再探Jane Addams的社區工作理念

Rereading Jane Addams's Theory of Community Work

10.6785/SPSW.201206.0087

張英陣(Ying-Chen Chang)；鄭怡世(Yi-Shih Cheng)

Jane Addams ； 社區工作 ； 社會改革 ； Jane Addams ； community work ； social reform

社會政策與社會工作學刊

16卷1期（2012 / 06 / 01）

87 - 132

繁體中文

社區雖然在1990年代以後再度成為各種公共服務的主要政策方向，但向來宣稱社區工作是基本工作方法之一的社會工作專業，在當前社會工作實務中卻將社區工作日趨邊緣化。當前公共服務社區化深受新自由主義的影響，比較著重於服務供給，這似乎有達社區工作先驅Jane Addams的理念。本丈嘗試透過Jane Addams的傳記、著作、討論其生平事蹟的專書與文章，以及諸多討論睦鄰運動及赫爾館的文章，來重新書寫她的社區工作理念。本文認為Jane Addams理解社區以及社區居民的位置與觀點，其實是「回到社區」本身，透過「與社區居民／受苦者共同生活」來觀察、聆聽以及共同行動，藉此回應社區居民/受苦者的需求，這是一種以人為本的思維與實踐。此外，對Jane Addams而言，社區不只是一個提供福利服務的地方，同時也是居民相互了解促進社會融合的地方；社區的居民不只是福利服務的案主，更是參與問題解決的公民；同時，社區是一個公共領域，也是實踐社會改革與社會民主的地方。我們相信Jane Addams社區工作的理念，對臺灣當前的社會民主、鄰里認同、社會改革、以及大學與社區的關係具有相當的啟發。

Community has reemerged as a main policy framework in many areas of public services since 1990s. Community work was one of the most important practice methods in the social work profession. However, community work is becoming marginalized in social work practice now. Contemporary community-based public services are strongly influenced by the Neo-liberalism. Neoliberals focus more on the service provision in the community rather than community participation. The current Neoliberal community practice contradicted Jane Addams's ideas of community work. We reinterpret Jane Addams's theory of community from the autobiography and from biographies and publications on her or on settlement house movement. We explore Jane Addams's philosophy of pragmatism and how her philosophy was practiced at Hull-House. According to Jane Addams, community is not only a place for welfare provision, but also a field for social inclusion. The residents of community are not clients of welfare, but are citizens of participating in public affairs Community is a public sphere that promotes social reform and socializes democracy. We believe that Jane Addams's ideas of community work are heuristic for social democracy, neighborhood identity, social reform, and community-university partnership for Taiwan.

