審美意識納入「公民參與式服務學習」課程實施成效評估

Effects and Evaluation of Aesthetic Consciousness on Service-Learning Based on Citizen Participation

10.3966/199679772014123102002

王玫(Mei Wang)

審美意識 ； 審美關係 ； 公民參與 ； 服務學習

新竹教育大學教育學報

31卷2期（2014 / 12 / 31）

33 - 66

繁體中文

審美能促使意識覺知，產生統整、自主與能動的能力。公民參與強調行動的面向，而服務學習是達成公民參與的途徑與方法，審美意識主體的判斷力是公民參與行動背後感性與理性交織的情感、思想與實踐力量。本研究試圖從三個審美樣態所發展出的審美關係，即審美意識主體、審美客體與審美主體，彼此透過意向性、表現性與共感性產生互為影響的關係，引發學生意識的覺知。透過服務學習內容的設計，在審美行為交互影響中，培育鑑賞、反思、批判、想像等能力。研究者以「餐飲美學」課程，依據學生專業特質，設計服務學習方案。整體課程透過審美意識覺知的三個途徑：處境意識、想像意識與解放意識，鋪陳設計，引發審美主體意識性。經過學習成效評估，在課程目標所設定之預期公民核心能力的表現均有提升，顯見透過審美經驗的體驗，運用服務學習真實場域，公民參與的精神確有改變。

Aesthetics promote conscious perception, which, in turn, leads to the competencies of integration, autonomy, and action. Citizen participation is action-oriented, and service-learning is a method by which it can be improved. Aesthetic consciousness is a judgment that helps integrate emotions, thoughts, and praxes to facilitate citizen participation. This process is an amalgamation of perception and reason. We aimed to probe the concept of ＂aesthetic relationships.＂ The behaviors in curricula comprise 3 modes: aesthetical conscious subject, aesthetic object, and aesthetic subject. These 3 modes interact with intentionality, expression, and sympathy to encourage students' perception. We cultivated students' appreciation, reflection, critics, and imagination by using service-learning to promote the interaction of aesthetic behaviors. We applied the ＂Hospitality Aesthetics＂ course, based on this concept, according to the technology of the Hospitality-major students. Service learning was implemented in this curriculum. We attempted to stimulate the students' aesthetic consciousness in 3 steps: awakening learners' environment concern , inducing imagination, and achieving relief consciousness. The goals of citizen core competencies in this curriculum were achieved by learning evaluation. Based on aesthetic experience and the service-learning fields applied in this curriculum, changes in citizen attitudes were observed.

1. 鄭博真(2012)。服務學習課程實施立成與成效之研究：以某科技大學為例。國立虎尾科技大學學報，30(4)
   連結：
2. Hancock, M. (director). (1999). Exclusions and awakenings: The life of Maxine Greene [A documentary film]. New York, NY: Hancock Productions.
3. Bringle, R. G.,Hatcher, J. A.(1995).A service-learning curriculum for faculty.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,2,112-122.
4. Canada, M.(ed.),Speck, B. W.(ed.)(2001).Developing and implementing service-learning programs.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
5. Cress, C. M.,Collier, P. J.,Reitenauer, V. L.,Associates(2005).Learning through service: A student guidebook for service-learning across the disciplines.Sterling, VA:Stylus.
6. Freire, P(2000).Education for Critical Consciousness.New York, NY:The Continum.
7. Greene, M.(1995).Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
8. Greene, M.(1978).Landscapes of learning.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
9. Greene, M.(1974).Cognition, consciousness, and curriculum.Heighten consciousness, culture revolution, and curriculum theory,Berkeley, CA:
10. Greene, M.(2001).Variations on a blue guitar.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
11. Greene, M.(1971).Curriculum and Consciousness.Teachers College Record,73(2),253-269.
12. Greene, M.(1973).Teacher as stranger: Educational philosophy in the modern age.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
13. Huebner, D. E.,Pinar, W.,Hillis, V.(1999).The lure of the transcendent: Collected essays by Dwayne E. Huebner.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Jacoby, B.(ed.),Associates(ed.)(2009).Civic engagement in higher education: Concepts and practices.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
15. Jacoby, B.,Associates(2009).Building partnership for service-learning.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
16. Pinar, W. F.,Reynolds, W. M.,Slattery, P.,Taubman, P. M.(1995).Understanding curriclum as poststructurlist, deconstructed, postmodern text.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
17. Wade, R. C.(ed.)(1997).Community servicelearning: A guide to including service in the public school curriculum.Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
18. 王文科(1996)。課程與教學論。臺北市:五南。
19. 王薇雅(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南市，臺南科技大學商學與管理研究所。
20. 朱慶蘭(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立臺北教育大學政策與管理研究所。
21. 李燕美(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學習在職進修碩士班。
22. 林至善(2002)。服務學習理念與實踐─以東吳大學服務學習課程為例。學生輔導，81
23. 苑舉正(2013)。從H. Arendt與M. Nussbaum的觀點論培育公民的重要性。教育研究月刊，227
24. 莊富源(2013)。建構與釋義：大學生公民素養內涵探析。教育研究月刊，227
25. 黃玉(2000)。服務學習與高等教育。高等教育潛在課程研討會，臺北市:
26. 甯增湖(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北師範大學教育研究所。
27. 劉曉波(1987)。跟傳統徹底決裂。當代雜誌，13，61。

1. 蔡昕璋(2018)。技專校院學生校園參與經驗、美感素養與公民行動特質之因果關係研究。學生事務與輔導，57(1)，31-47。
2. 李育齊,何奕勳(2022)。大學生參與服務學習課程經驗與學習成效關係研究－以致理科技大學為例。學生社團學刊，10，51-71。
3. 邱筱琪(2017)。服務學習融入技專校院通識課程教學設計之質性研究。學生事務與輔導，56(3)，25-41。