當低，顯示資源供需區位分布相關程度低。其次，就據點服務負荷量，50%據點服務負荷量低於平均數，推論為位置偏僻或與其他據點鄰近，導致服務人口較少。第三，就取得據點服務最近距離分析，平均值最大縣市是花蓮縣、嘉義縣、南投縣、新竹縣、臺東縣，若將使用方式以全島（跨縣市共享）最近道路距離法評估，除臺東縣，其餘縣市最近距離都能縮短。最後，就需求人口據點擁有率（地理可近性分數），吉尼係數呈現不公平趨向，「中位數－平均數」皆負值，顯示縣市資源分配不平等。
英文摘要

Neighborhood social networks are influential for the elderly's health and well-being, and community-based care can enhance their participation in social activities. The geographic accessibility of community care centers can reduce traffic inconvenience and advance the policy of active aging. This study focuses on the congruence between the demand population and the distribution of the supply of appropriate resources. The investigation applied the methods of Pearson's correlation, geographical accessibility, and the Gini coefficient to explore the service loading ratio of, resource ownership of, and nearest distance to community care centers. In this study, community care centers were held to be the supply points for the resources based on information derived from open data available in 2017. The demand population of the elderly was calculated according to the population aged 65 years or older in 2017. On the basis of these methods and data, our study provides a comparative analysis by using the administrative district average method, the nearest distance method of the same administrative district, and the nearest distance method of cross-county resource sharing. The results obtained from this investigation demonstrate the inconsistency between the density of the demand population location and the geographical distribution of community care centers. First, Pearson's correlation coefficients show a low degree of conformity in the resource allocation's demand and supply. This finding indicates inconsistency between the resource supply and the demand population. Second, according to the amount of service loading, 50% of the centers show below-average values. These figures indicate that the locations are isolated or are adjacent to each other and are thus lacking in demand population. Third, based on the largest average of the nearest distances, the top five counties were found to be rural. Applying the nearest distance method of cross-county sharing of resources to reassess accessibility, all except Taitung County can shorten the nearest distance. These results support our research position of encouraging local governments to share community care centers. Finally, based on the service resource ownership rates of the demand population (geographic accessibility scores), the Gini coefficients are between 0.4~0.7, emphasizing the seriousness of the inequality between the resource supply and the demand population. In sum, the appraisal of spatial resource allocation is a key issue for governmental agenda-setting, whereby geographic accessibility assessments should examine both the demand side (e.g. elderly demand population, and rural/urban locations of administrative districts) and the supply side (e.g. distance factor, and capacity of community care centers). Geographic accessibility and the equality of resource distribution need to be examined synchronously in order to optimize the spatial locations of community-based care resources. Our study suggests that effective policy creation can allow the demand population, regardless of the area of the registered permanent residence, to make use of community care centers, and encourages local governments to cooperate and to share their community care resources. Through our policy suggestion of the cross-county sharing of resources, the inconsistencies between the demand population and the distribution of the supply of resources can easily be improved by enhancing the geographic accessibility of the elderly. This move can help the elderly to avail themselves of community care centers, and promote the execution of the ＂aging in place＂ policy goal.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 王仕圖, S.-T.(2013)。非營利組織在社區照顧服務的協調合作：以社區照顧關懷據點為例。臺大社會工作學刊，27，185-228。
    連結：
  2. 呂寶靜, P.-C.(2012)。懷舊團體介入方案對增進社區老人福祉成效之初探。臺灣社會工作學刊，10，119-152。
    連結：
  3. 卓春英, C.-Y.(2017)。社會福利民營化之實踐與省思─以社區照顧關懷據點之實施為例。社會發展研究學刊，19，112-140。
    連結：
  4. 馬振來, C.-L.,郭俊巖, C.-Y.,呂季芳, C.-F.(2017)。體適能導入社區關懷據點對高齡者身心健康影響之探討。社會發展研究學刊，20，1-38。
    連結：
  5. 章殷超, Y.-C.,溫在弘, T.-H.,賴美淑, M.-S.(2011)。比較不同地理可近性分析方法於評估台灣各鄉鎮每萬人口西醫師數之差異。台灣公共衛生雜誌，30(6)，558-572。
    連結：
  6. 黃松林, S.-L.,汪中華, C.-H.,楊秋燕, C.-Y.(2012)。社區照顧據點服務與社區生活滿意度之探討─以彰化縣據點為例。社會發展研究學刊，11，86-110。
    連結：
  7. 廖興中, H.-C.(2013)。臺灣小兒科醫療資源空間可接近性分析。公共行政學報，44，1-39。
    連結：
  8. 羅秀華, S.-H.(2010)。社區關懷據點的使用空間分析。東吳社會工作學報，22，51-87。
    連結：
  9. Arcury, Thomas A.,Gesler, Wilbert M.,Preisser, John S.,Sherman, Jill,Spencer, John,Perin, Jamie(2005).The Effects of Geography and Spatial Behavior on Health Care Utilization among the Residents of a Rural Region.Health Services Research,40(1),135-156.
