從社會資本觀點探究原鄉社會資源整合與網絡建構：以南投縣原鄉地區為例

Exploring Social Resource Integration and Network Construction in Indigenous Region from Social Capital Perspective: Case of Nantou County

10.6785/SPSW.201906_23(1).0002

莊俐昕(Li-Hsin Chuang)

社會資本 ； 網絡模式 ； 夥伴關係 ； 資源整合 ； 網絡建構 ； social capital ； network model ； partnership ； resource integration ； network construction

社會政策與社會工作學刊

23卷1期（2019 / 06 / 01）

45 - 89

繁體中文

本研究旨在以社會資本觀點探討影響原鄉社會服務輸送的內外部因素，並據以提出有助於促進資源整合與網絡建構的相關建議。為達到研究目的，本研究以質性研究方法進行，立意選取南投縣13位公私部門社會服務領域的實務工作者進行個別深度訪談。結果顯示，原鄉地區社會服務輸送存在著許多內外部的優劣勢，經過分析和討論後，本研究從社會資本的觀點提出七項有助於促進資源整合與網絡建構的相關建議，包括：（1）降低家族或派系對資源過度的操控，以締造資源分享與整合之網絡建構的利基；（2）營造部落內外部組織水平／同儕式的關係，以促進並活化組織間的網絡運作；（3）營造部落內、外組織的信任感，以促進利害關係人彼此間的合作與協力關係；（4）打造部落內、外組織之平等與互惠關係，以排除網絡合作與協力的障礙；（5）強化鄉公所之橋接與連結的功能，發展成為部落內外組織的網絡平台；（6）善用連結型社會資本開拓並導入外部資源，以帶動資源網絡運作的正向迴圈；以及（7）整合政府部門的服務方案，形塑民間與政府組織有效的網絡關係。

This study aims to explore the influencing factors of social services delivery in the indigenous region, and then propose relevant suggestions to promote resource integration and network construction from the perspective of social capital. In order to achieve the aims, this study adopted qualitative research methods, and deliberately selected 13 practical practitioners in the social service field of public and private sectors in Nantou County to conduct individual in-depth interviews. The results show that there are many internal and external advantages and disadvantages in the social service delivery of the indigenous region. According to analysis and discussion, this study proposes seven suggestions to promote resource integration and network construction, including: (1) to create a niche for network construction of resource sharing and integration by reducing the excessive manipulation of resources by families or factions; (2) to promote and activate network operations between organizations by creating a level/peer relationship between the internal and external organizations of the tribe; (3) to promote cooperation and synergy between stakeholders by creating a sense of trust within and outside the tribal organizations; (4) to remove barriers to network cooperation and collaboration by creating equal and mutually beneficial relationships between internal and external organizations of the tribe; (5) to develop into a network platform for internal and external organizations of the tribe by strengthening the function of bridging and linking of township public offices; (6) to develop and introduce external resources to drive the virtuous circulation of resource network operations by making good use of linking social capital; and (7) to shape effective network relationships between civil and government organizations by integrating government service plans.

