荷蘭與丹麥彈性安全策略的探討：制度主義的生命歷程政策研究途徑

A Study of Flexicurity Strategy in Netherlands and Denmark: The Institutionalist Life-course Policy Approach

10.6785/SPSW.200806.0091

黃志隆(Chih-Lung Huang)

彈性安全 ； 去商品化，荷蘭 ； 丹麥 ； 生命歷程政策 ； flexicurity ； decommodification ； Netherlands ； Denmark ； life-course policy

社會政策與社會工作學刊

12卷1期（2008 / 06 / 01）

91 - 144

繁體中文

荷蘭與丹麥的彈性安全策略－勞動市場彈性化與社會安全制度的強化，隨著1990年代末期兩國失業率的有效控制而獲得各界的關注。然而在勞動市場彈性化政策下，隨著就業型態的去穩定發展，社會安全制度的強化究竟能發揮什麼樣的保障意涵，成了彈性安全策略討論的重點。本文機從制度主義的生命歷程政策研究出發，藉由納入時間與收入再分配分析途徑，檢視荷蘭與丹麥彈性安全策略的改革成果與近來的發展。研究結果顯示，荷蘭和丹麥在該策略的影響下，於工作時間分配呈現橫向與縱向的重分配。伴隨著社會安全制度的改革，荷蘭呈現後生產主義模式，而丹麥則仍有較濃厚的生產主義色彩。而從後工作社會理念，結合生命歷程政策的再制度化途程進行分析，我們亦發現荷蘭和丹麥的彈性安全策略仍存有若干待解決的問題。

The flexicurity strategy in Netherlands and Denmark, i.e. flexible labour market and the reinforcement of social security institutions, successfully kept the unemployment rate from rising in the 1990s and has drawn attention from social policy scholars. Under the development of flexible labour market and destabilized employment pattern, the agenda of flexicurity strategy has been shifted to strengthen and facilitate the transitions in social security institutions. Drawing on institutional analysis on redistribution of time and income, this paper explores Outcomes and development from recent flexicurity reforms. Results show that the working time in Netherlands and Denmark has been redistributed both vertically and horizontally. Nevertheless, Netherlands is close to the post-productivist mode, while Denmark remains in the productivist framework. In light of the new life course policy guided by the idea of post-work society, these remain problems unsettled by Netherlandish and Danish flexicurity strategies.

