如影隨形的暴力：親密伴侶跟蹤行為

Like the Shadow Following: Battered Women's Experience on Intimate Partner Stalking

10.6785/SPSW.201506_19(1).0001

王珮玲(Pei-Ling Wang)

親密伴侶跟蹤 ； 脅迫控制 ； 親密伴侶暴力 ； 受暴婦女 ； intimate partner stalking ； coercive control ； intimate partner violence ； abused women

社會政策與社會工作學刊

19卷1期（2015 / 06 / 01）

1 - 44

繁體中文

本研究探討受暴婦女遭親密伴侶跟蹤的經驗，以及親密伴侶跟蹤對婦女所造成的傷害，在安全、身心狀況、以及生活等方面的影響為何？採用質性研究方法，對17位曾遭受親密伴侶跟蹤的婦女進行深度訪談。研究結果發現親密伴侶跟蹤方法相當多元，依據跟蹤者所使用的方法，本研究將親密伴侶跟蹤行為歸納為：遠端操控－利用設備或通訊裝置監控，尋覓迫近－跟追與近距離監控，侵門踏戶－搜索破壞、發出警告，以及陰魂不散－透過各種方法持續糾纏等4類。而當施暴者展開跟蹤後，破壞力更大，對婦女的安全、身體健康、心理健康、工作、社會關係及生活上皆帶來嚴重的影響。最後研究者提出了親密伴侶跟蹤行為認定的考慮因素、脅迫控制理論模式的解釋以及暴力傷害等多項的討論，並對本土未來實務防治策略與學術研究方向提出建議。

The purpose of this study is to analyze intimate partner stalking behavior, the victim's experience and the impacts of intimate partner stalking on women. Qualitative methods were used in this study. A group study with social workers and a counselor was conducted first to highlight the scope and behaviors of intimate partner stalking. Then 17 intimate partner stalking victims were interviewed by researchers. Results indicated that there were varieties of intimate partner stalking behaviors. This study categorized four types of intimate partner stalking: using technicians or cyberstalking, approaching stalking, signal stalking, and continuing harassment. When the perpetrators adopted stalking toward their female partners, the previous violence and stalking behaviors were produced intensive effects on victims, making more serious harms. In addition, the intimate partner stalking victims received more dangerous offenses from their partners, serious threats on their physical and psychological health, and more critical destructions on their works, lives, and social relationships. At the end, this study proposed some issues of intimate partner stalking, including: the identification of such behaviors, the coercive control model explaining the intimate partner stalking, the procedure stalking, and the intensive violence and control by offenders via the stalking-violence circle. Moreover, some suggestions for future studies and practice, and policies were provided.

