题名

1916年英俄與伊朗的結盟交涉

并列篇名

Anglo-Iranian Negotiations for Alliance in 1916

作者

陳立樵(Chen, Li-chiao)

关键词

葛雷 ； 薩左諾夫 ； 穆斯陶斐馬馬雷克 ； 《1828年土庫曼查宜條約》 ； 《1907年英俄協定》 ； Edward Grey ； Serge Sazonov ； Mostowfi al-Mamalek ； Treaty of Torkmanchai of 1828 ； Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907

期刊名称

興大歷史學報

卷期/出版年月

32期（2018 / 12 / 01）

页次

35 - 55

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文探討一次大戰時期，1916年英俄兩國與伊朗進行結盟的交涉。自19世紀以來，英國與俄國在伊朗爭奪勢力範圍，但在避免雙方利益直接衝突之下，以「維護伊朗主權獨立與領土完整」為原則，致力於達到權力平衡的目的。然而現實的情況是，當伊朗試圖維護自身的獨立自主時，英俄卻多次介入，以致於伊朗受到英俄的長期箝制。一戰爆發之後，伊朗國王宣布中立，試圖藉著歐洲戰局而獲得獨立自主、擺脫強權干涉與避免戰爭波及。不過，英俄兩國與德國及鄂圖曼帝國交戰時，不僅戰場蔓延到伊朗境內，外交角力也在伊朗展開。1915年年底，英國為防範任何伊朗可能向德國靠攏的可能性，向伊朗提出結盟的要求。1916年年初，伊朗首相提出了結盟的條件，但條文中強力捍衛主權獨立，過去伊朗在英俄壓力之下不得不默許、甚至同意的條約，此時都要取消或重新修訂。許多研究稱伊朗政府衰敗沒有作為，但檔案記載並非如此，反而是相當維護自身權益。在英國外交部與駐伊公使的電報之中，看到英國（包括俄國）都不願意放下在伊朗的特權。於是，1916年的結盟一事，在伊朗與英俄三方都堅持立場的情況下，沒有達成共識。
英文摘要

