题名

移動的階級不平等：臺灣民眾的交通弱勢與交通事故風險初探

并列篇名

Class Inequality of Moving: A Preliminary Study of Transportation-Related Lifestyle and the Risk of Traffic Accidents in Taiwan

DOI

10.7014/SRMA.2021100004

作者

林宗弘(Thung-hong Lin)；許耿銘(Keng-ming Hsu)；李俊穎(Chun-yin Lee)

关键词

階級不平等 ； 交通弱勢 ； 公共交通可及性 ； 交通可負擔性 ； 車禍 ； class inequality ； transport disadvantage ； public transport accessibility ； transport affordability ； traffic accident

期刊名称

調查研究-方法與應用

卷期/出版年月

47期（2021 / 10 / 01）

页次

113 - 166

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

交通系統是各國重要的基礎建設，涉及不同社會階層民眾移動能力之不平等。然而，針對民眾社會階級可負擔性、公共交通工具可及性對交通方式選擇的影響，本土少有實證研究，連結階級不平等與車禍風險的分析更少。因此，本研究運用臺灣社會變遷調查2019第七期第五次（科技與風險組）的問卷數據，分析臺灣各階級民眾之交通方式與其車禍風險差異。運用卜瓦松（Poisson）與多類別邏輯迴歸（Multinomial Logistic Regression）模型統計分析發現，階級不平等會影響臺灣民眾選擇機車、汽車作為主要交通方式的機率，其中雇主最常使用汽車，非技術工人、自雇者與失業者最常使用機車，非勞動力較依賴步行與公共交通系統。其次，機車比汽車或公共交通系統容易導致車禍發生率提高，而受訪者居住地區捷運站密度，會顯著降低其使用機車機率，並減緩遭遇車禍的風險。研究結果建議以公共交通服務特別是捷運替代個人交通工具特別是機車，以減少城鄉差距與階級的交通弱勢，也有助減少機車使用比例，並且降低車禍風險。
英文摘要