  10. Baldwin, Steven(1993).The Myth of Community Care: An Alternative Neighbourhood Model of Care.London:Chapman & Hall.
  11. Berman, Peter A.,Gwatkin, Davidson R.,Burger, Susan E.(1987).Community-based Health Workers: Head Start or False Start towards Health for All?.Social science & medicine,25(5),443-459.
  12. Bolton, Matthew,Moore, Imogen,Ferreira, Ana,Day, Crispin,Bolton, Derek(2015).Community Organizing and Community Health: Piloting an Innovative Approach to Community Engagement Applied to an Early Intervention Project in South London.Journal of Public Health,38(1),115-121.
  13. Brandling, Janet,House, William(2009).Social Prescribing in General Practice: Adding Meaning to Medicine.British Journal of General Practice,59(563),454-456.
  14. Cabrera-Barona, Pablo,Blaschke, Thomas,Gaona, Gabriel(2018).Deprivation, Healthcare Accessibility and Satisfaction: Geographical Context and Scale Implications.Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy,11,313-332.
  15. Callaghan, Lisa,Brookes, Nadia,Palmer, Sinead(2017).Older People Receiving Family-based Support in the Community: A Survey of Quality of Life Among Users of ‘Shared Lives’ in England.Health & Social Care in the Community,25(5),1655-1666.
  16. Ceriani, Lidia,Verme, Paolo(2012).The Origins of the Gini Index: Extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini.The Journal of Economic Inequality,10(3),421-443.
  17. Findley, Sally,Matos, Sergio,Hicks, April,Chang, Ji,Reich, Douglas(2014).Community Health Worker Integration into the Health Care Team Accomplishes the Triple Aim in a Patient-centered Medical Home: A Bronx Tale.The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management,37(1),82-91.
  18. Gridley, Kate,Brooks, Jenni,Glendinning, Caroline(2014).Good Practice in Social Care: The Views of People with Severe and Complex Needs and Those Who Support Them.Health & Social Care in the Community,22(6),588-597.
  19. Guagliardo, Mark F.(2004).Spatial Accessibility of Primary Care: Concepts, Methods and Challenges.International Journal of Health Geographics,3(1),3.
  20. Israel, Barbara,Schulz, Amy J.,Parker, Edith A.,Becker, Adam B.(1998).Review of Community-Based Research: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health.Annual Review of Public Health,19(1),173.
  21. Jamtsho, Sonam,Corner, Robert,Dewan, Ashraf(2015).Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Spatial Accessibility to Primary Health Care in Bhutan.ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information,4(3),1584-1604.
  22. Levesque, Jean-Frederic,Harris, Mark F.,Russell, Grant(2013).Patient-centred Access to Health Care: Conceptualising Access at the Interface of Health Systems and Populations.International Journal for Equity in Health,12(1),18.
  23. Luo, Wei,Qi, Yi(2009).An Enhanced Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (E2SFCA) Method for Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Primary Care Physicians.Health & Place,15(4),1100-1107.
  24. Luo, Wei,Wang, Fahui(2003).Spatial Accessibility to Primary Care and Physician Shortage Area Designation: A Case Study in Illinois with GIS Approaches.Geographic Information Systems and Health Applications,London:
  25. Luo, Wei,Wang, Fahui(2003).Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Health Care in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in the Chicago Region.Environment and Planning B,30(6),865-884.