1. 石泱,孫健忠(2011)。原鄉地區福利服務輸送網絡建構之研究。台灣原住民族研究季刊，4(4)，33-60。
   連結：
2. 莊俐昕(2017)。原住民族社會資本之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，21(1)，1-47。
   連結：
3. 陳永龍(2010)。河岸邦查部落再生成與漂留族群生計重建：阿美族「都市原住民」自立家園的社會安全涵義。台灣社會研究季刊，77，135-175。
   連結：
4. 陳怡伃,黃源協(2015)。遠親或是近鄰？社區組織內外網絡對其服務績效的影響。臺大社會工作學刊，32，1-31。
   連結：
5. 童伊迪,黃源協(2010)。拉近差距：臺灣原住民家庭服務輸送之現況與展望。台灣原住民族研究，3(4)，145-166。
   連結：
6. 黃源協,莊俐昕,吳品儀(2018)。原鄉部落社會資本與部落營造關聯性之研究。臺大社會工作學刊，37，47-98。
   連結：
7. 黃源協,劉素珍,莊俐昕,林信廷(2010)。社區社會資本與社區發展關聯性之研究。公共行政學報，34，29-75。
   連結：
8. 詹宜璋(2011)。原住民對族群社會福利的經驗認知與發展期待。台灣原住民族研究季刊，4(4)，85-107。
   連結：
9. Agampodi, T. C.,Agampodi, S. B.,Glozier, N.,Siribaddana, S.(2015).Measurement of Social Capital in Relation to Health in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC): A Systematic Review.Social Science and Medicine,128,95-104.
10. Agranoff, R.(2012).Collaborating to Manage: A Primer for the Public Sector.Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
11. Bano, M.(2018).Partnerships and the Good-governance Agenda: Improving Service Delivery through State–NGO Collaborations.VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
12. Brinkerhoff, D. W.,Brinkerhoff, J. M.(2011).Public-private Partnerships: Perspectives on Purposes, Publicness, and Good Governance.Public Administration and Development,31(1),2-14.
13. Cairns, B.,Harris, M.(2011).Local Cross-sector Partnerships: Tackling the Challenges Collaboratively.Nonprofit Management and Leadership,21(3),311-324.
14. Carson, B.(ed.)(2007).Social Determinants of Indigenous Health.Sydney:Allen and Unwin.
15. Clarke, A.,MacDonald, A.(2019).Outcomes to Partners in Multi-stakeholder Cross-sector Partnerships: A Resource-based View.Business & Society,58(2),298-332.
16. Coleman, J. S.(1990).Foundations of Social Theory.Cambridge:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
17. Dill, A.(2015).,未出版
18. Edwards, M.,Onyx, J.(2007).Social Capital and Sustainability in a Community under Threat.Local Environment,12(1),17-30.
19. Flores, J. E.,Montgomery, S.,Lee, J. W.(2005).Organization and Staffing Barriers to Parent Involvement in Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs: Challenges for Community Partnerships.Journal of Adolescent Health,37(3),S108-S114.
20. Freeman, J. and M. Minow(2009).Government by Contract: Outsourcing and American Democracy.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
21. Gittell, R.,Vidal, A.(1998).Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy.California:Sage.
22. Glasby, J.,Dickinson, H.(2008).Partnership Working in Health and Social Care.Btistol:Policy Press.
23. Glendinning, C.(ed.)(2002).Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare.Bristol:The Policy Press.
24. Gonzales, E.,Nowell, W. B.(2017).Social Capital and Unretirement: Exploring the Bonding, Bridging, and Linking Aspects of Social Relationships.Research on Aging,39(10),1100-1117.
25. Gorriz-Mifsud, E.,Secco, L.,Re, R. Da,Pisani, E.,Bonet, J. A.(2017).Structural Social Capital and Local-level Forest Governance: Do they Inter-relate? A Mushroom Permit Case in Catalonia.Journal of Environmental Management,188,364-378.
26. Halsey, A. H.(ed.)(1997).Education, Culture, Economy and Society.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
27. Han, S.(2015).Social Capital and Subjective Happiness: Which Contexts Matter?.Journal of Happiness Studies,16(1),241-255.
28. Hing, N.,Breen, H.,Gordon, A.(2015).Consequences of Commercial Gambling for Indigenous Communities in New South Wales, Australia.Gambling: Cultural Attitudes, Motivations and Impact on Quality of Life,New York:
29. HRSDC (Human Resource and Skill Development Canada) (2009). Summative Evaluation of the Aboriginal Human Resources Development Agreements: Final Report. February 26, 2019. (http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2011/rhdcc-hrsdc/HS28-165-1-2010-eng.pdf).
30. Johnston, G.,Percy-Smith, J.(2003).In Search of Social Capital.Policy and Politics,31(3),321-334.
