從《民法典侵權責任編（草案）（二次審議稿）》第九百九十五條談「臨床醫療強制干預權」的失範

The failure of ＂the Right of clinical medical enforced Interference＂ of the Nine Hundred Ninety Five Article of the Chapter of Obligation of Invasion in Civil Law (Draft for Second Deliberation)

胡曉翔(Xiao-Xiang Hu)

《侵權責任法》 ； 《民法典各分編（草案）》 ； 《民法典侵權責任編（草案）（二次審議稿）》第九百九十五條 ； 臨床醫療強制干預權 ； 速裁 ； Act of Obligation of Invasion of Patient's Right ； Draft of Classified Civil Law ； the nine hundred ninety five article of the Chapter of Obligation of Invasion in Civil Law (Draft for Second Deliberation) ； clinical medical enforced right of interference ； quick jurisdiction

應用倫理評論

68期（2020 / 04 / 01）

31 - 50

繁體中文

《侵權責任法》第五十六條，完整地複製成《民法典各分編草案）》第九百九十五條，再被複製為《民法典侵權責任編（草案）（二次審議稿）》第九百九十五條，學界有誤讀其為臨床醫療強制干預權授權條。建議在民法典編纂中有所完善，專條規制臨床醫療強制干預權。新法條建議為：「患者病情危急，必須採取的不可替代的搶救措施經規範告知和解釋後，依然被患方無理拒絕，則醫療機構應當立即報告當地警務部門和衛生主管部門。警務部門和衛生主管部門應立即派員現場了解情況，協助引導。必要時，指導醫療機構向醫療機構所在地初級人民法院提交速裁申請，由法院派員現場開庭予以裁定是否啟動臨床醫療強制干預權。具體細則，另行製定。」

The fifty-six article of the Act of the Obligation of Invasion of Patient's Right is a copy of nine hundred ninety five article of the Draft of Classified Civil Law, and then reproduced completely as the nine hundred ninety five article of the Chapter of Obligation of Invasion in Civil Law (Draft for Second Deliberation), and some professionals misread it as a legal authorization of clinical medical enforced interference of the right of the patient. In this paper, I propose that it should be completed better in the collection of civil law as a special regulation for clinical medical enforced interference of the right of the patient. The new article should read : ＂In case of the saving of patient in emergence situation, the necessary and without alternative method of life-saving is unreasonably rejected after explanation according to regulation, the medical institute must report immediately to the local police department and public health department, and the police department and the chief officer of the public health department must send officials immediately to the site to understand the situation, give directional help, and if necessary, direct the medical institute to petite to the primary court of the region in order to seek a quick jurisdiction of the case, and the court must send judge setting up a court at the site in order to decide whether it should start the employment of the clinical medical enforced interference of the right of the patient. The detail arrangement to be set in due course.

1. http://www.npc.gov.cn/COBRS_LFYJNEW/user/UserIndex.jsp?ID=10051883
2. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%95%91%E6%AD%BB%E6%89%B6%E4%BC%A4/8426633?fr=Aladdin
3. http://www.npc.gov.cn/COBRS_LFYJNEW/user/UserIndex.jsp?ID=13134931
4. Cheeraid(1999).經濟學的思索.廣州:南方周末.
5. 王勝明（編）(2010).中華人民共和國侵權責任法解讀.北京:中國法制出版社.
6. 王勝明（編）(2010).中華人民共和國侵權責任法釋義.北京:中國法制出版社.
7. 何峰，2010，〈母嬰生命高於一切──「強行」剖宮案例南京早有，專家稱「生命權」大於「同意權」〉，《江南時報》4 版。
8. 周婷玉(2010)。侵權責任法能否成為維權「利器」。人民法院報，8
9. 胡曉翔(2007)。我國有無「臨床醫療強制干預權」。南京醫科大學學報（社會科學版），4
10. 胡曉翔(2010)。最不該的，是讓醫患一再糾結。醫界，12
11. 張燦燦，2010，〈透視「產婦拒絕剖宮」事件〉，《健康報》3 版。
12. 梁慧星(2010).侵權責任法重要條文解讀.河南省:河南省法官學院.
13. 梁慧星(2010).中國民事立法評說──民法典、物權法、侵權責任法.北京:法律出版社.
14. 曾昭耆，1999，〈應抓住這件事展開討論〉，《健康報》3 版。
15. 楊立新(2011).侵權責任法──條文背後的故事與難題.北京:法律出版社.
16. 劉士國(2009).侵權責任法重大疑難問題研究.北京:中國法制出版社.