1. 行政院衛生署新流感中央疫情指揮中心（2009）。《H1N1新型流感疫苗接種進度報告（2009年12月24日簡報檔）》。行政院衛生署疾病管制局網頁（http://www.cdc.gov.tw）
2. 台北市社會工作人員職業工會（2011）。《北市社工工會小語》。台北市社會工作人員職業工會網頁（http://swerunion.blogspot.com）
3. Addams, J. (1912/n. d.). A New Conscience and an Ancient Evil. Champaign, IL: Book Jungle
4. Dewey, J. (1902). ‘The School as Social Centre', The Elementary School Teacher, 3(2): 73-86
5. Addams, J. (1897). ‘Social Settlement'. in I. C. Barrows (ed.), Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Correction, Vol. 24, pp. 338-346. Boston: Geo. H. Ellis
6. Pimlott, J. A. R. (1935). ‘Toynbee Hall and the Settlement Movement, 1884-1934', Contemporary Review, 147(4): 447-453
7. Addams, J. (1910). ‘Charity and Social Justice: The Presidential Address at the National Conference of Charities and Correction', Survey, XXIV: 441-449
8. Addams, J. (1899). ‘A Function of the Social Settlement', The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 13(3): 33-55
9. Addams, J.(1999).Twenty Years at Hull-House: With Autobiographical Notes.Boston:Bedford/St. Martin's.
10. Addams, J.(1961).Twenty Years at Hull-House.New York:Signet Classic.
11. Addams, J.(1991).Commercialism Disguised as Patriotism and Duty.Affilia,6(2),5-8.
12. Addams, J.(2002).Democracy and Social Ethics.Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
13. Bonomo, L. R. M.(2010).Addams's Philosophy of Art: Feminist Aesthetics and Moral Imagination at Hull House.Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams,University Park, PA:
14. Brieland, D.(1990).The Hull-House Tradition and the Contemporary Social Worker: Was Jane Addams Really a Social Worker?.Social Work,35(3),134-138.
15. Carson, M.(1990).Settlement Folk: Social Thought and the American Settlement Movement, 1885-1930.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
16. Cort, J. C.(1988).Christian Socialism: An Informal History.New York:Orbis Books.
17. Daynes, G.,Longo, N. V.(2004).Jane Addams and the Origins of Service-Learning Practice in the United States.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,11(1),5-13.
18. Dewey, J.,Dewey, E.(1995).The School as a Social Settlement.Child & Youth Forum,24(1),55-65.
19. DuBois, B.,Miley, K. K.(2008).Social Work: An Empowering Profession.Boston:Pearson.
20. Elshtain, J. B.(2001).Jane Addams and the Social Claim.Public Interest,145(1),82-92.
21. Farley, O. W.,Smith, L. L.,Boyle, S. W.(2006).Introduction to Social Work.Boston:Pearson.
22. Fischer, M.(2004).On Addams.Toronto:Wadsworth.
23. Franklin, D. L.(1986).Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From Moral Certainty to Rational Inquiry in Social Work Practice.Social Service Review,60(4),504-525.
24. Geoghegan, M.,Powell, F.(2009).Community Development and the Contested Politics of the Modrn Agora: Of, Alongside or Against Neoliberalism.Community Development Journal,44(4),430-447.
25. Gilchrist, R.,Jeffs, T.(2001).Introduction.Settlements, Social Change and Community Action: Good Neighbours,London:
26. Glaser, G.(2001).Reflections of Social Work Practitioner: Bridging the 19th and 21st Centuries.Research on Social Work Practice,11(2),190-200.
27. Hamington, M.(2010).Introduction.Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams,University Park, PA:
28. Hamington, M.(2004).Embodied Care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Feminist Ethics.Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
29. Hamington, M.(2009).The Social Philosophy of Jane Addams.Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
30. Harkavy, I.,Puckett, J. L.(1994).Lesson from Hull House for the Contemporary Urban University.Social Service Review,68(3),299-321.
31. Hull-House(ed.)(2007).Hull-House Maps and Papers: A Presentation of Nationalities and Wages in Congested District of Chicago, Together with Comments and Essays on Problems Growing out of the Social Conditions.Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
32. Husock, H.(1992).Bring Back the Settlement House.Public Interest,109(1),53-72.
33. Jaggar, A. M.(ed.),Young, I. M.(ed.)(2000).A Companion to Feminist Philosophy.Malden, MA:Blackwell.
34. Johnson, A. K.(2004).Social Work is Standing on the Legacy of Jane Addams: But are We Sitting on the Sidelines?.Social Work,49(2),319-322.
