题名

Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Conners' Parent and Teacher Rating Scale-revised Short Form Using Multidimensional Rasch Modeling

并列篇名

以多向度羅序模式檢驗柯能氏家長版及老師版兒童行為量表-修訂版之心理計量

DOI

10.29478/TJP.200906.0007

作者

蘇佳廷(Chia-Ting Su);王文中(Wen-Chung-Wang);高淑芬(Shur-Fen Gau);宋維村(Wei-Tsuen Soong);許清芳(Ching-Fan Sheu);丘彥南(Yen-Nan Chiu);蔡文哲(Wen-Che Tsai);謝清麟(Ching-Lin Hsieh)

关键词

注意力缺失/過動症 ; 柯能氏問卷 ; 多向度羅序模式分析 ; ADHD ; Conners' rating scale ; multidimensional Rasch analysis

期刊名称

台灣精神醫學

卷期/出版年月

23卷2期(2009 / 06 / 01)

页次

146 - 158

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

目的:柯能氏問卷已被廣泛使用於注意力缺失/過動症(ADHD)孩童的篩選及療效量測。然而,問卷的心理計量卻未被完整的檢驗。故本研究的目的為藉由多向度羅序模式,分析柯能氏家長版及老師版兒童行為量表-修訂版(CPRS-R:S及CTRS-R:S)中各子測驗的向度一致性,轉換序位尺度成等距尺度,及檢驗分數層級的合適性。方法:研究對象包含具代表性的學校樣本2584 名學生(含國小1年級至國中3年級),及555位5歲至16歲從北臺灣醫學中心招募的臨床個案(含ADHD及非ADHD診斷)。個案的家長及老師分別填寫中文版的CPRS-R:S及CTRS-R:S。我們使用多向度羅序模式分析以檢驗兩份問卷之心理計量。結果:移除5題配適度差的題目後,其餘題目的模式與資料配適度佳。這支持了8個子測驗個別的向度一致性及等距尺度的達成。另外,8個子測驗亦有相當合適的分數層級。結論:去除掉5題配適度差的題目,CPRS-R:S及CTRS-R:S皆為有效且可靠之ADHD症狀的評估工具。此外,轉換原始分數為等距尺度改善了在比較評估結果方面的精準度。