Transportation systems are critical infrastructure for all countries and provide mobility accessible to all. However, some people's mobility and risks of transportation are more equal than others. In order to explain the inequality in transportation, studies have investigated transport affordability and public transport accessibility for people of different social classes. Yet, there has been little discussion about empirically investigating the relationship between social class and the risk of transportation accidents. In Taiwan, the high mortality rate of traffic accidents, especially involving motorcycles as the major mode of transport, has been publicly criticized for years. Therefore, we investigate the relationship between social classes, modes of transport, and the risks of traffic accidents in Taiwan. Three hypotheses are derived from the international literature and empirically tested with data from the 2019 Taiwan Social Change Survey. First, the social class of Taiwanese shaped their risk of car accidents. The lower classes such as workers and farmers were exposed to and suffered from higher risk of car accidents due to their longer driving time and distance resulting from their occupational and commuting needs. Second, people from lower classes in Taiwan tended to choose motorcycles as the major daily mode of transport because of their affordability; and using a motorcycle increased their risk of suffering from traffic accidents. Third, the lower accessibility of public transport services increased the probability of people using a motorcycle, and using a motorcycle increased the risk. For the sake of concentrating on this issue, we participated in the design of the 2019 Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS Round 7, Year 5): Technology and Risk Society. The questionnaire asked the major mode of transport and the frequency of car accidents the respondents had experienced during the last two decades. We merge two levels of data to break through the methodological limitations of the survey. The first level is the sampled data of socioeconomic status and traffic behavior in the TSCS. The second level measuring the accessibility of public transport services is the overall traffic development information, such as the densities of mass transport stations including railways, subways and buses of the township. From Poisson regression results, it can be seen that class inequality significantly affected an individual's choice of whether to adopt mass transit, a motorcycle, or a car as their primary mode of transport in their daily lives. Motorcycles were the main form of transportation (53%) in Taiwan. What is more, the results indicated that employers tended to drive cars; unskilled workers, self-employed individuals (including farmers), and unemployed individuals tended to ride motorcycles; and individuals who are not in the workforce tended to walk or use mass transit. In addition, the motorcyclists were significantly more prone to accidents than respondents driving cars or taking mass transit. In fact, respondents living in an area of higher density with mass rapid transit (MRT) stations tended to use the MRT and had a lower likelihood of using motorcycles; and these respondents had a lower risk of car accidents. Most important of all, the research findings may serve as a guide for transport policymakers; that is, the risk of car accidents in Taiwan could be reduced by building MRT stations and by reducing class inequalities vis-à-vis moving, the urban-rural transport gap, and motorcycle ridership.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 吳沛儒, Pei-Ju,蘇昭銘, Jau-Ming,吳東凌, Tung-Ling,林良泰, Liang-Tay,黃啟倡, Chi-Chang,鍾俊魁, Jiun-Kuei,張和盛, Ho-Sheng,何毓芬, Yu-Fen,簡君麟, Chun-Lin(2020)。建構交通事件之人工智慧物件偵測邏輯與實證研究。運輸學刊，32(3)，299-320。