This article argues that the negotiations between Britain and Iran in 1916. Since the nineteenth century, Britain and Russia had had their spheres of influence in Iran. Ironically, Britain and Russia had a principle of 'maintenance of the independence and integrity of Iran' in order to avoid from conflicts. Eventually, Iran hardly maintained its independence and integrity owing to pressures from the two European powers. During the First World War, in previous studies, the Iranian government was weaker, and made no efforts to resist to Britain and Russia. However, original documents tell a different side of history. At the outbreak of the war in 1914, the Iranian Shah declared neutrality, in order to eliminate possibilities of foreign intervention. Nevertheless, Britain and Russia were still suspicious to Iran, especially when the Germans were more and more influential in the Persian Gulf, where the British traditionally had its special interests. Eventually Britain suggested to Iran an alliance, which was to stop Iran from being an ally of the German side. However, in early 1916, Iran's proposal for alliance showed their will for Iran's independence and integrity, which was always their goal to be achieved. The result ended by a counter-proposal of Russia, followed by Britain, and in the end the alliance failed.
主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. 陳立樵(2014)。伊朗對英俄兩國的外交困局（1909-1914）。中正歷史學刊，17，205-216。
    連結：
  2. 陳立樵(2014)。石油開採與英伊關係（1901-1914）。東吳歷史學報，32，203-240。
    連結：
  3. 陳立樵(2018)。第一次世界大戰初期英國─伊朗關係（1914-1915）。成大歷史學報，54，163-187。
    連結：
  4. Barclay to Grey, December 1, 1911, 48064, no. 619, FO416/50.
  5. Marling to Grey, January 24, 1916, no. 61, 15008, FO371/2731
  6. Buchanan to Grey, November 26, 1911, 47134, no. 303, FO416/50
  7. Buchanan to Grey, November 28, 1915, 179337, FO371/2437.
  8. Marling to Grey, May 20, 1915, 63625, no. 189, FO416/62
  9. Marling to Grey, November 24, 1915, no. 480, 177914, FO371/2437
  10. O'Beirne to Grey, July 3, 1908, 22953, no. 111, FO416/37
  11. Grey to Buchanan, March 14, 1916, no. 586, 47616, FO416/64
  12. Note from the Persian Government dated September 2, 1915, by Mohtesham, 143127, no. 116, FO371/2436
  13. Buchanan to Grey, December 7, 1915, no. 1829, 186849, FO371/2438
  14. Marling to Grey, November 22, 1915, no. 472, 176358, FO371/2437
  15. Grey to Marling, October 27, 1915, 159391, no. 336, FO416/63
  16. Marling to Grey, December 10, 1915, no. 521, 189610, FO371/2438
  17. Agreement with Bakhtiari Khans, enclosure, February 17, 1916, no. 19, 50696, FO416/64
  18. Ala-es-Sultaneh to Townley, February 20, 1915, enclosure, 33973, no. 41, FO416/62
  19. Barclay to Grey, August 30, 1911, no. 364, FO248/1018
  20. Grey to Grant Duff, August 2, 1906, 26312, no. 104, FO371/112
  21. Vosuk-ed-Dowleh to Poklewski, December 2, 1911, enclosure 1, 50545, no. 237, FO371/1198
  22. Spring-Rice to Grey, November 9, 1906, 39524, no. 282, FO371/112
  23. Marling to Grey, October 25, 1915, 158939, no. 333, FO371/2436
  24. Buchanan to Grey, August 5, 1911, 30953, no. 176, FO371/1192
  25. Buchanan to Grey, November 26, 1915, no. 1766, 179337, FO371/2437
  26. Memorandum respecting the Boundary between Persia and Russia; and the Understanding between Great Britain and Russia as to the Maintenance of the Independence and Integrity of Persia, April 22, 1874, FO881/12464
  27. Curzon to Cox, January 14, 1919, 6345, no. 24, FO371/3858
  28. Nicolson to Grey, January 12, 1910, 1372, no. 12, FO416/43
  29. D'Arcy to Foreign Office, September 26, 1905, 3405, IOR/L/PS/10/143
  30. Neratoff to the Russian Ambassador at London. Telegram, Nov. 13-26, 1911. No.1881. in Entente Diplomacy and the World: Matrix of the History of Europe, 1909-1914, ed, George Abel Schreinder, trans. B. de Siebert (New York and London: The Knickerbocker Press, 1921), p. 127
  31. Barclay to Grey, December 8, 1911, 49202, no. 670, FO416/50
  32. Grey to Nicolson, August 3, 1906, 26986, no. 364, FO416/28
  33. Extract from the “Novoe Vremya” of May 20 (June 2), 1902 (Translation.), enclosure, no. 199, FO416/9
  34. Marling to Grey, October 30, 1915, 161289, no. 422, FO371/2436
  35. Grey to Marling, January 29, 1916, no. 51, 17996, FO317/2731.
  36. Marling to Grey, October 26, 1915, 158944, no. 411, FO3671/2436
  37. Buchanan to Grey, March 26, 16, no. 428, 57777, FO371/2731
  38. Grey to O'Beirne, July 1, 1908, 22576, no. 201, FO416/37
  39. Grant Duff to Grey, July 24, 1906, 25310, no. 195, FO371/112
  40. Marling to Grey, January 16, 1916, no. 43, 9765, FO416/64
  41. Buchanan to Grey, January 21, 1916, no. 114, 13245, FO371/2731
  42. Marling to Grey, December 9, 1915, no. 519, 188171, FO317/2438.
  43. Marling to Grey, November 20, 1915, no. 467, 175326, FO371/2437
  44. Scott to the Marquess of Salisbury, April 4, 1900, no 93, FO416/3
  45. Reynolds to Cox, enclosure 2, April 30, 1909, 20079, FO248/954
  46. Spring-Rice to Grey, December 21, 1906, private, FO248/869
  47. The Times, Thursday, April 19, 1900, p. 10
  48. Townley to Grey, February 26, 1914, 8631, no. 57, FO371/2066
  49. Marling to Grey, October 27, 1915, 159311, no. 415, FO371/2436
  50. Grant Duff to Grey, September 6, 1906, 30289, no. 234, FO371/112
  51. Buchanan to Grey, December 2, 1915, no. 1801, 183647, FO371/2438
  52. Grey to Benckendorff, December 16, 1915, 188274, FO371/2438
  53. India Office to Foreign Office, January 28, 1916, 17996, FO371/2731
  54. Marling to Grey, January 19, 1916, no. 51, 12526, FO416/64
  55. Marling to Grey, January 27, 1916, no. 66, 17502, FO371/2731
