题名

學科教學知識的內涵與發展歷程:以三位國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師為例

并列篇名

Contents and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Case Study on Three Elementary School Experienced Expert Natural Science and Living Technology Teachers

DOI

10.7044/NHCUEA.200706.0029

作者

陳國泰(Kuo-Tai Chen)

关键词

國小自然與生活科技 ; 資深專家教師 ; 學科教學知識 ; 發展 ; elementary school ; experienced expert natural science and living technology teacher ; pedagogical content knowledge ; development

期刊名称

新竹教育大學教育學報

卷期/出版年月

24卷1期(2007 / 06 / 01)

页次

29 - 60

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究針對三位國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師,深入探討其學科教學知識的內涵與發展歷程。研究方法採質化研究取向,蒐集資料的方式包括自然觀察、深度訪談及文件分析。經過一年半的探究,本研究獲得幾個主要的研究發現:一、國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師學科教學知識的內涵包括「教學信念」、「教學目標知識」、「學科知識」、「學生知識」、「課程知識」及「一般教學法知識」;二、國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師的學科教學知識之發展歷程:(一)國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師的學科教學知識內涵間之相互理解歷程,即為其學科教學知識發展的歷程;(二)國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師深受早年受教經驗之影響,許多學科教學知識皆從省思過往經驗中發展而來;(三)國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師從省思受教經驗中發展而來的學科教學知識,在經由學生的正面回饋後而進一步受到強化;(四)國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師的學科教學知識不斷從在職進修、擔任師院教授的國科會研究助理與國教輔導團輔導員,以及教師成長團體中獲得發展。