35. Johnson, C.(2001).Strength in Community: Historical Development of Settlements Internationally.Settlements, Social Change and Community Action: Good Neighbours,London:
36. Kelly, G. A.(1969).Idealism, Politics and History: Sources of Hegelian Thought.London:Cambridge University Press.
37. Knight, L. W.(2009).Jane Addams's Theory of Cooperation.Jane Addams and the Practice of Democracy,Urbana:
38. Levine, D.(1971).Jane Addams and the Liberal Tradition.Madison:State Historical Society of Wisconsin.
39. Linn, J. W.(2000).Jane Addams: A Biography.Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
40. Lubove, R.(1965).The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career 1880-1930.New York:Harvard University Press.
41. Lundblad, K. S.(1995).Jane Addams and Social Reform: A Role Model for the 1990s'.Social Work,40(5),661-669.
42. Mander, W. J.(2011).British Idealism: A History.New York:Oxford University.
43. Mayfield, L.,Hellwig, M.,Banks, B.(1999).The Chicago Response to Urban Problem: Building University-Community Collaborations.American Behavioral Scientist,42(5),863-875.
44. Meacham, S.(1987).Toynbee Hall and Social Reform 1880-1914: The Search for Community.New Haven:Yale University Press.
45. Mizrahi, T.(2001).The Status of Community Organizing in 2001: Community Practice Context, Complexities, Contradictions, and Contributions.Research on Social Work,11(2),176-189.
46. Morales, A. T.,Sheafor, B. W.,Scott, M. E.(2007).Social Work: A Profession of Many Faces.Boston:Pearson.
47. Nackenoff, C.(2009).New Politics for New Selves : Jane Addams's Legacy for Democratic Citizenship in the Twenty-First Century.Jane Addams and the Practice of Democracy,Urbana:
48. Pastorello, K.(2009).The Transfigured Few: Jane Addams, Bessie Abramowitz Hillman, and Immigrant Women Workers in Chicago, 1905-15.Jane Addams and the Practice of Democracy,Urbana:
49. Pocklington, T.,Tupper, A.(2002).No Place to Learn: Why Universities Aren't Working.Vancouver:UBC Press.
50. Putnam, R. D.(2000).Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York:Simon and Schuster.
51. Raven, C. E.(1968).Christian Socialism 1848-1854.London:Macmillan.
52. Reinder, R. C.(1982).Toynbee Hall and the American Settlement Movement.Social Service Review,56(1),39-54.
53. Reisch, M.,Andrews, J.(2001).The Road not Taken: A History of Radical Social Work in the United States.New York:Bunner-Routledge.
54. Rose, M.(2001).The Secular Faith of the Social Settlements: If Christ Came to Chicago.Settlements, Social Change and Community Action: Good Neighbours,London:
55. Segal, E. A.,Gerdes, K. E.,Steiner, S.(2006).An Introduction to the Profession of Social Work: Becoming a Change Agent.Belmont, CA:Thomson.
56. Seigfried, C. H.(1999).Socializing Democracy: Jane Addams and John Dewey.Philosophy of the Social Science,29(2),207-230.
57. Seigfried, C. H.(2009).The Courage of One's Convictions or the Conviction of One's Courage? Jane Addams's Principled Compromises.Jane Addams and the Practice of Democracy,Urbana:
58. Skidomre, R. A.,Thackeray, M. G.,Farley, O. W.(2000).Introduction to Social Work.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
59. Spectht, H.,Courtney, M. E.(1994).Unfaithful Angels: How Social Work Has Abandoned its Mission.New York:The Free Press.
60. West, C.(1989).The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism.Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.
61. Woodroofe, K.(1962).From Charity to Social Work: In England and the United States.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
62. Young, A. F.,Ashton, E. T.(1956).British Social Work in the Nineteenth Century.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
63. Zalta, E. N.(ed.)(2010).The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
64. Zastrow, C.(2007).Introduction to Social Work and Social Welfare.Belmont, CA:Brooks Cole.
65. 陳玟蒨、鄭怡世(2011)。社工很忙！以接受臺灣聯勸補助之組織的社工人員工作內容為例。「促進社會凝聚：社會工作專業的新視野」研討會，台北:
66. 黃彥宜(1991)。臺灣社會工作發展：1683-1988。思與言，29(3)，119-152。
67. 劉宏信譯、James, W.(2007)。實用主義。台北:立緒。
68. 賴兩陽(2002)。臺灣社區工作的歷史發展與功能轉型。社區發展季刊，100，69-80。

1. 許雅惠(2019)。我們能做朋友嗎？：反思保護性社會工作的專業關係。臺灣社會福利學刊，15(2)，57-108。
2. 黃彥宜(2014)。環境議題在社會工作觀點的移轉：對社會工作教育的意含。社會政策與社會工作學刊，18(2)，1-35。
3. (2016)。福利社區化的省思：社區治理的觀點。社區發展季刊，154，44-55。