影響企業環保技術創新發展意願之激勵因子與障礙因子

Drivers and Barriers to Developing Environmental Technology Innovation

10.6378/JTM.200606.0033

林亭汝(Grece Tr Lin)；虞孝成(Hsiao-Cheng Yu)；蔡昕翰(Hsin-Hann Tsai)

環保技術創新 ； 激勵因子 ； 障礙因子 ； 企業競爭力 ； Environmental-Concerned Technology Innovation ； Innovation Driviers ； Innovation Barriers ； Business Competitiveness

科技管理學刊

11卷2期（2006 / 06 / 01）

33 - 61

繁體中文

值此國際環保趨勢漸盛且國內政府積極從事輔導綠色科技之際，產業之環保技術創新發展議題需積極探究。本研究初始經由文獻探討，支持企業從事環保技術創新將能提高競爭力之論點，然而亦認為實務上應存在影響企業從事此種技術創新活動之激勵因子與障礙因子。因此本研究透過文獻探討與資料蒐集及結構與非結構之問卷調查與深度訪談，以整體性環保技術創新需求較高的台灣紡織化學產業為研究標的，整理歸納出上述之重要影響因子，以作為未來企業在制訂相關環保策略上之決策依據。主要研究結果如下：台灣紡織化學企業從事環保技術創新之意願激勵因子中，經過問卷調查分析後，其中「遵守相關環保規章」、「增加市場佔有率」、「降低環境傷害」、「增進產品多樣性」得較高之總分。而經過交叉比對後，受訪者回答認同度與一致性均較佳者為「遵守相關環保規章」、「增加市場佔有率」、「增進產品多樣性」及「改善產品品質」。障礙因子中經過問卷調查分析後，其中「高成本」、「缺乏財源」、「排擠效果」、「刻意忽視」得較高之總分。而經過交叉比對後，受訪者回答認同度與一致性均較佳者為「高成本」、「排擠效果」、及「缺乏市場資訊」。在深度訪談方面，受訪者對於環保技術創新可提升企業競爭力，都持正面肯定之態度。另一方面，多數受訪者並提出兩項原問卷調查未提出的障礙因子，即「公司規模」與「技術專利授權」問題。

While the environmental concern represents a significant international emphasis, Taiwan's government has made efforts in promoting and developing green technology among industries. In view of this, this paper is aimed at exploring the issue of ”technology innovation due to environmental concern”, with special reference to the positive as well as negative incentives of its development. Drawing on the data collected from several Taiwan's textile and chemical industries who have at different levels developed environmental-concerned technology innovation for a long time, this research is conducted through questionnaire survey and depth interview followed by statistical analyses. Some vital implicational outcomes are derived and they are hoped to be helpful to relevant policy applications of environmental-concerned technology at corporate level or government level. The research result shows that the driving forces of developing environmental-concerned technology innovation with Taiwan's textile and chemical industries mainly refer to ”comply with regulation”, ”increase market share”, ”lower environmental damage”, and ”increase product variety”, but the respondents have more coherent agreement on the answers of ”comply with regulation”, ”increase market share”, ”increase production efficiency”, and ”improve product quality”. On the other hand, the barriers to developing environmental-concerned technology innovation with Taiwan's textile and chemical industries chiefly include: ”high cost”, ”lack of financing”, ”delayed”, and ”not started”, but the respondents have more consistent agreement on the answers of ”high cost”, ”delayed”, and ”lack of technology information”. Finally, the depth interview result shows that the positive relation between environmental-concerned technology innovation and business competitiveness is largely confirmed, and that the issues of ”small size of company” and ”technology patent” also account for another two critical barriers to innovation for practical concern.

