题名

Re-Visiting the Role of Lecture-Based CME: Does it Make a Difference in Physician Learning and Change?

并列篇名

講授式繼續醫學教育活動:是否影響醫師之學習與醫療實務改變

DOI

10.6145/jme.201009_14(3).0003

作者

Marianna B. Shershneva;Min-Fen Wang;Curtis A. Olson;Julia N. Savoy;Chère C. Gibson

关键词

繼續醫學教育 ; 教育成效評鑑 ; 講授式教學法 ; 醫療實務改變 ; continuing medical education ; outcomes evaluation ; lecture ; practice change

期刊名称

Journal of Medical Education

卷期/出版年月

14卷3期(2010 / 09 / 01)

页次

183 - 196

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

研究目的:講授式的繼續醫學教育活動,一直被批評為無法有效地幫助改善臨床醫療實務及病人的健康療效。這項在美國執行的研究旨在評估一個75分鐘,以講授方法為主的繼續醫學教育活動,其成效是否影響活動參與者在更年期醫療保健方面的醫病溝通實務發生改變。研究方法:本研究同時採用質性與量化資料分析以了解教育活動的成效。41位在美國提供一般醫療服務的醫師參與本研究。在15個月的資料收集期間,採用追蹤電話訪談、教育活動實地觀察、臨床案例分析及書面問卷等方法。另外,還使用360度評估法收集8位研究參與者他們的病人、醫療團隊成員及同儕醫師的觀點。研究發現:研究參與者認為個人在提供更年期保健方面的知識與技能大幅提高。在參加教育活動過後的9-14個月之間,約86%的研究參與者(35人中有30人)實踐了一個或一個以上改變個人醫療實務的承諾。我們還訪談了6位沒有參與之前評估研究階段的教育活動參加者,發現他們有類似的醫療實務改變,與360度評估法的研究發現一致。結論:一個相對較短、以講授法為主、以實務為導向、有關更年期保健方面的繼續醫學教育活動,在使用良好的教育方案規劃原則的前提下,能促使醫生在知識、技能及醫療實務等方面發生改變。

英文摘要

Purpose: Lecture-based continuing medical education (CME) has been criticized for very limited impact on improving clinical practice and patient outcomes. This study assesses the impact of a 75-minute presentation for primary care physicians in the United States to enhance their communication with patient regarding the risks and benefits of hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms. Methods: Data were collected from 41 primary care physicians over 15 months through multiple telephone interviews, use of clinical vignettes, presentation observations, and a written survey. A 360-degree multisource evaluation of 8 participants was conducted to obtain data from their patients, peer physicians, and healthcare team members. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed to document educational outcomes. Results: Participants reported significant increases in their knowledge, skills, and confidence as related to menopausal care. At 9-14 months post-event, 85.7% (30 of 35) participants implemented one or more of their commitments to practice change. The 360-degree evaluation findings supported participants' claims of change, when 360-questions matched change statements. Meanwhile, we interviewed 6 conference attendants who did not participate in the previous evaluation phases. They reported similar practice changes to the rest of participants. Conclusions: A relatively short lecture-based, practice-oriented CME on menopausal care utilizing sound educational principles can precipitate changes in knowledge, skills and clinical practice. This study invites the CME community to re-visit the role of lecture-based CME and shift the discussion to consider under what conditions it can be expected to be more or less effective for physicians' learning and practice change.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 醫藥總論
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. ACCME Annual Report Data 2009. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education 2008.
  2. Duignan P: Outcomes Theory Knowledge Base (Organizational). Available at: [http://www.parkerduignan.com/ot/] Accessed on 12th Mar, 2008.
  3. Armstrong, E.,Parsa-Parsi, R.(2005).How can physicians' learning styles drive educational planning?.Acad Med,80,680-684.
  4. Bloom, B.S.(2005).Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: a review of systematic reviews.Int J Technol Assess Health Care,21,380-385.
  5. Browner, W.S.,Baron, R.B.,Solkowitz, S.(1994).Physician management of hypercholesterolemia: A randomized trial of continuing medical education.W J Med,161,572-578.
  6. Caldwell, J.E.(2007).Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips.CBE Life Sci Educ,6,9-20.
  7. Davis, D.,O''Brien, M.A.,Freemantle, N.(1999).Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional ontinuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?.J Am Med Assoc,282,867-874.
  8. Davis, N.,Davis, D.,Bloch, R.(2008).Continuing medical education: AMEE Education Guide No. 35.Med Teach,30,652-666.
  9. Dick, W.,Carey, L.,Carey, J.O.(2001).The Systematic Design of Instruction.United States:Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
  10. Dolan, N.C.,Ng, J.S.,Martin, G.J.(1997).Effectiveness of a skin cancer control educational intervention for internal medicine housestaff and attending physicians.J Gen Intern Med,12,531-536.
  11. Gall, M.D.,Gall, J.P.,Borg, W.R.(2003).Educational Research: an Introduction.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  12. Genuis, S.K.,Genuis, S.J.(2006).Exploring the continuum: Medical information to effective clinical practice. Paper I: The translation of knowledge into clinical practice.J Eval Clin Pract,12,49-62.
  13. Gillespie, R.(1991).Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne experiments.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  14. Greenberg, L.W.,Jewett, L.S.(1985).The impact of two teaching techniques on physicians' knowledge and performance.J Med Educ,60,390-396.
  15. Lockyer, J.(2003).Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.J Contin Educ Health Prof,23,4-12.
  16. Lockyer, J.,Gondocz, T.,Thiviere, R.(2004).Knowledge translation: The role and place of practice reflection.J Contin Educ Health Prof,24,50-56.
  17. Mansouri, M.,Lockyer, J.(2007).A meta-analysis of continuing medical education effectiveness.J Contin Educ Health Prof,27,6-15.
  18. Marinopoulos, S.S.,Dorman, T.,Ratanawongsa, N.(2007).Effectiveness of continuing medical education.Rockville, MD:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  19. Mathison, S.(1988).Why triangulate?.Educational Researcher,17,13-17.
  20. Miller, R.G.,Ashar, B.H.,Getz, K.J.(2003).Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of the health professionals.J Contin Educ Health Prof,23,109-115.
  21. Peabody, J.W.,Luck, J.,Glassman, P.(2004).Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: A prospective validation study.Ann Intern Med,141,771-780.
  22. Sarto, G.E.(2004).The gender gap: New challenges in women's health.Sexuality, Reproduction and Menopause,2,9-14.
  23. Shavelson, R.J.(1996).Statistical Reasoning for the Behavioral Sciences.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  24. Stancic, N.,Mullen, P.D.,Prokhorov, A.V.(2003).Continuing medical education: What delivery format do physicians prefer?.J Contin Educ Health Prof,23,162-167.
  25. Tipping, J.,Donahue, J.,Hannah, E.(2001).Value of unstructured time (breaks) during formal continuing medical education events.J Contin Educ Health Prof,21,90-96.
  26. Wholey, J.S.(ed.),Hatry, H.P.(ed.),Newcomer, K.E.(ed.)(2004).Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  27. Williams, R.S,.Christie, D.,Sistrom, C.(2005).Assessment of the understanding of the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in primary care physicians.Am J Obstet Gynecol,193,551-556.