31. Kickert, W. J. M.(ed.)(1997).Managing Complex Networks.London:Sage.
32. Kooiman, J.(1993).Modern Governance: New Government-society Interactions.London:Sage.
33. Milward, H. B.,Provan, K.(2003).Managing the Hollow State Collaboration and Contracting.Public Management Review,5(1),1-18.
34. Mohnen, S. M.,Völker, B.,Flap, H.,Subramanian, S. V.,Groenewegen, P. P.(2015).The Influence of Social Capital on Individual Health: Is it the Neighbourhood or the Network?.Social Indicators Research,121(1),195-214.
35. Movono, A.,Becken, S.(2018).Solesolevaki as Social Capital: A Tale of a Village, Two Tribes, and a Resort in Fiji.Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research,23(2),146-157.
36. Murphy, L. J.,Pickermell, D.,Thomas, B.,Fuller, D.(2018).Innovation, Social Capital and Regional Policy: the Case of the Communities First Programme in Wales.Regional Studies, Regional Science,5(1),21-39.
37. Nahapiet, J.,Ghoshal, S.(1998).Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
38. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2015). What Is Social Capital? February 26, 2019. (https://www.oecd.org/insights/37966934.pdf).
39. OECD=Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2001).The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital.Paris:Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD.
40. Pillai, K. G.,Hodgkinson, G. P.,Kalyanaram, G.,Nair, S. R.(2017).The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension.International Journal of Management Reviews,19(1),97-124.
41. Portes, A.(2014).Downsides of Social Capital.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,111(52),18407-18408.
42. Putnam, R. D.(1993).The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life.The American Prospect,4(13),1-11.
43. Putnam, R. D.,Leonardi, R.,Nanetti, R. Y.(1993).Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
44. Sullivan, H.,Skelcher, C.(2002).Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
45. Thompson, G.(ed.),Frances, J.(ed.),Levaċiċ, R.(ed.),Mitchell, J.(ed.)(1991).Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life.London:Sage.
46. Trevithick, P.(2003).Effective Relationship-based Practice: A Theoretical Exploration.Journal of Social Work Practice,17(2),163-176.
47. Wettenhall, R.(2003).The Rhetoric and Reality of Public-private Partnerships.Public Organization Review,3(1),77-107.
48. World Bank(2014).Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A Multidisciplinary Tool for Practitioners.
49. 王增勇,陳秋瑩,林美薰(2006)。原住民婦女與家庭暴力社工員的相遇：一個弱勢者保護弱勢者的制度？。性別平等教育季刊，37，36-45。
50. 吳品慧(2017)。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系研究所。
51. 李明政(1999)。台灣原住民族社會福利服務建構的理念初探。東吳社會工作學報，5，71-88。
52. 李明政(2016)。原住民族社會生活發展與轉型正義。台灣原住民族研究學報，6(1)，97-121。
53. 原住民族委員會（2017）。〈原住民族委員會全球資訊網原住民人口數統計資料〉。原住民族委員會網頁（http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docList.html?CID=940F9579765AC6A0）。
54. 張又升(2004)。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所。
55. 郭俊巖,吳惠如,賴秦瑩,王德睦(2013)。後工業社會下台灣都市原住民就業困境之探討：台中都會區原住民意見領袖的觀點。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，3(2)，69-108。
56. 陳文學,邱韻芳(2017)。大學協力下的部落治理：以暨南大學參與眉溪部落為例。台灣原住民族研究學報，7(1)，1-26。
57. 陳敦源,張世杰(2010)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊，2(3)，17-71。
58. 黃源協(2014).原住民族社會福利：問題分析與體系建構.臺北:雙葉書廊.
59. 黃源協（編）(2014).部落、家庭與照顧：原住民族生活經驗.臺北:雙葉書廊.
60. 黃源協（編）,詹宜璋（編）(2018).原住民族福利、福祉與部落治理.臺北:雙葉書廊.
61. 黃源協,莊俐昕(2018)。原住民族社會資本與幸福感關聯性之研究─量化資料分析。台灣原住民族研究學報，8(3)，103-135。
62. 黃樹民（編）,英華（編）(2010).臺灣原住民政策變遷與社會發展.臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所.
63. 蔡翔宇(2017)。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所。

1. 蔡輝英,劉麗娟(2022)。以社會網絡分析法探討原住民族家庭服務中心資源網絡：第一線社工觀點檢視。社會政策與社會工作學刊，26(1)，89-146。
2. 黃源協,范力仁,南玉芬(2021)。社會服務網絡的「跨邊界者」以中階管理者為例。東吳社會工作學報，41，107-136。
3. 黃源協,莊俐昕,張玉龍(2023)。原鄉部落動態能力之分析：對部落治理的意涵。臺大社會工作學刊，47，55-98。
4. (2024)。社區治理下的公民參與、網絡與權力—對社區工作的意涵。社區發展季刊，186，110-125。