美學教育：Arnold Berleant對無關乎利害美學的改造成功了嗎？

Education of Aesthetics: Does Arnold Berleant's Reform of Aesthetic Disinterestedness Succeed?

廖育正(Yu-Cheng Liao)

Arnold Berleant ； 無關乎利害 ； Immanuel Kant ； 融合美學 ； 美學教育 ； Arnold Berleant ； disinterestedness ； Immanuel Kant ； aesthetics of engagement ； education of aesthetics

應用倫理評論

69期（2020 / 10 / 01）

115 - 132

繁體中文

鑑賞判斷之無關乎利害是Immanuel Kant（康德）於《判斷力批判》提出的想法，成為現代美學的理論發源，但兩個世紀以來受到了不少批評。Arnold Berleant（柏林特）檢視並改造了無關乎利害等想法，將之納入「融合美學」的環境美學範圍內。他的批評與轉化是否成功，這是本文欲探討的問題。本文認為：Berleant對無關乎利害的批評，反而坐實了Kant美學的無可迴避；並以此觀點作為當代美學教育的參考。

In Critique of Judgement, Immanuel Kant proposed disinterestedness of taste judgement, which has become the theoretical origin of modern aesthetics, but it has been criticized for many years. Arnold Berleant reformed it, and incorporated it into environmental aesthetics and aesthetics of engagement. Does Berleant's reform succeed? This article tries to answer it, and claims that Berleant's criticism of disinterestedness actually proved that Kant's aesthetics is unavoidable. These views could be used as education of aesthetics.

1. 廖育正(2019)。「幻化遊戲」與「懸置遊玩」：論洪席耶對布爾迪厄的批評。中外文學，48(1)，127-162。
   連結：
2. Berleant, Arnold(2004).Re-thinking Aesthetics: rogue essays on aesthetics and the arts.Burlington:Ashgate.
3. Berleant, Arnold(1994).Beyond Disinterestedness.British Journal of Aesthetics,34(3),242-254.
4. Berleant, Arnold(1992).The Aesthetics of Environment.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:Temple University Press.
5. Berleant, Arnold,肖雙容（譯）,陳望衡（校）(2010)。美學再思考──激進的美學與藝術學論文，武漢:
6. Gay, Peter,梁永安（譯）(2009).現代主義：異端的誘惑.臺北:立緒.
7. Kant, Immanuel,李秋零（譯注）(2016).康德三大批判合集.北京:中國人民大學.
8. Parsons, Glenn,Carlson, Allen,薛富興（譯）(2015).功能之美──以善立美：環境美學新視野.河南:河南大學出版社.
9. Rorty, Richard McKay(1989).Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.New York:Cambridge University Press.
10. 賀瑞麟(2015).今天學美學了沒.臺北:商周.
11. 劉悅笛(2008)。自然美學與環境美學：生發語境和哲學貢獻。世界哲學，2008(3)，3-8。