慈濟大學醫學系實施推薦甄選入學策略之成效

Effectiveness of Recommended Admission Policy in the Department of Medicine at Tzu Chi University

10.6145/jme.200503_9(1).0004

潘靖瑛(Ching-Ying Pan)；賴明亮(Ming-Liang Lai)

醫學系招生策略 ； 推薦甄選 ； 大學聯招 ； Medical students' admission policy ； recommended admission ； Joint College Entrance Examination

Journal of Medical Education

9卷1期（2005 / 03 / 01）

46 - 59

繁體中文

本研究藉由慈濟大學醫學系推薦甄選入學學生（推甄生）和聯考分發入學學生（聯招生）之學業成績比較，及醫學系教師對推甄生在校表現的調查，來探究慈濟大學醫學系實施推薦甄選入學策略的有效性。本研究以慈濟大學85學年度到91學年度入學的醫學系七個年級學生為樣本，含推甄生68人，聯招生280人，分析七年463門必修課程，發現兩組學生在88%課程的成績上並無顯著差異；僅在12%的課程表現上有顯著差異，且多為推甄生優於聯招生。此外，有超過75%的教師肯定推薦甄選能招收到適合醫學系的學生，有一半以上的教師認為推甄生與聯招生的在校表現，並無顯著差異，但有三分之一的教師對推甄生在參與活動、辦事能力及特殊才藝的表現感到滿意。依據上述分析結果，可以證實慈濟大學醫學系實施之推薦甄選，確實達成其預定的選才功效，同時肯定推薦甄選不失為有效的醫學系選才方式。雖然如此，調查發現仍有半數的教師對推薦甄選的公平性質疑，主要原因是對「人」的不信任，因此建議未來在進行推甄的過程中，應慎選才德兼具者組成甄試委員會，且給予適切訓練，增強其資料審核能力、面談技巧，以利發掘適性的醫學生，同時讓推甄過程更透明化，以消減對公平性的質疑。

The main purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of recommended admission policy in the Department of Medicine at Tzu Chi University by checking students' academic achievements and investigating teachers' opinions on students' in-school performances. From 1996 through 2002, a total of 68 students were admitted to the Department of Medicine by the Recommended Admission Policy (RAP), and 280 students by Joint College Entrance Examination (JCEE). Researchers compared academic achievements between the two groups for all of the 463 required courses of the 7 year curriculum. The results showed that both groups' academic achievements are similar in 88% of the courses, and were only significantly different in 12% of the courses. Among the latter, the RAP students performed significantly better than JCEE students. In addition, more than 75% of the medical instructors agreed that RAP was a good policy that can recruit and admit appropriate students into the Department of Medicine. More than half of the teachers believed that. where it concerns in-school performance, there were no differences between RAP students and JCEE students. Furthermore, about one-third of the teachers were more satisfied with RAP students' performances in school activities and their special talents. Based on the results, the common suspicion about the Recommended Admission Policy can be laid to rest. Meanwhile, results also proved that the Recommended Admission Policy is an effective way to select appropriate students for the Department of Medicine at Tzu Chi University. However, approximately 50% of the teachers still had suspicions about the fairness of the Recommended Admission Policy. The main reason is lack of trust in persons involved in the selection process. Therefore, we suggest that in the Recommended Admission process, virtuous persons should be appointed to the selection committee, given the required training, for checking and approving documents, as well as possess the interview skills to decide on appropriate candidates. In addition, the process should be open to the public to reduce suspicion.

1. Allen I,Allen I,Brown P(Eds.),Hughes P (Eds.)(1997).Choosing Tomorrow`s Doctors.London:Policy Studies Institute.
2. Collins JP,White GR,Kennedy JA(1995).Entry to medical school: An audit of traditional selection requirements.Med Educ,29,22-28.
3. Greengross S,Allen I,Brown P.(Eds.),Hughes P (Eds.)(1997).Choosing Tomorrow`s Doctors.London:Policy Studies Institute.
4. Hughes P(2002).Can we improve on how we select medical students.J Royal Soc Med,95,18-23.
5. Ludmerer KM(1999).Instilling professionalism in medical education.JAMA,282,881-882.
6. 任建葳、張鎮華(1996)。八十四學年度推薦甄選追蹤調查研究－國立交通大學。台北:大學入學考試中心。
7. 何福田、林顯輝、黃冬富(1997)。八十五學年度推薦甄選追蹤調查研究－國立屏東師範學院。台北:大學入學考試中心。
8. 余民寧(1997)。教育測驗與評量。台北:心理出版社。
9. 呂金河、黃怡媜(1998)。八十五學年度推薦甄選追蹤調查研究－國立成功大學。台北:大學入學考試中心。
10. 李宇宙、李明濱、呂碧鴻、侯勝茂、謝博生(1998)。醫學系甄選入學學生的學習成效與團體適應。醫學教育，2，36-42。
11. 自由時報(2002/06/09)
12. 邱皓政(2000)。社會與行爲科學的量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南。
13. 翁清松、江瑞清、黃能堂(1996)。八十四學年度推薦甄選追蹤調查研究－私立中原大學。台北:大學入學考試中心。
14. 張玉成、賴慶三(1996)。八十四學年度推薦甄選追蹤調查研究－國立台北師範學院。台北:大學入學考試中心。
15. 郭旭崧(1996)。八十四學年度推薦甄選追蹤調查研究－國立陽明大學。台北:大學入學考試中心。
16. 自由時報(2002/06/15)
17. 陳舜芬、黃申如、張家榮(1998)。國立清華大學推薦甄選之研究。台北:大學入學考試中心。
18. 自由時報(2002/06/15)
19. 自由時報(2002/06/08)
20. 自由時報(2002/06/29)
21. 蕭次融、林秀紅、姚霞玲(1995)。推薦甄選追蹤調查研究。台北:大學入學考試中心。
22. 自由時報2002/06/10
23. 自由時報(2002/06/06)
24. 自由時報2002/07/05
25. 謝博生(1999)。醫學人文教育。台北:國立台灣大學醫學院。

1. Meng-Yueh Chien,Li-Ying Wang,Jau-Yih Tsauo,Huei-Ming Chai(2019).Academic Performance of Physical Therapy Students Recruited Through College Multiple Entrance Programs.醫學教育,23(1),14-25.
2. 陳秀蓉、高美英、呂碧鴻(2009)。醫學生以病人為中心之醫療態度的演變。醫學教育，13(4)，275-286。
3. 藍琴臺、鄭宇辰、楊仁宏、陳家玉、曹昌堯、林隆堯、李鴻森、李孟智(2006)。中山醫學大學醫學系推薦甄試生與分發入學生的回溯性比較研究。醫學教育，10(4)，301-312。
4. 謝小芩,曾正宜(2019)。多元入學方案的系統性矛盾與統合：以辯證認識觀解析T大經驗。教育研究集刊，65(2)，77-116。
5. 顏正芳、賴春生、劉宏文、劉克明、黃俊雄、黃尹亭(2006)。四種不同入學管道醫學生在接受醫學課程整合教育時學習成績之比較。醫學教育，10(3)，225-231。