英文摘要

Objective: The Conners' Rating Scales (CRS) have been widely used for screening and measuring outcomes in treating children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the psychometric properties of the CRS have not been fully examined. This study aimed to validate the dimensionality, to transform ordinal scores into interval scores, and to examine the appropriateness of the scoring levels of the Conners' Parent and Teacher Rating Scale-Revised Short Form (CPRS-R:S and CTRS-R:S, respectively) by using multidimensional Rasch analysis. Methods: The sample included a representative school-based sample of 2,584 grades 1 to 9 students and a clinic-based group of 555 participants aged 5 to 16 with and without ADHD consecutively recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan. Their parents and teachers completed the Chinese versions of the CPRS-R: S and CTRS-R: S, respectively. We used multidimensional Rasch analysis to examine the psychometric properties of both scales. Results: After removing 5 poor-fitting items, all the remaining items showed satisfactory model-data fit, which, subsequently, supported the unidimensionality of each of the 8 subtests and achieved interval-level measurement. Also, the scoring levels of the 8 subtests in the CPRS-R: S and CTRS-R: S were fairly appropriate. Conclusion: The CPRS-R: S and CTRS-R: S with the 5 misfit items removed are both valid and reliable tools in assessing symptoms of ADHD. Moreover, the transformation of raw scores into interval scores improves the precision of comparison between assessments.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. Adams RJ,Wilson MR,Wang WC(1997).The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model.Applied Psychological Measurement,21,1-23.
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics(2000).Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and evaluation of the child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Pediatrics,105,1158-1170.
  3. Andrich D(1978).A rating formulation for ordered response categories.Psychometrika,43,561-573.
  4. Banerji M,Smith RM,Dedrick RF(1997).Dimensionality of an early childhood scale using rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.Journal of Outcome Measurement,1,56-85.
  5. Bond TG,Fox CM(2001).Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Canners CK(1997).Conners' Rating Scales-Revised Technical Mannual.North Tonawanda, New York:Multi-Health Systems, Inc..
  7. Collett BR,Ohan JL,Myers KM(2003).Ten-year review of rating scales. VI: scales assessing externalizing behaviors.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,42,1143-1170.
  8. Conners CK.,Maruish M. E.(editor.)(1999).The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Conners CK,Sitarenios G,Parker JD,Epstein IN(1998).The revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRSR): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity.J Abnorm Child Psychol,26,257-268.
  10. Conners CK,Sitarenios G,Parker JD,Epstein JN(1998).Revision and restandardization of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity.J Abnorm Child Psychol,26,279-291.
  11. Fisher AG(1993).The assessment of IADL motor skills: an application of many-faceted Rasch analysis.Am J Occup Ther,47,319-329.
  12. Gau SF,Chong MY,Chen TH,Cheng ATA(2005).A three-year panel study of mental disorders among adolescents in Taiwan.Am J Psychiatry,162,1344-1350.
  13. Gau SS,Soong WT,Chiu YN,Tsai WC(2006).Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Conner& Parent and Teacher Rating Scales-Revised: Short Form.J Atten Disord,9,648-659.
  14. Gianarris WJ,Golden CJ,Greene L(2001).The Canners' Parent Rating Scales: a critical review of the literature.Clin Psychol Rev,21,1061-1093.
  15. Graetz BW,Sawyer MG,Hazell PL,Arney F,Baghurst P(2001).Validity of DSM-IV ADHD subtypes in a nationally representative sample of Australian children and adolescents.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,40,1410-1417.
  16. Gumpel T,Wilson M,Shalev R(1998).An item response theory analysis of the Conners Teacher's Rating Scale.J Learn Disabil,31,525-532.
  17. Hobart J(2002).Measuring disease impact in disabling neurological conditions: are patients' perspectives and scientific rigor compatible.Curt Opin Neural,15,721-724.
  18. Hsueh IP,Wang WC,Sheu CF,Hsieh CL(2004).Rasch analysis of combining two indices to assess comprehensive AOL function in stroke patients.Stroke,35,721-726.
  19. Lambert MC,Schmitt N,Samms-Vaughan ME,An JS,Fairclough M,Nutter CA(2003).Is it prudent to administer all items for each Child Behavior Checklist cross-informant syndrome? Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Youth Self- Report dimensions with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory.Psychol Assess,15,550-568.
  20. Lautamo T,Kottorp A,Salminen AL(2005).Play assessment for group settings: a pilot study to construct an assessment tool.Scand J Occup Ther,12,136-144.
  21. Loeber R,Green SM,Lahey BB,Frick PJ,McBurnett K(2000).Findings on disruptive behavior disorders from the first decade of the Developmental Trends Study.Clin Clin Fam Psychol Rev,3,37-60.
  22. McGee RA,Clark SE,Symons DK(2000).Does the Conners' Continuous Performance Test aid in ADHD diagnosis.J Abnorm Child Psychol,28,415-424.
  23. Merrell C,Tymms P(2005).Rasch analysis of inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive behaviour in young children and the link with academic achievement.J Appl Meas,6,1-18.
  24. Nirmalan PK,John RK,Gothwal VK,Baskaran S,Vijayalakshmi P,Rahmathullah L(2004).The impact of visual impairment on functional vision of children in rural South India: the Kariapatti Pediatric Eye Evaluation Project.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,45,3442-3445.
  25. Tasse MJ,Lecavalier L(2000).Comparing parent and teacher ratings of social competence and problem behaviors.Am J Merit Retard,105,252-259.
  26. Tesio L(2003).Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research.J Rehabil Med,35,105-115.
  27. Tuliatos J,Lindholm B(1981).Congruence of parents' and teachers' ratings of children's behavior problems.J Abnorm Child Psychol,9,347-354.
  28. Wang WC,Chen PH,Cheng YY(2004).Improving measurement precision of test batteries using multidimensional item response models.Psychol Methods,9,116-136.
  29. Wolraich ML,Hannah JN,Pinnock TY,Baumgaertel A,Brown J(1996).Comparison of diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a county-wide sample.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,35,319-324.
  30. Wolraich ML,Lambert EW,Bickman L,Simmons T,Doffing MA,Worley KA(2004).Assessing the impact of parent and teacher agreement on diagnosing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.J Dev Behav Pediatr,25,41-47.
  31. Wright BD,Linacre JM,Gustafson J-E,Martin Lof F(1994).Reasonable mean-square fit values.Rasch Measurement Transactions,8,370.
  32. Wu ML,Adams RJ,Wilson MR(1998).ConQuest.Camberwell, Victoria, Australia:Australian Council for Educational Research.
  33. Youngstrom E,Loeber R,Stouthamer-Loeber M(2000).Patterns and correlates of agreement between parent teacher and male adolescent rating of externalizing and internalizing problems.J Consult Clin Psychol,68,1038-1050.