题名

運用多元智能理論在中學戶外探究活動之行動研究

并列篇名

The Action Research of Applying Multiple Intelligence Theory to Field-Inquiry Activities of Junior High School Students

DOI

10.7044/NHCUEA.201106.0099

作者

李明昆(Ming-Kun Li)；洪振方(Jeng-Fung Hung)

关键词

多元智能理論 ； 中學戶外探究活動 ； 行動研究 ； multiple intelligences theory ； field-inquiry activity ； action research

期刊名称

新竹教育大學教育學報

卷期/出版年月

28卷1期（2011 / 06 / 01）

页次

99 - 142

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

諸多相關研究及文獻顯示，融入多元智能理論的教學活動有助於學生學習動機與成就。結合戶外活動與科學探究的戶外探究活動，讓學習者得以在自然真實的情境中學習，也使得科學學習更活潑生動。本研究旨在探討運用多元智能理論的中學戶外探究活動教學之實施，包括：學生的多元智能增長與創造力傾向的變化情形、學生對活動適切性之感受，以及教師在課程實施的反思情形。透過連續二次的戶外探究活動歷程之後，學生在多元智能潛能與創造力傾向得分表現均有顯著性成長。此外，從受測學生的戶外的科學學習環境施測結果與戶外探究活動之後所撰寫的心得報告之分析，發現本研究所安排的活動對受測學生而言難度適中，且具有積極引導學生學習意願的作用。據此顯示，運用多元智能理論的戶外探究活動的教學模式，確具其適切性。最後，本研究針對教學推廣提出建議。
英文摘要

