護理學系學生修習解剖學課程之成效評估

The Evaluation of Anatomy Course Provided for the Nursing Students

10.6145/jme.200403_8(1).0008

王霈(Pei Wang)；尹相姝(Hsiang-Shu Yin)；呂俊宏(June-Horng Lue)；吳建春(Jiahn-Chun Wu)；謝松蒼(Sung-Tsang Hsieh)；錢宗良(Chung-Liang Chien)

解剖學課程 ； 護理學系 ； 教育 ； 評估 ； anatomy course ； department of nursing ； education ； evaluation

Journal of Medical Education

8卷1期（2004 / 03 / 01）

78 - 86

繁體中文

本研究之主要目的為評估並瞭解醫學院設理學系學生學習解剖學的態度與需求。本研究計對從九十到九十二學年度修過解剖學護理學系同學做問卷調查，獲得一百二十六份有效問卷。經過統計分析後，結果顯示三學年中平均有75.9％同學對修習系統解剖學課程感到滿意；然而有13.8％同學在自我學習評估中，反應出其研究讀解剖學只為應付考試，而且在近兩年增加11％。另針對學生研讀解剖學的資料來源，以複選方式作答分析其結果顯示，有87.9％同學非常依賴具有中譯的上課講義。此外，有學生認為修習過解剖學的確有助於奠定其基礎醫學知識，亦對於其學習專業科目也有所幫助；但對目前解剖學課程中實習的內容與時數，則是認為明顯不足。本研究發現護理學系修課同學在對解剖學課程教學滿意度與自我學習評估之間仍存有落差，亦顯示出近年學生在學習態度上的轉變。此研究的結果，有助於解當前護理學系學生學習基礎醫學的狀況；並在規劃基礎醫學課程時，提供具有參考價值的資訊。

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning attitude toward and the demand for an anatomy course on the part of nursing students. A total of 126 questionnaires were collected from 133 nursing students taking an anatomy course during the years 2001 to 2003 inclusively. The analysis of the questionnaires revealed that 75.9% of the participating students were, on average, satisfied with the anatomy curriculum. Nevertheless, 13.8% of total students responded to suggest that their study course for anatomy was only “just good enough” to satisfy the requisites of the obligatory examination, such an attitude having increased by 11% in recent two years. Multiple-choice questions were also applied in order to attempt to analyze the study resources used by nursing students in the conduct of this study course. It was found that 87.9% of students relied upon the syllabus with Chinese translations of anatomical terms in addition to attempting to read the original textbook when they were learning anatomy. Further analysis of questionnaire responses also revealed that most of the participating students agreed that the learning of anatomy was essential for establishing their basic medical knowledge. In this study, we also found that nursing students do have greater expectations for the quantity and the quality of anatomy laboratory instructions than was delivered in their study course. In conclusion, informative feedback regarding the learning attitude of nursing students participating in this study program as obtained from questionnaires will help us to improve our teaching skills and maintain a high level of nursing training. The implication from this study is that the appropriate interpretation of the study’s results will provide relevant suggestions for the future design of an appropriate anatomy course for nursing students.

1. Ager CL(1979).Effects of the human dissection experience on subsequent related course work.American Journal of Occupational Therapy,33,776-778.
2. Alexander J(1970).Dissection versus prosection in the teaching of anatomy.Journal of Medical Education,45,600-606.
3. Alexander MK(2001).Transforming nursing education through problem-based education.Nursing & Health Care Perspectives,22(6),315-316.
4. Bukowski EL,Jensen RH,Morrison MA(1980).Comparison of textbook and self-instructional learning methods.Physical Therapy,60,179-183.
5. Gill AA,Marmo NA,Shuster JJ(1978).The effectiveness of laboratory vs written examinations in an anatomy course.American Journal of Occupational Therapy,32,26-30.
6. Handelsman J(2004).Scientific teaching.Science,304,521-522.
7. Murata K(1981).Self-evaluation in teaching of anatomy-in relation to the contents of the national examination.[Japanese] Kango Kyoiku-Japanese Journal of Nurses Education,22,561-571.
8. Tortora GJ(2002).Principles of Human Anatomy.New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
9. Yoro T.(1987).Teaching anatomy to nursing students.[Japanese] Kango Gijutsu-Japanese Journal of Nursing Art,33,608-609.
10. 王美業、邱淑貞、何美華(2000)。護理學系學生人格特質與壓力症狀相關性之研究。新台北護理期刊，2(1)，49-57。
11. 吳英黛、張祐仁、王惠珀、李明濱(1999)。物理治療臨床實習課程教學滿意程度之調查。醫學教育，3，53-60。
12. 林艷君、張媚、陳滋茨、蔡麗雅、黃秀梨(2000)。護理學系畢業生對學校教育與課程評價之探討。醫學教育，4，315-327。
13. 唐福瑩、陳秀蓮、吳祥鳳(2002)。生物學科在護理之重要性及其困境。護理雜誌，49(5)，5-9。
14. 許麗齡(2001)。問題導向學習於護理教育上之應用。護理雜誌，48(4)，31-36。
15. 許麗齡(2000)。護理教育的省思與展望。護理雜誌，47(4)，40-46。
16. 蕭淑貞、陳孝範、陳杏佳(1996)。護理系學生在大二學期生活壓力事件及壓力症狀之探討。衛生教育雜誌，16，41-48。
17. 錢宗良、王霈、謝相姝、呂俊宏、吳建春、謝松蒼、盧國賢(2001)。醫學相關科系學生修習解剖學課程之意見調查。醫學教育，5(2)，124-134。