    連結：
  2. 邱裕鈞, Yu-Chiun,溫傑華, Chieh-Hua,陳韋穎, Wei-Ying,王穆衡, Mu-Han,傅強, Chiang,曾幸敏, Hsing-Min,林育瑄, Yu-Shiuan(2014)。旅運者運具選擇行為異質性之研析：混合羅吉特模式之應用。運輸計劃季刊，43(2)，143-171。
    連結：
  3. 張國暉, Kuo-Hui(2011)。追尋主體性的工程設計：威權政治轉型下的臺灣高鐵土木設計。臺灣社會研究季刊，85，157-200。
    連結：
  4. 陳淑美, Shu-Mei,張金鶚, Chin-Oh(2004)。三代同堂家庭遷移決策之研究。人文及社會科學集刊，16(2)，325-348。
    連結：
  5. 曾平毅, Pin-Yin,連瑋鑫, Wei-Hsin(2020)。小客車車輛顏色與交通事故關聯性之初探。運輸計畫季刊，49(2)，117-146。
    連結：
  6. 黃令名, Ling-Ming(2016)。通往「現代」的曲折軌道 : 臺北捷運的詮釋彈性與科技生活形式。科技、醫療與社會，22，9-62。
    連結：
  7. 新北市政府交通局, New Taipei City Government(2019)。捷運環狀線交通施政規劃。都市交通，34(2)，1-9。
    連結：
  8. 鄭陸霖, Lu-Lin(2006)。幻象之後：臺灣汽車產業發展經驗與跨界產業場域理論。臺灣社會學，11，111-174。
    連結：
  9. Adey, Peter(2009).Mobility: Key Ideas in Geography.London:Taylor and Francis.
  10. Agresti, Alan(2002).Categorical Data Analysis.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Allen, Jeff,Farber, Steven(2019).Sizing up Transport Poverty: A National Scale Accounting of Low-Income Households Suffering from Inaccessibility in Canada, and What to Do about It.Transport Policy,74,214-223.
  12. Andersson, David Emanuel,Shyr, Oliver F.,Fu, Johnson(2010).Does High-speed Rail Accessibility Influence Residential Property Prices? Hedonic Estimates from Southern Taiwan.Journal of Transport Geography,18(1),166-174.
  13. Banister, D.(2018).Inequality in Transport.Marcham, Oxfordshire:Alexandrine Press.
  14. Blau, Peter M.,Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967).The American Occupational Structure.New York:Wiley.
  15. Bora, Bhaswati,Landge, Vishrut,Dalai, Bahuguna(2018).Socio-Economic Costing of Road Traffic Accidents: Evidence from Nagpur City, Maharashtra, India.Current Science,114(6),1275-1283.
  16. Bunn, Fernando,Zannin, Pau Henriquelo Trombetta(2016).Assessment of Railway Noise in an Urban Setting.Applied Acoustics,104,16-23.
  17. Castells, Manuel(1977).The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach.MA:The MIT Press.
  18. Chang, Hsin-Li,Yeh, Tsu-Hurng(2007).Motorcyclist Accident Involvement by Age, Gender, and Risky Behaviors in Taipei, Taiwan.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,10(2),109-122.
  19. Chang, Ya-Hui,Li, Chung-Yi,Lu, Tsung-Hsueh,Artanti, Kurnia Dwi,Hou, Wen-Hsuan(2020).Risk of Injury and Mortality among Driver Victims Involved in Single-Vehicle Crashes in Taiwan: Comparisons between Vehicle Types.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,17(13),1-9.
  20. Chen, Ching-Fu,Lai, Wen-Tai(2011).The Effects of Rational and Habitual Factors on Mode Choice Behaviors in a Motorcycle-Dependent Region: Evidence from Taiwan.Transport Policy,18(5),711-718.
  21. Chen, H. Y,Senserrick, Teresa,Chang, Hsing-Yi,Ivers, Rebecca,Martiniuk, Alex,Boufous, Soufiane,Norton, Robyn(2010).Road Crash Trends for Young Drivers in New South Wales, Australia, from 1997 to 2007.Traffic Injury Prevention,11(1),8-15.
  22. Cubbin, Catherine,Smith, Gordon S.(2002).Socioeconomic Inequalities in Injury: Critical Issues in Design and Analysis.Annual Review of Public Health,23(1),349-375.
  23. Currie, Graham,Delbosc, Alexa(2011).Transport Disadvantage: A Review.New Perspectives and Methods in Transport and Social Exclusion Research,Bingley:
  24. Delbosc, Alex,Currie, Graham(2012).Choice and Disadvantage in Low-Car Ownership Households.Transport Policy,23,8-14.
  25. Denney, Justin T.,He, Monica(2014).The Social Side of Accidental Death.Social Science Research,43,92-107.
