题名

從多元課程評量分析學生對醫學倫理小班教學的期待與成效

并列篇名

Analysis of Students' Expectations and Learning Outcomes in a Medical Ethics Course

DOI

10.6145/jme.200903_13(1).0005

作者

李錦虹(Gin-Hong Lee);鄒國英(Kuo-Ying Tsou);王志嘉(Chin-Chia Wang);穆淑琪(Shu-Chi Mu);邱浩彰(Hou-Chang Chiu)

关键词

課程評量 ; 醫學倫理 ; 教育成效 ; 學生期待 ; course evaluation ; medical ethics ; education outcome ; student expectation

期刊名称

Journal of Medical Education

卷期/出版年月

13卷1期(2009 / 03 / 01)

页次

35 - 48

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究以多角度的評量來探討輔仁大學目前醫學倫理課程之教學成效,尤其著重在學生對課程期待的調查。本課程融合了調整的PBL教學法與大堂授課,受試者為52位醫學系六年級的學生,施測工具為:思考列舉法(前測),期末課程綜合評量(後測),以及醫學倫理課程態度問卷與傑佛遜同理心量表(前後測)。結果發現:學生對於醫學倫理課程與理想教學的思考列舉質性資料分析,出現下列幾個面向的看法:法律問題、內容主題、上課方式、對醫療現狀的看法、對課程結果的看法、以及專業認同。在期末進行的量性綜合評量的每一個項目,都達到顯著差異,這些包括:課程整體效果、自我投入、以及在六次PBL單元中對於主題安排、討論氣氛、以及小班導師帶領的滿意度都很高。前後測比較描述出今年課程之優點與理想課程之特色,但是學生還是認為課堂所學無法應用於臨床,期待課程提供更多對病患與對醫師經驗的體會,以及更實際與恰當的做法。此外,在課前臨床醫師的經驗分享非常受到學生的期待,但是,在課後學生對於角色楷模的期待卻明顯下降,值得進一步探討背後的原因。在同理心測量方面,則沒有任何一個題項達到前後測的顯著差異。建議未來的醫學倫理課程設計,應多增加體驗性與同理心的教學,並且強化對於醫學倫理議題的思辨與問題解決能力訓練。

英文摘要

This paper evaluated a medical ethics course at Fu-Jen Catholic University from multiple perspectives, in particular focusing on student learning expectations. This two-credit course comprised two traditional lectures and six problem-based learning sessions in one semester. Each session in turn comprised six small groups led by different tutors. The participants were 52 sixth-year medical students at the FJU College of Medicine. Evaluations were conducted at the beginning and at the end of the course. A thought-listing method was used as the pre-test instrument while the post-test instrument was a general course evaluation form and the pre-post test instruments were a medical ethics attitude questionnaire and the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. The qualitative research findings from thought listing indicated that students attitudes toward medical ethics and an ideal course design concerned law issues, ethical themes, teaching methods, the current medical environment, expected learning outcomes, and professional identity. The quantative research findings in the post test suggested students were significantly satisfied with the general course design, self performance, and the six PBL sessions. Some positive attitude changes demonstrated the successful features of this course. However, students pointed out that there is a discrepancy between class learning and actual clinical application, and indicated that they expected more opportunities to gain a deeper understanding of the roles of doctors and patients as well as clearer problem solving strategies to deal with ethical dilemmas. Prior to the commencement of the class, students were eager to share the physician's clinical experience, but this tendency for role model learning was significantly decreased after the course. The underlying causes of this phenomenon are worthy of further exploration. None of the empathy scale items reached the pre-post statistical significant difference. The implications of all these findings for future course design in medical ethics are discussed in this paper.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 醫藥總論
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 何善台、徐建鵬、王如娥(2004)。台灣未來醫學系教育改革方向。醫學教育,8(1),18-30。
    連結:
  2. 呂碧鴻、陳秀蓉、高美英(2006)。醫學生之醫師同理心取向初探。醫學教育,10(4),276-282。
    連結:
  3. 賴明亮、陳興星、蔡明哲(2006)。以問題導向學習於醫科一二年級時教授醫學倫理之初步嘗試。醫學教育,10(3),209-214。
    連結:
  4. 賴明亮、趙可式、陳興星(2005)。以問導向學習教授醫學倫理之初步嘗試。醫學教育,9(4),297-307。
    連結:
  5. 謝正源、徐建鵬、王先震(2004)。醫學生對「醫學倫理-角色扮演」課程之滿意度調查。醫學教育,8(3),314-321。
    連結:
  6. 謝正源、戴劍雄、楊順晴(2003)。問題導向學習法在醫學倫理課程應用之評估。醫學教育,7,140-150。
    連結:
  7. Cacioppo JT,Hippel W. von,Ernst JM(1997).Mapping cognitive structures and processes through verbal content: the thought-listing technique.J Consult Clin Psychol,65(6),928-940.
  8. Eckles RE,Meslin EM,Gaffney M(2005).Medical ethic education: where are we? where should we be going? A review.Acad Med,80(12),1143-1152.
  9. Howe KR(2009).Medical students' evaluations of different levels of medical ethics teaching: implications for curricula.Med Educ,21(4),340-349.
  10. Lebmann LS,Kasoff WS,Koch P(2004).A survey of medical ethics education at U.S. and Canadian medical schools.Acad Med,79,682-689.
  11. Mattick K,Bligh J(2008).Teaching and assessing medical ethics: where are we now?.J Med Ethics,32,181-185.
  12. Nogueira-Martins CF,Nogueira-Martins LA,Turato ER(2006).Medical students' perceptions of their learning about the doctor-patient relationship: a qualitative study.Med Educ,40,322-328.
  13. Walton H,Gelder M(1999).Core curriculum in psychiatry for medical students.Med Educ,33,204-211.
  14. 李明濱、李宇宙、林信男(1999)。醫學倫理教學成效及其相關團體學習因素。醫學教育,3(1),19-28。
  15. 李明濱、李宇宙、林信男(1997)。利用小組教學方式實施醫學倫理教學。醫學教育,1(2),201-215。
  16. 楊哲銘、邱弘毅、林碧玉(2004)。臺北醫學大學醫學倫理教育現況。中央大學哲學研究所應用倫理研究中心。
  17. 戴正德(2001)。醫學倫理教學法的探討。醫學與哲學,22(5),133-157。
  18. 顏永杰、楊明仁、陳正宗(1999)。醫學生所見精神科日常醫療倫理問題。醫學教育,3,29-39。
被引用次数
  1. Lin, Li-Ling,Lin, Chyi-Her,Kan, Wai-Ming,Chen, Ching-Huey(2012).Effect of Interdisciplinary Small Group for Teaching Bioethics: Program Evaluation.醫學教育,16(1),39-46.
  2. 陳敏郎(2021)。多元教學方法於基礎性專業課程之教學實踐研究。弘光學報,88,69-87。
  3. 邱浩彰、李錦虹(2018)。論壇劇場-一個深化醫學倫理教學的新嘗試。教育心理學報,50(1),131-146。
  4. 趙可式、陳清惠、林其和、林秀娟(2010)。運用多元教學策略於醫學院大一新生「生命倫理學」課程教學之成效。醫學教育,14(4),262-271。