题名

建構台灣IC設計產業之供應商績效評估模式及實證

并列篇名

Constructing Supplier Performance Evaluation Model on IC Design Industry in Taiwan and Empirical Study

DOI

10.6378/JTM.200906.0001

作者

童超塵(Chau-Chen Torng);曾俊傑(Chun-Chieh Tseng);李佩熹(Pei-Hsi Lee);張舜傑(Shun-Chieh Chang)

关键词

績效評估 ; 分析層級程序法 ; 因素分析 ; 灰色理論 ; Performance Evaluation Model ; Analytical Hierarchy Process ; Factor Analysis ; Grey Theory

期刊名称

科技管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

14卷2期(2009 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 26

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

台灣的半導體產業於全世界的舞台佔有絕對重要的地位,其中的積體電路設計(IC設計)產業近年來更蓬勃的發展,其產值僅次於美國為世界第二。而IC設計產業的特性是無自有工廠,所有有關產品的製造皆需透過代工廠的生產外包流程達成,是故除了產品本身的競爭力之外,承接生產製造IC的供應商的績效亦是影響IC設計公司的競爭力之一。本文的研究範圍係以台灣IC設計產業為對象,探討並建構適用於台灣IC設計產業的供應商績效評估的模式,進而提供IC設計公司不論其於初始對於供應商的選擇或量產之後的績效評比作業的依據。本文之研究架構首先針對供應商績效評估指標進行探討,藉由文獻蒐集並經由IC設計產業及全面品質管理兩個領域的專家篩選出相關的績效指標共計32項。其後以因素分析法將32項指標萃取為19項,並針對此19項指標與予適當的命名。並透過問卷調查的方式,針對已於台灣上市、櫃股票公開發行的IC設計公司進行調查。將其對於19項績效指標的資料進行統計分析,首先經由分析層級程序法可求得各項績效指標之權重,以灰關聯分析法,則可解決績效評比指標之間不同的度量單位與向度,進而提供一個有效的供應商績效評估模式。最後透過一實證研究的對象,以驗證本文所建構的模式的可用性,其結果顯示此模式是有效的且能夠提供一個公正、客觀及可操作的程序予IC設計業者進行供應商績效評估或選擇的作業依據。

英文摘要

Taiwan's semiconductor industry plays a significant role in the world, in which Integrated Circuit (IC) design industry in recent years launches a more vigorous development; its output value was only inferior to the U.S.A. for the world second. Actually IC design industry's characteristic has no innate factory, all related manufacturing must be achieved by outsourcing suppliers. Therefore, the performance of outsourcing suppliers also affects competitiveness of IC design companies. This paper intends to construct supplier performance evaluation model for IC design industry in Taiwan during new supplier selection in the beginning or mass production stage. The first step in this article is making research to the indictors of supplier performance. Totally 32 performance evaluation indictors are raised by a group which consists of the specialists from the domain of IC design industry and total quality management (TQM). After factor analysis (FA) method is applied, 19 indictors are extracted from these 32 indictors and then give the extracted indictors with suitable naming. The second step is to apply analytical hierarchy process (AHP) on sampling data comes from questionnaire investigation to IC design companies in Taiwan for identifying the related weight of each performance indictor. The third step is using gray theory to solve complex of indictor which have different measurement unit and expected dimension in this performance evaluation model. Finally an empirical study is presented to evidence the ability and effectiveness of the performance evaluation model this article proposed. Its result shows that this model is effective and can provide the procedure which are fair, objective and may operate to give IC design companies for carrying on the supplier appraisal or choice.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 顏榮祥、張子明(2002)。整合灰關聯分析與層級分析法在供應商評選之應用研究。運籌研究集刊,1,15-42。
    連結:
  2. Barbarosoglu, G.,Yazgac, T.(1997).An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem.Production and Inventory Management Journal,38(1),14-21.
  3. Benson, P. G.,McClave J. T.,Sincich, T.(1998).Statistics for Business and Economics.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Inc..
  4. Cai, J.,Galynker, I.(1996).Latent structure of the Hamilton depression rating scale in major depressive disorder.Biological Psychiatry,39(7),523-524.
  5. Chang, P. L.,Tsai, C. T.(2002).Finding the niche position-competition strategy of Taiwan's IC design industry.Technovation,22(2),101-111.
  6. Choi, T. Y.,Hartley, J. L.(1996).An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain.Journal of Operations Management,14(4),333-343.
  7. Dickson, G.. W.(1996).An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions.Journal of Purchasing,2,563-588.
  8. Dulmin, R.,Mininno, V.(2003).Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method.Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,9(4),177-187.
  9. Dyer, J. H.(1997).Effective inter-firm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value.Strategic Management Journal,18,535-556.
  10. Ellram, L.(1987).The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships.Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,26(3),8-14.
  11. Gorg, H.,Hanley, A.(2004).Does outsourcing increase profitability?.Economic and Social Review,35,267-288.
  12. Ittner, C. D.,Larcker, D. F.,Nagar, V.,Rajan, M. V.(1999).Supplier selection, monitoring practices, and firm performance.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,18,253-281.
  13. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometriko,39,31-36.
  14. Kannan, V. R.,Tan, K. C.(2005).Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance.Omega,33(2),153-162.
  15. Katsikeas, C. S.,Paparoidamis, N. G.,Katsikea, E.(2004).Supply source selection criteria: The impact of supplier performance on distributor performance.Industrial Marketing Management,33(8),755-764.
  16. Liu, F. H.,Hai, H. L.(2005).The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier.International Journal of Production Economics,97(3),308-317.
  17. Swift, C. O.(1995).Preferences for single sourcing and supplier selection criteria.Journal of Business Research,32(2),105-111.
  18. Tam, C. Y.,Tummala, V. M.(2001).An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system.Omega The International Journal of Management Science,29(2),171-182.
  19. Wang, G. E.,Huang, S. H.,Dismukes, J. P.(2004).Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology.International Journal of Production Economics,91(1),1-15.
  20. Weber, C. A.,Current, J. R.,Benton, W. C.(1991).Vendor selection criteria and methods.European Journal of Operational Research,50,2-18.
  21. Yahya, S.,Kingsman, B.(1999).Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development program: A case study using the analytic hierarchy process method.The Journal of the Operational Research Society,50(9),916-930.
  22. IC設計上市及上櫃公司
  23. 江金山、吳佩玲、蔣祥第、張廷政、詹福賜、張軒庭、溫坤裡(1998)。灰色理論入門。台北:高立圖書。
  24. IEK產業情報網
  25. 周文賢(2002)。多變量統計分析SAS/STAT使用方法。台北:智勝文化。
  26. 邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南圖書。
  27. 翁慶昌、陳嘉欉、賴宏仁(2001)。灰色系統基本方法及其應用。台北:高立圖書。
  28. 陳順宇(2004)。多變量分析。台北:華泰書局。
  29. 黃俊英(1998)。多變量分析。台北:華泰書局。
  30. 鄧淵源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法的內涵特性與應用(上)。中國統計學報,27(6),12-20。
  31. 簡禎富(2005)。決策分析與管理。台北:雙葉書廊。
被引用次数
  1. 卓綵倫(2017)。台灣半導體企業社會責任之內部與外部影響。中原大學商學博士學位學程學位論文。2017。1-119。