  26. Di Milia, Lee,Smolensky, Michael H.,Costa, Giovanni,Howarth, Heidi D.,Ohayon, Maurice M.,Philip, Pierre(2011).Demographic Factors, Fatigue, and Driving Accidents: An Examination of the Published Literature.Accident Analysis & Prevention,43(2),516-532.
  27. Dodson, Jago,Gleeson, Brendan,Evans, Rick,Sipe, Neil(2007).Investigating the Social Dimensions of Transport Disadvantage II: From Concepts to Methods through an Empirical Case Study.Urban Policy and Research,25(1),63-89.
  28. Erikson, Robert,Goldthorpe, John H.(1992).The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  29. Falavigna, Claudio,Hernandez, Diego(2016).Assessing Inequalities on Public Transport Affordability in Two Latin American Cities: Montevideo (Uruguay) and Córdoba (Argentina).Transport Policy,45,145-155.
  30. Fu, Xin,Qiang, Yongjie,Wang, Jianwei,Zhao, Xiaoxuan,Hwang, Feng-Jang,Chen, Chi-Hua(2021).Urban Public Transport Accessibility to Medical Services from the Perspective of Residents’ Travel: A Hybrid Assessment Based on the Whole Process.IEEE Access,9,8977-8989.
  31. Giddens, Anthony(1991).Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.London:Polity Press.
  32. Giuliano, G.(2005).Low Income, Public Transit, and Mobility.Transportation Research Record,1927(1),63-70.
  33. Hamidi, Shima,Ewing, Reid(2015).Is Sprawl Affordable for Americans? Exploring the Association between Housing and Transportation Affordability and Urban Sprawl.Transportation Research Record,2500(1),75-79.
  34. Hamidi, Shima,Jahan, Jinat,Moazzeni, Somayeh(2018).Does Location Matter? Performance Analysis of the Affordable Housing Programs with Respect to Transportation Affordability in Dallas Fort Worth (DFW) Metropolis.Transportation Research Record,2672(3),194-205.
  35. Harper, Sam,Charters, Thomas J.,Strumpf, Erin C.(2015).Trends in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Motor Vehicle Accident Deaths in the United States, 1995–2010.American Journal of Epidemiology,182(7),606-614.
  36. Hasselberg, Marie,Laflamme, Lucie(2003).Socioeconomic Background and Road Traffic Injuries: A Study of Young Car Drivers in Sweden.Traffic Injury Prevention,4(3),249-254.
  37. Heinen, Eva,Chatterjee, Kiron(2015).The Same Mode Again? An Exploration of Mode Choice Variability in Great Britain Using the National Travel Survey.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,78,266-282.
  38. Heinen, Eva,Mattioli, Giulio(2019).Does a High Level of Multimodality Mean Less Car Use? An Exploration of Multimodality Trends in England.Transportation,46,1093-1126.
  39. Herwangi, Yori,Pradono, Pradono,Syabri, Ibnu,Kustiwan, Iwan(2017).Transport Affordability and Motorcycle Ownership in Low-income Households: Case of Yogyakarta Urbanised Area, Indonesia.Eastern Asia Societies for Transportation Studies 12th Conference,Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam:
  40. Hout, Michael(2015).A Summary of What We Know about Social Mobility.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,657(1),27-36.
  41. Hsu, Tien-Pen,Tsai, Chia-Chia,Lin, Yu-Jui(2007).Comparative Analysis of Household Car and Motorcycle Ownership Characteristics.Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,7,105-115.
  42. Huang, Ling Ming(2020).Georgia Institute of Technology.
  43. Karlson, Kristian Bernt,Holm, Anders,Breen, Richard(2012).Comparing Regression Coefficients between Same-sample Nested Models Using Logit and Probit: A New Method.Sociological Methodology,42(1),286-313.