1. 施世駿(2002)。生命歷程研究對社會政策效果的探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊，6(2)，101-157。
   連結：
2. 黃志隆、張世雄(2005)。就業成長的達成與社會安全的維繫－荷蘭社會改革的理論爭議和政策意涵。歐美研究，35(2)，405-458。
   連結：
3. Abrahamson, P.,C. Wehner(2003).Pension Reforms in Denmark.London:LSE.
4. Andersen, K.(2004).Pension Politics in Three Small States: Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands.Canadian Journal of Sociology,29(2),289-312.
5. IMF Policy Discussion Papers
6. Benner, M.,T. B. Vad,W. F. Scharpf,V. A. Schmidt (eds.)(2000).Welfare and Work in the Open Economy.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
7. Björklund, A.,G. Esping-Andersen,M. Regini (eds.)(2000).Why Deregulate Labour Markets?.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. paper presented at the ESPAneI Conference 2005 “Making Social Policy in the Post-industrial Age
9. CARMA Research Papers, Nr. 1. CARMA
10. Cox, R.(1998).From Safety Net to Trampoline: Labor Market Activation in the Netherlands and Denmark.Governance,11(4),397-414.
11. paper presented at the International Conference "Life Risks, Life Course and Social Policy"
12. Esping-Andersen, G.(1999).Social Foundation of Postindustrial Economies.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
13. Esping-Andersen, G.(2000).Multi-dimensional Decommodification: A RepLy to Graham Room.28(3),353-359.
14. Esping-Andersen, G.(1990).Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Cambridge:Polity Press.
15. Fitzpatrick, T.(2004).Social Policy and Time.Time & Society,13(213),197-219.
16. Fitzpatrick, T.(2004).A Post-productivist Future for Social Democracy?.Social Policy & Society,3(3),213-222.
17. Frericks, P.,R. Maier,W. de Graaf(2006).Shifting the Pension Mix: Consequences for Dutch and Danish Women.Social Policy & Administration,40(5),475-492.
18. Goodin, R.(2001).Work and Welfare: Towards a Post-productivist Welfare Regime.British Journal of Political Science,31(1),13-39.
19. Green-Pedersen, C.｜E. Immergut,K. Anderson,I. Schulze (eds.)(2007).The Handbook of West European Pension Politics.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
20. Green-Pedersen, C.,K. V. Kersbergen,A. Hemerijck(2001).Neoliberalism, the "Third Way" or What? Recent Social Democratic Welfare Policies in Denmark and the Netherlands.Journal of European Public Policy,8(2),307-325.
21. Hinrich, K.,C. Offe,H.Wiesenthal,J. Keane (eds.)(1988).Civil Society and the State. New European Perspective.London:Verso.
22. Immergut, E,K. Anderson,E. Immergut,K. Anderson,I. Schulze(eds.)(2007).The Handbook of West European Pension Politics.Oxford:Oxford University press.
23. European Life Course Policy
24. Compiled for the Danish Ministry of Employment, Employment Relations Research Centre
25. Keane, J.,John Keane (ed.)(1998).Democracy and Civil Society.London:Verso.
26. Kjær, P.,O. Pedersen,J. Campbell,O. Pedersen (eds.)(2001).The Rise of NeoLiberalism and Institutional analysis.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
27. Klammer, U.(2004).Flexicurity in a Life-course :Perspective.Transfer,10(2),282-299.
28. Leisering, L.,R. Walker,L. Leisering,R. Walker (eds.)(1998).The Dynamics of Modern Society: Poverty, Policy anti Welfare.London:Policy Press.
29. Leisering, L.,S. Leibfried(1995).Time and Poverty in Western Welfare States.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
30. Lind, J.,I. H. Møller(2006).Activation for What Purpose? Lessons from Demark.The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,26(1/2),5-19.
31. Little, A.(1998).Post-industrial Socialism.London:Routledge.
32. Madsen, P. K.(2004).The Danish Model of ‘Flexicurity’: Experiences and Lessons.Transfer,10(2),187-207.
33. Madsen, P. K.,P. Auer,S. Cazes (eds.)(2003).Employment Stability in An Age of Flexibility: Evidence from Industrialized Countries.Geneva:ILO.
34. Maier, R., W. de Graaf and P. Frericks(2007).Policyfor the "Peak Hour" of Life: Lessons from the New Dutch Life Course Saving Scheme.European Societies,9(3),339-358.
35. Mayer, K.(2004).Whose Lives? How History, Societies, and Institutions Define and Shape Life Courses.Research in Human Development,1(3),161-187.
36. Offe, C.(1996).Modernity and the State: East, West.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
37. Offe, C.,R. Heinze(1996).C. Offe, Modernity and the State: East, West.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
38. Regini, M.,G. Esping-Andersen,M. Regini (eds.)(2000).Why Deregulate Labourt Market?.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
39. Room, G.(2000).Commodification and Decommodification: A Developmental Critique.Policy & Politics,28(3),331-351.
40. Schmid, G.,G. Schmid,B. Gazier (eds.)(2002).The Dynamics of Full Employment.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
41. Schmid, G.,G. Schmid,B. Gazier (eds.)(2002).The Dynamics of Full Employment.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
42. paper presented at "Social Security and Pension Reform in the United States: Lessons from Europe
43. TLM,NET Working Paper No. 2005-19
44. Van Oorschot, W.(2004).Balancing Work and Welfare: Activation and Flexicurity Policies in the Netherlands, 1980-2000.International Journal of Social Welfare,13(1),15-27.
45. Van Oorschot, W.(2004).Flexible Work and Flexicurity policies in the Netherlands. Trends and Experiences.Transfer,10(2),208-225.
46. Van Oorschot, W.,P. Abrahamson(2003).The Dutch and Danish Miracles Revisited: A Critical Discussion of Activation Policies in Two Small Welfare States.Social Policy & Administration,37(3),288-304.
47. Visser, J.(2002).The First Part-time Economy in the World: A Model to Be Followed?.Journal of European Social Policy,12(1),23-42.
48. Wilthagen, T. and F. Tros(2004).The Concept of "Flexicurity": A New Approach to Regulating Employment and Labour markets.Transfer,10(2),166-186.
49. Paper presented at the 13th World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association (IIRA)
50. paper presents at the European Commission/DG Employment Thematic Review Seminar on "Increasing Adaptability for Workers and Enterprises"
51. 施世駿(2005)。歐盟新治理模式與社會政策發展：「開放協調法」興起的歷史脈絡與政策意涵。台灣社會福利學刊，4(1)，1-50。
52. 柯木興(2006)。談年金保險改革的替代策略－一種無財務準備式的個人帳戶制（NDC）。《國政分析》，社會（析）095-004號。
53. 張世雄(1995)。社會福利的理念與社會安全制度。台北:唐山出版社。

1. 黃志隆(2014)。社會投資國家的青年轉銜與生命歷程政策：以瑞典和英國相關社會政策改革為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊，18(2)，121-161。
2. 姚奮志(2019)。中高齡非典型工作者生命歷程分析。社會發展研究學刊，24，1-44。
3. (2009)。我國親職假改革方案的探討：理論觀點的檢視。靜宜人文社會學報，3(2)，1-30。