1. Bansal, P.,Roth, K.(2000).Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.Academy of Management Journal,43(4),717-736.
2. Becker, R.,Henderson, V.(2000).Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries.The Journal of Political Economy,108(2),379-421.
3. Becker, R.,Henderson, V.(1997).Effects of Air Quality Regulation on Decisions of Firms in Pollution Industries.NBER Working Paper.
4. Betz, F.(1987).Strategic Technology Management.McGraw Hill Inc..
5. Chandler, A.D.(1962).Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of American Industrial Enterprise.Cambridge:MIT Press, MA.
6. Unpublished Report, Ministry of Science and Technology
7. Dean, T.J.,Brown, R.L.(1995).Pollution Regulation as a Barrier to New Firm Entry: Initial Evidence and Implications for Future Research.Academy of Management Journal,38(1),288-303.
8. Dean, T.J.,Brown, R.L.,Stango, V.(2000).Environmental Regulation as a Barrier to the Formation of Small Manufacturing Establishments: A Longitudinal Examination.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,40(2),56-75.
9. Granger, J.V.(1979).Techonology and International Relations.San Franciso:W. H. Freeman and Company.
10. Hart, S.L.(1995).A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm.Academy of Management Review,20(4),986-1014.
11. Jaffe, A.,Palmer, K.(1997).Enval Regulation and Innovation: A Panel data Study.Review of Economics and Statistics,97(4),610-619.
12. Klassen, R.D.,Whybark, D.C.(1999).The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance.Academy of Management Journal,42(6),599-615.
13. Palmer, K.,Oates, W.E.,Portney, P.R.(1995).Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?.Journal of Economic Perspectives,9(4),119-132.
14. Pashigian, B.P.(1984).The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Optimal Plant Size and Factor Shares.Journal of Law and Economics,27(1),1-28.
15. Pedro Miguel dos Santos Vieira(2001).Instituto Superior Tecnico.
16. Porter, L.W.,Lawler, E.E.(1968).Managerial attitudes and performance.Homewood, Ill.:Irwin-Dorsey.
17. Porter, M. E.,Van Der Linde, C.(1995).Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.Journal of Economic Perspectives,9(4),97-118.
18. Porter, M. E.,Van Der Linde, C.(1995).Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate.Harvard Business Review,September-October,120-134.
19. Porter, M.E.(1991).America`s Green Strategy.Scientific American,264(4),168.
20. Porter, M.E.(1990).The Competitive Advantages of Nations.Free Press.
21. Roy, R.(1999).Greener Marketing: A Global Perspective to Greening Marketing Practices.Sheffield, U.K.:Greenleaf.
22. Schumpeter, J.A.(1959).The Theory of Economic Development.Cambridge, U.S.A.:Harvard University Press.
23. Schumpeter, J.A.(1942).Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.New York:Harpar & Row.
24. Sharma, S.(2000).Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy.Academy of Management Journal,43(4),681-697.
25. Shrivastava, P.(1994).Castrated Environment: Greening Organizational Studies.Organization Studies,15(5),705-726.
26. Sprenger, R.(1998).Environmental Policy and International Competitiveness: The Case of German.Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
27. Stead, W.E.,Stead, J.G.(1992).Management for a Small Planet: Strategic Decision Making and the Environment.Newbury Park, California:Sage.
28. Tushman, M.L.,Nadler, D.A.(1986).Organizing for Innovation.California Management Review,28(3),74-92.
29. Vroom, V.H.(1964).Work and Motivation.New York:John-Wiley & Sons.
30. 中華經濟研究院(1998)。OECD國家産業補巾政策與實施成效之評估經驗。台北:
31. 李堅明(2002)。環境政策與產業競爭力的親密關係。台灣綜合展望，4，109-121。
32. 黃正淡(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中原大學工業工程學系。
33. 劉常勇(1998)。技術資源管理能力對新產品開發績效影響之研究。科技管理學報，3(1)，121-135。
34. 工業環保報導專欄
35. 賴士葆(1990)。科技管理論文集。台北:華泰書局。

1. 陳瑞和、吳淑鶯(2014)。企業的綠色營運認知對實踐綠色營運及績效的影響。商管科技季刊，15(3)，379-405。
2. 簡宇祥,丁裕家(2021)。國軍採購人員綠色採購行為模式影響因子之研究：植基於計畫行為理論。商略學報，13(2)，117-134。
3. 游志青、陳俊碩、胡哲生(2013)。臺灣企業環境責任觀念架構之建構—以資訊科技產業領導廠商為例。企業管理學報，99，1-28。