  44. Kerbo, Harold R.(2006).Social Stratification and Inequality: Class Conflict in Historical, Comparative, and Global Perspective.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  45. Kim, Junghwa,Li, Yeun-Touh,Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk(2019).Regional Heterogeneity in Taiwan HSR Demand Developments: Station Accessibility and its Effect on Usage Adoption.European Planning Studies,27(3),555-573.
  46. Lai, Ching-Huei,Huang, Wei-Shin,Chang, Kai-Kuo,Jeng, Ming-Chang,Doong, Ji-Liang(2006).Using Data Linkage to Generate 30-Day Crash-Fatality Adjustment Factors for Taiwan.Accident Analysis & Prevention,38,696-702.
  47. Lee, Jaeyoung,Abdel-Aty, Mohamed,Choi, Keechoo(2014).Analysis of Residence Characteristics of At-fault Drivers in Traffic Crashes.Safety Science,68,6-13.
  48. Lin, Jen-Jia,Chen, Chi-Hau,Hsieh, Tsung-Yu(2016).Job Accessibility and Ethnic Minority Employment in Urban and Rural Areas in Taiwan.Papers in Regional Science,95(2),363-383.
  49. Lin, Jen-Jia,Cheng, Yu-Chun(2016).Access to Jobs and Apartment Rents.Journal of Transport Geography,55,121-128.
  50. Lin, Jen-Jia,Chung, Jo-Ching(2017).Metro-Induced Gentrification: A 17-year Experience in Taipei.Cities,67,53-62.
  51. Louf, Rémi,Roth, Camille,Barthelemy, Marc(2014).Scaling in Transportation Networks.PLoS ONE,9(7),e102007.
  52. Lucas, Karen(2012).Transport and Social Exclusion: Where Are We Now?.Transport Policy,20,105-113.
  53. Lucas, Karen,Mattioli, Giulio,Verlinghieri, Ersilia,Guzman, Alvaro(2016).Transport Poverty and Its Adverse Social Consequences.Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport,169(6),353-365.
  54. Machado-León, José Luis,de Oña, Juan,de Oña, Rocío,Eboli, Laura,Mazzulla, Gabriella(2016).Socio-Economic and Driving Experience Factors Affecting Drivers’ Perceptions of Traffic Crash Risk.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,37,41-51.
  55. Özkazanç, Seher,Nihan, Fahriye,Sönmez, Özdemir(2017).Spatial Analysis of Social Exclusion from a Transportation Perspective: A Case Study of Ankara Metropolitan Area.Cities,67,74-84.
  56. Pearl, Judea(2009).Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  57. Pereira, Rafael Henrique Moreas(2019).Future Accessibility Impacts of Transport Policy Scenarios: Equity and Sensitivity to Travel Time Thresholds for Bus Rapid Transit Expansion in Rio de Janeiro.Journal of Transport Geography,74,321-332.
  58. Saberi, Meead,Wu, Hongzhi,Amoh-Gyimah, Richard,Smith, Jonathan,Arunachalam, Dharmalingam(2017).Measuring Housing and Transportation Affordability: A Case Study of Melbourne, Australia.Journal of Transport Geography,65,134-146.
  59. Seo, Wonseok,Nam, Hyung Kwon(2019).Trade-Off Relationship between Public Transportation Accessibility and Household Economy: Analysis of Subway Access Values by Housing Size.Cities,87,247-258.
  60. Shiau, Tzay-An,Huang, Min-Wei,Lin, Wen-Ya(2015).Developing an Indicator System for Measuring Taiwan’s Transport Sustainability.International Journal of Sustainable Transportation,9(2),81-92.
  61. Stanković, Milan,Gladović, Pavle,Popović, Vladimir,Lukovac, Vesko(2018).Selection Criteria and Assessment of the Impact of Traffic Accessibility on the Development of Suburbs.Sustainability,10(6),1-23.
  62. Thøgersen, John(2018).Transport-Related Lifestyle and Environmentally-Friendly Travel Mode Choices: A Multi-Level Approach.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,107,166-186.
  63. Tuan, Vu Anh(2011).Dynamic Interactions between Private Passenger Car and Motorcycle Ownership in Asia: A Cross-Country Analysis.Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,9,541-556.
  64. Ubaidillah, Nur Zaimah Binti(2019).West Yorkshire,Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
  65. Van den Berghe, W.(2017).,Brussels:Vias Institute—Knowledge Centre Road Safety.