英文摘要

The study investigated three elementary school experienced expert natural science and living technology teachers on their pedagogical content knowledge and the development of this knowledge. Qualitative research method was used for case study. Data were collected by naturalistic observations, interviews, and documentary analysis. Following results were found: 1. The contents of pedagogical content knowledge of the cases included primarily following: teaching belief, knowledge of teaching goals, subject knowledge, learners' knowledge, curriculum knowledge, and knowledge of general pedagogy. 2. The development of the pedagogical content knowledge of cases were elaborated in terms of 4 points as follows: (1) The development of the pedagogical content knowledge of the cases is lateral. (2) The cases forms most of the pedagogical content knowledge from the reflection of early learning experiences. (3) The pedagogical content knowledge of cases reflect from the early educational experiences is developed more steadily After receiving the feedback of students. (4) The pedagogical content knowledge of the cases is continued developing from the in-service education program, acting as the instructor of the ”Compulsory Education Advisory Group”, participating in academic research, and participating teachers developmental group.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 邱憶惠、高忠增(2003)。教師知識之個案研究:以兩位國小級任教師爲例。台中師院學報,17(2),91-112。
    連結:
  2. Achilles, C. M.,Hoover, S. P.(1996).Transforming administrative praxis: The potential of problembased learning (PBL) as a school-improvment vehicle for middle and high schools.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  3. Ball, D.,Bass, H.,J. Boaler (Ed.)(2000).Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning.Westport, CT:ABLEX Publishing.
  4. Bauch, P. A.(1982).Predicting elementary classroom teaching practices from teachers` educational beliefs.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  5. Beane, J. A.(1997).Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democrative education.New York:Teachers College.
  6. Becker, J. R.(2000).Classroom coaching: An emerging method of professional development.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  7. Belfort, E.,Guimaraes, L. C.(2002).The Influence of subject matter on teachers` practices: Two case studies.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  8. Berliner, D.(1986).In pursuit of the expert pedagogue.Educational Research,15(7),5-13.
  9. Brown, J. S.,Collins, A.,Duguid, P.(1989).Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Research,18(2),32-42.
  10. Calderhead, J.,Miller, E.(1986).Research Monograph, School of Education, University of Lancaster..
  11. Carter, K.,T. Russell,H. Munby (Eds.)(1992).Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection.London:Falmer Press.
  12. Clandinin, D. J.,Connelly, F. M.,N. Denzin,Y. Lincoln (Eds.)(1994).Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  13. Clermont, C. P.,Borko, H.,Krajcik, J. S.(1994).Comparative study of pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrators.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(4),419-441.
  14. Cochran, K. F.,DeRuiter, J. A.,King, R. A.(1993).Pedagogical content knowledge: An integrative model for teacher preparation.Journal of Teacher Education,44(4),263-272.
  15. Cochran, K. F.,King, R. A.,DeRuiter, J. A.(1991).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Chicago, IL.:
  16. Cole, A.,Knowles, G.(1992).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association.San Francisco.:
  17. Connelly, F. M.,Clandinin, D. J.(1988).Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experiences.New York:Teachers College Press.
  18. Courtney, R.,Booth, D.,Emerson, J.,Kuzmich, N.(1987).No one way of being: A study of the practical knowledge of elementary art teachers.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  19. DeRuiter, J. A.(1991).The development of teachers` pedagogical content knowledge.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  20. Duffee, L.,Aikenhead, G, G.(1992).Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge.Science Education,76(5),493-506.
  21. Edens, K. M.(2000).Preparing problem solves for the 21 century through Problem-based Leaening.College Teaching,48(2),55-60.
  22. Elbaz, F.(1983).Teacher Thinking: A study of practical knowledge.N.Y.:Nichols.
  23. Fogarty, R.,Stoehr, J.(1995).Integrating curricula with multiple intelligences-teams, themes, and threads.Arlington Heights, IL:IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.
  24. Goodson, I. F.(1994).The story so far: Personal knowledge and the political.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  25. Grossman, P. L.(1987).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association.Washington, D.C.:
  26. Grossman, P. L.,Richert, A. E.(1988).Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A reexamination of the effects of teacher education.Teacher & Teacher Education,4(1),53-62.
  27. Grossman, P. L.,Wilson, S. M.,Shulman, L. S.,M. C. Reynolds (Ed.)(1989).Knowledge base for the beginning teacher.Oxford:Pergamon.
  28. Gudmundsdottir, S.(1991).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Chicago, IL.:
  29. Halim, L.,Meerah, S. M.(2002).Science trainee teachers` pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching.Research in Science & Technological Education,20(2),215-225.
  30. Hammerness, K.(2003).Learning to hope, or hoping to learn? The role of vision in the early professional lives of teachers.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  31. Jenkins, J. M.,Veal, M. L.(2002).Preservice teachers` PCK development during peer coaching.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,22(1),49-68.
  32. Jiunde, L.(1999).Problem-based learning: A decision model for problem selection.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  33. Johnston, S.(1992).Images: A way of understanding the practical knowledge of student teachers.Teaching & Teacher Education,8(2),123-136.
  34. Lee, J.,Meadows, M.,Lee, J. O.(2003).What causes teachers to implement high-quality mathematics education more frequently: Focusing on teachers` pedagogical content knowledge.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  35. Loughran, J.,Gunstone, R.,Berry, A.,Milroy, P.,Mulhall, P.(2000).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
