臺灣社會團體工作者專業知能之養成歷程

The Development of Professional Knowledge and Competencies of Practitioners in the Field of Social Group Work in Taiwan

10.6785/SPSW.201812_22(2).0005

林佩瑾(Pei-Chin Lin)；古允文(Yeun-Wen Ku)

社會團體工作 ； 專業養成 ； 師徒制 ； social group work ； professional cultivation ； mentorship

社會政策與社會工作學刊

22卷2期（2018 / 12 / 01）

181 - 223

繁體中文

本研究為探索性研究，從社會工作者學習、轉化與整合歷程與脈絡來探索臺灣社會團體工作的專業發展與養成。本研究深入訪談15位社工年資在五年以上且具有社會團體工作實務經驗之研究參與者，並進行文本詮釋與理解。研究結果發現，臺灣社會團體工作專業養成是漸進式的學習歷程，開始於大學教育，真正的學習則是在實務場域，從自己經驗團體、觀察團體、協同領導及擔任領導者，甚至經歷重要關鍵事件，當突破這些關卡之後，則更能靈活運用團體工作。因此，本研究提出建議：發展「經驗學習」及「行動中心」的教育與訓練取向、培養實務師資及發展師徒制訓練模式。本研究不僅關注社會團體工作發展中的失落，也關注轉變中的問題，最重要的是期盼本研究能夠燃起實務工作者投入社會團體工作之熱情，建構團體工作的專業認同，進而深化臺灣團體工作的專業發展。

This study aims to explore the professional development and cultivation of social group work in Taiwan from the perspective of social workers, based on their learning, transformation and integration context. The data are collected from in-depth interviewing with 15 social workers who have more than five years working experience in social work as well as practical experience in leading groups. Data is interpreted by using hermeneutic circle to discover the meanings and to achieve understandings. The findings of the research present that the professional cultivation processes of practitioners in social group work are beginning with higher education, going through by participating in groups, observing groups, as a co-leader of groups and as a leader of groups, in order to move from novices to expert practitioners. When key critical events are experienced, the practitioners could be more flexible on adopting social group work. Accordingly, the research recommendations include: (1) to develop an educational and training approach based on ＂experience learning＂ and ＂practical-based＂, (2) to cultivate practitioners to be mentors to coach students and novices, and (3) to form a mentorship of practicing social group work. This study not only concerns with the ＂lost＂ in the field of social group work, but also focus on the transition in the field. Most of all, this study would awaken spiritual heritage and construct professional identity of practitioners, as well as deepen the professional field of social group work.

1. Andrews, J.(2001).Group Work's Place in Social Work: A Historical Analysis.Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare,28(4),45-65.
2. Birnbaum, M. L.,Auerbach, C.(1994).Group Work in Graduate Social Work Education: the Price of Neglect.Journal of Social Work Education,30(3),325-335.
3. Birnbaum, M. L.,Wayne, J.(2000).Group Work in Foundation Generalist Education: The Necessity for Curriculum Change.Journal of Social Work Education,36(2),347-356.
4. Clements, J. A.(2008).Social Work Students' Perceived Knowledge of and Preparation for Group-work Practice.Social Work with Groups,31(3-4),329-346.
5. Cocker, C.(ed.),Allain, L.(ed.)(2011).Advanced Social Work with Children and Families.Exeter:Learning Matters.
6. Gitterman, A.(ed.),Salmon, R.(ed.)(2009).Encyclopedia of Social Work with Groups.New York:Routledge.
7. Glass, P. H.(ed.),Mayadas, N. S.(ed.)(1986).Group workers at work: theory and practice in the 80s.Totowa:Rowman & Littlefield.
8. Glassman, U.,Kates, L.(1988).Strategies for Group Work Field Instruction.Social Work with Groups,11(1-2),111-124.
9. Home, A.,Darveau-Fournier, L.(1982).A Study of Social Work Practice with Groups.Social Work with Groups,5(3),19-34.
10. Kurland, R.(ed.),Salmon, R.(ed.)(1995).Group Work Practice in a Troubled Society: Problems and opportunities.New York:Routledge.
11. Papell, C. P.(2015).More Than 60 Years with Social Group Work: Personal and Professional History.Social Work with Groups,38(3-4),201-219.
12. Pâquet-Deehy, A.,Hopmeyer, E.,Home, A.,Kislowicz, L.(1985).A Typology of Social Work Practice with Groups.Social Work with Groups,8(1),65-78.
13. Rice, A. H.(1999).Crossing Boundaries: Comparing Group Work in the United States and Australia.Social Work with Groups,22(2-3),159-178.
14. Schön, D. A.(1983).The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.New York:Basic Books.
15. Schön, D. A.(1987).Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
16. Sweifach, J.(2014).Group Work Education Today: A Content Analysis of MSW Group Work Course Syllabi.Social Work with Groups,37(1),8-22.
17. Webb, N. B.,Phillips, M. H.(1986).Teaching as a Discovery Process: Some Core Principles Derived from William Schwartz.Social Work with Groups,8(4),83-94.
18. 內政部社區發展雜誌社(2002)。社會工作教育與訓練社論。社區發展季刊，99，2-4。
19. 李憶微(1989)。助人專業者專業自我的發展與學習歷程之探討。臺北:張老師出版社。
20. 林萬億、沈詩涵(2008)。邁向專精之路：臺灣社會工作的下一步。社區發展季刊，121，199-233。
21. 莫藜藜(1995)。社會團體工作在台灣。東吳社會工作學報，1，201-221。
22. 許展耀(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系。
23. 曾華源編(2016)。社會團體工作。臺北:洪葉文化。
24. 楊蓓(2010)。由團體工作者的專業養成反思團體工作者的教育歷程。「CHANGE ─變遷社會下的社會工作教育與實務」研討會，臺北:

1. 林佩瑾(2021)。在經驗中學習、從行動中突破：臺灣社會團體工作專業養成的經驗與特色。社會政策與社會工作學刊，25(1)，93-135。
2. 張仁家,侯淳馨(2019)。當前電資領域企業對科技大學畢業生的就業力調查。科技與人力教育季刊，6(1)，55-72。
3. (2021)。品格教育融入兒童團體活動之歷程與成效：一個短期行動研究。靜宜人文社會學報，15(3)，1-26。
4. (2021)。臺灣社會團體工作實務的困境與出路。社區發展季刊，173，368-380。
5. (2022)。樂齡講師教學專業發展歷程：探索、成長與專業展現。教育學刊，59，119-160。
6. (2024)。精神科社工人員臨床團體工作實務現況與能力研究。中華心理衛生學刊，37(1)，19-51。