  26. McGrail, Matthew R.,Humphreys, John S.(2009).The Index of Rural Access: An Inno-vative Integrated Approach for Measuring Primary Care Access.BMC Health Services Research,9(1),124.
  27. McGrail, Matthew R.,Humphreys, John S.(2009).Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Primary Care in Rural Areas: Improving the Effectiveness of the Two-step Floating Catchment Area Method.Applied Geography,29(4),533-541.
  28. McLafferty, Sara L.(2003).GIS and Health Care.Annual Review of Public Health,24(1),25-42.
  29. Mitchell, Shannon M.,Shortell, Stephen M.(2000).The Governance and Management of Effective Community Health Partnerships: A Typology for Research, Policy, and Practice.Milbank Quarterly,78(2),241-289.
  30. Myers, Jerome L.,Well, Arnold,Lorch, Robert Frederick(2010).Research Design and Statistical Analysis.New York:Routledge.
  31. Page, Nicholas,Langford, Mitchel,Higgs, Gary(2018).An Evaluation of Alternative Measures of Accessibility for Investigating Potential ‘Deprivation Amplification’ in Service Provision.Applied Geography,95,19-33.
  32. Peters, David H.,Garg, Anu,Bloom, Gerry,Walker, Damian G.,Brieger, William R.,Rahman, M. Hafizur(2008).Poverty and Access to Health Care in Developing Countries.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1136(1),161-171.
  33. Phelan, Elizabeth A.,Anderson, Lynda A.,Lacroix, Andrea Z.,Larson, Eric B.(2004).Older Adults’ Views of "Successful Aging"-How Do They Compare with Researchers’ Definitions?.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,52(2),211-216.
  34. South, Jane,Higgins, Tracy J.,Woodall, James,White, Simon M.(2008).Can Social Pre-scribing Provide the Missing Link?.Primary Health Care Research & Development,9(4),310-318.
  35. Tseng, Ming-Hseng,Wu, Hui-Ching(2018).The Geographic Accessibility and Inequality of Community-based Elderly Learning Resources: A Remodeling Assessment, 2009~2017.Educational Gerontology,44(4),226-246.
  36. Wang, Fahui,Luo, Wei(2005).Assessing Spatial and Nonspatial Factors for Healthcare Access: Towards an Integrated Approach to Defining Health Professional Shortage Areas.Health & Place,11(2),131-146.
  37. World Health Organization, 2002, “Active Ageing: A Policy Framework.” http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/active_ageing/en/ (Date visited: September 13, 2017).
  38. Xu, Yanqing,Fu, Cong,Onega, Tracy,Shi, Xun,Wang, Fahui(2017).Disparities in Geographic Accessibility of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers in the United States.Journal of Medical Systems,41(12),203.
  39. Yitzhaki, Shlomo(1979).Relative Deprivation and the Gini Coefficient.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,93(2),321-324.
  40. 內政部戶政司，2017，人口統計資料（http://www.ris.gov.tw/346，取用日期：2017 年12 月 4 日）。（Department of Household Registration, M.O.I., 2017, “Statistics” http://www.ris.gov.tw/346 (Date visited: December 4, 2017.)）
  41. 交通部，2017， 交通路網數值圖服務網（https://gist-map.motc.gov.tw/General/LayerMessage，取用日期：2017 年 6 月 1 日）。（Ministry of Transportation and Commu-nications, 2017, “Gis-t” https://gist-map.motc.gov.tw/General/LayerMessage (Date visited: June 1, 2017.)）
