题名

試析嵇康理想人格的宗教向度

并列篇名

A Religious Perspective on Ji-Kang's Ideal Personality Theory

作者

陳佩君(Pei-Chun, Chen)

关键词

嵇康 ; 理想人格 ; 神仙 ; 養生 ; 才性 ; Ji-Kang(嵇康) ; ideal personality model ; the immortal ; life nourishment theory ; talent

期刊名称

應用倫理評論

卷期/出版年月

70期(2021 / 04 / 01)

页次

49 - 68

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

嵇康在〈養生論〉中,以「神仙」做為人生命的理想型態,其養生思想兼有道家、道教的色彩。但部分學者認為嵇康只強調養生長壽,並未信仙求仙,其所言「神仙」不是實際追求的對象,而是一種象徵性的意涵,是對《莊子》大鵬鳥之心靈境界的隱喻。然而,嵇康寫過〈遊仙詩〉,有著「思欲登仙,以濟不朽」的嚮往,在〈養生論〉中嘗試論證神仙實有及成仙之方,更與道士孫登、王烈交遊,多次上山採藥以求長生。從其詩文與言行來看,嵇康對「神仙」之超越境界的追求,似乎不僅僅是純粹精神上的嚮往,已然成為宗教信仰與虔敬實踐的具體方向。本文認為,要整體地理解嵇康,宗教向度的引入實有其必要性,嵇康在理想人格的論題上,兩合了道家與道教,呈顯出哲學向度與宗教向度視域交融的獨特面貌。

英文摘要

In Ji-Kang(嵇康)'s Life Nourishment Theory(〈養生論〉), he took the immortal as the ideal personality model that had both philosophical and religious Daoism features. Some scholars declare that Ji-Kang didn't really believed in immortals, nor tried to be immortal, what he actually cared about was how to promote health and prolong longevity, immortals were only metaphors for Peng's mental state of Zhuangzi(莊子). However, Ji-Kang wrote several poems about immortals, demonstrated immortals' existence, researched the methods to be immortal, contacted with Daoist priests Sun-Deng and Wang-Lie, and went up the mountains to gather herbs. According to Ji- Kang's texts and behavior, it appears that he did believe in and try to be immortal in a religious way. To gain an overall understanding of Ji-Kang, it is necessary to comprehend his texts from a religious perspective. This text tries to advocate that there are both philosophical and religious Daoism features, a fusion of horizons take place between philosophy and religion in Ji-Kang's ideal personality theory.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 盧桂珍(2006)。王弼、郭象性情論研考。臺大中文學報,25,95-133。
    連結:
  2. 蕭馳(2007)。嵇康與莊學超越境界在抒情傳統中之開�。漢學研究,25(1),95-129。
    連結:
  3. 吳冠宏(2015).走向嵇康──從情之有無到氣通內外.臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心.
  4. 李宗定(2012).葛洪《抱朴子內篇》與魏晉玄學.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
  5. 高柏園(1992).莊子內七篇思想研究.臺北:文津出版社.
  6. 崔大華(2005).莊子研究.北京:人民出版社.
  7. 興膳宏(1986).六朝文學論稿.長沙:嶽鹿書社.
  8. 蕭登福(2008).嵇康研究.新北:花木蘭文化出版社.
  9. 謝大寧(1997).歷史的嵇康與玄學的嵇康.臺北:文史哲出版社.