  56. Marling to Grey, December 4, 1915, no. 508, 184930, FO371/2438
  57. Buchanan to Grey, December 14, 1915, no. 1871, 191271, FO371/2438
  58. Marling to Grey, April 14, 1916, no. 237, 74212, FO371/2731
  59. Marling to Grey, November 25, 1915, no. 484, 178675, FO371/2437
  60. Marling to Grey, October 28, 1915, 159975, no. 418, FO371/2436
  61. Buchanan to Grey, November 25, 1915, no. 1761, 178818, FO371/2437
  62. Enclosure, 35944, no. 231, FO416/34
  63. India Office to Foreign Office, December 9, 1915, 188274, FO371/2438
  64. Barclay to Grey, July 24, 1911, 28967, no. 281, FO371/1193.
  65. From Viceroy, January 16, 1916, FO371/2731
  66. Grey to Marling, October 29, 1915, 160012, no. 341, FO371/2436
  67. Marling to Grey, March 23, 1916, no. 185, 56017, FO371/2731
  68. Afary, Janet(1996).The Iranian Constitutional Revolution, 1906-1911: Grassroots Democracy, Social Democracy, and the Origins of Feminism.New York:Columbia University Press.
  69. Ahmad, Ishtaq(1971).Anglo-Iranian Relations 1905-1919.New York:Asia Publishing House.
  70. Amirsadeghi, Hossein(ed.)(1977).Twentieth-Century Iran.New York:Holmes & Meier Publishers.
  71. Atabaki, Touraj(ed.)(2006).Iran and the First World War: Battleground of the Great Powers.London:I.B. Tauris.
  72. Axworthy, Michael(2008).A History of Iran: Empire of the Mind.New York:Basic Books.
  73. Chehabi, H. E.(ed.),Martin, Vanessa(ed.)(2010).Iran's Constitutional Revolution: Popular Politics, Cultural Transformations and Transnational Connections.London:I.B. Tauris.
  74. Clark, James D.(2006).Constitutionalists and Cossacks: The Constitutional Movement and Russian Intervention in Tabriz, 1907-1911.Iranian Studies,39,225.
  75. Cronin, Stephanie(2012).Deserters, Converts, Cossacks and Revolutionaries: Russians in Iranian Military Service 1800-1920.Middle Eastern Studies,48,168-169.
  76. Cronin, Stephanie(2008).Importing Modernity: European Military Missions to Qajar Iran.Comparative Studies in Society and History,50,221.
  77. Dashtaki, Khodabakhsh Oorbabpur(2010).Enqelis va Bakhtiyari 1896-1925 Miladi.Tehran:Mo'asseseh-e Motale'at-e Tarikh-e Mo'aser-e Iran.
  78. Edward Mead Earle, Turkey, the Great Powers, and the Bagdad Railway: A Study in Imperialism (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1924), p. 131.
  79. Ghods, M. Reza(1989).Iran in the Twentieth Century: A Political History.London:Adamantine Press.
  80. Hughes, Thomas L.(2002).The German Mission to Afghanistan, 1915-1916.German Studies, Review,25,456.
  81. Hurewitz, J. C.(1956).Diplomacy in the Near and Middle East, A Documentary Record: 1535-1914.Toronto:D. Van Nostrand Company.
  82. Issawi, Charles(ed)(1971).The Economic History of Iran 1800-1914.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  83. Kazemzadeh, Firuz(1968).Russia and Britain in Persia, 1864-1914: A Study in Imperialism.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  84. Keddie, Nikki(2006).Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  85. Lenczowski, George(1983).Foreign Powers' Intervention in Iran during World War I.Qajar Iran: Political, Social and Cultural Change 1800-1925,Edinburgh:
  86. Majd, Mohammad Gholi(2003).Persia in World War I and Its Conquest by Great Britain.Lanham:University Press of America.
  87. Martin, Bradford G.(1959).German-Persian Diplomatic Relations 1873-1912.Netherlands:Mouton & Co..
  88. Martin, Vanessa(1996).An Evaluation of Reform and development of the State in the Early Qajar Period.Die Welt des Islams,36,24.
  89. Martin, Vanessa(1993).Hartwig and Russian Policy in Iran 1906-08.Middle Eastern Studies,29,7.
  90. Martin, Vanessa(1989).Islam and Modernism: The Iranian Revolution of 1906.London:I.B. Tauris.
  91. Martin, Vanessa,Nouarei, Morteza(2011).Foreign land Holdings in Iran 1828 to 1911.Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society,21,131-145.
  92. McDaniel, Rober A.(1974).The Shuster Mission and the Persian Constitutional Revolution.Minneapolis:Bibiotheca Islamica.
  93. Olson, WM.(1984).Anglo-Iranian Relations during World War I.London:Frank Cass.
  94. Potter, Lawrence G.(ed.)(2009).The Persian Gulf in History.New York:Palgrave MacMillan.
  95. Rabi, Uzi,Ter-Qganov, Nugzar(2009).The Russian Military Mission and the Birth of the Persian Cossack Brigade: 1879-1894.Iranian Studies,42,446.
  96. Ramazani, Rouhollah K.(1966).The Foreign Policy of Iran: A Developing Nation in World Affairs 1500-1941.Charlottesville:University Press of Virginia.
  97. Sazman-e Asnad-e Melli-ye Iran, 293-18765, Du al-Hija 12, 1332 (2 November 1914)
  98. W. Morgan Shuster, The Strangling of Persia (New York: The Century Co., 1912). , p. 373 p. 366 p. 182 pp. 345-355
  99. Sicker, Martin(1988).The Bear and the Lion: Soviet Imperialism and Iran.New York:Prager.
  100. Eugene Staley, “Business and Politics in the Persian Gulf: The Story of the Wonckhaus Firm,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 3 (Sep., 1933), pp. 367-385
  101. Christopher Sykes, Wassmuss: “The German Lawrence” (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1936), pp. 28-32
  102. Torkman, Mohammad(1991).Asnadi Darbareh-e Hojum-e Engelis va Rus beh Iran 1291 tal 1287.Tehran:Daftar-e- Motale'at-e Siyasi va Baynalmelali.
  103. Yelfani, Ramin(1997).Zendeganiyeh Siyasi-e Abu al-Qasem Khan Naser al-Molk.Tehran:Mo'asseseh-ye Motale'at-e Tarikh-e Moa'aser-e Iran.
  104. Yeselson, Abraham(1956).United States-Persian Diplomatic Relation 1883-1921.New Jersey:Rutgers University Press.
被引用次数
  1. 陳立樵(2023)。伊朗加入巴黎和會與英伊關係。臺大歷史學報，71，197-237。
print cancel