  36. Magnusson, S.,Krajcik, J.,Borko, H.,J. Gess-Newsome,N. G. Lederman (Eds.)(1999).Examining pedagogical content knowledge.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer.
  37. Marks, R.(1990).Pedagogical content knowledge: From a methematical case to a modify conception.Journal of Teacher Education,41(3),3-11.
  38. Mbajiorgu, N. M.,Ali, A.(2003).Relationship between STS approach, scientific literacy, and achievement in biology.Science Education,87(1),31-39.
  39. McDiarmid, G. W.,Ball, D. L.,Anderson, C.W.,M. C. Reynolds (Ed.)(1989).Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher.Oxford:Pergamon Press.
  40. Mills, R. A.(1997).Teachers` voices shaping transformation: A multiple case study of personal practical knowledge among middle level teachers.Education Quarterly,20(3),57-84.
  41. Neil, P. A.(2002).Small-group work and assessment in a PBL curriculum: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of student perceptions of the process of working in small groups and its assessment.Medical Teacher,24(5),495-502.
  42. Nespor, J.(1987).The role of beliefs in practice of teaching.Journal of curriculum Studies,19(4),317-328.
  43. O`Byrne, K.,Clark, R. E.,Malakuti, R.(1997).Expert and novice performance: Implications for clinical training.Educational Psychology Review,9(4),321-332.
  44. Pajares, M. F.(1992).Teachers` belief and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct.Review of Educational Research,62(3),307-332.
  45. Pligge, M. A.,Kent, L. B.,Spence, M. S.(2000).Examining teacher change within the context of mathematics curriculum reform: Views from middle school teachers.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  46. Reynolds, A.(1992).What is competent beginning teaching? A review of the literature.Review of Educational Research,62(1),1-35.
  47. Schwartz, J. E.,Riedesel, C. A.(1994).The relationship between teachers` knowledge and beliefs and the teaching of elementary mathematics.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  48. Shulman, L. S.(1986).Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher,15(2),4-14.
  49. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
  50. Smyth, D. M.(1992).The kids just love him: A first year teacher's perceptions of how the workplace has affected his teaching.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  51. Sternberg, R. J.,Horvath, J. A.(1995).A prototype view of expert teaching.Educational Researcher,24(6),9-17.
  52. Tabachnic, B. R.,Zeichner, K. M.(1985).The development of teacher perspectives: Final report.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  53. van, Driel, J. H.,De, J. O.(2001).Investigating the development of preservice teachers` pedagogical content knowledge.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  54. Veenman, S.(1987).On becoming a teacher: An analysis of initial training.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
  55. Viiri, J.(2003).Students` understanding of tides.Physics Education,35(2),105-110.
  56. Williams, B.(2001).The theoretical links between problem-based learning and self-directed learning for continuing professional nursing education.Teaching in Higher Education,6(1),75-82.
  57. Wilson, S. M.,Shulman, L. S.,Richart, A. E.,J. Calderhead (Ed.)(1987).Exploring teachers` thinking.London:Cassell.
  58. 王鳳仙(2001)。台北,國立台北師範學院課程與消研究所。
  59. 何秋蘭(1997)。師院生在集中實習期間實際知識運作之個案研究。國立屏東師範學院學報,10,37-62。
  60. 吳宜玲(1993)。台北,國立台灣師範大學生物教育研究所。
  61. 吳青蓉、張景媛(1997)。英語科專家/生手教師課堂教學之研究。師大學報,42,17-33。
  62. 李子建、黃顯華(1996)。課程:範式、取向和設計。台北:五南。
  63. 李佳慧(2004)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所。
  64. 李曉萱(2001)。台北,國立臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所。
  65. 林生傳(1993)。實習教師的困擾問題與輔導研究。教育學刊,10,33-103。
  66. 林俊宏(1997)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
  67. 林清財(1990)。台北,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
  68. 林進材(1999)。國小專家教師與新手教師教學理論建構之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究集刊,5,185-218。
  69. 林靜萍(2004)。屏東,國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所。
  70. 邱憶惠(1996)。台中,國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所。
  71. 段曉林(1996)。探究職前化學教師學科知識、教學知識與學科教學知識的本質與發展。科學教育,6(2),101-112。
  72. 孫敏芝(2006)。實習教師學科教學知識芝探討:教學設計與教學實踐。教育研究與發展期刊,2(2),67-92。
  73. 翁崑泉(2002)。台東,國立台東師範學院教育研究所。
  74. 高榮成(1994)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
  75. 張民杰(2001)。統整課程與教學創新的有效方案:問題基礎學習在中小學之應用。高雄師範大學主辦國民中學九年一貫課程下教學創新研討會論文集,高雄:
  76. 張芬芬(1984)。台北,國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。
  77. 張靜儀(1997)。國小自然科專家教師學科教學知識與發展之個案研究。八十六學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集
  78. 張靜儀(2001)。國小自然科教師教學個案研究-教師背景與教學之探討。屏東師院學報,14,699-932。
  79. 張靜儀、戴翠華(2003)。「國小學童感知自然老師PCK量表」之效化研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(2),187-212。
  80. 教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程試辦工作輔導手冊-理念、配套措施與行政篇。台北:教育部。
  81. 郭義章(1997)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
  82. 郭銘哲(2004)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所。
  83. 陳美玉(1996)。教師專業實踐理論及其應用之研究。教育研究資訊雙月刊,4(3),120-147。
  84. 陳桂蘭(2002)。台北,國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所。
  85. 陳國泰(2006)。國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師學科教學知識的發展之個案研究。國立屏東教育大學學報,25,117-156。
  86. 陳國泰(2000)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
  87. 陳國泰(2003)。幼兒園所經驗教師實際知識的發展之研究。美和技術學院學報,22(1),85-112。
  88. 陳國泰(2003)。幼兒經驗教師班級經營知識的發展之研究。美和技術學院學報,22(2),129-159。
  89. 陳國泰、曾佳珍(2005)。國小自然與生活科技專家教師引發學生學習動機策略之研究。國民教育學報,2,203-240。
  90. 陳筱雯(2004)。屏東,屏東師範學院數理教育研究所。
  91. 陸美靜(2002)。屏東,國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所。
  92. 湯仁燕(1993)。台北,國立台灣師範大學教育研所。
  93. 黃瑞琴(1996)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理出版社。
  94. 劉怡亭(2000)。嘉義,國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。
  95. 劉蕙鈺(2003)。屏東,國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所。
  96. 蔡添財(2004)。台中,臺中師範學院自然科學教育學系。
  97. 賴秀芬(2003)。嘉義,國立中正大學教育研究所。
  98. 戴翠華(1998)。屏東,國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
  99. 戴翠華(2000)。運用「檔案評量」在自然科實際教學之研究。2000行動研究~展望本土教育改革學術論文集
  100. 戴翠華、張靜儀(2001)。國立台東師範學院主編之教學行動研究與教學創新下冊。台北:揚智文化。
  101. 謝建國(2001)。台北,國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
  102. 鍾任琴(1994)。台北,國立政治大學教育研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 桑顯舜,林淑梤(2019)。運用德懷術建立國小教師基本科學能力之評量要項。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,12(1),29-58。
  2. 魏豐閔、施登堯(2011)。Shulman 學科教學知識(PCK)內涵剖析。中華體育季刊,25(4),760-773。
  3. (2023)。國小自然科學領域教師SCCT滿意度模式之研究:以TIMSS 2019臺灣資料為例。教育研究與實踐學刊,70(2),25-51。