  42. 何華欽, H.-C.,李庭志, T.-Z.(2010)。宗教團體投入社區照顧關懷據點之研究。靜宜人文社會學報，4(2)，187-212。
  43. 何華欽, H.-C.,林宏陽, H.-Y.,戴品芳, P.-F.,何華倫, H.-L.(2016)。高齡者社區參與對心理福祉的影響：以屏東縣社區關懷據點為例。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，6(3)，45-80。
  44. 吳秀照, S.-C.,陶蕃瀛, F.-Y.(2017)。另一種社區照顧：友善共老的社區家園建構。社區發展季刊，159，313-321。
  45. 吳淑瓊, S.-C.(2005)。人口老化與長期照護政策。國家政策季刊，4(4)，5-24。
  46. 吳淑瓊, S.-C.,江東亮, T.-L.(1995)。台灣地區長期照護的問題與對策。中華公共衛生雜誌，14(3)，246-255。
  47. 吳淑瓊, S.-C.,莊坤洋, K.-Y.(2001)。在地老化：台灣二十一世紀長期照護的政策方向。台灣公共衛生雜誌，20(3)，192-201。
  48. 邱泯科, M.-K.(2010)。關懷據點老人健康促進活動推動現況與檢討─以苗栗縣經驗為例。社區發展季刊，130，209-225。
  49. 邱泯科, M.-K,傅秀秀, H.-H.(2014)。初探高齡者使用社區照顧關懷據點服務之經驗─以台北市關渡關懷據點為例。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，4(1)，1-39。
  50. 徐震, James C.(2004)。臺灣社區發展與社區營造的異同─論社區工作中微視與鉅視面的兩條路線。社區發展季刊，107，22-31。
  51. 張英陣, Y.-C.(2016)。福利社區化的省思：社區治理的觀點。社區發展季刊，154，44-55。
  52. 莊俐昕, L.-H.,黃源協, Y.-S.(2013)。社區照顧關懷據點成效評估：服務提供者觀點之分析。社區發展季刊，141，230-246。
  53. 陳燕禎, Y.-J.,林義盛, Y.-S.(2010)。社區照顧關懷據點之實踐經驗─社會工作者的田野觀察。社區發展季刊，132，385-403。
  54. 曾明性, M.-H.,陳冠志, G.-J.,吳慧卿, H.-C.(2016)。高齡人口與社區關懷據點之在地老化資源分布探討。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，4(2)，209-210。
  55. 黃彥宜, Y.-Y.,陳昭榮, J.-R.(2016)。社區政策與措施中的空間不均議題。社區發展季刊，154，32-43。
  56. 詹雪梅, X.-M.,周柏宏, B.-H.(2017)。彰化縣馬興社區關懷據點的服務成效探討。社區發展季刊，157，348-360。
  57. 監察院，2017，監察院調查報告案號：106 內調 0054 （https://www.cy.gov.tw/sp.asp?xdURL=./di/RSS/detail.asp&ctNode=871&mp=1&no=5765，取用日期：107 年 1 月 1日）。（The Control Yuan, 2017, “Investigation Report No. 106II0054” https://www.cy.gov.tw/sp.asp?xdURL=./di/RSS/detail.asp&ctNode=871&mp=1&no=5765 (Date visited: January 1, 2018.)）
  58. 衛生福利部，2018，長照政策專區（https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/mp-201.html，取用日期：107 年3 月 1 日）。（Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2018, “Long-Term Care Policy.” https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/mp-201.html (Date visited: March 1, 2018.)）
  59. 衛生福利部，2017，普設社區照顧關懷據點，廣佈多元長照服務據點（https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-37558-1.html， 取用日期：106 年 9 月 16 日）。（Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2017, “Focus News: Community Care Centers and Diversified Long-Term Care Stations.” https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-37558-1.html (Date visited: September 16, 2017.)）
  60. 衛生福利部社會及家庭署，2017，社區照顧關懷據點服務入口網（https://ccare.sfaa.gov.tw/home/community-point，取用日期：2017 年 12 月 1 日）。（Social and Family Affairs Administration, M.O.H.W., 2017, “Community Care Canters Service.” https://ccare.sfaa.gov.tw/home/community-point (Date visited: December 1, 2017.)）
  61. 衛生福利部國民健康署，2017，《2017 年臺灣各縣市衛生所統計年報》。臺北：衛生福利部國民健康署。（Health Promotion Administration, M.O.H.W., 2017, “2017 Statistical Annual Report of Public Health Centers in Taiwan.” Taipei: Health Promotion Adminis-tration, M.O.H.W.）
  62. 蕭文高, W.-K.(2016)。十年有成：社區照顧關懷據點計畫之挑戰與前瞻。社區發展季刊，154，118-131。
被引用次数
  1. 鄭清霞,歐紫彤,洪惠芬(2023)。輪班照顧到遷移照顧：男性照顧者返鄉照顧歷程的社會脈絡初探。人文社會科學研究，17(3)，23-60。
print cancel