從中小學電腦教學實際狀況探討生態文化教育理念推行的可能性

The Possibility of Advocating Ideas of Cultural Ecology in Education Based on Factual Situation of Computer Programs in Primary and Middle Schools in Northern Taiwan

10.7044/JNHCTC.200406.0001

郭實渝(Shih-Yu Kuo)

電腦教學 ； 教師角色 ； 網際網路 ； 教學形式 ； Internet ； computer learning ； teachers' role ； ecological education

新竹師院學報

18期（2004 / 06 / 01）

1 - 21

繁體中文

本文嘗試以質性研究方式，從實際的訪談中，整理出目前在台北縣市的中小學念腦課程之實際狀況，並探討其在生態文化教育的推行上顯示的意義。 結論顯示：(1)目前電腦教學近似技能訓練；(2)未能達到獨立學習或合作研習經驗的養成；(3)老師在中小學階段的必要性；(4)對人際疏離的疑慮。同時，也顯示電腦應用在教學中只是增加教師教學及呈現資訊的另一個選擇工具，教學也未深思電腦在知識結構及呈現上產生的影響力，因此對目前之傳統教學尚未產生嚴重的衝擊，我們應藉此機會推動以人及生態文化為本的教育理論。

In digital age, the relationships between modern technology and knowledge, teaching, learning, thinking, understanding, belief, justification, theory, the disciplines, rationality and the like undergo various stages of changes. In field of philosophy of education, what would happen when we take on new ICT (information and communications technology) as main transformational vehicle of knowledge in school systems or other form of education? Thus, the researcher conducts interviews with about 25 primary and secondary school teachers who are responsible for computer programs in his (her) schools. The researcher intends to find out what these teachers conceive in meaning of digitized information, its definition, as well as the differences between traditional and computer teachings as they perceive; what they conceive as the influence of computer teaching in students learning. We found that, in our educational system, computer learning is just one more technique for students to familiarize in terms of storing and retrieving information as well as a means of entertainment. Besides, all teachers who were interviewed strongly maintained that the present of teachers in classroom are necessary. Thus, I would argue that while the western influence has not invaded our school system completely, we could hold some valuable traditional teachings that are culturally and ecologically sustainable.

1. Bauman, Z.(1997).Postmodernity and its discontents.New York:New York University Press.
2. Bigum, C.(1998).Solutions in search of educational problems: Speaking for computers in schools.Educational Policy,12(5),586-601.
3. Blake, N.(2000).Tutors and students without faces or places.Journal of Philosophy of Education,34(1),183-196.
4. Bowers, C. A.(2000).Let them eat data: How computers affect education, cultural diversity, and the prospects of ecological sustainability.Athens, Georgia:The University of Georgia Press.
5. Bowers, C. A.(1995).Educating for an ecologically sustainable culture.New York:State University of New York Press.
6. Brandt, R. S.(2000).Education in a new era: 2000 ASCD yearbook.Alexandria, VA:ASCD Press.
7. Burbules, N.,Callister, T.,C. Lanshear(Eds.)(1997).Digital rhetorics: Literacies and technologies in education, current practices and future directions.Canberra:Department of Employment, Education.
8. Burniske, R. W.(2001).Avaricious and envious: Confessions of a computer-literate educator.Phi Delta Kappan,82(7),524-527.
9. Càrdenas, K.(1998).Technology in today`s classroom.ACADEME.
10. Carr, D.(2003).Making sense of education-An introduction to the philosophy of education and teaching.London:Routledge Falmer.
11. Crabtree, B.、Miller, W. L.、黃惠雯譯(2002)。質性方法與研究。台北:韋伯文化事業出版社。
12. De Moura Castro, C. (Ed.)(1998).Education in the information age.Washington DC:Inter-American Development Bank.
13. Dugger, W.(2001).Standards for technological literacy.Phi Delta Kappan,82(7),513-517.
14. Fisher, C.,Dwyer, D. C.,Yocam, K. (Eds.)(1996).Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
15. Gilster, P.(1997).Digital Literacy.New York:Wiley Computer.
16. Giroux, H. A.(2002).Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere.Harvard Educational Review,72(4),425-463.
17. Graham, G.(1999).The internet, a philosophical inquiry.New York:Routledge.
18. Kearsley, G.(2000).Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace.U. S.:Wadswarth, Thomson Learning, Inc.
19. Lankshear, C.,Peters, M.,Knobel, M.(2000).Information, knowledge and learning: Some issues facing epistemology and education in a digital age.Journal of Philosophy of Education,34(1),17-40.
20. Lelliott, A.,Pendleburg, S.,Enslin, P.(2000).Promises of access and inclusion: Online education in Africa.Journal of Philosophy of Education,34(1),41-52.
21. Linn, M. C.,Hsi, S.(2000).Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Lyotard. J. F.,G. Bennington,B. Massumi,(Trans.),Foreword,F. Jameson(1984).The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
23. Markley, R. (Ed.)(1996).Virtual realities and their discontents.Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Marshall, J.(2000).Electronic writing and the wrapping of language.Journal of Philosophy of Education,34(1),135-150.
25. Maxwell, D. J.(2000).Technology and inequality within the United States school systems.Journal of Educational Thought,34(1),43-57.
26. Riel, M.,Fulton, K.(2001).The role of technology in supporting learning communities.Phi Delta Kappan,82(7),518-523.
27. Schrum, L. M.(2000).Guarding the promise of online learning.The Education Digest.
28. Schwab, R. L.,Foa, L. J.(2001).Integrating technologies throughout our schools.Phi Delta Kappan,82(8),620-624.
29. Thornburg, D. D.(1991).Education, technology, and paradigms of change for 21st century.Starsong.
30. Tyner, K.(1998).Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.