  66. Whitlock, Gary,Norton, Norton,Clark, Taane,Pledger, Megan,Jackson, Rodney,MacMahon, Stephen(2003).Motor Vehicle Driver Injury and Socioeconomic Status: A Cohort Study with Prospective and Retrospective Driver Injuries.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,57(7),512-516.
  67. Wijnen, Wim,Stipdonk, Henk(2016).Social Costs of Road Crashes: An International Analysis.Accident Analysis & Prevention,94,97-106.
  68. World Health Organisation=WHO(2015).Deaths on the Roads: Based on the WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety.Geneva:WHO.
  69. Wright, Erik Olin(1998).Class Analysis.Social Class and Stratification: Classical Statements and Theoretical Debates,New York:
  70. Wright, Erik Olin(1985).Classes.London:Verso.
  71. Yu, Ming-Miin(2008).Measuring the Efficiency and Return to Scale Status of Multi-Mode Bus Transit—Evidence from Taiwan’s Bus System.Applied Economics Letters,15(8),647-653.
  72. 內政部警政署，2020， 歷史交通事故資料（https://www.npa.gov.tw/ch/app/data/list?module=wg074&id=2302，取用日期：2020 年 9 月 25 日）。（National Police Agency, Ministry of the Interior, 2020, “Historical Traffic Accident Data.” https://www.npa.gov.tw/ch/app/data/list?module=wg074&id=2302 (Date visited: September 25, 2020.)）
  73. 尤重道, Chung-Tao(2020)。以交通事故車輛損害之巨額賠償為思考。全國律師，23(12)，83-95。
  74. 交通部，2021，交通部統計查詢網（https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100&funid=a3301， 取用日期：2021 年 3 月 10 日）。（Ministry of Transportation and Communication, R.O.C., 2021, “Commonly Used Transportation Statistics.” https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100&funid=a3301 (Date visited: March 10, 2021.)）
  75. 交通部運輸研究所，2020，近年重要成果（https://www.iot.gov.tw/np–34–1.html，取用日期：2021 年3 月 10 日）。（Institute of Transportation, MOTC, 2020, “Recent Important Achievements.” https://www.iot.gov.tw/np– 34–1.html (Date visited: March 10, 2021.)）
  76. 交通部運輸研究所, MOTC(2019).2020 年版運輸政策白皮書（套書）—總論及七分冊.
  77. 交通部臺灣鐵路管理局，2016，車站基本資料集（https://data.gov.tw/dataset/33425，取用日期：2019 年 4 月 10 日）。（Taiwan Railway, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, R.O.C., 2016, “Basic Station Information Collection.” https://data.gov.tw/dataset/33425 (Date visited: April 10, 2019.)）
  78. 行政院，2017，前瞻基礎建設計畫（核定本）（https://achievement.ey.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=1E42BEB0F68720CB&s=07C62FA08A8D1775，取用日期：2019 年 5 月 28 日）。（Executive Yuan, 2017, “Forward-looking Basic Construction Plan (approved version).” https://achievement.ey.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=1E42BEB0F68720CB&s=07C62FA08A8D1775 (Date visited: May 28, 2019.)）
  79. 吳佳紋, Chia-Wen(2006)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所=Institute of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University。
  80. 吳俊潭, Chun-Tan(2017)。臺中=Taichung, Taiwan，朝陽科技大學財務金融系=Department of Finance, Chaoyang University of Technology。
  81. 李哲宇, Je-Yu(2008)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，世新大學社會發展研究所=Institute of Social Transformation Studies, Shih Hsin University。
  82. 林之耀, Chih-Yao(2019)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學社會學系=Department of Sociology, National Chengchi University。
  83. 林宗弘, Thung-Hong(2009)。臺灣的後工業化：階級結構的轉型與社會不平等，1992–2007。臺灣社會學刊，43，93-158。
  84. 孫璋英, Chang-Yin(2004)。新北=New Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北大學統計學系=Department of Statistics, National Taipei University。
  85. 桃園大眾捷運股份有限公司，2019，桃園捷運路線車站基本資料（https://data.gov.tw/dataset/46315，取用日期：2019 年 6 月 18 日）。（Taoyuan Metro, 2019, “Basic Infor-mation of Taoyuan MRT Stations.” https://data.gov.tw/dataset/46315 (Date visited: June 18, 2019.)）