A large amount of relevant research and literature indicates that incorporating multiple intelligence theory in teaching facilitates the motivation and learning achievements of students. Outdoor field-inquiry activities combined with scientific inquiry provides learners with the opportunity to study in real-life situations and also enlivens scientific learning. The objectives of this study are to discover if learners promote multiple intelligence and creative tendency, and to study the reactions of teachers and students after applying multiple intelligence theory in field-inquiry activities.Following the two field-inquiry activities, students displayed continuous growth in multiple intelligence talent and creativity inclination. According to the results of the exam and the analysis of learners' composition, the activities arranged for learners in the research were simple, and promoted active learning. As such, the application of multiple intelligences theory to field-inquiry activities is recommended. The study offers recommendations for teachers.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王為國(2002)。多元智能取向的課程設計。課程與教學季刊，5(1)，1-20。
    連結：
  2. 汪榮才、陳宗韓、汪宇琪(2008)。幼兒多元智能與問題本位學習整合模式發展之初探（下）。幼教研究彙刊，1(2)，29-53。
    連結：
  3. 林佩璇(2009)。課程行動研究的實踐論述：從自我到社會文化。教育實踐與研究，22(2)，95-122。
    連結：
  4. 翁福元、林松柏(2005)。行動研究運用於教師專業發展初探─中部縣市某高中教師從事行動研究為例。教育科學期刊，5(2)，78-94。
    連結：
  5. 張德銳、丁一顧(2008)。教學行動研究及其對中學教師專業成長態度影響之研究。課程與教學季刊，12(1)，157-182。
    連結：
  6. 許瑛玿、林詩怡(2003)。多元化教學與評量中學生多元智能表現之研究模式。科學教育學刊，11(4)，351-372。
    連結：
  7. 郭碧祝、陳秀婷(2009)。提升國小四年級學生過程技能的主題式教學活動。屏東教育大學學報，33，365-396。
    連結：
  8. 蔡淑桂(2004)。多元智能教學方案對幼兒創造力之影響研究。醫護科技學刊，6(4)，330-348。
    連結：
  9. 顏瓊芬、黃世傑(2003)。學生在開放式科學探究過程中互動模式之研究。科學教育學刊，11(2)，141-169。
    連結：
  10. 蘇明俊(2007)。發展野外探究學習量表之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，24(1)，61-84。
    連結：
  11. Brualdi, A. C. (1996). Multiple intelligences: Gardner's theory. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 5(10). Retrieved November 23, 2010, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=10
  12. Amabile, T. M.(1983).The social psychology of creativity.New York:Springer-Verlag.
  13. Campbell, L.,Campbell, B.(1999).Multiple intelligences and student achievement: Success stories from six schools.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  14. Campbell, L.,Campbell, B.,Dickinson, D.(1999).Teaching and learning through multiple intelligence (2nd ed.).Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
  15. Charyton, C.,Snelbecker, G. E.(2007).General, artistic and scientific creativity attributes of engineering and music students.Creativity Research Journal,19(2-3),213-225.
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).Creativity.New York:Harper Collins.
  17. Csikzentmihalyi, M.,Wolfe, R.(2000).New conceptions and research approach to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education.International handbook of giftedness and talent,New York:
  18. Derry, G. N.(1999).What science is and how it works.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University.
  19. Eikeland, O.(2002).Action research as the hidden curriculum of the western tradition.Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice,London:
  20. Espinoza, F.(2002).Developing inquiry through activities that integrate fieldwork and microcomputer-based technology.Science Activities,39(3),9-17.
  21. Fredericks, A. D.,Blake-Kline, B.,Kristo, J. V.(1996).Teaching the integrated language arts: Process and practice.New York:Longman.
  22. Gardner, H.(1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.New York:Basic Books.
  23. Gardner, H.(1995).Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages.Phi Delta Kappan,77(3),200-203+206-209.
  24. Gardner, H.,Hatch, T.(1989).Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of MI.Educational Researcher,18(8),4-9.
  25. Goleman, D.(1995).Emotional intelligence.New York:Bantam Books.
  26. Gruber, H. E.,Wallace, D. B.(2001).Creative work.American Psychologist,56(4),346-349.
  27. Hodson, D.(2003).Time for action: Science education for an alternative future.International Journal of Science Education,25(6),645-670.
  28. Hopper, B.,Hurry, P.(2000).Learning the MI way: The effects on students' learning of using the theory of multiple intelligences.Pastoral Care in Education,18(4),26-32.
  29. Jeronen, E.,Jeronen, J.,Raustia, H.(2009).Environmental education in Finlanda case study of environmental education in nature schools.International Journal of Environmental and Science Education,4(1),1-23.
  30. Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.)(2004).Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed.).New York:Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
  31. Karen, G.,(2001).Multiple intelligences theory: A framework for personalizing science curricula.School Science and Mathematics,101(4),180-193.
  32. Kern, E.,Carpenter, J.(1986).Effect of field activities on students learning.Journal of Geological Education,34,180-183.
  33. Kolb, D. A.(1981).Experiential learning theory and the learning style inventory: A reply to freedman and stumpf.Academy of Management Review,6(2),289-296.
  34. Laugksch, R. C.,Spargo, P. E.(1996).Development of a pool of scientific literacy test-items based on selected AAAS literacy goals.Science Education,80(2),121-143.
  35. Lazear, D.(1994).Multiple intelligence approaches to assessment: Solving the assessment conundrum.Tucson, AZ:Zephyr.
  36. Lazear, D.(1991).Seven ways of teaching: The artistry of teaching with multiple intelligence.Palatin, IL:Skylight.
