「趨生畏死」與「趨樂避苦」之兩難抉擇－「自主意願」：流動且幽微的心靈答案

The dilemma between ＂living and suffering＂ and ＂dying but relieved＂: in search of answers from within the soul - approaching patient autonomy with fluidity and subtlety

釋昭慧(Chao-hwei Shih)

病人自主權利法 ； 不確定性 ； 不由自主 ； 緣起 ； 畏死 ； 懼痛 ； Patient Right to Autonomy Act ； uncertainty ； lack of agency ； Dependent Origination ； fear of death ； avoidance of suffering

應用倫理評論

67期（2019 / 10 / 01）

5 - 28

繁體中文

本文就「自主權利」的概念，首先回顧「自主」與「責任」之對應，其次討論「自主」與「權利」之連結，然後才探究《病人自主權利法》在維護「自主意願」方面的保障與瓶頸，以及實施本法可能遇到的倫理爭議。醫學科技發達，導致眾多重症末期病患與植物人，承受著過度醫療所帶來的深切痛苦，於是，病患的自主權利，開始受到了重視，並且在醫學倫理的討論中，建立了「尊重自主原則」依佛法的「緣起」正觀，病人的「自主權利」，永遠是相對（而非絕對）的選擇自由。因為此中伴隨著或多或少的不確定性，以及「不由自主」的兩大風險：一、病後已無法有效表達當前改變的自主意願。二、執行其自主意願後，無法立即終止痛苦地邁向死亡。然而《病主法》的保障，使病人終究無須面對「他人代替選擇，自己無從置喙」的處境。「畏死」與「懼痛」，這是生命的兩大強烈本能。然而在某些時刻，劇痛之難熬，猶甚於死亡。但是，無限慈愛的力量，也很有可能讓身體衰敗的人，超克「懼痛」之情，產生「努力而活」的感悟。說到底，「自主意願」並非定格不變的產物，反之，隨著當事人的健康狀況、所獲得的支持力量與外在情境的無常變化，「自主意願」經常是一項流動且幽微的心靈答案。

In considering the concept of patients' right to autonomy, this paper first reviews the alignment between autonomy and personal responsibility and the interrelation between autonomy and personal rights. It then investigates the guarantees and obstacles of the Patient Right to Autonomy Act which safeguards patient autonomy. This is followed with a discussion of the potential ethical controversy which implementation of this Act entails. Due to tremendous advances in health care, patients living with terminal illness or occupying persistent vegetative states may undergo severe pain induced by what some may regard as overtreatment. As a result, considerations around patient autonomy arise with increasing frequency and gravity, to the point that they have become a regular topic in discussions of medical ethics. According to the Buddhist view of Dependent Origination, patient autonomy is a relative rather than an absolute freedom of choice due to two significant components of the medical decision-making process-uncertainty and lack of agency. Regarding uncertainty, patients may not be able to consciously address changes to their autonomous wishes (or advance medical directive) once their illness reaches a more advanced stage. As for agency, there are times when, even though their wishes are carried out, patients are unable to receive immediate assistance in dying to end their pain and suffering. Thanks to the Patient Right to Autonomy Act, patients are relieved of the plight presented by being unable to make personal medical choices once they are no longer capable of exercising either conscious deliberation or agency. Fear of death and avoidance of suffering are two strong instincts of life. At times, sharp pain may seem even more unbearable than death. However, the internal strength which arises from practices generating boundless loving-kindness may also encourage individuals with deteriorating health to overcome their fear of suffering and develop the resolve to continue to ＂do their best to live＂. In sum, there is no fixed conclusion regarding patient autonomy. Rather, it often varies due to patients' health conditions, the support they receive, or changes in external circumstances. For these reasons, questions around patient autonomy are often an exploration from within the soul, and characterized by fluidity and subtlety.

1. Beauchamp, Tom L.,Childress, James F.(2009).Principles of Biomedical Ethics.New York:Oxford University Press.
2. Cerminara, Kathy L.(2006).Theresa Marie Schiavo's Long Road to Peace.Death Studies,30(2)
3. Kinney, Hannah C.,Korein, Julius,Panigrahy, Ashok,Dikkes, Pieter,Goode, Robert(1994).Neuropathological Findings in the Brain of Karen Ann Quinlan--The Role of the Thalamus in the Persistent Vegetative State.The New England Journal of Medicine
4. 安卓恩˙歐文, Adrian(2018).困在大腦裡的人.臺北:采實文化.
5. 吳育政，2016，〈不專業的《病人自主權利法》〉，《天下雜誌》「獨立評論」。URL：http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/3822
6. 安寧照顧基金網頁。URL：https://www.hospice.org.tw/content/2051
7. 周定國，〈以《基督教要義》為基礎，論預定論中「上帝的主權」與「人的自由意志」的關係〉。URL=http://www.chinesetheology.com/DKChow/Predestination.htm
8. 孫效智(2017)。《病人自主權利法》評釋。澄清醫護管理雜誌，13(1)
9. 曾芷筠：〈【植物人甦醒番外篇】植物人甦醒機率有多少腦部造影技術可判〉。URL：https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20180907pol006/
10. 黃純德(2017)。咀嚼吞嚥障礙──插鼻胃管的優缺點。高醫醫訊，36(9)
11. 臺北市立聯合醫院：〈《病人自主權利法》與《安寧緩和醫療條例》之不同〉， URL=https://tpech.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=343ADEA7F444B698&sms=B1B940B2F10F0AB3&s=23FD2CFB9196A61F
12. 臺北慈濟醫院：〈《病人自主權利法》Q&A，URL=taipei.tzuchi.com. tw/162/pdf/e/ACP/7.pdf
13. 蔡甫昌(2000)。生命倫理四原則方法。醫學教育，4(2)
14. 蔡甫昌(2008)。末期病人之撤除維生治療。健康世界，395
15. 賴治怡(2005)。生命在無人知曉處──植物人泰莉案的死亡權爭議。司改雜誌，56
16. 釋昭慧(2013).佛教規範倫理學.北京:宗教文化出版社.

1. 黃亮維(2021)。互為分靈體－超脫「病人自主」與「病方自主」的兩難。生命教育研究，13(1)，1-23。
2. 楊秀儀(2021)。再論病人之拒絕治療權：病人自主權利法施行之後。臺大法學論叢，50(3)，789-865。