1. 王珮玲(2012)。臺灣親密關係暴力危險評估表（TIPVDA）之建構與驗證。社會政策與社會工作學刊，16(1)，1-58。
   連結：
2. 王珮玲(2010)。親密伴侶暴力案件保護令成效與相關因素之研究：以禁制、遷出及遠離令為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊，14(2)，1-47。
   連結：
3. Blaauw, E.,Winkel, F. W.,Arensman, E.,Sheridan, L.,Freeve, A.(2002).The Toll of Stalking: the Relationship between Features of Stalking and Psychopathology of Victims.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,17(1),50-63.
4. Brewster, M. P.(1999).Exploring of the Experience and Needs of Former Intimate Partner Stalking Victims.Washington, DC:National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Program, U.S. Department of Justice.
5. Brewster, M. P.(2003).Power and Control Dynamics in Prestalking and Stalking Situations.Journal of Family Violence,18(4),207-217.
6. Coleman, F. L.(1997).Stalking Behavior and the Cycle of Domestic Violence.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,12(3),420-432.
7. De Fazio, L.(2009).The Legal Situation on Stalking among the European Member States.European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research,15(3),229-242.
8. Douglas, K. S.,Dutton, D. G.(2001).Assessing the Link between Stalking and Domestic Violence.Aggression and Violent Behavior,6(6),519-546.
9. Dutton, M. A.,Goodman, L. A.(2005).Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization.Sex Roles,52(11/12),743-756.
10. Kropp, P. R.,Hart, S. D.,Lyon, D. R.(2002).Risk Assessment of Stalkers: Some Problems and Possible Solutions.Criminal Justice and Behavior,29(5),590-616.
11. Logan, T. K.,Cole, J.,Shannon, L.,Walker, R.(2006).Partner Stalking: How Women Respond, Cope, and Survive.New York:Springer Publishing.
12. Logan, T. K.,Shannon, L.,Cole, J.(2007).Stalking Victimization in the Context of Intimate Partner Violence.Violence and Victims,22(6),669-683.
13. Logan, T. K.,Shannon, L.,Cole, J.,Walker, R.(2006).The Impact of Differential Patterns of Physical Violence and Stalking on Mental Health and Help-seeking among Women with Protective Orders.Violence Against Women,12(9),866-886.
14. Logan, T. K.,Walker, R.(2009).Partner Stalking: Psychological Dominance or "Business as Usual"?.Trauma, Violence & Abuse,10(3),247-270.
15. McFarlane, J.,Campbell, J. C.,Watson, K.(2002).Intimate Partner Stalking and Femicide: Urgent Implications for Women's Safety.Behavioral Science and the Law,20(1),51-68.
16. McFarlane, J.,Campbell, J. C.,Wilt, S.,Sachs, C. J.,Ulrich, Y.,Xu, X.(1999).Stalking and Intimate Partner Femicide.Homicide Studies,3(4),300-316.
17. Mechanic, M. B.,Weaver, T. L.,Resick, P. A.(2008).Mental Health Consequences of Intimate Partner Abuse: a Multidimensional Assessment of Four Different Forms of Abuse.Violence Against Women,14(6),634-654.
18. Melton, H. C.(2007).Stalking in the Context of Intimate Partner Abuse: in the Victims 'Words'.Feminist Criminology,2(4),347-363.
19. Miller, S. L.,Smolter, N. L.(2011)."Paper Abuse": When All Else Fails, Batterers Use Procedural Stalking.Violence Against Women,17(5),637-650.
20. Mullen, P. E.,Pathé, M.(2002).Stalking.Crime and Justice,29,273-318.
21. Mullen, P. E.,Pathé, M.,Purcell, R.(2000).Stalkers and Their Victims.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
22. Pathe, M.,Mullen, P. E.(1997).The Impact of Stalkers on Their Victims.The British Journal of Psychiatry,170(1),12-17.
23. Roberts, K. A.(2005).Women's Experience of Violence During Stalking by Former Romantic Partners: Factors Predictive of Stalking Violence.Violence Against Women,11(1),89-114.
24. Sheridan, L. P.,Blaauw, E.,Davies, G. M.(2003).Stalking: Knowns and Unknowns.Trauma, Violence & Abuse,4(2),148-162.
25. Southworth, C.,Finn, J.,Dawson, S.,Fraser, C.,Tucker, S.(2007).Intimate Partner Violence, Technology, and Stalking.Violence Against Women,13(8),842-856.
26. Spitzberg, B. H.(2002).The Tactical Topography of Stalking Victimization and Management.Trauma, Violenc, & Abuse,3(4),261-288.
27. Spitzberg, B. H.,Cupach, W. R.(2007).The State of the Art of Stalking: Taking Stock of the Eemerging Literature.Aggression and Violent Behavior,12(1),64-86.
28. Stark, E.(2007).Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life.New York:Oxford University Press.
29. Swanberg, J. E.,Logan, T. K.,Macke, C.(2005).Intimate Partner Violence, Employment,and the Workplace: Consequences and Future Directions.Trauma, Violence & Abuse,6(4),286-312.
30. Tjaden, P.(2009).Stalking Policies and Research in the United States: A Twenty Year Retrospective.European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research,15,261-278.
31. Tjaden, P.,Thoennes, N.(1998).Stalking in America: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey.Washington D.C.:U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
32. 王麗容、陳芬苓、王雲東(2012)。內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會委託研究報告內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會委託研究報告,臺北:內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會。
33. 邱筱媛(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系。
34. 胡幼慧編(1996)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。
35. 陳姿君(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中正大學犯罪防治學系。
36. 陳虹燁(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中原大學財經法律學系。
37. 陳慈幸(2011)。司法改革的另一思考：從日本纏擾（Stalker）防治法談起。司法新聲，97，78-104。
38. 黃靜怡(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中正大學犯罪防治學系。
39. 潘淑滿、游美貴(2012)。內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會委託研究報告內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會委託研究報告,臺北:內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會。

1. 曾秀雲,王浩威(2023)。精神暴力自我評估量表編制。中華心理衛生學刊，36(3)，293-322。
2. 黃景聖,黃政昌,林綺嫻,林久榆,李冠瑩(2021)。「跟蹤纏擾者心理評估」的內涵與方式之探討。諮商與輔導，430，41-46+52。
3. 雷亞潔,郭倩惠(2021)。以愛之名－談親密關係中的心理暴力。諮商與輔導，426，5-8。
4. 潘淑滿、歐紫彤、陳杏容、林雅容、林東龍(2016)。親密關係暴力：臺灣女性之受暴與求助經驗。臺灣社會工作學刊，17，1-42。
5. 蘇盈瑜,朱惠瓊(2021)。適婚男女親密關係暴力行為與關係承諾相關之研究－以關係滿意度為中介變項。中華輔導與諮商學報，60，37-72。
6. (2020)。數位時代的親密關係暴力。社區發展季刊，171，244-254。
7. (2024)。誰是受害人？台灣數位親密關係暴力的群體特性與暴力特性。台灣公共衛生雜誌，43(1)，69-81。