大專生專題報告Rubrics之發展與成效評估：以人力資源管理相關課程為例

Development and Evaluation of Rubrics for Assessing the Performance of College Students in Human Resource Management Courses

10.3966/199679772016063301003

柳玉清(Yu-Ching Liu)

評分規準 ； 學習成果評量 ； 實作評量 ； 信度 ； rubrics ； learning outcome assessment ； performance assessment ； reliability

新竹教育大學教育學報

33卷1期（2016 / 06 / 30）

77 - 108

繁體中文

研究者採用 Rubrics，分別發展人力資源管理課程的書面報告大綱和口頭專題報告之評分規準。研究參與對象為研究者任教課程之51位大學生，分成十組。結果發現：在二位教師之間、以及教師與學生之間的評分者間信度頗高，而且評分標準越具體、可量化，評分的信度相對提高。雖然以Rubrics評分的相關係數略高於傳統評分方式，只是此差異極為微小。問卷調查顯示：學生對於 Rubrics評量方法傾向認同與肯定，學生也願意接受同學之間的互評。本研究整理研究發現以及學生意見，提出對於未來研究與使用 Rubrics的具體建議。

Two sets of rubrics were developed for assessing the performance of students in Human Resource Management courses. The rubrics were reviewed by 3 experts and discussed with students in class. The final versions of the rubrics were used for assessing students’ performance. In addition, a questionnaire was designed to obtain students’ opinions on using the rubrics for assessment. The participants were 2 college professors and 51 college students. They were divided into 10 groups. The results showed high interrater reliability among the professors’ scores, as well as between the professors’ and students’ scores; interrater reliability results were higher when the criteria were concrete and quantifiable. Despite the use of rubrics resulting in slightly higher interrater consistency than the use of traditional grading methods did, the differences were negligible. However, the intrarater correlations (scores graded using 2 methods by the same person) were higher than the interrater correlations (scores graded using the rubric method by different people). The results from the questionnaire revealed that the students had positive attitudes toward the uses of rubrics for classroom assessment and peer assessment. On the basis of these findings, I offer specific recommendations for future studies of the application of rubrics to classroom assessment.

1. 曾慧青（2009）。大學畢業生就業問題與對策。取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/6075【Zeng, H.-J. (2009). Employment problems and policies of college graduates. Retrieved from http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/6075】
2. 李紋霞（無日期）。學習成果導向評量：Rubrics運用與設計。取自ctl.scu.edu.tw/photo/photo_td/activity/1010606/ppt.pdf 【Li, W.-X. (n.d.). Learning result evaluation: Application and design of Rubrics. Retrieved from ctl.scu.edu.tw/photo/photo_td/activity/1010606/ppt.pdf】
3. 教育部青年發展署（2006）。在正式教育中提升就業力：行政院青輔會大專畢業生就業力調查摘要報告。取自www.center.nkfust.edu.tw/paper/jobsurvey.pdf【Youth Development Administration, Ministry of Education. (2006).Increasing employability in formal education: The survey on college graduates' employability. Report of National Youth Commission, Executive Yuan. Retrieved from www.center.nkfust.edu.tw/paper/jobsurvey.pdf】
4. Association of American Colleges & Universities (2010). VALUE rubric development project. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/value-rubrics
5. Andrade, H.(2007).Self-assessment through rubrics.Educational Leadership,65(4),60-63.
6. Andrade, H. G.(2005).Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly.College Teaching,53(1),27-30.
7. Dunbar, N.E.,Brooks, C.F.,Kubicka-Miller, T.(2006).Oral communication skills in higher education: Using a performance-based evaluation rubric to assess communication skills.Innovative Higher Education,31(2),115-28.
8. Green, R.,Bowser, M.(2006).Observations from the field: Sharing a literature review rubric.Journal of Library Administration,45(1-2),185-202.
9. Halonen, J. S.,Bosck, T.,Clay, S.,McCarthy, M.,Dunn, D. S.,Hill, G. W., IV,McEntarffer, R.,Whitlock, K.(2003).A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology.Teaching of Psychology,30(3),196-208.
10. Jackson, C. W.,Larkin, M. J.(2002).RUBRIC: Teaching students to use grading rubric.Teaching Exceptional Children,35(1),40-45.
11. Kerby, D.,Romine, J.(2009).Develop oral presentation skills through accounting curriculum design and course-embedded assessment.Journal of Education for Business,85,172-179.
12. Lapsley, R.,Moody, R.(2007).Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non-traditional students.Journal of American Aacademy of Business,12(1),167-172.
13. Mertler, C. A.(2001).Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom.Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,7(25)
14. Moni, R. W.,Beswick, E.,Moni, K. B.(2005).Using student feedback to construct an assessment rubric for a concept map in physiology.Advances in Physiology Education,29,197-203.
15. Montgomery, K.(2002).Authentic tasks and rubrics: Going beyond traditional assessments in college teaching.College Teaching,50(1),34-39.
16. Moskal, B. M.(2000).Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?.Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,7(3)
17. Reddy, Y. M.,Andrade, H.(2010).A review of rubric use in higher education.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,35(4),435-448.
18. Riebe, L.,Jackson, D.(2014).The use of rubrics in benchmarking and assessing employability skills.Journal of Management Education,38,319-344.
19. Selke, M. J. G.(2013).Rubric assessment goes to college : Objective, comprehensive evaluation of student work.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Education.
20. Skillings, M. J.,Ferrell, R.(2000).Student-generated Rubrics: Bringing students into the assessment process.The Reading Teacher,53(6),452-458.
21. Yoshina, J. M.,Harada, V. H.(2007).Involving students in learning through rubrics.Library Media Connection,25(5),10-14.
22. 史美瑤(2012)。提升學生學習成效：評估表格（Rubrics）的設計與運用。評鑑雙月刊，40，39-41。
23. 池俊吉(2011)。大學校院推動學習成效為本教育應有之認知與作為。評鑑雙月刊，33，28-32。
24. 余民寧(2011)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychology。
25. 吳清山(2012)。善用評量方法提升學生學習成就。教育人力與專業發展，29(4)，1-4。
26. 吳清山、林天祐(1997)。真實評量、實作評量、卷宗評量。教育資料與研究，15，67-69。
27. 李坤崇(2006)。教學評量。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。
28. 彭森明(2010)。大學校院如何推展學生學習成果評量。評鑑雙月刊，24，28-34。
29. 趙建豐、林志隆(2005)。評分規準（Rubric）的類型、發展方式與使用原則。國教天地，161，99-107。
30. 藍珮君(2012)。以多面向Rasch測量模式分析TOCFL口語測驗評分者訓練效果。永續教育發展─創新與實踐論文集：2010 年國際學術研討會─測驗及評量論文專輯，新北市=New Taipei City, Taiwan:
31. 蘇錦麗、黃曙東、浮絲曼(2011)。評分量尺rubrics在大學生學習成效評估之運用。教育研究月刊，207，18-31。

1. 韓德彥(2020)。以三國演義簡報設計教學及訓練提升學生簡報技能效益。通識學刊：理念與實務，8(2)，107-133+135。
2. 王敏東(2019)。非日本語学科の大学生を対象とした「日本事情」の授業から見えたこと－レポートを中心に－。台灣日語教育學報，33，52-81。
3. 莊妙仙(2021)。以寫作模式融入視覺故事設計教學之行動研究。設計學報，26(2)，1-22。