  86. 財團法人車輛研究測試中心=Automotive Research & Testing Center(2020)。我國小客車安全法規演進現況與發展方向。新社會政策雙月刊，66，17-22。
  87. 財團法人車輛研究測試中心=Automotive Research & Testing Center(2020)。我國機車安全法規演進現況與發展方向。新社會政策雙月刊，66，23-27。
  88. 高子航, Tzu-Hang(2010)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所=Institute of Mass Communication, National Taiwan Normal University。
  89. 張家銘, Chia-Ming,吳政財, Jenq-Tsair(1997)。奇蹟與幻象：臺灣汽車產業的發展經驗。東吳社會學報，6，1-44。
  90. 張國暉, Kuo-Hui(2016)。捷運木柵線：移入的大型科技系統與在地交通建設網絡的共造。科技、醫療與社會，22，159-223。
  91. 張琬淇, Wan-Chi(2019)。宜蘭=Yilan, Taiwan，國立宜蘭大學土木工程學系=Department of Civil Engineering, National Ilan University。
  92. 張嚴云, Yen-Yun(2013)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國防醫學院公共衛生學研究所=Institute of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center。
  93. 許嘉猷, Jia-You(1994)。階級結構與階級意識比較研究論文集，臺北=Taipei:
  94. 陳吟汝, Ju-yin(2020)。事物本質在民法上之適用—以交通事故車輛損害之巨額賠償為思考。臺灣法學雜誌，390，61-70。
  95. 陳榮明, Rong-Ming(1984)。新竹=Hsinchu, Taiwan，國立交通大學運輸與物流管理學系=Department of Transportation and Logistics Management, National Chiao Tung University。
  96. 傅仰止, Yang-Chih(2020)。中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫,未出版
  97. 黃立強, Li-Chiang(2005)。高雄=Tainan, Taiwan，立德管理學院科技管理研究所=Institute of Technology Management, Leader University。
  98. 楊子葆, Tzu-Pao(1991)。臺灣都市交通政策的政治經濟學分析─台北都會區大衆捷運系統計畫之個案研究。臺灣社會研究，3(2)，33-103。
  99. 楊家欣, Jia-Shin(2012)。新竹=Hsinchu, Taiwan，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所=Institute of Transportation and Logistics Management, National Chiao Tung University。
  100. 董建宏, Chien-Hung(2007)。臺灣高鐵通車與臺灣社會對現代化之渴望。當代，239，86-99。
  101. 廖珪如、林巧雁，2020，〈前瞻 2.0 預算 4 年 5100 億軌道建設佔比降砸 950 億投入 5G AI 半導體〉。蘋果日報（https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/20200909/P6REMWV7UJBPJAO7FJS4544VYM/，取用日期：2020 年 9 月 25 日）。（Liao, Guei-Ru, and Ciao-Yan Lin, 2020, “The Budget of for Forward-Looking Infrastructure Is 510 Billion in 4 Years. The Proportion of Rail Construction Declines and 95 Billion Will Be Invested in 5G, AI and Semiconductor.” Apple Online https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/20200909/P6REMWV7UJBPJAO7FJS4544VYM/ (Date visited: September 25, 2020.)）
  102. 臺北大眾捷運股份有限公司，2019，臺北都會區大眾捷運系統車站點位圖（https://data.gov.tw/dataset/61474， 取用日期：2019 年 5 月 1 日）。（Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation, 2019, “Location Map of the Mass Rapid Transit System Station in Taipei Metropolitan Area.” https://data.gov.tw/dataset/61474 (Date visited: May 1, 2019.)）
  103. 趙大維, Ta-Wei(1998)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣大學土木工程學系研究所=Institute of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University。
  104. 劉清耿, Ching-Keng(2017)。Bringing the Consumer Back In: NCAP 與臺灣汽車產業的轉型升級？。臺灣社會學年會，新北=New Taipei, Taiwan:
  105. 劉清耿, Ching-Keng(2020)。紀錄一段車安議題的公民實踐：從安全性召回到檸檬車立法。新社會政策雙月刊，66，32-37。
  106. 潘佩君, Pei-Chun,劉欣怡, Hsin-Yi(2018)。交通可近性對身心障礙女性健康的重要性初探。社區發展季刊，162，179-191。
  107. 鄭雅文, Yawen(2019).職災之後：補償的意義、困境與出路.臺北=Taipei:巨流出版社=Chuliu Publisher.
  108. 駱冠宏, Kuan-Hung(2007)。高雄=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，高雄醫學大學性別研究所=Institute of Gender Studies, Kaohsiung Medical University。
  109. 謝國雄, Gwo-Shyong(1989)。黑手變頭家—台灣製造業中的階級流動。台灣社會研究季刊，2(2)，11-54。
  110. 藍嘉俊, Jia-Jyun(2001)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所=Institute of Building & Planning, National Taiwan University。
  111. 蘇宥宜, Yu-Yi(2005)。新竹=Hsinchu, Taiwan，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所=Department of Transportation and Logistics Management, National Chiao Tung University。
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。從移動性到可及性：偏鄉需求反應式服務場所的概念建構。都市與計劃，51(2)，162-187。
print cancel