自我詢問檢核策略的介入對讀者覺察能力的實驗效果

Promoting Audience Awareness in Writing

10.3966/199679772013063001002

陳鳳如(Feng-Ru Chen)

自我詢問檢核 ； 寫作品質 ； 寫作修改能力 ； 讀者覺察能力 ； Audience awareness ； self-assessment checklist ； text revision skill ； writing quality

新竹教育大學教育學報

30卷1期（2013 / 06 / 30）

39 - 69

繁體中文

本研究設計寫作之自我詢問檢核策略，據此探討策略介入對寫作者之讀者覺察能力、寫作修改能力及寫作品質的影響，更進一步分析此策略介入的漸進效果。研究對象取自臺中市國小五年級的學生，以班級為單位抽取兩個班級，再隨機分派至不同的實驗處理組別，實驗組接受十二週次「寫作之自我詢問檢核策略」的實驗處理，而控制組則接受一般寫作教學的處理。因之，本研究採不等組前後測的準實驗設計，以前測為共變數進行共變數分析。研究結果發現，寫作之自我詢問檢核策略的介入對學生的讀者覺察能力具增進效果，且促進寫作修改能力及提昇寫作品質。隨著自我詢問檢核策略介入次數的增加，實驗組學生的讀者覺察能力、寫作修改能力及寫作品質亦隨之增進。

Audience awareness in writing is a vital concern for all mass communicators. Writing methods enable students to specifically and clearly learn how to consider their readers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of promoting audience awareness in elementary school students to their writing ability. We used one type of procedural facilitation strategy focused on text revision to promote audience awareness. We introduced 2 self-assessment checklists whereby students were encouraged to evaluate and modify their text. We used a pre/post-test quasi-experimental design. We recruited 2 fifth-grade classes that we randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group received 12 weeks of experimental treatment, whereas the control group did not. The obtained data were analyzed by using one-way ANCOVA statistics and trend analysis. The results show significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in audience awareness, text revision skill, and writing quality. The experimental students gradually progressed in audience awareness, text revision skill, and writing quality.

1. 陳鳳如(2007)。寫作者的讀者覺察能力分析及其影響效果之研究。教育心理學報，38(3)，291-310。
   連結：
2. 陳鳳如、郭生玉(2000)。閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式之適配度研究。師大學報，45(1)，1-18。
   連結：
3. Armstrong, T.(2003).The multiple intellingences of reading and writing.Alexandria, Egypt:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4. Beason, L.(1993).Feedback and revision in writing across the curriculum class.Research in the Teaching of English,27(4),395-419.
5. Berkenkotter, C.(1981).Understanding a writer's awareness of audience.College Composition and Communication,32,388-399.
6. Butler, J. A.,Britt, U. A.(2011).Investigating instruction for improving revision of argumentative essays.Written Communication,28(1),70-96.
7. Butterfield, E. C.,Hacker, D. J.,Albertson, L. R.(1996).Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence.Educational Psychology Review,8(3),239-298.
8. Carvalho, J. B.(2002).Developing audience awareness in writing.Journal of Research in Reading,25(3),271-282.
9. El-Hindi, A. E.(1997).Connecting reading and writing: College learners' metacognitive awareness.Journal of Developmental Education,21(2),10-15.
10. Feagans, H.(1994).Using structured questions to improve writing self evaluation.Texas Reading Report,16(2),5-7.
11. Flower, L.(1979).Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing.College English,41,19-37.
12. Frank, L. A.(1992).Writing to be read: Young writers' ability to demonstrate audience awareness when evaluated by their readers.Research in the Teaching of English,26,277-298.
13. Freedman, S. W.(Ed.)(1985).The acquisition of written language.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
14. Gordon, C.(1990).Changes in readers' and writers' metacognitive knowledge: Some observations.Reading Research and Instruction,30(1),1-14.
15. Greene, S.,Ackerman, J. M.(1995).Expanding the consturctivist metaphor: A rhetotical perspective on literacy research and practice.Reviewing Educational Research,65,383-420.
16. Gregg, N.,Sigalas, S. A.,Hoy, C.,Wisenbaker, J.,McKinley, C.(1996).Sense of audience and the adult writer: A study across competence levels.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,8,121-137.
17. Hendrickson, R. S. B.(1995).Seattle,Washington University.
18. Kirsch, G.(1991).Writing up and down the social ladder: A study of experienced writers composing for contrasting audiences.Research in the Teaching of English,25(1),33-51.
19. Magnifico, A. M.(2010).Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer's audience.Educational Psychologist,45(3),167-184.
20. Martlew, M.(Ed.)(1983).The psychology of written language-developmental and educational perspectives.Chichester, England:John Wiley & Sons.
21. Midgette, E.,Haria, P.,MacArthur, C.(2008).The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students.Reading and Writing,21(1),131-151.
22. Morkane, S.(2004).Original Writing.London, England:Routledge.
23. Murray, D. M.(1985).A writer teach writing.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
24. Newkirk, T.(1995).The writing conference as performance.Research in the Teaching of English,29(2),193-215.
25. Olsom, L. D.(1989).Technical writing methods show ways to consider audience.Educator,44(2),3-6.
26. Petersen, B. T.(Ed.)(1986).Convergences: Transactions in Reading and Writing.Urbana, IL:National Council of Teachers of English.
27. Sargne, M. E.(1997).Peer response to low stake writing in a WAC (in any writing-across-the-curriculum) Literature classroom.New Directions for Teaching and Learning,69,41-52.
28. Spivey, N. N.(1990).Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing.Written Communication,7,256-287.
29. Spivey, N. N.(1995).Written dicourse: A constructivist perspective.Constructivism in Education,Hillsdale, NJ:
30. Spivey, N. N.(1987).Construing constructivism: Reading research in the United States.Poetics,16,169-192.
31. Walter, A.(2006).Happy poems: Children's awareness of audience.Language Arts,83(6),523-529.
32. Zainuddin, H.,Moore, R. A.(2003).,未出版
33. 李麗霞(2000)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,行政院國家科學委員會。
34. 陳鳳如(2003)。不同寫作能力的國中生在寫作歷程與讀者察覺能力之研究。國北師院學報，16(1)，63-88。
35. 蔡銘津(2000)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,行政院國家科學委員會。

1. 廖長彥、陳德懷、陳秉成、張菀真(2017)。透過同儕回應寫作環境培養國小學生的讀者意識。數位學習科技期刊，9(4)，25-51。
2. (2017)。為誰而寫：讀者覺察與其在兒童寫作發展上的啟示。市北教育學刊，58，43-72。