教學方法與學習偏好對經濟學學習成效影響之實證性研究

Effects of Matching Instructional Methods and Learning Preferences for Economics Learning

10.7044/JNHCTC.200406.0023

于富雲(Fu-Yun Yu)；劉祐興(Yu-Hsin)

合作學習 ； 高等教育 ； 經濟學 ； 教學方法 ； 學習偏好 ； 學習成效 ； Cooperative learning ； Economics instruction ； Higher education ； Instructional methods ； Learning preferences ； Learning outcomes

新竹師院學報

18期（2004 / 06 / 01）

23 - 42

繁體中文

鑑於經濟教學之實證研究結果於現階段教學情境實施的難處，研究者選定已於其他學門有效運用且擁有實證研究基礎之合作學習教學方法，以深入探討其於經濟學教學之整合運用對學生認知、情意與社交等目標範疇的影響。此外，在普遍重視學習者本身獨特性與個別需求的現代教育思潮聲浪中，學習者對不同教學方法的偏好及其對學習成效之交互作用影響也是本研究的探討重點。本研究採兩因子實驗設計法，以成就測驗、經濟學態度、人際關係與學習喜好等量表為資料蒐集工具。所收集的資料以二因子變異數之統計方法分析發現，不同教學方法之主要變項在學習成就、經濟學態度與人際關係上皆有顯著差異，參與合作學習組的學習者在學習成就、學科態度與人際關係上的表現皆顯著優於傳統個別學習組的學生，然而，配合學習偏好與否之主要變項，以及教學方法與配合學習偏好與否之交互作用在所有的依變項上皆未有顯著差異。基於結果發現，本研究建議為提昇經濟之學習成就、學科態度與人際關係、不論參與者之學習偏好為何，合作學習教學方法是教學者可考慮運用之有效教學策略。

In the process of searching for strategies and methods that can be easily implemented and readily integrated into everyday economics instruction, the present study set out to explore the potentials of cooperative learning on students’ cognitive, affective and social gains as compared to individualistic learning--the traditional instructional mode adopted most often by economics instructors nowadays. While re-structuring classroom, one important issue that warrants instructors’ attention is students’ learning preferences. Matching instructional methods and individual differences is intuitively recommended for humanistic education; yet, the idea is rarely substantiated empirically. Hence, another purpose of this study was to explore the interaction effects of matching instructional methods and learners’ preferences on student learning. A 2x2 factorial design was adopted for the study. Data analyzed using two-way ANOVA found that cooperative learning promoted student academic achievement, and enhanced student attitudes toward economics and interpersonal relationship better than individualistic instructional method. Based on the collected data, it was suggested that to enhance students’ cognitive, affective and social gains, cooperative learning would be the preferred instructional method to adopt regardless of individual learning mode preferences

