環境倫理學與環境美學的東西差異－與Holmes Rolston, III商榷

East-West Difference and Diversity of Environmental Ethics and Environmental Aesthetics-Response for Holmes Rolston III and Other Matters

劉悅笛(Yue-Di Liu)

環境倫理學 ； 環境美學 ； 荷姆斯．羅斯頓III ； 荒野模式 ； environmental ethics ； environmental aesthetics ； Holmes Rolston III ； the paradigm of wild

應用倫理評論

60期（2016 / 04 / 01）

47 - 73

繁體中文

所謂「荒野模式」，主張環境倫理學和環境美學皆要「荒野化」，本文就與荷姆斯．羅斯頓III提出的「哲學走向荒野」之基本觀點進行商榷。中國環境主義傳統走出的就是另一條「天人學」之路，而且，這條道路在東西差異之間更具有全球適用性。這是由於，傳統的「自然——文化」二分法已經過時，如今人類面臨的境遇是如何更好地融入業已人化的自然當中，而不是逃離到荒野之外。無論是關於「自然全美」的積極美學的爭論，還是關於「自然之醜」是否存在的爭論，皆關係到如何應對人與自然基本關係的難題。由此，就可以從中國儒家的「審美倫理學」或「倫理美學」的視角，來重新探尋環境倫理學與環境美學之新型關聯。

The socalled ＂The Paradigm of Wild＂, means whether environmental ethics or environmental aesthetics be gone wild, and I would discuss by Holmes Rolston III about ＂philosophy gone wild＂. Chinese traditional environmentalism extended another kind of anthropocosmic way, and it has a global applicability in the contexts of the east-west diversity. The dichotomy of ＂nature-culture＂ was already out of time, and human have to face to the new relation of the humanized-nature today. The debates between ＂positive aesthetics＂ and ＂ugly in nature＂ are related to the new human-nature relationship. From the perspective of Confucian aesthetic-ethics or ethic-aesthetics, we are shaping a passageway between environmental ethics and environmental aesthetics in the end.

1. Bell, Daniel、趙一凡譯(1989)。資本主義文化矛盾。北京:三聯書店。
2. Berleant, Arnold(ed.)(2002).Environment and the Arts: Perspectives on Environmental Aesthetics.Hampshire:Ashgate Publishing.
3. Berleant, Arnold編、劉悅笛譯(2007)。環境與藝術：環境美學的多維視角。重慶:重慶出版社。
4. Carlson, Allen(1984).Nature and Positive Aesthetics.Environmental Ethics,6
5. Carlson, Allen(1991).The Aesthetics of Landscape.London:Belhaven Press.
6. Carlson, Allen(ed.),Lintott, Sheila(ed.)(2008).Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Duty.New York:Columbia University Press.
7. Elvin, Mark(2004).The Retreat of the Elephants. An Environmental History of China.New Haven:Yale University Press.
8. Hargrove, Eugene、楊通進譯(2007)。環境倫理學基礎。重慶:重慶出版社。
9. Hettinger, Ned(2005).Allen Carlson's Environmental Aesthetics and the Protection of the Environment.Environmental Ethics,27
10. Liu, Yue-di(ed.),Carter, Curtis L.(ed.)(2014).Aesthetics of Everyday Life: East and West.Newcastle upon Tyne:Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
11. Naess, Arne,Drengson, Alan,Devall, Bill(2008).The Ecology of Wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess.Berkeley, CA:Counterpoint.
12. Rolston, Holmes, III(1988).Environmental Ethics.Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press.
13. Rolston, Holmes, III(1986).Philosophy Gone Wild.New York:Prometheus Books.
14. Rolston, Holmes, III(2012).A New Environmental Ethics: The Next Millennium for Life on Earth.London:Routledge.
15. Rolston, Holmes, III(1995).Does Aesthetic Appreciation of Landscapes Need to be Science-Based?.British Journal of Aesthetics,35
16. Rolston, Holmes, III、楊通進譯(2000)。環境倫理學。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
17. Rolston, Holmes, III、齊君譯。環境美學：東方與西方的對話。應用倫理評論，60，23-45。
18. Rolston, Holmes, III、劉耳譯、葉平譯(2000)。哲學走向荒野。長春:吉林人民出版社。
19. Thiele, Leslie Paul(1999).Environmentalism for a New Millennium: The Challenge of Coevolution.New York:Oxford University Press.
20. Tuan, Yi-Fu(1974).Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
21. 段義孚、周尚意譯、張春美譯(2006)。逃避主義。臺北:立緒文化事業有限公司。
22. 費孝通(1998)。鄉土中國。北京:北京大學出版社。
23. 楊伯峻譯注(1960)。孟子譯注。北京:中華書局。
24. 劉悅笛(2011)。從倫理美學到審美倫理學—維特根斯坦、杜威與原始儒家的比較研究。哲學研究，2011(8)，104-109。