無形資產價值創造之比較研究：以台灣電子零組件和電腦及週邊產業為例

A Study of Comparing Intangible Asset Values Creating between Taiwan Electronic Components Industry and Computers & Peripherals Industry

10.6378/JTM.201009.0001

朱博湧(Po-Young Chu)；林裕淩(Yu-Ling Lin)；李俊雄(Jun-Xiong Lee)

無形資產價值 ； 電子零組件產業 ； 電腦及週邊產業 ； Intangible Asset Values ； Electronic Components Industry ； Computers & Peripherals industry

科技管理學刊

15卷3期（2010 / 09 / 01）

1 - 24

繁體中文

企業漸漸將無形資產作為公司獲利成長的動力，無形資產管理不僅攸關組織價值，且偽企業成長之重要關鍵。研究樣本選自數位時代雙週刊2003-2009年台灣科技一百大公司，入榜三次以上且財務資料健全的企業，並選擇前兩大產業別－電子零組件產業和電腦及週邊產業，作為研究對象。研究首先求出兩產業中，各公司的無形資產價值MV/BV、Tobin' s Q、VAIC值，來作為應變數，再將以財務及智慧資本構面構成的24項變數，透過因素分析，縮減成九大構面為其命名，作為自變數，最後透過逐步迥歸，找出不同評價法下，對兩產業最重要的影響因素進行分析比較。研究結果如下：不同無形資產評價法的價值驅動變數亦不同。在市場資本化法下，最重要的影響因素為「獲利能力」；資產報酬法下，則是「員工生產力」。台灣電子零組件和電腦及週邊產業性質相近。

The company gradually uses intangible asset as driving factor of profit growth. Te analysis of intangible resources affects an organization’s value and growth. This study referred in Taiwan Info Tech 100 firms of ”Business Next” magazine from 2003 to 2009, and screened those which listed more than three times and had complete financial data. Then, choose two largest industries, electronic components industry and computers & peripherals industry, as study targets. At first, calculate MV/By, Tobin Q and VAIC of each company as dependent variables. Second, reduce 24 chosen variables into nine factors which are used to be independent variables. Finally, find out the most important factors to the intangible asset values of two industries under different valuation methods through stepwise regression, and analyze the difference between two industries. The conclusion as following: The different valuations of intangible asset have different driving factors. Under ”Market Capitalization Method,” profitability is the most important factor; under ”Return on Assets Method,” productivity is the most important one. In Taiwan, the nature of electronic components industry is similar with one of computers and peripherals industry.

1. Luthy, D. H. (1998), Intellectual Capital and its Measurement. Retrieved April, 13.
2. Williams, S. M. (2000), “Is a Company's Intellectual Capital Performance and Intellectual Capital Disclosure Practices Related: Evidence from Publicly Listed Companies form the FTSE 100, From: http://www.measuring-ip.at/English/frame.html
3. Pulic, A. (1998), “Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in knowledge economy”, From: http://www.measuringip.at/papers/Pulic/Vaictxt/vaictxt.html.
4. Sveiby, K. E. (2007), “Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets”, From: http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntanbibleMethods.htm
5. Abowd, J. M.(1990).Dose Performance-Based Managerial Compensation Affect Corporate Performance.Industrial and Labor Relations Review,43(3),52-73.
6. Bharadwaj, A. S.,Bharadwaj, S. G.,Konsynski, B. R.(1999).Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q.Management Science,45(7),1008-1024.
7. Brooking, A.(1998).Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise.UK:Intemational Thomson Business Press.
8. Chu, Po-Young,Hsiung, Hsing-Hwa,Huang, Chi-Hung,Yang, Chuan-Yi(2008).Determinants of the Valuation of Intangible Assets - A Contrast between Taiwanese and American IC Design Houses.Intenational Joumal of Technology Management,41(3/4),336-358.
9. Chung, K. H.,Pruitt, S. W.(1994).A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q.Financial Management,23(3),70-74.
10. Edvinsson, L.,Malone, M. S.(1997).Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower.New York:Harper Business.
11. Fey, C. F.,Bjorkman, I.,Pavlovskaya, A.(2000).The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on Firm Perfonnance in Russia.International Journal of Human Resource Management,11,1-18.
12. Johnson, W. H. A.(1999).An Integrative Taxonomy of Intellectual Capital: Measuring the Stock and Flow of Intellectual Capital Components in the Firm.International Journal of Technology Management,18(5/6/7/8),562-575.
13. Jose, M. L.,Nichols, L. M.,Stevens, J. L.(1986).Contributions of Diversification, Promotion, and R&D to the Value of Multiproduct Firms: A Tobin's q Approach.Financial Management,15(4),33-42.
14. Knight, D.J.(1999).Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research.Academy of Management Review,11(1),1-30.
15. Norton, D. P.,Kaplan, R. S.(2004).Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes.Harvard Business School Press.
16. Pulic, A.(2000).VAICTM-an Accounting Tool for IC Management.International Joumal of Technology Management,20(5),702-714.
17. Smith, Gordon V.,Parr, Russell L.(2000).Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets.New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
18. Stewart, Thomas A.(1997).Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations.New York:
19. Sveiby, K. E.(2001).A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm to Guide in Strategy Fomulation.Journal of Intellectual Capital,24,344-358.
20. Sveiby, K. E.(1997).The Intangible Assets Monitor.Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting,2(1),73-97.
21. 吳思華、黃宛華、賴鈺晶(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學科技管理研究所。
22. 李坤致(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中正大學企業管理研究所。
23. 林良陽(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理學所。
24. 許戌(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學會計學研究所。
25. 劉俊宏(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學管理科學研究所。
26. 蔡基德(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學會計學研究所。

1. 陳怡廷(2016)。從公司與顧客的認知價值初探企業潛在無形資產：以自然語言處理的方法為應用。中山管理評論，24(3)，565-608。
2. 邱麗卿(2020)。控制股東掏空行為及其公司治理分析：以樂陞案為例。管理評論，39(2)，1-33+147。
3. 張淑清、呂欣樺(2015)。研發支出與管理團隊特性對公司績效之影響。會計學報，6(1)，1-34。