1. Adams, F. G.,Kroch, E.(1989).The computers in the teaching of macroeconomics.Journal of Economic Education,20(3),269-280.
2. Bandura, A.(1986).Social cognitive theory.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3. Barlett, R L.(1995).A flip of the coin-a roll of the die: an answer to the free-rider problem in economic instruction.Journal of Economic Education,26(2),131-139.
4. Barnes, J.,Owens, L.,Rotter, A.(1980).Learning preference scale-post secondary students, trial version.University of Sydney.
5. Barns, J.,Owens(1992).Learner preference scale.Australian Council for Educational Research.
6. Bearison, D. J.,F. C. Serafica (Ed.)(1982).Social-cognitive development in context.New York, NY:Guilford.
7. Boekaerts, M.,Minnaert, A.(1999).Self-regulated with respect to informal learning.International Journal of Educational research,31,533-544.
8. Damon, W.(1984).Peer interaction: the untapped potential.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,5,331-343.
9. Deci, E. L.,Vallerand, R. J.,Pelletier, L. G.,Ryan, R. M.(1991).Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective.Educational Psychologist,26(3&4),331-343.
10. Freitag E. T.,Sullivan, H. J.(1995).Matching learner preference to amount of instruction: an alternative form of learner control.Educational Technology Research & Development,43(2),5-14.
11. Heinich, R.,Molenda, M.,Russell, J. D.,Smaldino, S. E.(2002).Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning.Prentice Hall Merrill Education.
12. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1999).Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.Allyn and Bacon.
13. Jones, E. K.,Sullivan, H. J.,Klein, J. D.(1996).Proceedings of Selected Research and Development at the 18th National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Indianapolis, IN:
14. Kagan, G.(1995).Risk-adjusted returns and stock market games.Journal of Economic education,26(1),39-50.
15. Kalin, M. F.,McAvoy, R.(1973).The influence of choice on the acquisition and retention of learning materials in different modes of instruction.New Orleans, LA: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
16. Kearsley, G.(2001).Online education: learning and teaching in cyberspace.
17. King, A.(1989).Verbal interaction and problem-solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning groups.Journal of Educational Computing Research,5(1),1-15.
18. Klein, J. D.,Pridemore, D. R.(1992).Effects of cooperative learning and need for affiliation on performance, time on task and satisfaction.Educational Technology Research & Development,40(4),39-47.
19. Kourilsky, M.,Wittrock, M. C.(1992).Generative teaching: an enhancement strategy for the learning of economics in cooperative groups.American Educational Research Journal,29(4),861-876.
20. Laney, J. D.(1996).The effect of cooperative and mastery learning methods on primary grade students leaning and retention of economic concepts.Early Education and Development,7(3),253-274.
21. Leuthold, J. H.(1998).Building a homepage for your economics class.Journal of Economic Education,29(3),247-261.
22. Mager, R. F.(1964).Learner-controlled instruction, 1958-1964.Programmed instruction,4(2),1, 8, 10-12.
23. Marzano, R. J.,Pickering, D. J.,Pollock, J. E.(2001).Classroom instruction that works: research-based strategies for increasing student achievement.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24. McClelland, D.(1961).The Achieving society.Princeton, NJ:D. Van Nostrand.
25. Merrill, M. D.(1980).Learner control in computer based learning.Computers & Education,4,77-95.
26. Merrill, M. D.(1975).Learner control: beyond aptitude-treatment interactions.AV Communications Review,23,217-226.
27. Nastasi, B. K.,Clements, D. H.(1991).Research on cooperative learning: implications for practice.School Psychology Review,20(1),110-131.
28. Newman, M. K.(1993).Identification and analysis of learning preference of mentally ill adult in rehabilitative psychosocial therapy at the Anderson Mental Health Center.
29. Owens, L.(1985).Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Australian Association for Research in Education.Hobart:
30. Owens, L.(1992).The Learning mode preferences of secondary students: a three-country comparison-Australia.England, USA. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisco, CA:
31. Owens, L.,Barnes, J.(1982).The relationships between cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preferences and students perceptions of classroom learning atmosphere.American Educational Research Journal,19,182-200.
32. Owens, L.,Leong Yin Ching,Chiam Heng Keng,Lily Chew Suk Men (eds)(1984).Proceedings of the Third Asian Workshop on Child and Adolescent Development, Preparation for Adulthood.Kuala Lumpur:Faculty of Education.
33. Peterson, P. L.,Janicki, T. C.(1979).Individual characteristics and children`s learning in largegroup and small-group approaches.Journal of Educational Psychology,71(5),677-687.
34. Piaget, J.(1926).The Language and thought of the child.New York:Harcourt Brace.
35. Reigeluth, C. M.(1983).Instructional-design theories and models.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Schallert, D. L.,Flood, J.,Jensen, J. M.,Lapp, D.,Squire, J. R. (Eds.)(1991).Handbook of Research on teaching the English language arts.New York:Macmillan.
37. Schoenfeld, A. H.(1999).Looking toward the 21st century: challenges of educational theory and practice.Educational Researcher,28(7),4-14.
38. Sharan, S.(1999).Handbook of cooperative learning methods.Greenwood Press.
39. Shute, V. J.,Gluck, K. A.(1995).Learners, environments, and a confirmatory test of an aptitutde-treatment interaction.Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. Slavin, R.(1983).Cooperative learning.New York:Longman.
41. Slavin, R. E.(1995).Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice.Allyn and Bacon.
42. Slavin, R.,Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.,Miller, N. (Eds.)(1992).Interaction in cooperative groups.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
43. Smith. L. M.,Smith, L. C.(1988).Teaching microeconomics with microcomputer spreadsheets.Journal of Economic Education,19(4),363-382.
44. Soper, J. C.,Walstad, W. B.(1983).On measuring economic attitudes.Journal of Economic Education,14(4),4-17.
45. Vygotsky, L. S.,M. Cole,V. John-Steiner,S. Scribner,E. Souberman, (Eds.)(1978).Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
46. Weiser, L. A.,Schug, M. C.(1992).Financial market simulations: motivating learning and performance.Social Studies,83(6),244-247.
47. Whyte, M. M.,Knirk, F. G.,Casey, R. J.,Willard, M. L.(1990).Individualistic versus paired/cooperative computer-assisted instruction: matching instructional method with cognitive style.Journal of Educational Technology Systems,19(4),299-312.
48. Wittrock, M. C.(1978).The cognitive movement in instruction.Educational Psychology,13,15-29.
49. Yu, F. Y.(1996).Competition or noncompetition: its impact on inter-personal relationships in a computer-assisted learning environment.Journal of Educational Technology Systems,25(1),13-24.
50. 余民寧(1997)。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。臺北市:心理。
51. 李日順(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學地理學系。
52. 黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。五南圖書出版公司。
53. 賴振榮(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學工業教育學系。
54. 顏有信(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中正大學教育研究所。

1. 陳敏郎(2021)。多元教學方法於基礎性專業課程之教學實踐研究。弘光學報，88，69-87。
2. 廖玲珠、汪瑞芝(2008)。會計習作課程之學習行為與學習成效。當代會計，9(1)，105-130。
3. 鄭窈窕(2020)。樂齡大學學員人際關係、知覺教師教學型態與學習成效之關聯性。慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊，25，130-165。
4. (2011)。從正式與非正式課程探討大學生能力之養成：以朝陽科技大學通識教育課程為例。止善，11，47-72。
5. (2014)。學習興趣、學習策略和學習偏好對國小學生國語文學習成就之結構方程模型分析：以TASA 2009為例。市北教育學刊，45，99-138。
6. (2020)。跨專業醫學入門課程之發展與成效探究。高等教育，15(1)，75-112。