  37. Linn, M.(1992).Science education reform: Building on the research base.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29,821-840.
  38. Magnusson, S. J.,Palincsar, A. S.(2005).Teaching to promote the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning about light at the elementary school level.How students learn: Science in the classroom,Washington DC:
  39. Mechling, K. R.,Oliver, D. L.(1983).Science teaches basic skills, handbook I.Washington DC:National Science Teacher Association.
  40. National Research Council(1996).The national science education standards.Washington DC:National Academy.
  41. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and national science education standards.Washington DC:National Academy.
  42. Nicholson-Nelson, K.(1998).Developing students' multiple intelligence.New York:Professional Books.
  43. Orion, N.,Hofstein A.,Tamir, P.,Giddings, G. J.(1997).Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the learning environment of outdoor science activities.Science Education,81,161-171.
  44. Orion, N.,Hofstein, A.(1991).The measurement of students' attitudes towards scientific field trips.Science Education,75(5),513-523.
  45. Pate, P. E.,Homestead, E. R.,McGinnis, K. L.(1997).Making integrated curriculum work: Teachers, students, and the quest for coherent curriculum.New York:Teachers College.
  46. Plonczak, I.(2009).Outdoor classrooms in elementary science teacher education: Teaching and learning in a vegetable garden.The Constructivist,20(1),1-16.
  47. Saban, A.(2009).Content analysis of Turkish studies about the multiple intelligences theory.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,9(2),859-876.
  48. Sagor, R.(2000).Guiding school improvement with action research.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  49. Shearer, B.(2009).MI at 25: Assessing the impact and future of multiple intelligences for teaching and learning.New York:Teachers College.
  50. Shearer, B.(2004).Multiple intelligences theory after 20 years.Teachers College Record,106(1),2-16.
  51. Shore, J. R.(2004).Teacher education and multiple intelligences: A case study of multiple intelligences and teacher efficacy in two teacher preparation courses.Teachers College Record,106(1),112-139.
  52. Souto-Manning, M.,James, N.(2008).A multi-arts approach to early literacy and learning.Journal of Research in Childhood Education,23(1),82-95.
  53. Sternberg, R. J.,Williams, W. M.(2002).Educational psychology.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
  54. Stewart, P.(2009).Using co-operative learning infused with multiple intelligences: The teaching strategy that works.Access,23(1),21-26.
  55. Tobin, K.(1987).Secondary science laboratory activities.European Journal of Science Education,8,199-211.
  56. Tobin, K.(1990).Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning.School Science and Mathematics,90(5),403-415.
  57. Torresan, P.(2007).Intelligences and styles in language teaching: What is the differences?.Didáctica(Lengua y Literatura),19,315-325.
  58. Tracey, M. W.(2009).Design and development research: A model validation case.Education Technology Research Development,57,553-571.
  59. van Cleave, J.(1997).Guide to more of the best science fair projects.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  60. Wallach, M.,Kogan, N.(1965).Modes of thinking in young children.Westport, CT:Creenwod.
  61. Xie, J. C. R.,Lin, L.(2009).Research on multiple intelligences teaching and assessment.Asian Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences,4(2-3),106-124.
  62. Zandvliet, D.(2007).Learning environments for environmental education.Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE),Fremantle, Australia:
  63. 王佩蓮、林碧楨(1990)。國小自然科學教學研究。臺北市:五南。
  64. 王靖婷(2007)。大一國文多元智能取向教學策略。通識學刊：理念與實務，1(2)，101-136。
  65. 呂宜儒(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，銘傳大學應用統計資訊學系。
  66. 李明昆、洪振方(2005)。開發符合科學探究教學策略之研究。數學和科學教育 E-Journal，94(2)
  67. 李雅婷、尤沛婕(2007)。校外教學新紀元─校外教學課程設計的改變，學生多元智能的引動。第八屆中小學及幼稚園教育專業創新與行動研究（上），臺北市:
  68. 周鴻騰(2006)。國立臺灣科學教育館推動戶外體驗學習的意義與實例。科教館學刊，2，44-74。
  69. 林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。臺北市:心理。
  70. 翁榮源、李孔文(2005)。多元智慧理論在化學平衡教學網站以增強學習成效之應用研究。化學教育，63(1)，149-166。
  71. 高翠霞(1998)。主題式教學的理念：國小實施課程統整的可行策略。教育資料與研究，25，9-11。
  72. 張世忠(2003)。建構取向教學─數學與科學。臺北市:五南。
  73. 張滄敏(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北師範學院數理教育研究所。
  74. 張稚美(2000)。學校實踐多元智能論的方針和挑戰。教師天地，106，14-21。
  75. 教育部(2003)。九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市:教育部。
  76. 郭英彥(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，中原大學教育研究所。
  77. 郭靜姿、張蘭畹、林秋妹、王曼娜、盧冠每(1999)。多元智能特質觀察量表。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
  78. 陳俐妤(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立中山大學教育研究所。
  79. 陳建宏(2005)。教育部94年度中小學科學教育專案報告書教育部94年度中小學科學教育專案報告書,教育部。
  80. 曾才銘(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。
  81. 黃娟娟(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學教育研究所。
  82. 黃朝恩(1990)。戶外教學在地理教育中扮演的角色。環境教育季刊，5，24-31。
  83. 葉玉珠(2005)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
  84. 劉田修、蘇明俊(2005)。教育部顧問室─創造力教育中程發展計畫教育部顧問室─創造力教育中程發展計畫,未出版
  85. 蔡宛芸(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學地球科學研究所。
  86. 鄭博真(2006)。幼兒教師多元智能與多元智能教育態度之相關研究。國立臺南大學教育研究學報，40(1)，99-123。
  87. 謝佳蓁、葉玉珠(2001)。多元智能量表。高雄市:國立中山大學教育研究所。
  88. 蘇明俊、羅豪章(2007)。科學寫作融入野外探究教學之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，3(2)，163-188。
  89. 蘇詠梅、鄭美紅(2001)。亞太科學教育論壇，2(1)
print cancel